School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASTM OFFICERS CONFERENCE SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMENS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advertisements

Debriefing/brainstorming meeting for the training of experts for agency reviews Decision making process on the reviews: experiences from the ENQA Board.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Eligibility for Accommodations & Required Disability Documentation Revisions to Section Catalog.
1 Dissertation & Comprehensive Exam Process Dissertation Process Comprehensive Exam.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
Quality Assurance Initiative. What is it anyway? The Quality Assurance (QA) Initiative is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to assess the.
Oglala Lakota College Graduate Studies Faculty Information
Academic Integrity. Academic Integrity LaGuardia Academic Integrity Policy: Website (
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RPT Workshop March 28, :30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Intermountain Network Scientific CC (INSCC) Building, room 110.
Accessibility Resources: An Introduction to the Memo Professor and student sitting and talking.
Kim Gingerich, Assistant to V-P, Academic & Provost Lisa Weber, Administrative Secretary, Dean of Science Marie Armstrong, Associate University Secretary.
Portfolios. Why use portfolios? To encourage students to be reflective and responsible To allow students to make choices To give students evidence of.
Request from University Graduate Council for Revision to UFS Bylaws.
MyKIIS Kentucky Institute for International Studies.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
1 Academic Appeals STUDENT TUTORIAL Academic Advising Program in the College of Arts & Sciences and the General College.
How to conduct an Academic Misconduct investigation in the FOA New policies and procedures effective September 2007 (Adapted for use in the FOA by Michael.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
Grade Change & Incompletes Policy/ Procedure Auburn University Office of the Provost.
Graduate Degree Progress & Clearance Graduate School Office Amy Gillett and Amy Corr.
Econ 3320 Managerial Economics (Fall 2015)
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Review of University Policies and Procedures Academic Regulations.
Sabbatical Workshop Sabbatical Workshop Friday, April 21, :00 – 4:30 p.m. Dr. Wallace Smith, VPAA Prof. Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, chair, sabbatical.
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
LECTURER’S EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (LEO) REVIEW PROCESS.
The Office of Curriculum Systems
Moving To the Year 2000:Implementing 4010 Implementation Resolution Process Rich Emrich EDI Manager J.M. Schneider.
Attendance Modification Amanda Weyant Julie Di Biasio.
Graduate School Orientation for New TA’s August 13, 2012 Sonja Feist-Price, Ph.D. Academic Ombud.
Curriculum Development at KCC Prepared by Edward Martin Amanda Kalin ChairDirector College Council Curriculum CommitteeCurriculum Development and Program.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Equity and Access Plans and ANU Student Support.
TEACHING ASSISTANTS STUDENT- FACULTY POLICY ISSUES, RIGHTS, PROCESSES.
Revision of Policy on Academic Misconduct Academic Integrity Committee
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Filing an Academic Grievance
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
Curriculum Development at KCC
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
FLOWSHEET FOR APPEALS Application for appeal received
Syllabus Guidelines and Other Instructor/Student Policies
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Pat Barton Clayton State University
Standards and Certification Training
Distinguished Teacher Award
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
COLLEGE OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES College Academic Calendar
COLLEGE OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES College Academic Calendar
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Life of a Dossier Redelegated Merit Non-Redelegated Merit
Distinguished Teacher Award
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Promotion and Tenure.
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Presentation transcript:

School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011

GRADE APPEAL PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION The student grade appeal procedure must follow the University policy (CSULB Policy statement which was approved on June 2, 2010 and supersedes the Policy Statement of 99-16). The faculty and students may review this detailed policy in the current CSULB catalogue, or the Academic Senate Website. The policy can also be found at: policy/academic/numerical/GradeAppealProcedures.html policy/academic/numerical/GradeAppealProcedures.html The following diagrammatic presentation is to assist the student and the faculty as to steps involved with the grade appeal procedure in the School of Nursing. For detailed information please review the University Policy.

Preliminary Informal Phase Student C/O Final Course Grade Discuss grade orally or in writing with INSTRUCTOR Not resolved Initiate Formal Appeal Process Resolved

Initiate Grade Appeal Process Must be submitted within the first 40 instructional days immediately following the semester the course completed. Student prepares a file which includes : A written statement to School of Nursing (SON) Director describing the reasons for the appeal and recommendation for a new grade Obtain and complete the College Grade Appeal Request & Route Sheet from the Nursing Office Provide supporting documentations: class syllabus, examinations, class assignments, etc. SON Director consults with instructor & student Resolved Not resolved Go to Phase 1 If instructor refuses to participate, SON Director insert a letter in the Appeal File

First Phase Student requests in writing to SON Director to forward the Appeal to the School Grade Appeals Committee (SGAC). SON Director notifies Instructor and forwards the file to S.G.A.C within 10 instructional days S. G. A. C. Chair of S. G. A. C. Notify student & instructor of committee memberships Notify all parties of all responses & deadlines Provide copies of instructor’s response to the student Instructor may write a response letter Student & instructor shall have one preemptory challenge to remove a committee member. If a member is removed, S.G.A.C. has 10 additional instructional days for review. S.G.A.C. to use alternative members Notify the instructor of the formal appeal

Second Phase S.G. A. C. Determination Written Statements Explanation of Reasoning Responses to Specific Issues Decision placed in the student file Copy sent to student and instructor S. G. A. C. Determination of the grade if Appeal is granted Instructor changes grade (within 10 instructional days) SON Director may change grade If instructor refuses to change grade

Third Phase If the Appeal is rejected by the student or the instructor If student or instructor do not appeal within 10 instructional days Student or instructor file a written Appeal to the School Committee findings and requests further review Process terminated If either the student or the instructor files a written appeal to the S.G.A.C. findings, committee chair shall within 10 instructional days forward the file (including the committee’s decision & rationale) to the College Appeals Committee. P PreparedPrepared