Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Colombian Leadership Dialogue: The Renewal of Research Universities Value of Comparative Data Lydia Snover.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPEDS Changes and Updates Michigan Community Colleges Data Workshop, August 2, 2013 PRESENTED BY: Eileen Brennan, Oakland Community College 1.
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Big Ten SAA Stipends. Project Goals Question: Are IU graduate students - in particular AIs and GAs- paid less in comparison to peers at other Big Ten.
Carol Livingstone Associate Provost for Management Information
Carol Livingstone Associate Provost for Management Information
UA Metrics University of Alaska Board of Regents Meeting December 6-7,
PROGRAM PRIORITIZATION Open Forum January 16, 2013.
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) Interrelated surveys conducted annually by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
SCCP Excellence. TOP-10 Quality Blueprint for Excellence SCCP Excellence Key performance indicators Pillar Goals MUSC Excellence LDI.
Trends in Higher Education Series Distribution of Full-Time Undergraduates at Four-Year Institutions by Published Tuition and Fee Charges,
Specific outcomes can be compared to resources expended; and successful programs can be highlighted;
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
Survey of Earned Doctorates National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Mark Fiegener, Ph.D. Presentation to Clemson University.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Temple University Russell Conwell Learning Center Office of Senior Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies GETTING INVOLVED IN RESEARCH AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY.
1 Cost per Degree Board of Governors Strategic Planning Committee Florida Gulf Coast University June 9, 2005.
Creating a Culture of Collaboration: Collecting Community Engagement Data Susan Connery, Director of the Feinstein Community Service Center Christopher.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
The State of Christian Higher Education CCCU Alumni Professionals Conference Wheaton College July 16, 2003 Ronald P. Mahurin Council for Christian Colleges.
Office of Institutional Research Marilyn Blaustein Krisztina Filep Alan McArdle Heather Young Office of Institutional Research University of Massachusetts.
Ron Strauss Lynn Williford Jim Dean Office of the Provost.
Impact of Community Engagement Grants ( ): A Preliminary Report.
STEM Faculty from Underrepresented Groups at MSI and TWI Institutions: are their lives different? Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of the Faculty and Professor,
Data Development and Pilots Academic Leadership Retreat August 2015.
Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) Daniel Denecke Director, Best Practices Council of Graduate Schools (US)
FAEIS – A Resource for Agriculture Faculty and Institutions Mary A. Marchant, Joseph R. Hunnings, Jolene D. Hamm (Virginia Tech), Timothy P. Mack (Indiana.
Organization, Administration, and Improvement of Graduate Education Daniel Denecke, Ph.D. Program Director, Best Practices and Publications The Council.
INVESTIGATING GEOSCIENCE COMPETENCIES: THE GEOSCIENCE CAREER MASTER’S PREPARATION SURVEY (GEO CAREER MAPS) Funded by the National Science Foundation Grant:
NSF Higher Education R&D Survey Update Ronda Britt, NSF Samuel Peterson, University of Missouri 2013 NCURA Annual Meeting August 6, 2013 National Science.
Academic Program Review Chair’s Workshop John E. Sawyer, Ph.D. Associate Provost Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
From Cyclical to Continuous Improvement: Assessment Feedback and Program Metrics Derek J. Herrmann, Coordinator of University Assessment Services Kristen.
“An Educational Partnership Program with Minority Serving Institutions: A Framework for Producing Minority Scientists in NOAA-Related Disciplines” Larry.
BUILDING A PRIOR LEARNING ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Office for Prior Learning Assessment Joyce Lapping, Director and Panel Presenter at NEASC 126 th Annual Meeting.
2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.
INTEGRATED STEM INITIATIVE ON THE SOUTH PLAINS NSF INNOVATION THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION AT TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY.
A Perspective on Student Learning at ECU It’s working! Marilyn Sheerer Provost and Senior Vice Chancellor.
RDE Projects Sheryl Burgstahler Director, DO-IT (Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, & Technology) Director, UW Accessible Technology University.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Trends in Higher Education Series 2006, October 24, The Price of College Sandy Baum Skidmore College and the College Board National.
1 Council on Postsecondary Education Senate Appropriations and Revenue Committee March 2, 2004 Thomas D. Layzell, President.
MASFAA Annual Meeting November 7 th, State Appropriations for Higher Education per $1,000 in Personal Income, SOURCE: The College Board,
FAEIS in Action Accessing data from the Food and Agricultural Education Information System Thursday, March 31, 2005 New Orleans, LA Bill Richardson Ella.
The Library’s Place in UTSA’s Growth Projections Stefanie Wittenbach Assistant Dean for Collections October 2007.
ASEE Profiles and Salary Surveys: An Overview
Portfolio Preparation: Faculty Experience Catherine L. Kling Charles F. Curtis Distinguished Professor Director, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development.
Managing Enrollment Sharon Alston Vice Provost Undergraduate Enrollment.
FACULTY SURVEY WORKSHOP Mary Marchant Bill Richardson Joe Hunnings.
Tracking Outcomes On Graduates of Yale University Karen Anderson Associate Provost.
Draft of the Conceptual Framework for Evaluation & Assessment of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Alliance for Graduate Education & the Professoriate.
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN Facilitating Research Productivity John Unsworth, Dean Graduate School of Library and Information Science 2009.
Quality assurance and graduate student support Fred L Hall Former Dean of Graduate Studies at University of Calgary, McMaster University,
Annual Program Survey Results NASPAA Annual Conference 2015 Brooklyn, NY.
Enhancing the Institutional Value of Your Department Lisa A. Rossbacher Office of the President Dallas D. Rhodes Department of Geology.
National (and U. of Delaware) Data from the 2014 Survey of Earned Doctorates University of Delaware Graduate Directors Meeting April 29, 2016 Mark K. Fiegener.
Grade statistics Libby Shapira, ICBS
Academic Program Viability Report February 2010 Florida Association of Institutional Research 2010 Annual Conference.
IPEDS Overview April 14, 2015.
Research Doctorates Conferred,
George A. Smathers Libraries
FSSE-G RESULTS Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors.
OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOPS
Graduate Training Grants
College of Behavioral and Community Sciences
Supporting Excellence In Academic Departments
MIT Institutional Research
2019 Academic Administrator Workshop
Supporting Institutional Excellence
Presentation transcript:

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Colombian Leadership Dialogue: The Renewal of Research Universities Value of Comparative Data Lydia Snover Director of Institutional Research Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Why compare? Comparisons provide valuable information to leadership –Helps leadership understand how schools, departments and institutions are similar –Helps leadership understand how schools, departments and institutions are different –Helps leadership understand changes over time –Helps leadership to put changes in context

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research What are the comparison groups? Externally –Against national trends –Other Institutions Groupings of institutions (public, private, comprehensive, doctoral granting) –Selected peers (institutions that are similar) Internally –Schools, departments, disciplines

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research What to compare? Measurable inputs –Funding –Students Numbers by level and demographics Quality –Faculty Counts by discipline and demographics

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research What to compare? Measurable outcomes –Graduation rates –Degrees Awarded –Publications and citations –Research funding and results –Alumni placement –Alumni giving

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research How to compare? Development of metrics allows comparisons of institutions of different sizes –Funding per faculty member –Funding per student –Students per faculty member –Degrees earned per faculty member –Average years to earn a degree –Cost per credit unit

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Who should do the comparing? –At the National Level In the US, National Center for Educational Statistics using annual surveys and the National Science Foundation –At the State Level In the US, most states have an office that collects data on education –At the Institutional Level At most colleges and Universities, there is an Office for Institutional Research

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Some Examples for MIT

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research MIT Population

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research MIT Population

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research MIT Population

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Research Expenditures

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Research Expenditures per Faculty

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Research Peer Comparisons

Office of the Provost - Institutional Research When compiling and analyzing data Be consistent –Consistency is often better than absolute correctness Be comprehensive –Get as much as you can while you can because you can never plan for every contingency Make appropriate comparisons –Comparisons are limited by differences Understand the context –Understand what the similarities and differences represent Analyze creatively –Always try to look at data from new perspectives