Progress within the Ny-Ålesund Atmosphere Flagship Programme Roland Neuber, Christina A. Pedersen and the programme contributors NySMAC Meeting, 6 – 7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

2010 update of GCOS IP in support of UNFCCC Paul Mason and Stephan Bojinski GCOS Steering Committee September 2010.
WCRP polar climate predictability initiative Vladimir Ryabinin
Nordic Centers of Excellence - a platform for international research collaboration: Example from climate research Dr. Ilona Riipinen on behalf of Prof.
Global Change Research in Belgium Guy P. Brasseur Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Chair, International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP)
AR Science Gaps/Objectives Duane Waliser on behalf of Calwater 2 SSG Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech Pasadena, CA CalWater 2015 – ACAPEX Campaign Planning.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 SI O S Svalbard Integrated Earth.
Collaborative Investigation of Climate Cryosphere Interaction 3 (CICCI 3) Rune Storvold, Norut/NTNU NySMAC, Helsinki, April 7 th -8 th, 2014.
In Cooperation with the IAMAS Commission on Atmospheric Chemistry and Global Pollution (CACGP) The International Global Atmospheric Chemistry Project A.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Introduction to Breakout Session 2.2 Essential Variables for GEO SBAs (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations.
The Role of Aerosols in Climate Change Eleanor J. Highwood Department of Meteorology, With thanks to all the IPCC scientists, Keith Shine (Reading) and.
Ocean and Climate An Introduction Program in Climate Change Summer Institute Friday Harbor Labs September 2008 Dennis L. Hartmann Atmospheric Sciences.
Report on National activities, 2012 Poland Waldemar Walczowski SAON Board Meeting, 1-2 October 2012 Potsdam.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
A Monitoring Program for Ny-Ålesund Christina A. Pedersen Norwegian Polar Institute.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites John Bates Chair, Joint CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate 3 rd WCRP Data Advisory Committee.
Retrieval of snow physical parameters with consideration of underlying vegetation Teruo Aoki (Meteorological Research Institute), Masahiro Hori (JAXA/EORC)
CryosPheric responses to Anthropogenic PRessures in the HIndu Kush-Himalaya regions: impacts on water resources and society adaptation in Nepal DHM Centre.
Ny-Ålesund Seminars, October Black carbon (BC) belongs to what is generally termed Short Lived Climate Forcers (SLCF). This means that the.
Proposal for a Research Infrastructure for Advanced Aerosol Observations and Capacity Building in China Alfred WIEDENSOHLER Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric.
28 th CEOS Plenary Session Alain Ratier EUMETSAT CEOS Plenary, Agenda Item 28 Tromsø, Norway October 2014.
Bologna 30/08- 1/09/2010 Amundsen - Nobile Climate Change Tower the key element of an Integrated Project to investigate processes at the surface and in.
GHP and Extremes. GHP SCIENCE ISSUES 1995 How do water and energy processes operate over different land areas? Sub-Issues include: What is the relative.
Polar Communications and Weather Mission Canadian Context and Benefits.
Observational Platforms Vito Vitale, Lars-Otto Reiersen, Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,
GEO Strategic Target on Climate (Carbon) Facilitate a comprehensive global carbon observation and analysis system in support of decision-making, including.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Consultation meetings: Jan 2005, Brussels, consultation meeting on topics for FP7 2-3 Feb 06, Brussels, Symposium in memoriam Anver Ghazi 17 Feb 06, Text.
Cooperation Strategy in Polar Regions, ITALY – KOREA workshop, Incheon, 6-8 September, 2011 SAON Board meeting Potsdam, 1 st -2 nd October, 2012 INGV 1.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research DOE Workshop on Community Modeling and Long-term Predictions of the Integrated Water.
CPPA Past/Ongoing Activities - Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions - Address systematic ocean-atmosphere model biases - Eastern Pacific Investigation of Climate.
Science Discipline Overview: Atmosphere (large-scale perspective)  How might large-scale atmospheric challenges add to the scientific arguments for MOSAIC?
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
© Crown copyright Met Office The Role of Research Aircraft in YOPP Chawn Harlow, YOPP Summit, WMO, Geneva 13 July 2015.
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Summary J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001 CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001.
ASCL Workshop— Boulder, CO Fundamental Concepts for Essential Principal: Atmospheric circulations transport matter, gases, particles, energy and momentum.
Overview of NOAA’s Arctic Climate Science Activities Current or Proposed Activities Expected to Persist in FY
How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.
Autonomous Polar Atmospheric Observations John J. Cassano University of Colorado.
Modelling the climate system and climate change PRECIS Workshop Tanzania Meteorological Agency, 29 th June – 3 rd July 2015.
IPY International Polar Year Progress report to STG 2.
PEEX – Pan Eurasian Experiment Research initiative involving European, Russian and Chinese organisations and institues
NSIDC—Enhancing NASA’s Contribution to Polar Science A response to the NRC Polar Research Board’s review of NASA’s polar geophysical data sets Mark Parsons.
Wanda R. Ferrell, Ph.D. Acting Director Climate and Environmental Sciences Division February 24, 2010 BERAC Meeting Atmospheric System Research Science.
Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate
The Polar Prediction Workshop, Oslo, Norway, 6-8 October 2010.
Research Data Management Nova Southeastern University – Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography – Ocean Campus November 2015 Data Management.
Joint Science Workshop Biodiversity, Terrestrial Ecology, and Related Applied Sciences.
Cooperation Strategy in Polar Regions, ITALY – KOREA workshop, Incheon, 6-8 September, 2011 Arctic Circle, 2015, Reykjavik, October , Iceland 1.
1 - What are the local, regional, and continental-scale exchanges of carbon, nitrogen, and reactive species? What are their relationships to underlying.
MOSAiC Meeting, ASSW, 13 March 2016, Fairbanks Townhall Meeting 13 March :00 – 17:00 Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic.
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,
ICWG: CGMS-43, May 2015, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Status report on the International Clouds.
IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.
NOAA Council on Long-Term Climate Monitoring (CLTCM) Presentation to NOAA Science Advisory Board November 5 – 7, 2002 Chair: Tom Karl Executive Secretary:
Dr. Elisabeth Lipiatou Head of Unit Climate Change and Environmental Risks Unit Environment Directorate Research DG European Commission Way forward for.
Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Study
Craig Nicolson, UMass-Amherst
Atmosphere Flagship Campaign Plans 2017
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
SIOS (Svalbard Integrated
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
The Atmosphere during MOSAiC
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
ICWG and Link to Other CGMS Working Groups
Kevin Noone Atmospheric Physics Division Department of Meteorology
Presentation transcript:

Progress within the Ny-Ålesund Atmosphere Flagship Programme Roland Neuber, Christina A. Pedersen and the programme contributors NySMAC Meeting, 6 – 7 November 2014, Goa

Atmosphere Flagship Workshop 8-9 Oct A workshop financed by SSF was held 8-9 October 2014 in Potsdam to provide a forum for organizing research work in the field and cooperation among contributing scientists, in particular for making joint analyses possible, which individual actors cannot provide alone.

Main Goals of the workshop: “Climate change in the Arctic: How do we tackle the challenge?” “Develop collaboration and joint research actions”, i.e.: Plan for joint expeditions, observational periods, campaigns Develop cross-station field activities Develop cross-station utilisation and analyses of available data and ongoing measurements, plan joint publications List new observational needs Provide timeline for future activities

Flagship topics as of Oct (1): Boundary Layer Properties Snow and atmosphere Meteorology network and long-term data sets Clouds, Humidity, Precipitation

Flagship topics as of Oct (2) Aerosol Direct Effect (Clear Sky Closure Study) Aerosol indirect effects Regional Representativeness, including Satellite Validation Long range transport and modelling activities Comparison & analysis of duplicate measurements (e.g. trace elements)

Atmosphere Flagship Workshop continued

Atmospheric Flagship Gap Analysis Workshop, Goa, 4 – 5 November Aim of the workshop Identify the Gaps in the Atmospheric Research at Ny-Alesund and find area of collaboration where India can contribute The meeting heard the point of view of the modellers

Some Areas where identified and contact points where identified ● Air – snow interaction ● Aersols, Clouds and precipitation ● Arctic Climate and Forecast Modelling It is felt in the meeting that research in aersol chemical charaterization not very active and stressed the need for giving an impetus to it

Future development of the flagship

Scientific committee Roland Neuber, Alfred-Wegener Institute Christina A. Pedersen, Norwegian Polar institute Vito Vitale, NRC Ove Hermansen, Norwegian Institute for Air Research Hans-Christian Hansson, Stockholm University Masataka Shiobara, NIPR Young Jun Yoon, KOPRI Satheesan Karathazhiyath, NCAOR Boris Ivanov, Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute Grzegorz Karasiński, Polish Academy of Sciences

Atmospheric flagship webpage Will contain information about: -the flagship -Ongoing activities/campaigns/focus areas -Monitored parameters (with link to actual dataset, data owner, frequency and period) -Publications Mailing list to all flagship participants to spesific topics

Need of (annual) meeting arenas Apply to Svalbard Strategic Grant for an Atmospheric Symposium Will be an opportunity to present and develop collaborative work Can we manage to secure funding for an annual meeting? (workshop, symposium, meeting, targeted workshop, etc.) Follow up meetings connected to other events e.g. ECRA workshops, YOPP, MACC, IAGOS, ICOS, ACTRIS2

Flagship topics as of Oct (1) Boundary Layer Properties Snow and atmospheric chemistry Meteorology net and long-term data sets Long Term time series and large scale circulation development Interaction Modelling – Observational activities Application of model analyses

Flagship topics as of Oct (2) Aerosol Direct Effect (Clear Sky Closure Study) Aerosol indirect effects Clouds, Humidity, Precipitation Regional Representativeness, including Satellite Validation Long range transport investigations Comparison & analysis of duplicate measurements (e.g. trace elements) Long Term time series and large scale circulation development

An initiative by NySMAC and SSF: Science Plan Kongsfjorden International Research Base (KIRB), Svalbard: Develop Flagship programmes to define and organize core scientific research Flagship programs define core scientific foci for KIRB. All scientists active within KIRB are encouraged to focus on developing the science and outcome of the agreed flagships. Activities that are endorsed flagship activities will be prioritized when infrastructure or human resources limit activities

Marine flagship ”Kongsfjorden System” Terrestrial Ecosystems flagship Atmosphere research flagship Glaciology research flagship ® C. Lydersen ® L. Bakken ® C. Hübner ® E. Ø. Kjartansson Ny-Ålesund Flagship Programmes

Overarching issues Listed activities are neither comprehensive, nor exclusive! Long Term time series and large scale circulation development Interaction Modelling – Observational activities Application of model analyses

Workshop report – SSF requests Workshops are to deliver report including: Detailed timetable List of participants Plans for cont. work with scientific justifications

Report from workshop Agenda and participant list Contributions from each institute – any objections? Reports from each working group (incl. future plans) Plans for flagship development

Thank You !

Motivation: Climate change in the Arctic Questions like – What are the most important reasons for the changes observed? – What are the main reasons for the Arctic amplification? – What causes the changing cloud cover? – What are the climatic roles of air pollutants? – How will the Arctic weather change? and many more… The rapid change occurring in the Arctic is a challenge to the polar atmospheric sciences.

A SSF flagship program includes International and institutional cooperation Review of current status, identify knowledge gaps, plan for exchange of knowledge Priorities, recommendations, strategies for future work and data sharing

Contributions from each institition – 2.1 Plans & Timelines: - Provide lists of ongoing and planned measurements, expeditions - Provide times of planned field activities / campaigns – 2.2 Gaps: Which observations / measurements do You miss, which might be provided by others in Ny-Aalesund or on Svalbard? – 2.3 What are your specific contributions to the flagship programme? – 2.4 How do you want the Flagship Programme to be active? – 2.5 Please provide plans for - common publications - common applications to funding calls (SSF, EU, SIOS?, others) - development of satellite cal/val activities - common activities across institutions/stations to enlarge the analysis to a regional level

Agenda : Wednesday, 8. October Introductory talks: - The atmosphere flagship: status, outlook and goals for the workshop (R. Neuber) - SSF motivation and wishes to the workshop (R. Neuber for SSF) - The flagship programmes and SIOS (K. Holmen tbc) Presentations of the atmosphere programmes at other locations: - Barentsburg (B. Ivanov) - Hornsund (G. Karasinski) - Station Nord (A. Massling) Educational issues (V. Vitale or B. Ivanov, tbc) Arrangement of working groups (WG) (C. Pedersen) - Define topics for all WG, and their specific science questions - Select participants to each WG - Separate WG meetings Summary of the day Workshop Dinner

Agenda : Thursday, 9. October Start / goals of the day (plenary) Continue WG work Plenary: - Reports from each WG - discussion: - Which Flagship activities are wanted/needed? - Any formal structure needed? (WG coordinators? Science Guiding Group? Web page? …) Updated list of future activities: within each WG, for the flagship, for pan-Svalbard collaboration Preparation of a workshop document: - list of authors - deadlines Adjourn

Working groups – Meteorology and planetary boundary layer process (WG1), including fluxes / Eddy and snow – atmosphere interactions – Radiation – Aerosol - Clouds interactions (WG2) – Large scale dynamics and atmospheric transport mechanisms (WG3) (including Atmospheric chemistry, long range transport, pollutants)

Boundary Layer Properties ABL height from ceilometers, lidars (NCAOR, CNR, AWI) Comparison of MW radiometer ABL data (AWI, NCAOR, UB, NN?) Precipitation measurements (NCAOR, NIPR?, NPI) Turbulence campaign 2015 (PI Focken): Eddy-systems AWIPEV, Climate Change Tower, AWI mobile tower; comparison of observations and data analysis (Including Barentsburg / AARI system) Water vapor isotopes: double measurements Ny-Ålesund / Zeppelin, planned for spring 2015 (LSCE France, NILU)

Snow and atmospheric chemistry CICCI campaign in April – May 2015 PI: Storvold, Norut/NTNU, NOAA, NPI, U Oslo 4 UAVs: spectral and broadband albedo, physical snow properties, stratigraphy; BC and aerosols in snow and atmosphere Norwegian Young sea ICE cruise (N-ICE2015): Sea ice drift with RV Lance. Freeze in about 82°N 30°E (north of Nordaustlandet). January-June Energy budget of the first-year sea ice, from formation to melt ocean – atmosphere coupling Comparison to long term data from Ny-Aalesund Long Term snow observations: Snow height, snow and soil temperature, heat flux, spatial variability, precipitation and accumulation : NPI, AWI, CAA, CNR (CCT), LGGE, AARI (Barentsburg)

Meteorology networks and long-term data sets Contact:Marion Maturilli (AWI) Temperature inversions: occurrence, strength, persistence, seasonal cycles, long-term trends  analysis of radio sondes Historical long-term records: temperature, humidity, wind, radiation (Hornsund, Pyramiden, Barentsburg, Ny-Ålesund) Link to cloud topic: cover (low, high level, octas); height characteristics; seasonal cycles; link to boundary layer processes; local vs. large scale processes; how can remote sensing / radiation data be used? Contact: Becagli (U. Florence) + Massling (U. Aarhus) Relate variations in long term time series of atmospheric trace gases and aerosols to large scale circulation.

Clouds, Humidity, Precipitation Contact: Shiobara Scientific Questions: What is the altitude / frequency / phase of clouds ? What is the radiative effect of different cloud types ? Any trends in humidity and/or clouds, any radiative effect ? Aim: Quantification of clouds, humidity, and precipitation, and their dependence on regional meteorology. Involved Groups: Japan, Germany, France, Norway, Korea, Italy, Russia, India Planned activities: ArcticCARE campaigns on clouds / satellite validation → Shiobara Test campaign net radiation balance above clouds 2015 Maturilli & DWD Water isotope parallel measurements at AWIPEV and Zeppelin Mt, 2015 Ultralight plane (potentially): measuring water isotopes

Aerosol direct effect Contact: Ritter, Shiobara Scientific Questions: Long-term changes in aerosol load and composition? How does that affect the climate system ? [→ Earth system model !] Contribution of anthropogenic (or natural) aerosol to Arctic change ? Chemical composition of the aerosol -> radiative effect ? Aim: combine remote sensing and in situ measurements (closure study), to optimize information from remote sensing (Contact Ritter) an aerosol radiative transfer model and an appropriate climate model to estimate the direct aerosol radiative forcing in the Svalbard region To address the relevance of different aerosol species and sources for direct radiative forcing Involved Groups: Japan, Italy, Germany, India, Norway, Sweden

Aerosol indirect effect Contact Shiobara, Ritter Scientific Questions: How does the chemical composition of the aerosol affect the cloud formation and microphysics ? Aim: To understand the role of CCN and IN on the lifetime and the radiative properties of clouds. Involved Groups: Japan, Italy, Germany, Denmark, Norway, India, Korea, Sweden Planned activities: campaign May 2015 with focus on mixed-phase clouds (GRENE/NIPR/AWI)

Regional Representativeness, including Satellite Validation Scientific Questions: Representativety of measurements in Ny-Alesund on different scales ? Ny-Alesund ← → Kongsfjord (Zeppelin, Gruvebadet, Rabben, Corbel) Ny-Alesund ← → Svalbard (connection to Barentsburg and Hornsund) Ny-Alesund ← → Arctic (connection to Station Nord, R/V Lance, others) To what extent are measurements in Svalbard useful for satellite validation ? Aim: To understand local and regional influences in the Ny-Alesund area Involved Groups: Japan, Norway, Germany, Italy, Poland, Russia, Denmark, Sweden Planned activities: Ny-Alesund is supersite for validation (EarthCare, after 2018) (→ Shiobara) N-ICE expedition wit R/V Lance 2015 (NP) mobile system for CO, CO2, CH4 to travel the Svalbard stations (Hornsund, Barentsburg, Isfjorden) (NILU)

Long range transport and modelling activities Contact Len Barrie (U. Stockholm) Need explicit involvement of modellers in the Atmospheric flagship programme to understand atmospheric composition observations and contributing sources (trajectory models, chemical transport, climate models simulated situations, source apportionment models). Use Svalbard observations in the evaluation and validation of models Combine the dense meteorological network on Svalbard with a permanent nested grid mesoscale models resolving the topography of the islands. -> Improved chemical transport models -> Feedback on meterological network design

Comparison & analysis of duplicate measurements Hypothesis: Duplicate observations can be utilized: Comparison of duplicate observations of gases and aerosols at different stations in Svalbard. (e.g. BC, OPC, CO, CO2, CH4, aerosol chemistry: trace elements and major ions) (Norwegian Polar Institute shall find lead) Utilize duplicate meteorological observations e.g. local discrepencies in ABL properties, revealing orographic influences like ABL height, surface fluxes, …

Workinggroup discussion issues – 2.1 Plans & Timelines: - Provide lists of ongoing and planned measurements, expeditions - Provide times of planned field activities / campaigns – 2.2 Gaps: Which observations / measurements do You miss, which might be provided by others in Ny-Aalesund or on Svalbard? – 2.3 What are your specific contributions to the flagship programme? – 2.4 How do you want the Flagship Programme to be active? – 2.5 Please provide plans for - common publications - common applications to funding calls (SSF, EU, SIOS?, others) - development of satellite cal/val activities - common activities across institutions/stations to enlarge the analysis to a regional level

Def. SSF flagship programs for scientific cooperation in Svalbard SSF flagship programs for scientific cooperation in Svalbard are groups of researchers from different nations, stations, institutions and/or research bases that work together with the same questions and challenges to find common answers and solutions. A prerequisite for success is that the cooperation within and between the research entities is strengthened. SSF flagship programs include sharing of knowledge and data, they have priorities and a clear strategy to ensure added value for Svalbard research. New SSF flagship programs should complement existing ones, and all SSF flagship programs should be continuously developed. SSF flagship programs for scientific cooperation in Svalbard include: International and institutional cooperation between relevant nations, research bases and research groups in Svalbard. A review of the status today, an identification of knowledge gaps and a plan for exchange of knowledge. Priorities and recommendations for and strategies for future work and data sharing. A plan for how to initiate and continuously develop the flagship program, including: – Organization of program leadership – Shared responsibilities for activities and research – Suggested budget – Measures to secure dissemination of results and open sharing of data