Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manure Side-Dress Nitrogen Corn and Wheat Plots Glen Arnold, OSU Extension Educator Jon Rausch, OSUE State Extension Associate.
Advertisements

Manure 101: Nutrient Management and the Dairy Industry.
A. What is it? B. Why is it important? C. How is it done?
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
Chapter 6: Record Keeping. Record Keeping Record keeping is needed to keep up with the management of the waste application system.Record keeping is needed.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
Kim Meyer UW-Nutrient and Pest Management Program.
Conesus Lake – Upstream Changes Maxwell Farms Farm plan developed by Nathan Herendeen, Nancy Glazier, John Hanchar, and the Maxwell Brothers.
Readily Available Calcium for Your Soil
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters What has been Happening in Lake Erie? Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems.
Nutrient Management Planning Alan Sutton Department of Animal Sciences.
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009
Logo Certified Nutrient Management Planning7-1 Module 7: Manure Utilization By Hailin Zhang.
Lauer © University of Wisconsin – Agronomy Establish Realistic Yield Goals Yield Potential of Soil Growing Season.
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
Managing P & N Nutrient Resources Agronomy In-service January 3, 2013 Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 6 Manure Application Building Environmental.
Nutrient Budgets For CNMPs Nutrient Management Planners Training March 31, 2009 Bobby Smith County Extension Coordinator UGA Cooperative Extension Morgan.
Value of swine manure to grow finish operations 2015 Wisconsin Pork Expo Jerry May, MSU Extension Educator
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
Corn Plot Overview Jared Shippey Ben Logan. General Information  Planted 5/30/08  Hybrid – Pioneer 38B87 – 94 days  Planted population 35,000  Manure.
Nebraska CNMP Program 1 Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska Tools for Integrating Feed Program into NMP or CNMP.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 1 Nutrient Management Building Environmental.
The “New” Economics of Crop Production in 2008 Paul D. Mitchell Assistant Professor Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
Record Keeping CNMP Core Curriculum Section 7— Record Keeping.
Step 1 – Based on the soil test shown on P. 5 describe a soil sampling strategy for each field that will result in the taking of the proper number of soil.
Fertilizer Calculations. Overview Soil Test Recommendations Total Nutrient Needs Available Nutrient Sources Concentration of Nutrient in each source Calculating.
Current N Fertilization
Enhancing Sorghum Yield and Profitability through Sensor Based N Management Dave Mengel and Drew Tucker Department of Agronomy K-State.
Summary of supplementary data GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23, 2013.
Highway 56 West Adams, MN Lynn Lagerstedt.
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Nutrient Management Planning CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Nutrient Management.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – RATE TABLES Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Manure nutrients are managed on a basis of phosphorus not nitrogen. Most crops use 3 times more nitrogen than they do phosphorus. Example: Fertilizer recommendations.
Potassium Cycle, Fertilizer, and Organic K Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
Manure and Environmental Impacts Amber Moore et al. Extension Soil Fertility Specialist University of Idaho Twin Falls, Idaho.
Part 2: Answers to practical fertilizer management problems Fundamentals of Nutrient Management December 16-17, 2009 West Virginia University Extension.
Phosphorus Cycle, Fertilizer and Organic P Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
Categorizing Nitrogen Availability for Corn Fields Using Field History and Cornstalk Nitrate Test Haiying Tao 1, Thomas Morris 1, Suzy Friedman 2, Richard.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – MMP NBS Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN SPREADSHEET VERSION 5.0 UPDATE 2015 Pennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference Don Orner Penn State Extension.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – PASTURE RATES Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Manure Problem Solving December 17, 2009 CraigW. Yohn WVU Extension Agent and Certified Crop Advisor.
Exploratory Research in Corn
Vermont Farmers In 2015 – 16,259 acres of cover crops planted on 1,299 fields throughout Vermont. In 2016 – 25,227 acres of cover crop planted on.
Manure management plan summary – MMP NBs
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT POLICY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Winter application worksheet
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
Lesson 4 – Fertilizing Soils
Manure management plan summary – Rate tables
Manure’s Fertility Value
Jamie long, C.C.A. Josh Gunther, C.C.A.
BASIC ISSUES OF MANURE MANAGEMENT: ASSIGNING MANURE SPREADING PRIORITIES RICHARD WOLKOWSKI AND KEITH KELLING DEPARTMENT OF SOIL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF.
Fertilizer Price: per lb of N
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Fertilizer Calculations
Thoughts on The Impact of Changing Commodity and Fertilizer Prices
Nutrient Management Planning
Presentation transcript:

Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension

MSR Agenda Today 9:00 Introduction & Welcome Workbook overview 10:30Break  (pick-up pencil + calculator) Work nutrient management example Complete field plan for your farm NoonLunch

Objective Development a nutrient management plan for each field of the farming operation.  Focus on those utilizing animal manure. Take Home:  General understanding of this Nutrient Management Workbook  Steps toward and approved Nutrient Management Plan

Outline Identify available soil resources. Identify manure nutrients available. Identify the nutrient needs of growing crop. Identify sources of nutrients available for that crop. Allocate and balance available nutrients by field. Estimate nutrient carry-over, if any, and the value of that carry- over. Identify spreadable acres available for manure application. Estimate number of acres needed to recycle manure nutrients generated by your operation. Identify steps toward an approved plan.

Heritage Lane Dairy 2009

Example Farm Page 1 Throughout the book an example is provided based on a farm that is currently milking 100 dairy cows and has 200 acres. This farm has a rotation of corn, soybeans, wheat, and alfalfa and fertilizes his fields with manure from the dairy operation. This is supplemented with commercial fertilizer when necessary. The field used throughout this book as an example is Brown 1 or B1. It is 30 acres and will be planted in corn. The previous crop was soybeans. Examples based on this scenario can be found in different sections throughout the book in gray boxes like this one.

Soils/Field Data OSU Fact Sheet: Soil Sampling, Handling & Testing Field Plan EXAMPLE A Field Information ac Meq/100g Brown 160 bu/ac ppm Corn B1 Silt Loam Soybeans lb/ac lb/ac ppm

Soil Test-Preferred

Yield response likely Yield response NOT likely Increasing 

Soil Test Critical Values K at CEC P Crop ppm (lb/acre) ppm (lb/acre) Corn 15 (30) 88 (175) 100 (200) 125 (250) 150 (300) Soybean 15 (30) 88 (175) 100 (200) 125 (250) 150 (300) Wheat 25 (50) 88 (175) 100 (200) 125 (250) 150 (300)

No Soil Test Page 2 Assumes maintenance level Nutrientpp m lb/ac P 2 O 5 - Corn and soybeans 1530 P 2 O 5 - wheat and alfalfa 2550 K 2 O- all crops Nutrientpp m lb/ac P 2 O 5 - Corn and soybeans 1530 P 2 O 5 - wheat and alfalfa 2550 K 2 O- all crops Nutrientpp m lb/ac P 2 O 5 - Corn and soybeans 1530 P 2 O 5 - wheat and alfalfa 2550 K 2 O- all crops Nutrientpp m lb/ac P 2 O 5 - Corn and soybeans 1530 P 2 O 5 - wheat and alfalfa 2550 K 2 O- all crops Nutrientpp m lb/ac P 2 O 5 - Corn and soybeans 1530 P 2 O 5 - wheat and alfalfa 2550 K 2 O- all crops Nutrientpp m lb/ac P 2 O 5 - Corn and soybeans 1530 P 2 O 5 - wheat and alfalfa 2550 K 2 O- all crops Nutrient ppmlb/ac P 2 O 5 - Corn and soybeans 1530 P 2 O 5 - wheat and alfalfa 2550 K 2 O- all crops125250

Winter application see page 17 Example Farm

Manure Test-Preferred 1414

Manure Nutrients Page 3 Example This dairy example uses book values, due to a lack of manure test results, from Table 1 of 6 lb/1,000 gal of NH 3 -N, 25 lb/1,000 gal of Organic N (ON), 15 lb/1,000 gal of P 2 O 5 and 19 lb/1,000 gal of K 2 O which will be applied in September and incorporated within 1 day. PAN: (25 x.33) + (6 x.25) = 9.75 lb/1,000 gal P 2 O 5 : 15 lb/1,000 gal K 2 O: 19 lb/1,000 gal PAN is Plant Available Nitrogen. This is the amount of Nitrogen available to the crop based on time of application and method of application.

Page 3-4

Time of Year page 5

Calculating PAN- Example Farm PAN worksheet top of page %33% % diff. Test 1

Winter (Frozen & Snow Covered) application see page 17 Example Farm

Example Nutrient Worksheet E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed

Example Farm Page 5 Example A dairy farmer expects 160 bu/ac of grain corn in field B1. The previous crop was soybeans. Nutrient recommendations without soil test values are: PAN: 160 lb/ac P2O5: 60 lb/ac K2O: 65 lb/ac

Corn Silage use 1T/ac = 6 bu/ac; 160 bu/ac = 26.6 T/ac silage Page 6

Page 6-8 Yield Potential– bu/ac Soil Test ppm (lb/ac)lb P 2 O 5 per acre 5 (10) (20) (30-60) (70) (80)00000 P 2 O 5 Recommendation

Page 8-10 Table 12: Corn K 2 O Recommendations at CEC level 20 meq/100g Yield Potential– bu/acre Soil test K ppm (lb/ac)lb K 2 O per acre 50 (100) (150) (200) ( ) (330) (350) Values in parentheses are lb/ac. 2 Maintenance recommendations are given for this soils test range.

√ √ Example Nutrient Worksheet E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed

Example - Liquid Fertilizer (used in this example) 5 gal/ac of are applied at planting. The fertilizer contains 10% PAN, 34% P 2 O 5, and 0% K 2 O. The application rate is 5 gal/ac x 11.7 lb/gal = 58.5 lb/ac. PAN: 58.5 lb/ac x 10% = 6 P 2 O 5 : 58.5 lb/ac x 34% = 20 K 2 O: 58.5 lb/ac x 0% = 0 Example - Dry Fertilizer Diammonium phosphate has a blend of ( ) applied at 150 lb/ac. The fertilizer contains 18% PAN, 46% P 2 O 5 and 0% K 2 O. PAN:150 lb/ac x 18% = 27 lb/ac P 2 O 5 :150 lb/ac x 46% = 69 lb/ac or 14 lbs/ac K 2 O: 150 lb/ac x 0% = 0 lb/ac

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ Nutrient Worksheet

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ Nutrient Worksheet

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ Nutrient Worksheet √

Page 12 See also: NRCS-633, Table 4, page 13 Example The dairy farmer decides to base his application rate on the nitrogen need of the corn crop. Field B1 needs 154 lb/ac of PAN (from E: Additional Nutrients Needed) and the manure has a value of 9.75 lb/1000 gal or lb/gal. PAN Application Rate = 154 lb/ac / lb/gal = 15,794 gal/ac If he chose to use P 2 O 5 : 40 lb/ac / lb/gal = 2,700 gal/ac If he chose to use K 2 O: 65 lb/ac / lb/gal = 3,421 gal/ac

Determining Application Rate “P” Soil Test LevelApplication Criteria Bray-Kurtz P1 < 80 Lbs/Ac LOW POTENTIALN rate or P 2 O 5. Bray-Kurtz P1 80 – 200 Lbs/Ac MODERATE POTENTAL N rate or P 2 O 5 removal for rotation, whichever is less. Bray-Kurtz P Lbs/Ac HIGH POTENTIAL N rate or P 2 O 5 removal for rotation, whichever is less PLUS additional setback criteria from drainageway/water source/concentrated flow areas and/or other environmentally sensitive areas. Bray-Kurtz P1 > 300 Lbs/Ac VERY HIGH POTENTIALNo additional P 2 O 5 – Use P 2 O 5 Draw-down Strategies

Manure Nutrients

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ √ Nutrient Worksheet √

Manure Nutrients Applied Page 13 Example Manure Nutrient Values for field B1 are lb/1000 gal of PAN, 15 lb/1000 gal P 2 O 5, and 19 lb/1000 of K 2 O. Dividing these by 1000 to achieve lb/gal or a PAN of lb/gal, P 2 O 5 of lb/gal, and K 2 O of lb/gal. The application rate calculated previously is 15,794 gal/ac but 13,000 gal/ac was applied. PAN: lb/gal x 13,000 gal/ac = 127 lb/ac P 2 O 5 :0.015 lb/gal x 13,000 gal/ac = 195 lb/ac K 2 O:0.019 lb/gal x 13,000 gal/ac = 247 lb/ac

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ √ Nutrient Worksheet √

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ √ Nutrient Worksheet √ √

Additional Nutrients Page 13 PSNT: Pre Side-dress Nitrogen Test Applicable for fields with history of manure application Designed to capture ON cycling Sample just prior to side-dress N application Indicator of NO 3 -N + NH 4 -N available 30 ppm sufficient PAN, low probability of yield response with additional N 0 – 30 ppm, higher probability of yield response with additional N

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ √ Nutrient Worksheet √ √ √

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ √ Nutrient Worksheet √ √ √ √

Page 14

Nutrient Carry-over Apply based on N needs of crop when applicable and P for rotation. 2.6 year carry-over means the need for more P is not likely for 2-3 years, but dependant upon crop rotation and soil test level.

E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs , ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application 6065 Additional Nutrients Needed √ √ √ Nutrient Worksheet √ √ √ √ √

K Spreadable Acreage (field sketch on back) L Value of Excess Nutrients Applied 28.9 ac. $11, M Manure Storage Management Volume Applied =Volume Remaining = 375,700 gal 597,390 gal

Backside of worksheet

Common Set-backs Page 15

Nutrient Worksheet √ K Spreadable Acreage (field sketch on back) L Value of Excess Nutrients Applied 28.9 ac. $11, M Manure Storage Management Volume Applied =Volume Remaining = 375,700 gal 597,390 gal

Page 18 Fertilizer value used June ‘09: Urea = $420/ton = $0.46/lb N DAP $500/ton = $0.37/lb P2O5 Potash $770/ton = $0.65/lb K2O $1,657 $3,419 $5,076

Nutrient Worksheet √ √ $5,076 K Spreadable Acreage (field sketch on back) L Value of Excess Nutrients Applied 28.9 ac. $11, M Manure Storage Management Volume Applied =Volume Remaining = 375,700 gal 597,390 gal

Page 19

Page 20

Manure Production Dry Cows Heifers 973, ,280 gal ,760 gal Does not include bedding or other additions to storage

Total Nutrients Available 973,090 gallons available  = $21,782 (PAN, P 2 O 5, K 2 O) Total PAN = * 9.75 = 9,488 lb  9,488 / 160 = 60 ac  9,488 * $0.46/lb = $4,365 Total P 2 O 5 = * 15 = 14,596 lb  14,596 / 60 = 243 ac  14,596 * $0.37/lb =$5,400 Total K 2 O = * 19 = 18,489 lb  18,489/ 65 = 285 ac  18,489 *$0.65 = $12,018

Manure Application Records Field record book  Emergency contact information  Spill response information  Equipment information  Detailed ‘day-of-application’ information  Winter application guidelines

Break  Pick up pencil + calculator

Corn Silage Example Change planned crop to Corn Silage (26 T/ac) following Grain Corn (160 bu/ac) Application (April-June) with direct inject/incorporate.

Corn Silage use 1T/ac = 6 bu/ac; 160 bu/ac = 26.6 T/ac silage Page 6

Corn Silage (26 T/ac) Yield Potential– tons/acre Soil Test ppm (lb/ac)lb P 2 O 5 per acre 5 (10) (20) (30-60) (70) (80)00000 Page 8

Corn Silage (26 T/ac) Table 16: Corn Silage K 2 O Recommendations at CEC level 20 meq/100g Yield Potential– tons/acre Soil test K ppm (lb/ac)lb K 2 O per acre 50 (100) (150) (200) (250) (290) (330) (350) Values in parentheses are lb/ac. 2 Maintenance recommendations are given for this soils test range. Page 10

Time of Year page 5

Calculating PAN- Example Farm PAN worksheet top of page %33%12.75 April/June

Heritage Lane Dairy Dairy

, Heritage Lane Dairy E Manure Application Rate F G Manure Nutrients Applied I Crop Nutrient Balance* Additional Nutrients Applied H C Crop Nutrient Needs ton/ac gal/ac D Starter Fertilizer Applied J Years to Next Nutrient Application Additional Nutrients Needed

Manure Value Change What is the per acre change in manure nutrient value when the application period changes from Sept-Oct to April-June? Only PAN changed.  9.75 lb/1,000 gal (Sept-Oct)  12.8 lb/1,000 gal (April-June) 12.8 – 9.75 = 3.05 lb/1,000 gal Price of N = $0.65/unit of N  3.05 units * $0.65 = $1.98/1,000 gal  $ $25.77 / acre (9.5 – 13k gal/ac)

Summary Balanced nutrient inputs to match crop nutrient needs + soil resources(?)  Soil test is necessary for full utilization of nutrient inputs. Application of nutrients beyond crop needs and soil carrying capacity increases risk of nutrient moving off-site.  Economic loss ($$$)  When, where, how and how much are important questions to ask.

Summary Nutrient sampling/testing is necessary to “fine-tune” a nutrient management program.  Testing provides you a tool to make an “educated guess.” Nutrient management workbook used as a tool to:  Verify current nutrient management practices.  Identify more efficiently uses of on-farm nutrients.  others

Questions Amanda Meddles, Jon Rausch,