October 31, 2008METDQM Study1 Summary from MET DQM Plot Scanning

October 31, 2008METDQM Study2 MET DQM Plots From CRAFT data JetMET POG DQM is already routinely run

October 31, 2008METDQM Study3 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only First few lumi sections appear to be problematic. Number of events

October 31, 2008METDQM Study4 Run cont’d  Zoom-in view  Problem only in a first few lumi sections  On a lumi section based method, can keep the majority of events

October 31, 2008METDQM Study5 Run cont’d  Data certification Looking at  Chi2 of double Gaussian fits: reduced chi2 <20 (lum section) or 200 (entire run) (Need to adjust the criteria based on the statistics)  Mean of the fitted Gaussian form: within +-10 GeV

October 31, 2008METDQM Study6 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only No major problem. Number of events

October 31, 2008METDQM Study7 Run cont’d  Data certification output Good run

October 31, 2008METDQM Study8 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only Noise in HF at phi~0.8 Check of the mean MEx or MEy will detecot this problem. Number of events

October 31, 2008METDQM Study9 Run cont’d  Data certification output MET without HF mostly OK

October 31, 2008METDQM Study10 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only Number of events met with/withtou HF seem to suffer from hot tower(s)

October 31, 2008METDQM Study11 Run cont’d  Data certification outputs Bad Run

October 31, 2008METDQM Study12 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only Number of events No major problem.

October 31, 2008METDQM Study13 Run cont’d  Data certification outputs