Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions Chapter 15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AU 350 SAS 111 Audit Sampling C Delano Gray June 14, 2008.
Advertisements

©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens//Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions.
Presentation Outline Representative Sample
Audit Sampling By David N. Ricchiute
Audit Sampling. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 9-2 What is Audit Sampling? Applying a procedure to less.
Audit Sampling. Definition: Audit Sampling Audit sampling is the application of an audit procedure to less than 100 percent of the items within an account.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 13: Audit Sampling Spring Overview of Sampling.
SAMPLING. THIRD STANDARD OF FIELD WORK (AU ) “SUFFICIENT COMPETENT EVIDENTIAL MATTER IS TO BE OBTAINED THROUGH INSPECTION, OBSERVATION, INQUIRIES,
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive.
11-1 Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd Revised PPTs t/a Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia 3e by Grant Gay and Roger Simnett Slides.
S S (5.1) RTI, JAIPUR1 STATISTICAL SAMPLING Presented By RTI, JAIPUR.
17 AUDIT SAMPLING FOR TEST OF DETAILS OF BALANCES BB OTH STATISTICAL AND NONSTATISTICAL SAMPLING ARE ACCEPTABLE UNDER GAAS, BUT WHICHEVER IS USED, IT MUST.
BA 427 – Assurance and Attestation Services
Learning Objectives Describe how auditors use sampling and generalized audit software to gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence Explain the objectives.
Chapter 17 Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances.
Copyright  2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc. CHAPTER 11 Audit Sampling Concepts.
Modern Auditing: Assurance Services and the Integrity of Financial Reporting, 8 th Edition Modern Auditing: Assurance Services and the Integrity of Financial.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 12: Audit Sampling Concepts.
Slide 9-1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006 Audit Sampling.
Chapter 10 Audit Sampling.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 8-1 Chapter 8 CHAPTER 8 AUDIT SAMPLING: AN OVERVIEW AND APPLICATION TO TESTS.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling – Part b.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Essentials of Auditing 1/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling Chapter 13.
Audit Sampling 1.
Audit Sampling Chapter 9. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 9-2 What is Audit Sampling?  Applying a procedure.
SAMPLING DALAM PENGUJIAN PENGENDALIAN. AU defines audit sampling as the application of an audit procedure to less than 100% of the items within.
©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
Part Six Audit Sampling.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Audit Sampling Concepts
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens//Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
Copyright  2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc. CHAPTER 11 Audit Sampling Concepts.
©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
Charteredaccountants.com.au/training Fundamentals of Auditing in 2007 Chartered Accountants Audit Conference ASA 530 – Audit Sampling and Other Means of.
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive.
Chapter 09 Audit Sampling McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Chapter 8 Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
Electronic Presentations in Microsoft ® PowerPoint ® Prepared by Brad MacDonald SIAST © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 8-1 Chapter Eight Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application.
Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements Chapter 13: Audit Sampling Concepts Copyright © 2011 Pearson Canada Inc.
CHAPTER 14 AUDIT SAMPLING FOR TESTS OF DETAIL OF BALANCES.
Audit Sampling Concepts
9-1 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Specialized Audit Tools: Sampling and Generalized Audit Software
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling – Part a.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 10/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
©2005 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling 1.
Chapter 11 Audit sampling
Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances
Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances
STATISTICAL TOOLS FOR AUDITING
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Modern Auditing: Assurance Services and the Integrity of Financial Reporting, 8th Edition William C. Boynton California Polytechnic State University at.
STATISTICAL TOOLS FOR AUDITING
Auditing & Assurance Services, 6e
Presentation transcript:

Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions Chapter 15

Learning Objective 1 Explain the concept of representative sampling.

Representative Samples A representative sample is one in which the characteristics in the sample of audit interest are approximately the same as those of the population. In practice, an auditor can increase the likelihood of a representative sample by using care in designing the sampling process and selection, and evaluating the results.

Sampling Risks Sampling risk is the risk that an auditor reaches an incorrect conclusion because the sample is not representative of the population. Sampling risk is an inherent part of sampling that results from testing less than the entire population. Nonsampling risk is the risk that audit tests do not uncover existing exceptions in the sample.

Minimizing Sampling Risk Sampling Risk Meter Step 1 Step 2 Adjust sample size Use appropriate sample selection method Increasing sample size reduces sampling risk and vice versa. Using an appropriate sample selection method increases the likelihood of representativeness.

Learning Objective 2 Distinguish between statistical and nonstatistical sampling and between probabilistic and nonprobabilistic sample selection.

Statistical Versus Nonstatistical Sampling Similarities of both approaches: Step 2 Step 1 Select the sample and perform the tests Step 3 Plan the sample Evaluate the results The purpose of planning the sample is to make sure that the audit tests are performed in a manner that provides the desired sampling risk and minimizes the likelihood of nonsampling error. Selecting the sample involves deciding how a sample is selected from the population. Evaluating the results is drawing conclusions based on the audit tests.

Statistical Versus Nonstatistical Sampling Differences in approach: Statistical sampling allows the quantification of sampling risk in planning the sample (Step 1) and evaluating the results (Step 3) In nonstatistical sampling those items that the auditor believes will provide the most useful information are selected

Probabilistic Versus Nonprobabilistic Sample Selection Probabilistic sample selection is a method of selecting a sample such that each population item has a known probability of being included in the sample. Nonprobabilistic sample selection is a method in which the auditor uses professional judgment rather than probabilistic methods.

Probabilistic Versus Nonprobabilistic Sample Selection Nonprobabilistic selection methods: 1. Directed sample selection 2. Block sample selection 3. Haphazard sample selection

Probabilistic Versus Nonprobabilistic Sample Selection Probabilistic selection methods: 1. Simple random sample selection 2. Systematic sample selection 3. Probability proportional to size sample selection 4. Stratified sample selection

Nonprobabilistic Sample Selection Methods Directed sample selection is the selection of each item based on auditor’s judgmental criteria. Items most likely to contain misstatements Items containing selected population characteristics Large dollar coverage Auditors are often able to identify which population items are most likely to be misstated. Examples include accounts receivable outstanding for a long time, purchases from and sales to officers and affiliated companies and unusually large or complex transactions. The auditor can sometimes select a sample that includes a large portion of total population dollars, and thereby reduce the risk of drawing an improper conclusion by not examining small items.

Nonprobabilistic Sample Selection Methods Block sample selection is the selection of several items in sequence. Haphazard sample selection is the selection of items without any conscious bias on the part of the auditor. It is ordinarily acceptable to use block samples only if a reasonable number of blocks is used. The most serious shortcoming of haphazard sample selection is the difficulty of remaining completely unbiased in the selection.

Learning Objective 3 Select representative samples.

Probabilistic Sample Selection Methods A simple random sample is one in which every possible combination of elements in the population has an equal chance of constituting the sample. Random number tables Computer generation of random numbers offers several advantages time savings reduced risk of error automatic documentation Auditors use random sampling when there is no need to emphasize one or more types of population items. An application of this concept is when selecting a sample for testing cash disbursements.

Random Sample Selection Tools Random number tables Computer generation of random numbers offers several advantages time savings reduced risk of error automatic documentation Random numbers are a series of digits that have equal probabilities of occurring over long runs and which have no identifiable pattern. Auditors usually prefer to use computer generation of random numbers over other probabilistic selection methods.

Probabilistic Sample Selection Methods Systematic sample selection: The auditor calculates an interval and then selects the items for the sample based on the size of the interval. The advantage of systematic selection is its ease of use. A systematic sample can be drawn quickly and the approach automatically puts the numbers in sequence. The interval is determined by dividing the population size by the number of sample items desired.

Probabilistic Sample Selection Methods Probability proportional to size: A sample is taken where the probability of selecting any individual population item is proportional to its recorded amount (PPS). In many auditing situations it is advantageous to select samples that emphasize population items with larger recorded amounts. One such audit area is in the selection of customer accounts for confirmation. In this area, the auditor may select larger balances that may be susceptible to error or adjustment.

Learning Objective 4 Define and describe audit sampling for exception rates.

Sampling for Exception Rates The occurrence rate, or exception rate, is the percent of items in the population containing the characteristic or specific attribute of interest to the total number of population items. For example, if the auditor determines that the exception rate for the internal verification of sales invoices is approximately 3%, then on average 3 of every 100 invoices are not properly verified.

Sampling for Exception Rates Following are types of exceptions in populations of accounting data: 1. Deviations from client’s established controls 2. Monetary misstatements in populations of transaction data 3. Monetary misstatements in populations of account balance details Knowing the exception rate in a sample is used to estimate the exception rate in the entire population. Exceptions refer to both deviations from the client’s procedures and amounts that are not monetarily correct.

Learning Objective 5 Use nonstatistical sampling in tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions.

Terms Used in Audit Sampling Terms related to planning: Characteristic or attribute Acceptable risk of assessing control risk too low (ARACR) Tolerable exception rate (TER) Estimated population exception rate (EPER) Initial sample size Attribute is the characteristic being tested in the application. ARACR is the risk that the auditor is willing to take of accepting a control as effective or a rate of monetary misstatements as tolerable when the true population exception rate is greater than the tolerable exception rate. TER is the exception rate that the auditor will permit in the population and still be willing to conclude the control is operating effectively and/or the amount of monetary misstatements in the transactions established during the planning is acceptable. EPER is the exception rate that the auditor expects to find in the population before testing begins. Initial sample size is the sample size decided after considering the above factors in planning.

Terms Used in Audit Sampling Terms related to evaluating results: Exception Sample exception rate (SER) Computed upper exception rate (CUER) Exception – deviation from the attribute in a sample item. Sample exception rate -- Number of exceptions in the sample divided by the sample size. CUER -- The highest estimated exception rate in the population at a given ARACR.

I: Plan the Sample State the objectives of the audit test. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 State the objectives of the audit test. Decide whether audit sampling applies. Define attributes and exception conditions Objectives might be: Test the operating effectiveness of controls Determine whether the transactions contain monetary misstatements When sampling is used, auditors must carefully define the characteristics being tested and the exception conditions. The population is those items about which the auditor wishes to generalize. The sample must be selected from the entire population as it has been defined. The sampling unit is defined by the auditor based on the definition of the population and objective of the audit test. Step 5 Step 4 Define the sampling unit Define the population

I: Plan the Sample Step 7 Step 6 Specify acceptable risk of assessing control risk too low Specify the tolerable exception rate. TER represents the highest exception rate the auditor will permit in the control being tested and still be willing to conclude the control is operating effectively. For audit sampling in tests of controls and tests of transactions, that risk is called the acceptable risk of assessing control risk too low (ARACR). ARACR measures the risk the auditor is willing to take of accepting a control as effective when the true population exception rate is greater than TER. A combination of two factors has the greatest effect on sample size: TER minus EPER. The difference is precision of the initial sample estimate. Population size is not a significant factor and typically can be ignored especially for large populations. Auditors should make an advance estimate of the population exception rate to plan the appropriate sample size. If the EPER is low, a relatively small sample size will satisfy the auditor’s tolerable exception rate because a less precise estimate is required. Four factors determine the initial sample size for audit sampling: population size, TER, ARACR, and EPER Step 8 Step 9 Estimate the population exception rate. Determine the initial sample size

II: Select the Sample and Perform the Audit Procedures Step 11 Step10 Perform the audit procedures Select the sample

III: Evaluate the Results Step 12 Step 14 Generalize from the sample to the population Step 13 Decide the acceptability of the population Analyze exceptions The sample exception rate can be easily calculated from the actual sample results. SER equals the actual number of exceptions divided by the actual sample size.

Guidelines for ARACR and TER Tests of Controls

Guidelines for ARACR and TER Tests of Transactions

Effect on Sample Size of Changing Factors Effect on initial Type of change sample size Increase acceptable risk of assessing control risk too low Increase tolerable risk rate Increase estimated population exception rate Increase population size (minor)

Actions When Population is Not Acceptable Revise TER or ARACR Expand the sample size Revise assessed control risk Communicate with the audit committee or management Revising the TER of ARACR is an alternative that should only be followed when the auditor has concluded that the original specifications were too conservative. An increase in sample size has the effect of decreasing the sampling error if the actual sample exception rate does not increase. If the results of the tests do not support the preliminary assessed control risk, the auditor should revise the assess control risk upward.

Summary of Audit Sampling Steps Plan the sample (Steps 1-9) To/From Step 6 Select the sample (Step 10) Compare Computed upper exception rate Number of exceptions in sample and actual sample size Perform the tests (Step 11) Step 12 From Evaluate the results (Steps 12-14) To Step 14 To Step 12

Learning Objective 6 Define and describe attributes sampling and a sampling distribution.

Statistical Audit Sampling The statistical sampling method most commonly used for tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions is attributes sampling.

Sampling Distribution It is a frequency distribution of the results of all possible samples of a specified size that could be obtained from a population containing some specific parameters. Attributes sampling is based on the binomial distribution.

Sampling Distribution

Learning Objective 7 Use attributes sampling in tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions.

Application of Attributes Sampling Use of the tables: Select the table corresponding to the ARACR Locate the TER on the top of the table Locate the EPER in the far left column Read down the appropriate TER column until it intersects with the appropriate EPER row in order to get the initial sample size

Application of Attributes Sampling Effect of population size: Population size is a minor consideration in determining sample size Representativeness is ensured by the sample selection process more than by sample size

Application of Attributes Sampling Select the sample Perform the audit procedures Evaluate the results

End of Chapter 15