Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Models Jeremy Oakley & Anthony O’Hagan University of Sheffield, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical evaluation of model uncertainties in Copert III, by I. Kioutsioukis & S. Tarantola (JRC, I)
Advertisements

Bayesian tools for analysing and reducing uncertainty Tony OHagan University of Sheffield.
Dialogue Policy Optimisation
Running a model's adjoint to obtain derivatives, while more efficient and accurate than other methods, such as the finite difference method, is a computationally.
Objectives 10.1 Simple linear regression
Bayesian Health Technology Assessment: An Industry Statistician's Perspective John Stevens AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood Bayesian Statistics Focus Team Leader.
20- 1 Chapter Twenty McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Twenty An Introduction to Decision Making GOALS.
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets
Exploring uncertainty in cost effectiveness analysis NICE International and HITAP copyright © 2013 Francis Ruiz NICE International (acknowledgements to:
1 Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Type I and Type II Errors One-Tailed Tests About a Population Mean: Large-Sample.
1 1 Slide Chapter 9 Hypothesis Tests Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Type I and Type II Errors Type.
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide STATISTICS FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Seventh Edition AndersonSweeneyWilliams Slides Prepared by John Loucks © 1999 ITP/South-Western College.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and.
Optimal Drug Development Programs and Efficient Licensing and Reimbursement Regimens Neil Hawkins Karl Claxton CENTRE FOR HEALTH ECONOMICS.
BAYESIAN POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS FOR PROBABILISTIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Gordon B. Hazen and Min Huang, IEMS Department, Northwestern University, Evanston.
Accounting for Psychological Determinants of Treatment Response in Health Economic Simulation Models of Behavioural Interventions A Case Study in Type.
Validating uncertain predictions Tony O’Hagan, Leo Bastos, Jeremy Oakley, University of Sheffield.
Approaches to Data Acquisition The LCA depends upon data acquisition Qualitative vs. Quantitative –While some quantitative analysis is appropriate, inappropriate.
Gaussian Processes I have known
Chapter 12 Simple Regression
USE OF LAPLACE APPROXIMATIONS TO SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY
Methods to Analyse The Economic Benefits of a Pharmacogenetic (PGt) Test to Predict Response to Biologic Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and to Prioritise.
An Optimal Learning Approach to Finding an Outbreak of a Disease Warren Scott Warren Powell
Results 2 (cont’d) c) Long term observational data on the duration of effective response Observational data on n=50 has EVSI = £867 d) Collect data on.
Value of Information Some introductory remarks by Tony O’Hagan.
A Two Level Monte Carlo Approach To Calculating
1 Transforming the efficiency of Partial EVSI computation Alan Brennan Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS) Samer Kharroubi Centre for Bayesian.
Non-parametric Bayesian value of information analysis Aim: To inform the efficient allocation of research resources Objectives: To use all the available.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses.
Lecture 10 Comparison and Evaluation of Alternative System Designs.
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
Value of Information for Complex Economic Models Jeremy Oakley Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield. Paper available from.
Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
Introduction to ModelingMonte Carlo Simulation Expensive Not always practical Time consuming Impossible for all situations Can be complex Cons Pros Experience.
1 Assessment of Imprecise Reliability Using Efficient Probabilistic Reanalysis Farizal Efstratios Nikolaidis SAE 2007 World Congress.
Gaussian process modelling
Decision theory and Bayesian statistics. Tests and problem solving Petter Mostad
Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management Accounting: Information for managing and creating value 4e Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 17: Economic Evaluation using Decision.
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
1 1 Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning.
Presentation Ling Zhang Date: Framework of the method 1 Using Distribution Fitting for Assumptions 2 monte – carlo simulation 3 compare different.
Bootstrapping (And other statistical trickery). Reminder Of What We Do In Statistics Null Hypothesis Statistical Test Logic – Assume that the “no effect”
Probabilistic Mechanism Analysis. Outline Uncertainty in mechanisms Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Probabilistic mechanism analysis Examples.
Introduction to Linear Regression
Value of information Marko Tainio Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
1 Chapter 7 Applying Simulation to Decision Problems.
CSC321: 2011 Introduction to Neural Networks and Machine Learning Lecture 11: Bayesian learning continued Geoffrey Hinton.
Slide 1 Marc Kennedy, Clive Anderson, Anthony O’Hagan, Mark Lomas, Ian Woodward, Andreas Heinemayer and John Paul Gosling Uncertainty in environmental.
17 May 2007RSS Kent Local Group1 Quantifying uncertainty in the UK carbon flux Tony O’Hagan CTCD, Sheffield.
Department Author Bayesian Sample Size Determination in the Real World John Stevens AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood Tony O’Hagan University of Sheffield.
Emulation and Sensitivity Analysis of the CMAQ Model During a UK Ozone Pollution Episode Andrew Beddows Environmental Research Group King’s College London.
Reducing MCMC Computational Cost With a Two Layered Bayesian Approach
1 1 Slide Simulation Professor Ahmadi. 2 2 Slide Simulation Chapter Outline n Computer Simulation n Simulation Modeling n Random Variables and Pseudo-Random.
Machine Learning 5. Parametric Methods.
The Unscented Kalman Filter for Nonlinear Estimation Young Ki Baik.
1 Design of experiment for computer simulations Let X = (X 1,…,X p )  R p denote the vector of input values chosen for the computer program Each X j is.
Introduction to emulators Tony O’Hagan University of Sheffield.
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS Farm Business Management: The Fundamentals of Good Practice Peter L. Nuthall.
8 Sept 2006, DEMA2006Slide 1 An Introduction to Computer Experiments and their Design Problems Tony O’Hagan University of Sheffield.
Marc Kennedy, Tony O’Hagan, Clive Anderson,
Chapter 13 Simple Linear Regression
Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
Monte Carlo Simulation Managing uncertainty in complex environments.
Enhancing the rational use of antimalarials: The cost-effectiveness of rapid immunochromatographic dipsticks in sub-Saharan Africa.
Uncertainty Propagation
Presentation transcript:

Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Models Jeremy Oakley & Anthony O’Hagan University of Sheffield, UK.

Introduction An economic model is to be used to predict the cost- effectiveness of a particular treatment(s). Values of some or all of the input parameters required for the model are uncertain. This implies the output of the model, the cost- effectiveness of the treatment is also uncertain. We wish to identify which input parameters are the most influential in driving this output uncertainty. Should we learn more about these parameters before making a decision?

Introduction Various measures of importance for input variables have been proposed, such as the partial expected value of perfect information (partial EVPI) (Klaxton et al, 2001). Computing the values of these measures is conventionally done using Monte Carlo techniques. These invariably require a very large numbers of runs of the economic model. For computationally expensive models, this can be completely impractical. We present an efficient alternative to Monte Carlo.

Sensitivity analysis: partial EVPI We work with net benefit: utility of treatment is K x efficacy – cost With K the monetary value of a unit increase in efficacy. The economic model states the utilities of various treatment as a function of a set of input variables X. u = f (X ) There is uncertainty regarding the true values of the input variables X. Decision maker chooses treatment with highest expected utility, U *.

Value of learning an input variable Denote Y to be the input variable in the model under question. Expected value to the decision maker of learning Y before choosing a treatment is U Y. Value of learning Y, the partial EVPI of Y is U Y - U *. Partial EVPI is zero if the same decision is made for all values of Y.

Improving on Monte Carlo

Use each run of the model to learn about the entire model.

Efficient computation using an emulator We can compute partial EVPIs more efficiently through the use of an emulator. An emulator is a statistical model of the original economic model which can then be used as a fast approximation to the model itself. An approach used by Sacks et al (1989) for dealing with computationally expensive computer models. Any regression technique can be used. We employ a nonparametric regression technique based on Gaussian processes (O’Hagan, 1978).

Gaussian processes The gaussian process model for the function f (X ) is non-parametric; the only assumption made about f (X ) is that it is a continuous function. The interpolation is exact; given sufficient runs of the economic model, the gaussian process emulator `becomes’ the economic model. It is also possible to allow for uncertainty in the emulator; we can say how our estimate might change if we were to obtain more runs from the economic model. Additional features can be exploited to speed up computation.

Example: GERD model The GERD model, presented in Briggs et al (2002) predicts the cost-effectiveness of a range of treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Various uncertain inputs in the model related to treatment efficacies, resource uses by patients. Model outputs mean number of weeks free of GERD symptoms, and mean cost of treatment for a particular strategy. Distributions for uncertain inputs detailed in Briggs et al (2002).

GERD example We consider a choice between three treatment strategies: ›Acute treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 8 weeks, then continuous maintenance treatment with PPIs at the same dose. ›Acute treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 8 weeks, then continuous maintenance treatment with hydrogen receptor antagonists (H2RAs). ›Acute treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 8 weeks, then continuous maintenance treatment with PPIs at the a lower dose.

GERD example There are 23 uncertain input variables. We estimate the partial EVPI for each input variable, based on 600 runs of the GERD model. We assume a value of $250 for each week free of GERD symptoms. (It is straightforward to repeat our analysis for alternative values). The GERD model is computationally cheap, and so we can compare our estimates with Monte Carlo estimates based on large samples.

GERD Results

Conclusions. The use of the Gaussian process emulator allows partial EVPIs to be computed considerably more efficiently. Sensitivity analysis feasible for computationally expensive models. Can also be extended to value of sample information calculations.

Acknowledgement We would like to thank Andrew Briggs, Ron Goeree, Gord Blackhouse and Bernie O’Brien for providing us with the GERD model and input distributions.