Alan Fox, Joe Francois, and Pilar Londoño-Kent Measuring Border Costs and their Impact on Trade Flows: The United States-Mexican Trucking Case.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Asian Drivers and Poor Countries: The Research Agenda Jörg Mayer UNCTAD China and India: Whats in it for Africa? Paris, March 2006.
Advertisements

Subsidies and the Environment An Overview of the State of Knowledge Gareth Porter OECD Workshop on Environmentally Harmful Subsidies November 7-8, 2002.
THE IMPLICATION OF ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR ACP GROUPS A GENERAL E QUILIBRIUM A NALYSIS Alemnesh Angelo Adamu August 5,2013.
EC 936 ECONOMIC POLICY MODELLING LECTURE 5: MODELS OF TRADE AND TRADE POLICY: CGE PERSPECTIVES ON TRADE LIBERALIZATION.
Chapter 4 Global Analysis
Understand the role of business in the global economy. 1.
Free Trade vs Fair Trade Winners and Losers. Why trade? Specialization and economies of scale in production lead to greater quantity of production in.
Understand the role of business in the global economy.
Trade Policy Exports stood at 38% of GDP in 2007 Foreign affiliates account for roughly 50% of manufacturing output and Canadians have significant investment.
NAFTA Economy Mark Kasoff Three things to know about NAFTA: 1. What it is and is not 2. Size of economy and trade 3. CDA-U.S. Trade.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Chapter 2 World Trade: An Overview.
The Impact of Syrian Trade Policies on Agricultural Trade Performance Basheer Hamwi.
+ NAFTA: North American Free Trade Agreement William Breeman.
Global Trade, Local Impacts, Who Benefits? Who Pays? Jim McGrath Port of Oakland.
Chapter 18: International Trade. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Trade Facts Principal.
CANADA-UNITED STATES LAW INSTITUTE ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2008 THE WORLD’S LONGEST UNDEFENDED BORDER: GATEWAY OR CHECKPOINT? Paul Vandevert International Trade.
Country Report on Presented by: Mr. Thol Nara
Shale gas boom, trade, and environmental policies: Global economic and environmental analyses in a multidisciplinary modeling framework Farzad Taheripour,
THE BORDER AND THE ONTARIO ECONOMY Bill Anderson Ontario Research Chair in Cross-Border Transportation Policy, University of Windsor.
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 World Trade: An Overview.
11th FIW Workshop, 8th of April 2010, Vienna AUSTRIA 2020 The impact of medium-term global trends on the Austrian economy E. Christie, J.
Lecture 8 WORLD TRADING PATTERNS. International trade is exchange of capital, goods and services across international borders or territories. In most.
Barriers and Obstacles. Introduction to Barriers  While doing business internationally may result in higher profits, there are often difficulties or.
Chapter 2 World Trade: An Overview Yanan University Finance and Economics Dep. Aihong Qin.
1 China’s WTO Accession: Some Lessons for Vietnam Will Martin World Bank 3 June 2003.
NAFTA By Bianca Conway and Andy Heckman. What is NAFTA?  NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement  On Dec. 17, 1992, President Bush, Mexican.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment Ukraine: Trade and Human Development Igor Burakovsky, Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting (Ukraine) 14.
Economic Impacts of the KORUS-FTA Progressive Caucus Briefing Robert E. Scott, Ph.D. Economic Policy Institute February 23, 2011.
Economic Union$ Geography WG.9d O’Leary- Riverbend High School.
The World Market Place: BUSINESS WITHOUT BORDERS.
Chapter 17 International Trade. Why Do Nations Trade? There is an unequal distribution of resources There is an unequal distribution of resources High.
International Organizations Multi-national groups intended create for an economic purpose.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 An Introduction to International Trade.
John Panzer World Bank February 2007 Global Economic Prospects, 2007 Managing the Next Wave of Globalization in North Africa.
An Introduction to International Economics
Estimating Economic Impacts of Border Wait Times in the San Diego-Baja California Region February 24, 2006.
Competing with Giants: Who Wins, Who Loses? Betina Dimaranan, Elena Ianchovichina, and Will Martin National University of Singapore 15 September 2006.
Are free trade agreements harmful to the U.S economy?
International Economics Developing Countries Organizations of International Economy.
 Background Information  Disadvantages of NAFTA  Advantages of NAFTA  Trouble in Juarez  Conclusion.
Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group, October 28, 2010 The Canada-US Trade and Investment Relationship.
Objective 1.03 Understand business in the global marketplace. 1.
North American Free Trade Agreement
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
International Trade. International economics as a field of study in economics; one may ask: What makes economic relations among nation states different.
The Economy and Culture Globalization. Economic Policies ProtectionismFree trade Goal: to protect national production from outside competition. Some measures:
Measuring the Benefits of Improved Market Access Irina Orlova CASE Ukraine January 2008.
PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS LECTURE 11 ECONOMICS OF PROTECTIONISM.
Defining North American Economic Integration Raymond Robertson Macalester College St. Paul, MN.
Pedal Power Goes Global
Impact of the Western Hemisphere’s free trade agreements on the foreign sector and the sustainability of the debt José Luis Machinea 15 August 2003 Departament.
Mexico Section 2 Political Economy and Development
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
Ashley Haskell INTB  Population Million ◦ 4% living under poverty level  Per Capita Income- $15,782  GDP growth rate- 3.9%  Inflation.
Xinshen Diao, Agapi Somwaru and Terry Roe The objective was to provide the “ big picture ” A Global Analysis Of Agricultural Reform In WTO Member Countries.
Profile of the Mexican Economy Key Macro Data Latest annual GDP Growth (%) 2.6% GDP or GNI per capita (US $, PPP) $18k Inflation (%)2.7% Unemployment rate.
ECONOMIC INTEGRATION. Introduction: Economic integration around the world has been one of the most significant trends since world war two. The creation.
Trouble in Juarez BY Chris Maleki Jason Swope.  NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, was signed by the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Intra- and Extra-regional Effects of Plurilateral FTAs in Asia
Getting the most out of a services agreement with the USA
Preferential Trade Arrangements
North American Free Trade Agreement
Globalization.
International Economics and Trade
The Global Markets Continued...
International Monetary Fund April 2019 Sub-Saharan Africa
Presentation transcript:

Alan Fox, Joe Francois, and Pilar Londoño-Kent Measuring Border Costs and their Impact on Trade Flows: The United States-Mexican Trucking Case

Presentation Outline The Problem Objectives –Inefficiencies in the Border-Crossing Processes –Presentation of their Implication on the Trade Flows and the Economic Welfare of the countries Conclusion

The Problem Border crossing: theoretical efficiency vs. institutional barriers The context: –World’s longest border between highly industrialized/developing economies –Language, culture, and history NAFTA: –Expands trade –Eliminates tariff barriers, and minimizes non-tariff barriers –Rules guaranteeing the permanent access of domestic products –Recognizes and encourages the large and growing trade

Mexico-U.S. Trade (billions of U.S. dollars) Year of NAFTA Agreement

NAFTA Scenario: Crossing the Border South-Bound Trucking the main mode of transportation between U.S. and Mexico

Current Situation Scenario: Crossing the Border South-Bound

Objectives Identify inefficiencies in the border- crossing process Quantify inefficiencies in terms of time and cost Present their implication on the trade flows and the economic welfare of the countries

Impediments to Free Trade Agreements: The United States-Mexican Trucking Case Significant time and cost inefficiencies in border crossing processes at Laredo, the main border crossing Generates costs in the form of congestion, pollution and lengthy delays Favors specific economic interests by the revenue it generates Creates local employment and economic activity The sources: legal and institutional barriers that impede NAFTA’s assumed seamless border

Border Crossing Logistics, Cost and Time Methodology: interview shippers, truckers, ITDS members, transport consultants; verify by examining invoices, observing times and movements, and calculating data from maps, traffic engineering, etc. The next figure shows times and variable transportation cost for the Laredo crossing southbound by truck; excludes costs such as pedimento, duties, taxes and broker’s commissions, costs regardless the mode of transportation

Crossing the Border South-Bound Southbound costs total between $287 - $636 per truckload It typically takes from 2-5 days to cross the border

Crossing the Border North-Bound Northbound costs total between $150 - $300 per truckload It typically takes only a few hours to cross the border

Macroeconomic Effect of Border Crossing Inefficiencies Review of literature on border effects GTAP model appropriate framework for analysis Micro effect of Laredo border inefficiencies apparently minimal: 1-2 percent money to brokers Time is a more important variable: Hummels estimates that each day saved in shipping is worth 0.8% ad valorem for manufactured goods. 2-5 days are equivalent to 1.6% - 4%

Simulating Removal of Trade Frictions Use GTAP version 6 to measure welfare and trade impacts Two types of shock –Tariff reduction (- Δ tms, - Δtxs) Southbound brokerage cost treated as import tariff Northbound brokerage cost treated as export tariff –Productivity increase (+ Δ ams) Proxies for removal of iceberg tariff

Model Aggregation Table 1: Model Regions and Sectors RegionsSectors MexicoFood and Agriculture* United StatesCoal, Oil and Gas CanadaOther Primary Production* European UnionMotor Vehicles and Parts* Rest of WorldPetroleum, Coal Products Minerals and Metals Electronic Equipment* Other Manufacturing* Transport, NEC Sea and Air Transport Services and Activities, NES *Sectors included in set T, commodities predominantly shipped by truck.

Experiment Structure Table 2: Experiment Structure Variable shocked* BarrierSouthboundNorthbound Lost time∆ ams(T, US, Mex) = +3%∆ ams(T, Mex, US) = +0.25% Brokerage frictions∆ tms(T, US, Mex) = -2%∆ txs(T, Mex, US) = -0.75% *T is the set of commodities shipped predominantly by truck. See Table 1.

Welfare Impact Table 3: Welfare Impact of Friction Removal (millions of 1997 dollars) RegionAllocative Technical ChangeTerms of Trade Investment and SavingsTotal Mexico USA Canada EU Rest of World Total

Impact on Trade Flows Sector Mexican imports from U.S.U.S. imports from Mexico Chg. (mill.)PercentChg. (mill.)Percent Food and Agriculture* Coal, Oil and Gas Other Primary Production* Motor Vehicles and Parts* Petroleum, Coal Products Minerals and Metals Electronic Equipment* Other Manufacturing* Transport, NEC Sea and Air Transport Services and Activities, NES Total (∆ viws) *Commodities predominantly shipped by truck and subject to liberalization.

Conclusions Reform could increase welfare: –For Mexico, $1.8 billion/year –For the United States, $1.4 billion/year Other benefits not quantified: –Reduction in pollution, congestion, and demand for new infrastructure at the border –Improved efficiency of capital equipment use –Improved integration of the two economies –Increase in security