1 Lexicon, experimental Oct 22, 2008. 2 Psycholinguistic ways of examining the lexicon/syntax Three things we will look at: a. Mental Lexicon b. Collocates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GAP Writing/Grammar Shinsuke Tsuchiya. Today’s outline Singular/Plural (Subject-serb agreement) Wh-questions (North-Star) Outline.
Advertisements

Syntactic Processing in Second Language Production
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Production: Models cont.
Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 12: BRANIGAN ET AL.: PRIMING.
Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Memory & media Hoorcollege - Using Media week 4.
Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context Snedeker and Trueswell (2003) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
Phonological Priming in Spontaneous Speech Production Katrina Housel H uman L anguage P rocessing L ab.
Sentences Using 220 Dolch Words and the Dolch Common Nouns.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 12: SNEDEKER ET AL.: PROSODY.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 8 Meaning and Grammar. A brief history In classical and traditional grammar not much distinction was made between grammar and.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 11 – Language Structure.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Mental representations II.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Representing language.
Knowing Semantic memory.
Language, Mind, and Brain by Ewa Dabrowska Chapter 2: Language processing: speed and flexibility.
CEP Remember? October 3, Matthew J. Koehler October 3, 2002CEP Cognition and Technology Whirlwind overview of Long-term Memory (Ashcraft.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Some basic linguistic theory part3.
Knowledge information that is gained and retained what someone has acquired and learned organized in some way into our memory.
Today  What is syntax?  Grammaticality  Ambiguity  Phrase structure Readings: 6.1 – 6.2.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Acquisition: Bilinugalism.
Intro to Psycholinguistics What its experiments are teaching us about language processing and production.
Generative Grammar(Part ii)
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 4 Psycholinguistics Experimental approaches to understanding language.
Syntactic representation. Last week Lexical access: Split between syntactic information (lemma) and phonological (word-form) information Two models: Levelt.
Machine Translation Dr. Radhika Mamidi. What is Machine Translation? A sub-field of computational linguistics It investigates the use of computer software.
Linguistics, Pragmatics & Natural Grammar
Experimental study of morphological priming: evidence from Russian verbal inflection Tatiana Svistunova Elizaveta Gazeeva Tatiana Chernigovskaya St. Petersburg.
Ways of relating or organizing events in the past – Using 4 Past Tenses in English 1.Past (Simple Past) 2.Past Progressive 3.Present Perfect 4.Past Perfect.
Assessment of Semantics
Fiction vs. Non- Fiction Practice. Would this tiger belong in a fiction or non-fiction book? N O N- F I C T I O N.
Syntax.
Dr. Monira Al-Mohizea MORPHOLOGY & SYNTAX WEEK 12.
Formal Properties of Language. Grammar Morphology Syntax Semantics.
SYNTAX 2 DAY 31 – NOV 08, 2013 Brain & Language LING NSCI Harry Howard Tulane University.
Introduction to Linguistics Ms. Suha Jawabreh Lecture 18.
Semantics The study of meaning in language. Semantics is…  The study of meaning in language.  It deals with the meaning of words (Lexical semantics)
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics A Crash Course in Linguistic Theory Part II.
LIN 1101 TOPIC 1. Major Sub-fields of Linguistics Phonetics: nature of speech sounds –How they are articulated (articulatory phonetics) –Their physical.
Grammars Grammars can get quite complex, but are essential. Syntax: the form of the text that is valid Semantics: the meaning of the form – Sometimes semantics.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
PSY270 Michaela Porubanova. Language  a system of communication using sounds or symbols that enables us to express our feelings, thoughts, ideas, and.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 11 – Language Structure June 2, 2003.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Comprehension: Semantic networks.
How Speakers' Eye Movements Reflect Spoken Language Generation Zenzi M. Griffin Department of Psychology Intro to Cognitive Science University of Texas.
Lexical and morphosyntactic minimal pairs. Evidence for different processing Luca Cilibrasi, Vesna Stojanovik, Patricia Riddell, School of Psychology,
Watch the powerpoints. What is the bird doing? The bird is flying.
SYNTAX.
Tip of the tongue state sematics. What do these words mean? ● Fecundity.
FREE-WORD COMBINATIONS Lecture # 11
Dolch Sight Words Nouns. apple baby back ball.
September 26, : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin.
Dolch Nouns To start. apple baby back ball bear.
Chapter 11 Language. Some Questions to Consider How do we understand individual words, and how are words combined to create sentences? How can we understand.
1 LIN 1300 What is language? Dr Marie-Claude Tremblay.
VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION. What is Word Recognition? Features, letters & word interactions Interactive Activation Model Lexical and Sublexical Approach.
Robert J. Hartsuiker Martin J. Pickering
Lexical representations in bilingualism: syntax and phonology
Cognitive Processes in SLL and Bilinguals:
Lecture – VIII Monojit Choudhury RS, CSE, IIT Kharagpur
SYNTAX.
Disorders of sentence processing in Aphasia
Psycholinguistics: the study of language processing
Syntax.
Verb Activation through Priming at the Syntax-Semantics Interface
عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
Presentation transcript:

1 Lexicon, experimental Oct 22, 2008

2 Psycholinguistic ways of examining the lexicon/syntax Three things we will look at: a. Mental Lexicon b. Collocates c. Influence of lexicon on sentence structure

3 1. Mental Lexicon How can we investigate the mental lexicon? Main question: how is the mental lexicon organized? How do we retrieve words?

4 a. aphasia T: Now then, what’s this a picture of? (showing a picture of an apple) P: Ra-ra-rabbit. T: No, not a rabbit... It’s a kind of fruit. P: Fruit T: What kind of fruit is it? P: Oh this is a lovely rabbit. T: Not a rabbit. It’s an apple. P: Apple, yes. T: Can you name any other pieces of fruit? What other kinds of fruit would you have in a dish with an apple. P: Beginning with an A? T: No, not necessarily. P: O well rhubarb. T: Perhaps, yes. P: Rhubarb. T: What’s this boy doing? (showing a picture of a boy swimming.) P: O he’s in the sea. T: yes. P: Driving... driving. It’s not very deep. He’s driving with his feet, his legs driving. Well, er driving er diving. T: In fact, he’s... P: Swimming. T: Good, what about this one? (showing a picture of a boy climbing over a wall). P: Driving on a wall. T: He’s what? P: Dr... driving, he’s climbing on a wall.

5 b. Semantic Verification Task 1. Is a robin a bird? 2. Is a bad a bird? 3. Is a goose a computer? 4. Is a horse a mammal? 5. Does a monkey have teeth? 6. Does a pickle have fingernails? 7. Does a bird have feet? 8. Is a cow a bird? 9. Is a tomato a vegetable? 10. Does a bird have wings? 5. Does an octopus run on batteries? 6. Is a horse a mammal? 7. Is robbery a crime? 8. Is murder a crime? 9. Is libel a crime? 10. Is a shark dangerous? 11. Is a cow dangerous? 12. Is a cat dangerous? 13. Did Abraham Lincoln have a beard? 14. Is corn a vegetable? Which were easy to reject? Which were more difficult?

6 b. Semantic Verification Task

7 2. Collocates What are some psycholinguistic ways to look at collocates? Psycholinguists usually take information from corpora and use it to create stimuli....

8 a. response times research question: Are collocates stored as a single unit in the mental lexicon? Sosa & McFarlane, 2002

9 a. response times Why are response times slower for high frequency words?

10 b. eye movements Research question: Do native and non-native speakers of English process collocates and non-collocates similarly? Looked at eye movement response times (and what they looked at for both native and non-native speakers AND at both collocates and non-collocates Findings: Both groups processed one faster than the other The freaky thing is that natives processed collocates faster... Non native speakers processed non-collocates faster Why? Gerard, 2008

11 3. Lexicon and sentence structure a. lexical priming b. syntactic priming main question: what aspects of the lexicon/syntax determines what sentence structure we use?

12 a. lexicon

13

14 What else we know... Animate objects chosen as subjects Humans chosen as subjects More frequent word chosen as subjects Phonological priming (especially rhyming) more likely to cause word to be chosen than semantic priming Age that word is learned determines which word is chosen as subject

15 The woman dialed 911 to report an emergency situation in her building.

16

17 The car’s windshield was struck by a brick.

18

19 One of the fans punched the referee.

20

21 Bock & Griffin (2000)

22 b. syntax  a: The ghost sold the werewolf a flower  a: The man gave the woman a box  b: The ghost sold a flower to the werewolf  b: The man gave a box to the woman  Bock (1986): syntactic persistance tested by picture naming

23 b. syntax  a: The werewolf baked a cake for the witch  b: The snowman brought a book to the boy  Bock (1989): global syntactic role matters, syntactic priming does not depend on lexical similarity  NPV NP PP  c: The snowman brought a book to study

24 b. syntax Manipulations of roles: The foreigner was loitering by the traffic light The boy is being woken by the alarm clock Manipulations of verb form: Same vs different tense (hands/handed) Same vs different number (hands/hand) Same vs different aspect (hands/is handing) Bock & Loebell (1990)

25 b. syntax Bock & Griffin (2000) How long does syntax priming last? Bock & Griffin (2000) used same stimuli but varied the amount of time between stimuli and showing Picture from 0 to 2 sentences

26 b. syntax Bock & Griffin (2000 How long does syntax priming last?

27 Even longer...

28 b. syntax In real life, syntactic priming seems to occur as well Branigan, Pickering, & Cleland (2000): Speakers tend to reuse syntactic constructions of other speakers Potter & Lombardi (1998): Speakers tend to reuse syntactic constructions of just read materials It may be a feature that helps us to learn language.... Researchers are now using priming to teach second languages