TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Thredbo 9 9 th International Conference on Competition and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobility in Cities Database
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
SCATTER final seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2004 SCATTER Testing and evaluating potential solutions to control urban sprawl, through simulation.
SCATTER WORKSHOP, Brussels, November 9th 2004 KARI LAUTSO / LT CONSULTANTS SCATTER SPRAWLING CITIES AND TRANSPORT: FROM EVALUATION TO RECOMMENDATIONS Lic.
SCATTER WORKSHOP Virpi Pastinen/LT Consultants SCATTER SPRAWLING CITIES AND TRANSPORT: FROM EVALUATION TO RECOMMENDATIONS SCATTER WORKSHOP MILAN.
Public Transport’s Contribution to Sustainable Development.
Welcome to CIVITAS. What is CIVITAS ? 3 72% of Europe’s citizens live in cities.
TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTER – ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Thredbo 9 Lisbon, Portugal 5-9 September 2005 Performance.
Mobility in Munich Tasks & Challenges Third AENEAS Training Workshop March 4th 2010 Florian Paul Munich Transit Ltd. (MVG) Strategy and Planning.
TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTER UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID COST WATCH "Changing behaviour towards a more sustainable transport system" 355 “FREIGHT.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Welcome to CIVITAS.
Introduction to CIVITAS‘ Definition of “Collective Passenger Transport“ and a Snapshot of its Results 13 September 2011 Brussels, Belgium Siegfried Rupprecht,
Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities 13 September 2011 Brussels, Belgium Anne Vicenzotti, Nantes Métropole.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Ljubljana Urban Region Development Agency meeting with Delegation of Germany - Berlin 31 May 2005 Ljubljana Mr. Miloš Bajt Adviser, City of Ljubljana,
CRUISE TOURISM, REGENERATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: THE NEED FOR ACCESSIBILITY John McCarthy Heriot-Watt University Scotland, UK.
1 Integration as a competitiveness instrument for Public Transport in rural areas Helder Cristóvão, José M Viegas Integration as a Competitiveness Instrument.
Increasing the Quality of Public Transport in Prague Prague Integrated Transport.
The effects of major toll-road financed investments in private and public transport infrastructure on public transport – the “Oslo package” Thredbo conference.
Interchange in Public Transport Tredbo 9. Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Transport. Cecília Silva 1/ 10 6 September 2005 Interchange in.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
CITTA 5 TH Annual Conference on Planning Research Planning and Ageing Think, Act and Share Age-Friendly Cities CiViTAS-ELAN Project Development, Implementation,
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Reforming transit Why smaller public transport subsidy is better Francesco Ramella, Ph.D. June 24-26, 2005 Bloomington, Minnesota.
Managing Director/CEO
CREATING THE CASE FOR MORE TRAVEL CHOICES John Bartels, City of Port Phillip and Ainsley Nigro, GHD Cost Benefit Analysis for Implementing Separated Bike.
Workshop on Infrastructures Sustainable Infrastructure for Efficient Mobility: the Key Challenges Luc Bourdeau ECTP Secretary General Industrial Technologies.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
London Transport Policy, Planning and Strategies Towards clean and sustainable transport By Lucy Hayward-Speight, TfL Principal Policy Advisor.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
The Clapham Omnibus is Full………….. Challenges to our Transport System Neil Ridley Chief Business Development Officer.
Rail and the West Midlands Economy EMTA Conference Birmingham, 11/11/11 Peter Sargant Head of Rail Development, Centro.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
TRANSPORT INNOVATION FUND Stephen McFarlane Regional & Local Transport Delivery - DfT.
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
Regional Centre Transport Vision 2013 Presentation to Salford City Council Members - 19 August 2008.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
EU Transport Policy Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest, June Wioletta Szymanska Project Manager.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SKOPJE: NEW APROACH FOR BETTER QUALITY OF SERVICE
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
CIVITAS PLUS Skopje sustainable transport measures MIRJANA APOSTOLOVA, City of Skopje Skopje, 17 September 2012.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
REDUCING THE NEED TO TRAVEL David Banister The Bartlett School of Planning University College London Mobile Network Seminar – 16 th May 2003.
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas FISCHER Almada, 26 th March 2009 Parking Policy Graz.
Mobility energy use for different residential urban patterns in India Anil Kashyap, Jim Berry, Stanley McGreal, School of the Built Environment.
Oscar Figueroa P. Universidad Católica de Chile Reducing the Impact of Vehicles on Air and Environment Quality in Cities ISSUES AND ACHIEVEMENTS ON TRANSPORTATION.
Impacts Europe Impacts of planning instruments on suburbanisation and modal split in the Vienna Region Angelika WINKLERMunicipal Department 18.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
Parking Policy - Sustainable Development, Vibrant Cities Gerry Murphy 12 September 2013.
3rd Forum for Sustainable Mobility and Metropolitan Development
Urban Sprawl Government notices problems in the 1980s –Urban sprawl –Car ownership rising (1960: 113/ : 422/1000) –Little housing for low income.
, ValenciaTamás Dombi, ZTM Warsaw1 Strategy on Sustainable Development of the Warsaw Transport System Tamás Dombi, ZTM Warsaw.
International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus Georgia: Areas in the vicinity of Tbilisi airport Ministry of Economy and Sustainable.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl Inter-city comparison.
The developments in Milan’s sustainable transport initiatives to reduce air and noise pollution Maria Berrini - CEO, Milan Mobility Environment and Territory.
CIVITAS PLUS Testing Innovative Strategies for Clean Urban Transport, examples from Skopje, MIRJANA APOSTOLOVA, City of Skopje Regional Public Transport.
Road user charge, City of Zagreb Marko Slavulj Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities, Athens, 24 April 2012.
Janos MONIGL director of TRANSMAN Ltd 1968 TU Dresden – M.Sc.traffic engineer 1974 TU Budapest – M.Sc.engineer economist 1976 Hungarian Academy of Science.
Athens, Conference Hall, Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks, 5&6 November 2015 ALTERNATIVE-COLLECTIVE PATTERNS OF OWNERSHIP AND USE OF.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Urban Institute Ireland/University College Dublin School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland Eda Ustaoglu.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Manchester Airport -sustainable development plan – Surface access
Members’ Workshop Wednesday 17th April 2019 Woodhill House Aberdeen
Geospatial data for cities and FUAs: state of play and opportunities
Presentation transcript:

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Thredbo 9 9 th International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport Lisbon, Portugal 5 – 9 September 2005 RAIL URBAN PROJECTS: A WAY FOR IMPROVING PUBLIC TRANSPORT PATRONAGE Dr. Rocío CascajoProf. Andrés Monzón Conference theme A: Design and Innovation of Competitive Public Transport to foster Patronage

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Increase of motorised mobility Introduction City centre’s liveable conditions deteriorated Cycle of urban decline  unsustainable transport schemes Congestion in urban areas

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Introduction: The cycle of urban decline Users choose to travel by car More cars create more traffic More traffic jams More air pollution, noise, accidents Life in urban districts becomes less pleasant Residents leave urban areas and scatter Access to urban business districts become more difficult Jobs move out of urban areas to outer suburbs Reduced speed, efficiency and benefits of ground PT Decline in the use of PT Less PT supply

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Introduction Balance between economic, social and environmental issues  Minimise negative impacts produced by transport Improve PT patronage Towards a sustainable urban transport

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Rail urban projects Sustainable mobility + urban population growth  great development of trams, metros and light rail systems overall the world Tram and light rail systems in Europe (ERRAC, 2004) SystemsLinesTrack length (km) EU (59%) New Member States (28%) Beyond EU (13%) Total Metro systems in Europe (ERRAC, 2004) SystemsLinesTrack length (km) EU (88%) New Member States3793 (4%) Beyond EU (8%) Total

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Case studies (I) CityLYONMADMANSTUT&WVALVI ProjectMetro Metro / Tram S-Bahn Metro / S- Bahn TramMetro Areas concerned City city and suburbs city Length (Km.) % new project/ total network 54.5%4.1%84.7%14.5%94.1%7.3%13.3% Total investment (M€ 2002) Investment/Km. (M€/Km.) Operation since METRO TRAM/ LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM S-BAHN (Suburban Rail) Lyon Madrid Vienna Stuttgart Tyne&Wear Manchester Valencia

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Line of project studied Principal main line station 5 Km. distance Other lines of network Central area = Z1 Case studies (II)

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID LINE D (driverless): Construction phase: 1984 – 1992 In operation since: 1992 Main effects: Some transfer form PV to the metro High level of mobility and accessibility Integrated network Changes in land uses by zones Bus network reorganisation Case studies: LYON

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Metro line 6, from Ciudad Universitaria to Laguna; 6 stations, 7 km, in operation since 1995 Main effects: Improvement of intermodality Redistribute effect Demand increase Improvement in the network connectivity Case studies: MADRID

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID METROLINK (phase 1): In operation since: 1992 Main effects: aumento de la oferta y la competitividad del TP: servicio fiable, con alta frecuencia, eficiente, mejorando el acceso al centro de la ciudad Improvement in the image of the city Case studies: MANCHESTER

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Extension of the S-Bahn line S1; 16 Km. length and 6 new stations. In operation since: 1992 Main effects: Less congestion in road network Improvement in the PT supply, PT competitiveness increase, rise in the users demand Travel time savings and improvement in accessibility Development of residential and industrial areas Case studies: STUTTGART

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Construction of the metro network until 1991, total length 55.5 Km. In operation since: 1980 (1 st phase), 1984 (2nd phase) and 1991 (airport extension) Main effects: Increase in PT trips Decrease of radial trips in private vehicle Reduction in the average travel time in the PT network Improvement in the accessibility to urban centres Case studies: TYNE & WEAR

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Effects: Increase in the users demand network effect: increase in the metro network connectivity Improvement in the urban quality Improvement of the public transport image Tram line 4, 9.7 km, in operation since Case studies: VALENCIA

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Central stretch of the metro line U3, 14 stations and 8.2 Km. In operation since Effects: Some tram lines were removed Pedestranisation of some streets Urban regeneration along the line Increase in the number of trips in the corridor Modal shift in favour of PT Improvement of the accessibility Case studies: VIENNA

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Improvements of PT patronage: Impact assessment Based on the methodology adopted in TranSEcon (5FP-EU). The impact of the project corresponds to the relative variation of the value of the indicator for scenario with project (WS) and its value for the reference scenario (RS).

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Indicators for measuring benefits 2 groups of indicators: i.mobility and trip behaviour: quantify the effect of the project on transport demand -Number of PT trips per day and O-D -Number of private transport trips per day and O-D -PT passenger-km per day and O-D -Private transport passenger-km per day and O-D ii.time savings: measure the impact of the new project on time savings -Average trip travel time on the PT network, in minutes -Average trip travel time on the road network, in minutes

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Results: mobility and trip behaviour Mobility and trip behaviour indicators LYONMADMANSTUT&WVALVI PT trips5,52%0,09%8,06%25,48%41,37%3,03%7,20% Car trips-4,71%-3,00%-0,84%-6,22%-4,17%-1,00%-7,05% Passenger-Km. in PT5,32%1,08%4,08%35,99%30,24%41,51%46,82% Passenger-Km. in cars-4,73%0,00%-0,56%-10,36%-4,15%-1,00%-7,28%

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Results: mobility and trip behaviour  Lyon: uniform improvement of the mobility and trip behaviour indicators, around a 5% between scenarios. Increase in PT trips and the number of passenger-Km. in PT network, whereas trips in private vehicle and the number of vehicle-km decrease.  Madrid: small increase of trips and passenger-km in PT (less than in Lyon), and decrease of trips in private vehicle by 3%.  Manchester: increase in the use of PT (4% growth in PT trips and 8% increase in passenger-km in PT). Insignificant reduction in the use of private vehicle (less than 1%).  Stuttgart: improvements on PT patronage in the new line corridor: 25% trips and 36% pax-km

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Results: mobility and trip behaviour  Tyne and Wear: highest increase in PT trips (around 40%): new metro network. Clear reduction in the use of private vehicle.  Valencia: 40% increase in PT passenger-km due to the connectivity with the metro network  Vienna: 47% increase in PT passenger-km and also the highest reduction in the number of trips in private vehicle  the construction of the metro line U3 and its accompanying measures have produced the most important enhancements in terms of mobility and trip behaviour, thus improving the public transport patronage.

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Results: time savings Time savings indicatorsLYONMADMANSTUT&WVALVI Average travel time on PT network -4,55%-1,95%-0,33%-28,25%-24,10%-14,81%-22,29% Average travel time on road network 0,00%-2,78%-0,34%-1,86%0,00%-3,33%-15,65%

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Results: time savings  Global reduction of travel time thanks to the implementation of the urban rail projects in all the case studies.  The highest time savings in public transports services correspond to Stuttgart, whereas Vienna presents the maximum time savings in the road network. It means that the improvement in public transport patronage is also beneficial for car users.

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Key factors in the success of urban rail systems Introduction of integrated ticketing in the PT system (Lyon, Madrid, Valencia) Construction of Park and Ride facilities (Manchester, Tyne&Wear and Vienna) Restriction of car parking in city centres (Lyon, Madrid, Stuttgart, Tyne&Wear and Vienna) Modern image offered by the new generation of light rail systems contribute to an urban regeneration (Valencia, Vienna) Pedestrianisation of streets (Vienna)

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Conclusions (I)  Some management policies (frequent services, integrated ticketing, and security) and some transport policies (PT integration, provision of Park & Ride facilities and car parking restrictions) are very important in order to increase the patronage of public transport.  Rail transport systems have great potential to improve modal split in urban areas, and they produce long term effects on mobility patterns improving sustainability standards.  Tram and metro projects should be integrated in urban transport policy packages: synergy effects on the whole city

TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE - ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Conclusions (II)  The success of urban rail systems is influenced by many factors and policy measures  the integration of transport policies with urban, socio-economic and environmental policies benefits more than isolated policies  New trams can induce urban regeneration processes with mobilisation of economic resources  improvement of commercial activities and the quality of life in the area