Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Pre-flare Energy Storage The possible role of equilibrium current sheets Dana Longcope Montana State University Work supported.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPD June 16, 2003 Separators: Fault Lines in the Magnetic Field Dana Longcope Montana State University.
Advertisements

Free Magnetic Energy and Relative Helicity in Quiet Sun Regions and their role in Solar Dynamics Kostas Tziotziou IAASARS, National Observatory of Athens,
SOLAR FLARES Marina Rodríguez Baras 1. Solar activity Why do we study it? Close study of the internal processes of a star. Preventing the effects on the.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
Colorado Research Associates Division, NorthWest Research Associates Magnetic Charge Topology (MCT) Analysis of NOAA AR8210 Graham Barnes NWRA/CoRA K.D.
Multi-Wavelength Studies of Flare Activities with Solar-B ASAI Ayumi Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University Solar-B Science February 4, 2003.
Current sheets formation along magnetic separators in 3d Dana Longcope Montana State University Thanks: I Klapper, A.A. Van Ballegooijen NSF-ATM.
14 Feb 2006C4: Coronal Energy Inputs I. Mapping Free Energy in the Solar Atmosphere What can we learn from HMI & AIA? Brian Welsch, Space Sciences Lab,
Flare energy supply and magnetic field variations H. S. Hudson & B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley Trying to predict vector field changes during.
MSU Solar Physics REU Jennifer O’Hara Heating of Flare Loops With Observationally Constrained Heating Functions Advisors Jiong Qiu, Wenjuan Liu.
A Diachronic Topological Analysis of the 13th May 2005 Solar Flare William M.R. Simpson, Angela Des Jardins U NIVERSITY OF S T. A NDREWS, M ONTANA S TATE.
Ryan Payne Advisor: Dana Longcope. Solar Flares General  Solar flares are violent releases of matter and energy within active regions on the Sun.  Flares.
Evolution of Magnetic Helicity in the Corona During Flux Emergence Anna Malanushenko, Humed Yusuf, Dana Longcope.
Solar evidence for magnetic reconnection H. S. Hudson Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
Connections Between the Magnetic Carpet and the Unbalanced Corona: New Monte Carlo Models Steven R. Cranmer & Adriaan van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian.
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
One mask to group them all, One code to find them, One file to store them all, And in a structure bind them. William (Tolkien) Simpson m.
Solar-B Science MeetingKyoto, Nov. 9, 2005 Quantifying Reconnection* Dana Longcope, Dave McKenzie Jonathan Cirtain, Jason Scott Montana State University.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Aug 16, 2004 Coronal loops formed by separator reconnection: The birth & life of AR9574 Dana Longcope Montana State University.
Some Thoughts on Transients: Buildup & Release of Energy David E. McKenzie, Montana State University—Bozeman HMI/AIA Science Team MeetingMonterey, February.
Magnetic Helicity Generation Inside the Sun
Dec. 2, 2008 Bangalore, India Active region emergence and its effect on the solar corona Dana Longcope Montana State University, Bozeman, MT Isaac Klapper.
Flare-related current systems H. S. Hudson & B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Pre-flare Energy Storage Current sheets (YES) Reconnection (NO then YES) Dana Longcope Montana State University Work supported.
Observations of December 2006 events Yang Liu – Stanford University
Dec 9, 2005AGU Fall 2005, San Francisco Reconnection in the Solar Corona Probing the fundamental scales Dana Longcope Montana State University Work supported.
Modeling Magnetic Reconnection in a Complex Solar Corona Dana Longcope Montana State University & Institute for Theoretical Physics.
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
SOHO-15, Sept. 8, 2004 Heating from Reconnection Quantified Dana Longcope Montana State University.
Flare-related current systems H. S. Hudson & B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Data-Driven MHD Modeling of CME Events
Sept. 13, 2007 CORONAL HEATING (Space Climate School, Saariselka, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Helicity: where it comes from and what it tells us Dana Longcope, MSU Anna Malanushenko, MSU/LMSAL 8/11/10Canfield-fest Thanks: Graham Barnes, CoRA B.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
A topological view of 3D global magnetic field reversal in the solar corona Rhona Maclean Armagh Observatory 5 th December 2006.
Evolution of Flare Ribbons and Energy Release Rate Ayumi Asai 1,2, T. Yokoyama T. 3, M. Shimojo 2, S. Masuda 4, and K. Shibata 1 1:Kwasan and Hida Observatories,
SHINE 2009 Signatures of spatially extended reconnection in solar flares Lyndsay Fletcher University of Glasgow.
AGU Dec 2000 The Structure and Evolution of a Sigmoid Observed During Whole Sun Month 3 Lyndsay Fletcher Sarah Gibson, and the WSM3 sigmoid structure working.
Calculating Magnetic Energy in Active Regions Using Coronal Loops for AR and AR Presentation by, Joseph B. Jensen.
Practical Calculation of Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budgets in Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis Research Center for Astronomy.
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
Analysis Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares: the Importance of Spines and Separators Angela Des Jardins 1, Richard Canfield 1, Dana Longcope 1, Emily.
Evolution of Flare Ribbons and Energy Release Rate Ayumi ASAI 1, Takaaki YOKOYAMA 2, Masumi SHIMOJO 3, Satoshi MASUDA 4, and Kazunari SHIBATA 1 1:Kwasan.
Feb. 3-5, 20034th Solar-B science meeting1 Corona-Photosphere Connection with Spectropolarimeter Yukio Katsukawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
Determining the Heating Rate in Reconnection Formed Flare Loops Wenjuan Liu 1, Jiong Qiu 1, Dana W. Longcope 1, Amir Caspi 2, Courtney Peck 2, Jennifer.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University Explosive Phenomena in Magnetized Plasma – New Development.
SIMULATING SHOCKS IN SOLAR FLARES MATTHEW THORNTON SUPERVISOR: DANA LONGCOPE NASA/SDO/S. Wiessinger.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
A Topological Analysis of the Magnetic Breakout Model by Rhona Maclean University of St Andrews 10 th August 2004 Collaborators: Colin Beveridge, Dana.
1 Wei Liu, Tongjiang Wang, Brian Dennis, & Gordon Holman NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Evidence of Magnetic Reconnection & Existence of Current Sheet.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Evolution of Flare Ribbons and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI 1, Takaaki YOKOYAMA 2, Masumi SHIMOJO 3, Satoshi MASUDA 4, Hiroki KUROKAWA 1, and Kazunari SHIBATA.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR Yingna Su 1,2 Collaborators: A. A. Van Ballegooijen 1, E. E. Deluca 1, Leon Golub 1 P. Grigis 1, B. Lites 3,
Magnetic Topology of the 29 October 2003 X10 Flare
Evolution of Flare Ribbons and Energy Release
Observations of December 2006 events
Quantifying Reconnection*
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release
Modelling the Effect of Magnetic Field Variation on Solar Flares
Magnetic fields in ADs Magnetic “flux tube”.
Presentation transcript:

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Pre-flare Energy Storage The possible role of equilibrium current sheets Dana Longcope Montana State University Work supported by NASA NAG Thanks: Dave McKenzie Jonathan Cirtain Jason Scott

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE The Photospheric Field distribution of isolated distribution of isolated sources sources evolution over ~ days evolution over ~ days anchors coronal field anchors coronal field :51 UT :39 UT

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE The Coronal Field P07 P10 N09 N05 N01 P04 Total flux connecting P i  N j : y ij y 41 y 71 coronal connections y 49

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE The Coronal Field Potential Field: Potential Field: sources

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Quantifying Flux All flux connecting P07  N01 All flux connecting P07  N01 enclosed by 2 separatices enclosed by 2 separatices Intersect at separator Intersect at separator separator null

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Quantifying Flux close path separator All P07  N01 lines enclosed All P07  N01 lines enclosed All flux connecting P07  N01 All flux connecting P07  N01 enclosed by 2 separatices enclosed by 2 separatices Intersect at separator Intersect at separator

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Model of energy storage Unconstrained minimum: Flux y=y (v) linking poles 0 W pot W

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Model of energy storage Constrain Flux y & minimize energy… 0 W fce W pot W DWDWDWDW Flux Constrained Equilibrium (Longcope 2002) Potential iff Dy=y-y (v) =0

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Model of energy storage Lowest Energy w/ fixed y: Flux Constrained Equilibrium (Longcope 2002) Current-free Current-free except … except …

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Model of energy storage Flux Constrained Equilibrium (Longcope 2002) Current-free Current-free except … except … Current Sheet Current separator I ( Dy ) I ( Dy ) Mag. Energy Mag. Energy in excess of in excess of potential potential D W( Dy ) D W( Dy ) Lowest Energy w/ fixed y:

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Role(s) of Current Sheets 0 W fce W pot W DWDWDWDW Energy storage: D W accumulates prior to reconn’ burst Stored globally

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Steady Reconnection? = 4 months Sweet-Parker:

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Role(s) of Current Sheet Site of localized reconnection 2 X Mx of newly reconnected flux (1% of Dy )

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Role(s) of Current Sheet 2 X Mx of newly reconnected flux (1% of Dy ) Releases D E ~ I Dy ~ ergs

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Role(s) of Current Sheets 0 W fce W pot W DWDWDWDW Energy storage: D W accumulates prior to reconn’ burst: latency Rapidly released via local field via local E field

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Flux emergence AR9574 begins 7: AR9570 remains

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Stack plot of inter- connectingloops Evidence of reconn’n latency loops

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Evidence of reconn’n latency GOES 1-8 A loops EUV loop EUV emergence TRACE 171 A

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Evidence of reconn’n latency reconnection latency cooling emergence

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Evidence of reconn’n latency y (v) y from potential model from observed loops latency latency ~24 hrs flux transfer 3.5 hrs Dy = Mx d y /dt = 10 9 V

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Consequence of latency I = 1.3 x Amps D W FCE = 1.4 x ergs Dy = Mx

Dec. 10, 2004RHESSI/SOHO/TRACE Consequence of latency GOES 1-8 A GOES A Radiated power P ~ 5 x erg/sec Radiated energy10 31 ergs D W FCE = 10 31