Developing a Logic Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
Advertisements

REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
Muskie School of Public ServiceInstitute for Public Sector Innovation Where we are trying to go? Common outcome measures Quality data collection for outcomes.
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Sexual health education David Ross London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Bergen, 7 th May 2014.
Effective Practices for Preventing and Addressing Young Children’s Challenging Behaviors Mary Louise Hemmeter, Ph.D.: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
How to Evaluate Your Health Literacy Project Jill Lucht, MS Project Director, Center for Health Policy
Logic Modeling 101 Jessica Meyerson Wilder Research May 21, 2009.
“If you don’t know where you are going, how are you gonna’ know when you get there?” Yogi Berra Common Elements of Strong Program Evaluation THEORY OF.
A Program Evaluation Strategy The Causal Pathway.
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Logic Models. A logic model is your program ROAD MAP. Where are you trying to go? How are you trying to get there? What will tell you that you’ve arrived?
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Diabetes Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt Knowlton,
Action Planning Guidance Illinois Public Health Institute.
A Project of the Child Care Bureau Office of Family Assistance, U.S. Department of Health and Human ZERO TO THREE Supporting Infants and Toddlers.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Beth Mastro New York State Center for School Safety 2010 ACT for Youth Center of Excellence Cornell University Family Life Development Center Cornell University.
Step 2. Describe Program Logic Models & Outcome Measurement
OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INTERIM TRAINING Marlene Mason MCPP Healthcare Consulting, Inc. October 28, 2010.
NJ - 1 Performance Measurement Reporting Development Services Group, Inc. Don Johnson For more information contact Development Services Group, Inc
Case Management 1 What Will be Covered? 1. Organizational Assessments (Module 1) 2. Designing Quality Services (Module 2) 3. HIV Prevention and Care Advancing.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
The Evaluation Plan.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Preparing for the Main Event Using Logic Models as a Tool for Collaboratives Brenda M. Joly Leslie M. Beitsch August 6, 2008.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Model mod·el noun \mä-d ə l\ 1:Structural design. 2:A usually miniature representation of something; a pattern of something to be made. 3:An example for.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
The Logic Model An Introduction. Slide 2 Innovation Network, Inc. Who We Are National nonprofit organization Committed to evaluation as a tool for empowerment.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Purposes of Evaluation Why evaluate? Accountability: Justify trust of stakeholders (funders, parents, citizens) by showing program results (Summative)
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
HIV Prevention Programs That Work Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
Nancy L. Weaver, PhD, MPH Department of Community Health School of Public Health Saint Louis University 16 July 2010 LOGIC MODEL FUNDAMENTALS.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Program Evaluation Dr. Ruth Buzi Mrs. Nettie Johnson Baylor College of Medicine Teen Health Clinic.
Family Resource and Youth Services Centers: Action Component Plan.
THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED AS ONE COMPLETE PRESENTATION. HOWEVER, IT IS DIVIDED INTO 3 PARTS IN ORDER TO FACILITATE EASIER DOWNLOADING AND VIEWING,
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
Project Overview In the school year (SY), the School District of Philadelphia (SDP) was awarded a grant from the Centers for Disease Control.
Basic Program Logic RESOURCES/INPUTS The ingredients you need to implement your program! YOUR PROGRAM What you do to achieve your departmental goals! RESULTS/IMPACT.
Getting to Outcomes: How to do strategic planning with your CRP Theresa Costello National Resource Center for Child Protective Services May 25, 2007.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Promoting Science-based Approaches to Preventing Teen Pregnancy, STDs and HIV Policy, Partnerships, and Creativity Brigid Riley, MPH American Public Health.
ADRCs Do What? Using Logic Models to Document and Improve ADRC Outcomes Glenn M. Landers.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Strategic Prevention Framework - Evaluation
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
SUCCESSFUL MEASURING JAMES HARDIN, DIRECTOR, HEALTH IMPACT
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Troubleshooting Logic Models
BOOTCAMP SOCIAL INNOVATION ACCELERATOR TO CREATE LASTING CHANGE
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Logic Model Identify the problem or issue that the program will address Identify the ultimate goal of the program in addressing the problem The objectives lead to the conduct of a variety of activities (intervention, training, service delivery) Each activity is assumed to result in short-term outcomes The short-term outcomes lead to intermediate outcomes The intermediate outcomes lead to long-term outcomes Long-term outcomes should have an impact on the ultimate program goal

Problem/Issue The adolescent pregnancy rate and STI/STD rate in Washington State is increasing. A needs assessment points to pockets of “high risk” youth 13-16 years of age that are especially vulnerable and are accounting for a disproportionate share of these rates. The Department of Health wants to address this issue by funding “client focused” prevention interventions targeting these populations in the state. A RFP is sent out and your team will respond. Develop a simple logic model that “maps” your response.

Logic Model: Client Centered Program Goal Outcome Objectives Intervention (Process) Short-term Outcomes Intermediate Outcomes Long-term Outcomes A statement of an ideal or hoped for state or condition. It is usually general and abstract. Statements that specify the desirable results of an intervention that are derived from the goal. Statements that identify the steps to be taken toward accomplishing a desired end (outcome). Inputs Activities Interventions Short term benefits or changes for participants that are influenced by a program’s outputs. (e.g., Knowledge, Attitudes, Intention) Intermediate benefits or changes for participants that are influenced by a program’s outputs and follow short term outcomes. (e.g., Behavior). Long term benefits or changes for participants that are influenced by a program’s outputs, follow intermediate outcomes and impact the target population. Outputs are the products of program activities and are measured in terms of what was done, how it was done, and who received it. Outputs

Exercise Identify: Goal Outcome Objectives Inputs/Activities/Intervention Outputs Short Term Outcomes Intermediate Term Outcomes Long term Term Outcomes

Goal To improve the social and health well being of teens by delaying sexual intercourse and/or reducing risks for early pregnancy/STDs

Outcome Objectives Increase knowledge About sexuality, relationships, decision making, and communication. Increase intention to delay sexual activity, achieve higher education, and use contraception Decrease intention to use substances Behavior changes (Decrease/delay sexual intercourse/ Increase use of contraceptives).

Intervention To offer group sessions which will include discussions on Sexuality and safe sexual behaviors, relationships, self-esteem, decision-making and communication skills. To provide individual counseling, Advocacy, and referrals to other community services.

Outputs Attendance in group sessions Client perception of groups in meeting needs Number and hours of advocacy and counseling sessions

Short Term Outcomes Increase knowledge About sexuality, relationships, decision making, and communication Increase intention to delay sexual activity, achieve higher education, and contraception Decrease intention to use substances

Intermediate Outcomes (Behavior) Delayed/decrease sexual intercourse Increase use of contraceptives. Decrease substance use

Long Term Outcomes (Impacts) Reduction in pregnancy and STD rates amongst teens in targeted areas

Logic Model: Client Centered Program Goal Outcome Objectives Intervention (Process) Short-term Outcomes Intermediate Outcomes Long-term Outcomes Improve the social and health well being of teens by delaying sexual intercourse and/or reducing risks for early pregnancy/STDs Increase knowledge About sexuality, relationships, decision making, and communication. Increase intention to delay sexual activity, achieve higher education, and use contraception Decrease intention to use substances Behavior changes To offer group sessions which will include discussions on Sexuality and safe sexual behaviors, relationships, self-esteem, decision-making and Communication skills. To provide individual counseling, Advocacy, and referrals to other community services. Increase knowledge About sexuality, relationships, decision making, and communication Increase intention to delay sexual activity, achieve higher education, and contraception Decrease intention to use substances. Delayed sexual intercourse and or reduction of risk for early pregnancy with the use of contraceptives. Decrease substance use Reduction in pregnancy and STD rates amongst teens in the targeted areas. >Attendance in group sessions >Client perception of groups in meeting needs >Number and hours of advocacy and counseling sessions. Outputs

Why Bother? Clarifies the difference between activities and intended outcomes Helps develop a common understanding of the program between managers, staff, other stakeholders, and the evaluator Has a wide variety of uses including program monitoring, quality assurance, benchmarking, and evaluation Can be used as a map for both managers and evaluators

Logic Model: Limitations Represents reality, not reality Programs are not linear Focuses on expected outcomes Challenge of causal attribution Many factors influence outcomes Doesn’t address: Are we doing the right thing? Challenge of causal attribution: Does not suggest/’prove’ that program caused the outcome Adapted from UW Extension

Basic Considerations When Developing a Logic Model No one way to do it Keep the model simple to begin. Add elements as you go along. The logic model should show clear, logical relationships between components

Adapted from UW Extension Check Your Logic Model Are the outcomes really outcomes? Is the longest-term outcome meaningful? Is it logical? Is it realistic? Does it represent the program’s purpose; response to the situation? Adapted from UW Extension