1 Background: Use of TKR Trigger One-Shots individual TKR strip channels “true” when analog shaped pulse is above threshold. strips in a plane are OR’d.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.
Advertisements

1 COMM 301: Empirical Research in Communication Lecture 15 – Hypothesis Testing Kwan M Lee.
Digital Logic Design Lecture # 17 University of Tehran.
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 L1 Configuration and Future Prospects DCZ cuts and new GLT objects L1 rate diagnosis Can an improved.
Alex Moiseev, 02/01/021 ACD VETO SIGNALS AND EFFICIENCY With the recent changes, the following ACD VETO signals will be generated: AEM VETO HIT MAP, created.
GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 1 Proposed Flight Trigger Configuration: Engines and Scheduler Table J.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
1Daya Bay RPC HV FDR 6/17/2008 RPC HV cable pick-up noise issue C. Lu, Princeton University (6/17/2008)
S. Ritz 1 Hardware Trigger Throttle Issues Context: the triggers Purpose of throttle on TKR trigger Earlier design using TKR geographic information The.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 3, 2007.
GLAST LAT Project Apr 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/31 Overview of End to End Runs Eduardo do Couto e Silva April 1, 2005 ( not it is not a joke, we finally.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Workshop, February 27, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview Of LAT Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
GLAST LAT ProjectTrigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates 6 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC Trigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
Hardware Failure Impacts Exercises S. Ritz. Issues Recent results from design reliability analysis (system engineering, Thurston et al.) Probabilities.
GLAST LAT Project LAT Instrument Analysis Meeting – May 26, 2006 Hiro Tajima, TKR Efficiency Trending 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Efficiency Trending.
GLAST LAT Readout Electronics Marcus ZieglerIEEE SCIPP The Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics of the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus.
SVAC Instrument Analysis Meeting Aug 5, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva and Anders W. Borgland 1/7 SVAC 8 tower testing+ACD Anders and Eduardo.
GLAST LAT ProjectGLAST Flight Software IDT, October 16, 2001 JJRussell1 October 16, 2001 What’s Covered Activity –Monitoring FSW defines this as activity.
GLAST LAT Readout Electronics Marcus ZieglerIEEE SCIPP The Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics of the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus.
Onboard Filter Update Performance after updated cuts David Wren 26 January 2004.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
IA meeting, Feb. 3, 2006 Mutsumi Sugizaki TKR Noise Stdudy 1 LAT TKR Noise Study Current Status Mutusmi Sugizaki (and short comment about TOT=255 event)
SVACInstrument Analysis Meeting, September 23, 2005 Anders W. Borgland 1 GEM Discarded Events Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis and Calibrations.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning meeting October 4, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/13 SVAC Data Taking during LAT SLAC Oct 4, 2004 Eduardo.
Patrick Spradlin, SCIPP trip to LLU, May 2, 2001 Detector Characteristics.
1 ACD studies: 1. Light Yield Determination for top ACD Tiles 2. Looking for holes (screws) in the ACD data Instrument Analysis Workshop VI Luis C. Reyes.
SVACInstrument Analysis Workshop IV Quatorze Juillet, 2005 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview of Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.
10/21/2005 Inst Ana Meeting TKR Noise Flares1 TKR Noise Flares observed in TKR #11 and #8 Mutsumi Sugizaki, Hiro Tajima, and TKR team.
EET 1131 Unit 13 Multivibrators and the 555 Timer
Sequential Circuit  It is a type of logic circuit whose output depends not only on the present value of its input signals but on the past history of its.
Sep/26/05Trigger test plan Trigger ACD/LAT Test Plan Eric Grove, Martin Kocian, Su Dong.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
ENEE 440 Chapter Timer 8254 Register Select The 8254 timer is actually 3 timers in one. It is an upgraded version of the 8253 timer which was.
Rabie A. Ramadan Lecture 3
PHY 202 (Blum)1 Analog-to-Digital Converter and Multi-vibrators.
PHY 202 (Blum)1 Analog-to-Digital Converter and Multi-vibrators.
PLC Counters. Introduction We use timers to measure the elapsed time between two events. With retentive timers the “run” signal can be turned on and off.
The SuperCDMS-SNOLAB Trigger System Report of the Trigger Task Force Scott Oser (co-chair), Dave Toback (co-chair), Dan Bauer, Anders Borgland, Ray Bunker,
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
SL1Calo Input Signal-Handling Requirements Joint Calorimeter – L1 Trigger Workshop November 2008 Norman Gee.
1 BFEM Trigger Diagnostics Mar 12, 2002 Tsunefumi Mizuno Note: For reference, this document includes some works already reported (pages 2-5 and 7). The.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations (Quantitative) What physics is possible in Run-13 assuming some (prototype) sectors are there? Relates to how long would.
Trigger Anomaly in BFEM? February 13, 2002 Tsunefumi Mizuno and Tune Kamae.
21 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of Imperial tasks Paul Dauncey.
ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR28 July 2004 Resonant Triggers - Matt Warren1 Physics & Astronomy HEP Electronics Matthew Warren John Lane, Martin Postranecky.
1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October,
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
The SuperCDMS-SNOLAB Trigger System Report of the Trigger Task Force Scott Oser (co-chair), Dave Toback (co-chair), Dan Bauer, Anders Borgland, Ray Bunker,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
1 Study of Data from the GLAST Balloon Prototype Based on a Geant4 Simulator Tsunefumi Mizuno February 22, Geant4 Work Shop The GLAST Satellite.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning Dec 7, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/27 Trigger and SVAC Tests During LAT integration Su Dong, Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
Acd Veto Latching The Acd front end electronics generate a veto primitive when a discriminator goes above threshold. But. The signal is split: One path.
Background Rejection Prep Work
Mini-Tower test results
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Downlink rates The next slide was presented to Jonathans’ flux review
LAT Test Results GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review
Overview Goal Study GEM variables in SVAC ntuple
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Eduardo do Couto e Silva Feb 28, 2006
Studies of the Time over Threshold
Shaped Digital Readout Noise in CAL
Presentation transcript:

1 Background: Use of TKR Trigger One-Shots individual TKR strip channels “true” when analog shaped pulse is above threshold. strips in a plane are OR’d together. –The resulting layer OR’d signal is the subject of discussion –The resulting layer OR’d signal is the subject of discussion today. A one-shot with programmable width can be turned on in the circuit. Currently in our testing it is off. –This signal is used in forming the “3-in-a-row”: when these signals from spatially consecutive xy*yx*xy are “true”, a TKR trigger request is sent to the global trigger. the global trigger process is started by transition edges, not levels (this is good!). Consider a situation with a long-duration pulse (e.g., a heavy ion in the TKR): –a trigger request level that persists longer than the single-event deadtime will NOT retrigger the instrument. –the channels involved in a long-time level are effectively dead in the trigger when subsequent particles pass through them; that situation persists until the level goes away. (see next slides) –in the readout, a ghost of the track persists in any subsequent triggers until the levels go below threshold. once a global trigger decision process (“window”) has started, the logic is level- sensitive, not edge-sensitive. (again, this is good) Purpose of today’s discussion: what is the most likely flight configuration for the one-shots: on or off; and what is the stretch duration? We want to test in the flight configuration, so a timely decision is necessary.Purpose of today’s discussion: what is the most likely flight configuration for the one-shots: on or off; and what is the stretch duration? We want to test in the flight configuration, so a timely decision is necessary. [Many details glossed over here] binary strip signal (also resulting layer OR if this is the only strip in the layer above threshold) hit single strip analog pulse and threshold level

2 Why does this matter? Because the opening of the trigger window is edge-sensitive, this issue is not very critical (LAT won’t continuously retrigger). However, we still must make a choice. The first, best-guess length of time for the one-shot stretch is ~1 microsecond (see later slide). –no identified benefits, and some possible complications, making it longer We have found three cases in which turning on/off the one- shots matters: –impact on handling of heavy ions –impact on noise triggers –possible impact on mip trigger efficiency due to jitter (see talk by Su Dong) In all three cases, the impacts are fairly small but potentially important. –“choose your poison” – J. Russell

3 Heavy Ions TKR signal from passage of a heavy ion will often persist (pileup) into subsequent events (~150 microsecond time over threshold, with 4-10 kHz of charged particles passing through the TKR that could make triggers). The heavy ion rate is ~50 Hz. The layers exposed to the heavy ion are dead for subsequent triggering until the layer-OR turns off, and the WHOLE TOWER is dead for subsequent retriggering until its trigger request turns off (no more 3-in-a-row condition). Thus, with the one-shots OFF, for ~6 ms every second (0.6% of the time) a fraction of the instrument (~20%) is not retriggerable. [The impact on the dead area in the readout is effectively nil due to the huge number of strips.] If the one-shot is OFF, the layer-OR signal will persist for future triggers. –this is potentially GOOD, because the trigger readout info in affected events [only those WITHOUT TKR TRIGGERS] will tell us this happened and we can then monitor the rate of event pileup. Also, we can tell in those events if at least some hits in a layer are ghosts from pileup. Also, the readout and trigger information will disagree less than if the one-shot is ON. only useful for statistical monitoring at best –this is NOT GOOD, because use of the TKR information in the trigger logic in some cases will be incorrect. In particular, the geographic VETO (one of our two possible veto’s), when engaged, looks for TKR triggers coincident with lists of ACD tiles. If a subsequent event happens to have a hit ACD tile associated with the persisting TKR level from a previous heavy ion event, the subsequent event will be vetoed. The error rate will be small (VETO is only used for small CAL deposits so backsplash rate is low), and we would be able to monitor the rate of those incorrect vetoes using the pass-throughs.

4 Noise Triggers Two categories: –without the one-shots, after a heavy ion, and AFTER the 3- in-a-row condition is no longer true, some of the layers will still be in saturation for a brief period. During that window, noise hits in some layers will again make a 3-in-a-row, resulting in a trigger. –A noise pulse in the TKR has a very short time over threshold, typically, so the plane OR is nominally also short. However, turning on the one-shot will increase the chance coincidence of noise pulses. Noise considerations: best choice is to turn ON the one-shots but to keep the pulse width short (~1 microsecond).Noise considerations: best choice is to turn ON the one-shots but to keep the pulse width short (~1 microsecond).

5 Summary IssueOne-Shot ONOne-Shot OFF NOISE TRIGGERS [clear winner if stretch short] TRIGGER/READOUT TKR INFO MISMATCH [incremental disagreement O(0.1)%] WRONG VETO DEAD TRIGGER AREA [ <1% effect: layers dead instead of whole towers ] INDIRECT PILEUP MONITORING [may also have TOT info?] [small] TKR TRIGGER EFFICIENCY [w/stretch] = better choice

6 Stretch Value need slide from Su Dongneed slide from Su Dong answer is 14 ticks?answer is 14 ticks?

7 Conclusion Recommendation: We recommend turning ON the one-shots for nominal operations, with stretch of 14 ticks (0.7 microseconds). –still important to test the full LAT with the one-shots turned off to make sure it works as expected. Surprises on orbit may lead to the desire to turn off the one-shots, at least for systematic studies.