Experiment 2: Context generalization following delayed context shift.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project VIABLE: Behavioral Specificity and Wording Impact on DBR Accuracy Teresa J. LeBel 1, Amy M. Briesch 1, Stephen P. Kilgus 1, T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Advertisements

YOU CANT RECYCLE WASTED TIME Victoria Hinkson. EXPERIMENT #1 :
Hypothesis testing 5th - 9th December 2011, Rome.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Learning Effect With Repeated Use of the DynaVision D2 Visual Motor Evaluation William P. McCormack,
Randomized Experimental Design
One of these images doesn’t fit – which one is it and why? There are two connected pairs of images – what are they and what is the connection?
The Effects of Vicarious Learning with Experienced Rats Jessie Young and Lyndsey Wells Randolph College Lynchburg, VA Introduction Vicarious learning.
Experiment 1: Memory in Different Contexts. Hypothesis It was hypothesized that when participants were asked to recall stories in the same context they.
Using Statistics in Research Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Examination of the State Dependent Properties of WIN on Spatial Learning and Memory in Rats in the Sand Maze Ashley R. Smith and Gretchen Hanson.
Chapter Eleven: Designing, Conducting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Experiments with More Than Two Groups The Psychologist as Detective,
Working & Reference Memory Following Fimbra-Fornix Lesions.
Methods Experiment 1 Conclusions Running on rungs: Serial pattern learning on the horizontal ladder *M.J Hylin 1 ; S.S. Winter 1 ; T. L. Marsiglio 1 ;
Protein Synthesis is Not Required for Extinction of Paired-Associate Odor Discriminations Sarah Linderman, Elizabeth Nguyen, and Gretchen Hanson Gotthard.
Using Statistics in Research Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
HTA as a framework for task analysis Presenter: Hilary Ince, University of Idaho.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis testing is a statistical procedure Allows researchers to use sample data to.
SAT 411.
Sleep Deprivation Effects on Memory and Anxiety in Mice Eyitemi Opuogen Department of Biology, York College of Pennsylvania Sleep is imperative for a person’s.
St. Mary’s Catholic School Science Fair Student Kickoff.
GROUP DIFFERENCES: THE SEQUEL. Last time  Last week we introduced a few new concepts and one new statistical test:  Testing for group differences 
The Scientific Method. The Scientific Method The Scientific Method is a problem solving-strategy. *It is just a series of steps that can be used to solve.
Some terms Parametric data assumptions(more rigorous, so can make a better judgment) – Randomly drawn samples from normally distributed population – Homogenous.
Who has better digit memory, males or females? The purpose of my investigation is to determine if males or females have better digit memory. I think.
Warm-up Discussion What are the important “steps” in developing and analyzing scientific investigations? Is the process linear (meaning one step always.
LEXICAL LEARNING AND GENERALIZATION IN CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROME Abstract LEXICAL LEARNING AND GENERALIZATION IN CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROME Elbouz M.
Hypothesis testing Intermediate Food Security Analysis Training Rome, July 2010.
Spatial Learning and Memory in the Sand Maze: Does WIN-2 Produce State Dependent Retention in Rats? Ashley R. Smith and Gretchen Hanson Gotthard Randolph-Macon.
Single-Subject Experimental Research
Determinants of Olfactory Memory Span in Rats MacQueen, D. A., Bullard, L. A., & Galizio, M. University of North Carolina Wilmington Introduction Dudchenko,
Introduction The authors of this research would like to thank the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire’s Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for financial.
Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats previously used for other purposes (Mackechnie et al., 2008 and Govind et al., 2008) were used in this pilot study. Rats.
Effect of Cycloheximide on Extinction of Odor Discrimination Learning in Rats Alexandra Knoppel, Katherine Janson, Sonnett White, and Gretchen Hanson Gotthard.
The purpose of this project is to determine who has a better memory, males or female? The reason why this is important is because if you had something.
Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 02, 2009 Papastergiou, M.(2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science.
Stats Lunch: Day 3 The Basis of Hypothesis Testing w/ Parametric Statistics.
Results Table 1 Table 1 displays means and standard deviations of scores on the retention test. Higher scores indicate better recall of material from the.
ANOVAs.  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  Difference in two or more average scores in different groups  Simplest is one-way ANOVA (one variable as predictor);
The Use of Chaining and Reinforcement in an Obstacle Course Vivian Scott & Elishia Webster Randolph-Macon Woman’s College Lynchburg, VA Introduction.
Extinction of Conditioned Behavior Chapter 9 Effects of Extinction Extinction and Original Learning What is learned during Extinction.
The Effects of Different Types of Food Reinforcers on Performance in the T-Maze Sarah A. Linderman, Fahima Vakalia, and Laura Revetta Randolph-Macon Woman’s.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I May 9, 2003 Chapter 6 and 7 (Ray) Control: The Keystone of the Experimental Method.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 5 Research Reports.
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method. What is the Scientific Method? Step-by-step way in which scientists answer questions. Step-by-step way.
FYP 446 /4 Final Year Project 2 Dr. Khairul Farihan Kasim FYP Coordinator Bioprocess Engineering Program Universiti Malaysia Perls.
A Comparison of the Usage of English Tenses of Undergraduate Students with Different Abilities Receiving Different Types of Error Treatment through the.
BUS 308 Entire Course (Ash Course) For more course tutorials visit BUS 308 Week 1 Assignment Problems 1.2, 1.17, 3.3 & 3.22 BUS 308.
Research methods Designing an experiment Lesson 5.
Inferential Statistics
Context Cues and Conditional Relations
Experimental Psychology
Nutrition Education Intervention
Justin Yates & Michael Bardo
12 Inferential Analysis.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Experimental Design.
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Introduction Results Discussion Method References
WORD BLAST.
How to Write a good Lab Report
12 Inferential Analysis.
Sir James Smith’s Community School
Do Rats Have the Ability to Discriminate Between Words?
Single reward vs. two different rewards:
TEST FOR RANDOMNESS: THE RUNS TEST
InferentIal StatIstIcs
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (April 2003)
Eye vs. Ear.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Better Memory: Male or Female?
Presentation transcript:

Experiment 2: Context generalization following delayed context shift

Hypothesis 1 It was hypothesized following an immediate delay subjects would be able to discriminate between two contexts  Subjects trained in context A and immediately tested in context B for would not run down the runway as quickly in B as they did in A; whereas subjects trained in context A and tested in context A would show little to no difference in their time to run down a run way

Hypothesis 2 It was hypothesized following an longer delay subjects would generalize the two contexts as indicated by similar performance between the two groups  Subjects trained in context A and tested in context B a week later would run down the runway as quickly in B as they initially did in A suggesting that the subjects generalized the two contexts; similarly subjects trained in context A and tested in context A would show little to no difference in their time to run down a run way

Subjects 16 female Long-Evans rats approximately days old  Subjects were quasi-randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=4 per group)

Apparatus & Materials Both runways had the following dimesions 61” long X 5” wide and the walls 4” high and contained a food cup at the end; food cup contained one fruit loop Context A  Walls were gray  Floor was a wire grid  44” off the floor  Covered with a plexiglass lid  Normal light conditions

Apparatus & Materials Context B  Walls were white  Floor was covered with coarse grit sandpaper  24.5” off floor  No lid on top  Illuminated by three desk lamps  Contained lemon scent throughout

Figure 1a & 1b Context A

Figure 2a & 2b Context B

Procedure The first 3 days of the study were used as pre-testing in order to get the subjects acclimated to context A  Each day every subject was given 5 trials, a trial consisted of the subject starting at one end and running to the other end and ended once the subject began eating the fruit loop  Each subject was given 5 minutes per trial, if the subject failed to perform they would be removed and the next trial would begin Once the subjects reached asymptotic performance all subjects were given one day of testing in context A in order to establish baseline performance  Each subject was given 3 trials

Procedure Following baseline testing subjects were quasi- randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=4 per group)  Each subject was given 3 trials Two groups were either tested in context A or context B two days after baseline testing The other two groups were tested in context A or context B one week after baseline testing

Procedure Initial performance as well as baseline performance was analyzed to determine whether there were any group differences The dependent measure was the difference in time it took to run down the alley from baseline to testing  Averaged across 3 trials  Positive score indicates improved performance; subject running quicker  Negative score indicates that it took longer to reach the end

Initial performance

SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. PreTest PreTest * Context PreTest * Delay PreTest * Context * Delay Error(PreTest) Context Delay Context * Delay Error

Initial performance Pre-Training D1Pre-Training D2Pre-Training D3 Mean2 Days1 Week2 Days1 Week2 Days1 Week Same Different PreD1PreD2PreD3 S.D.2 Days1 Week2 Days1 Week2 Days1 Week Same Different

Initial performance A context X delay X day repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of day F(2,24)=74.29, p.05) This suggests that all subjects were performing similar prior to any experimental manipulation, but were demonstrating improved performance by the final day of pretesting as indicated by a reduced time to reach the end of the alley

Baseline

Source Sum of Squaresdf Mean SquareFSig. Context Delay Context * Delay Error

Baseline Mean2 Days1 Week Same Different S.D.2 Days1 Week Same Different

Baseline A context X delay ANOVA demonstrated no significant differences between any of the groups (p’s >.05) This suggests that during baseline testing there were no significant difference between any of the subjects’ performance

Mean difference from baseline * p<.05

Mean difference from baseline Source Sum of Squaresdf Mean SquareFSig. Context Delay Context * Delay Error

Mean difference from baseline Mean2 days1 Week Same0.5 Different-90.5 S.D.2 days1 Week Same Different

Mean difference from baseline A context X delay ANOVA found a significant main effect for context, F(1,12) = 8.35 and delay F(1,12) = 8.35, as well as a significant context X delay interaction F(1,12) = 15.78, p’s<.05 The significant effect of context indicates that subjects tested in a different context performed significantly poorer, as indicated by a slower running time during testing The significant effect of delay suggests that subjects tested immediately following baseline testing were able to discriminate between the two contexts The significant context X delay interaction suggests that subjects tested in a different context 2 days after baseline are able to discriminate between the two environments whereas subjects tested in the different context 1 week later is generalizing the different context as indicated by similar performance to subjects tested in the same environment as baseline at both 2 days and 1 week

Some extra information There are numerous books and articles about this topic  Generalization and discrimination of context  Recall cues  Contextual learning Remember to discuss this in an overall context, don’t just simply regurgitate try to integrate The challenge in this is to try to relate this to other aspects of the literature or even find conflicting studies  In other words why are our findings important, what can people take from this study

Some extra information An important paper Gisquet-Verrier, P., & Alexinsky, T. (1986). Does contextual change determine long-term forgetting? Animal Learning & Behavior, 14(4), Can use this, but it can’t count towards the two paper min. requirement (but it is very useful)

Some extra information Remember if you need help ask