Genome responses of trypanosome infected cattle The encounter between cattle and trypanosomes elicits changes in the activities of both genomes - that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pathways regulating response to Trypanosoma congolense infection Harry Noyes University of Liverpool.
Advertisements

Gene expression analysis summary Where are we now?
Functional annotation and network reconstruction through cross-platform integration of microarray data X. J. Zhou et al
A Transgenic Approach to QTL analysis in a Trypanotolerant Mouse Model Anderson SI 1 Noyes HA 2 Agaba M 3 Ogugo M 3 Kemp SJ 2,3 Archibald AL 1 1 Roslin.
Trinity College Dublin KARI-TRC Shirakawa Institute of Animal Genetics Genomic approaches to trypanosomiasis resistance - some surprises.
Congenic mice infected with Trypanosoma congolense Harry Noyes University of Liverpool.
Discovering the genes controlling response to Trypanosoma congolense infection Harry Noyes University of Liverpool.
BIG DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GENOTYPES AND OVER TIME. Between 600 and 750 probes were differently expressed between infected and uninfected cattle. Principle.
Early and sustained acute falls in total serum cholesterol are associated with critical illness mortality in the setting of tight glycaemic control Paul.
Transcriptional profiling I – microarrays and proteomics
Microarrays: Theory and Application By Rich Jenkins MS Student of Zoo4670/5670 Year 2004.
Genome wide expression consequences of a disease resistance QTL are strongly influenced by the genetic background.
Trinity College Dublin KARI-TRC Shirakawa Institute of Animal Genetics.
Trinity College Dublin KARI-TRC Shirakawa Institute of Animal Genetics Functional genomics to explore host response to trypanosome infection in particular.
Genomics I: The Transcriptome RNA Expression Analysis Determining genomewide RNA expression levels.
Data Type 1: Microarrays
Amandine Bemmo 1,2, David Benovoy 2, Jacek Majewski 2 1 Universite de Montreal, 2 McGill university and Genome Quebec innovation centre Analyses of Affymetrix.
Bioconductor in R with a expectation free dataset Transcriptomics - practical 2014.
Scenario 6 Distinguishing different types of leukemia to target treatment.
S factor  body weight during WM  body weight during ER Supplementary figure 1: S factor distribution in each diet. S.
Monday Human and chimp DNA is ~98.7 similar, But, we differ in many and profound ways, Can this difference be attributed, at least in part, to differences.
The Role and Mechanism of PPAR  in the Transcriptional Regulation of its Target Genes Jinlu Cai 1, Henry L. Keen 2,Thomas L. Casavant 3,4,5, and Curt.
Global network analysis of drug tolerance, mode of action and virulence in methicillin-resistant S. aureus Bobby Arnold Alex Cardenas Zeb Russo Loyola.
EMBL- EBI Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SD UK T +44 (0) F +44 (0) Gene Co-expression.
Networks of Neuronal Genes Affected by Common and Rare Variants in Autism Spectrum Disorders.
DECIPHERING THE EARLY BOVINE HOST RESPONSE AFTER Brucella melitensis INFECTION ROSSETTI CA 1 * DRAKE K 2, LAWHON S 3, NUNES J 3, GULL T 3, KHARE S 3, EVERTS.
Idea: measure the amount of mRNA to see which genes are being expressed in (used by) the cell. Measuring protein might be more direct, but is currently.
Introduction to Microarrays. The Central Dogma.
ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION DATA. Gene expression data is a high-throughput data type (like DNA and protein sequences) that requires bioinformatic pattern.
Analysing African and European cattle with Taverna 2.2 Stuart Owen Based on the work by : Professor Andy Brass and Mohammad Khodadadi.
1 Agenda Introduction Functional traits Genomics to system biology in animal science OMICS for analyzing diseases in livestock species Genomics Transcriptomics.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
Transcriptome What is it - genome wide transcript abundance How do you obtain it - Arrays + MPSS What do you do with it when you have it - ?
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 5.
Functional Genomics Carol Bult, Ph.D. Course coordinator The Jackson Laboratory Winter/Spring 2011 Keith Hutchison, Ph.D. Course co-coordinator.
Affymetrix User’s Group Meeting Boston, MA May 2005 Keynote Topics: 1. Human genome annotations: emergence of non-coding transcripts -tiling arrays: study.
Overview  Introduction  Biological network data  Text mining  Gene Ontology  Expression data basics  Expression, text mining, and GO  Modules and.
Effect of Alcohol on Brain Development NormalFetal Alcohol Syndrome.
Microarray Technology and Data Analysis Roy Williams PhD Sanford | Burnham Medical Research Institute.
PUTATIVE CANDIDATE GENES TRANSCRIPTIONALLY UPREGULATED BOTH IN ACUTE AND CHRONIC PHASE OF RESPONSE DURING INFESTATION OF MICE AND SYRIAN GOLDEN HAMSTERS.
Rennie C1 Hulme H2 Fisher P2 Hall L3 Agaba M4 Noyes HA1 Kemp SJ1,4
Identifying candidate genes for the regulation of the response to Trypanosoma congolense infection Introduction African cattle breeds differ significantly.
Identification of gene networks associated with lipid response to infection with Trypanosoma congolense Brass A3; Broadhead, A2; Gibson, JP1; Iraqi, FA1,
EQTLs.
Trinity College Dublin
Noyes HA1 Agaba M2 Gibson J3 Ogugo M2 Iraqi F2 Brass A4 Anderson S5
Hassan, M. 1 & 2, Kemp, S. J. 1 & 3, Agaba, M. 1, Noyes, H. A
Identification of gene networks associated with lipid response to infection with Trypanosoma congolense Brass A3; Broadhead, A2; Gibson, JP1; Iraqi, FA1,
Microarray Experiment Design and Data Interpretation
Rennie, C1 Noyes,HA2 Kemp, SJ2 Hulme, H1 Brass, A1,3 Hoyle, DC4
Congenic mice reveal effect of SNP, genomic rearrangements and expression variation on genome wide gene expression Introduction There is still no well-defined.
Functional Genomics in Evolutionary Research
A. B. Supplemental Figure S2.  A.  Cell cycle G1/S Growth Factor Regulation.  Publically available data from (20;
7 Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Rennie C1 Hulme H2 Fisher P2 Hall L3 Agaba M4 Noyes HA1 Kemp SJ1,4
Congenic mice reveal effect of SNP, genomic rearrangements and expression variation on genome wide gene expression Introduction There is still no well-defined.
Indigene Project: Systems Biology Project
Position specific effect of SNP on signal ratio from long oligonucleotide CGH microarrays; most single probe aberrations represent genuine genomic variants.
Erythroid differentiation
Erythroid differentiation
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Figure 1: Breeding programme for generation of congenic mice
Loyola Marymount University
Functional classification and visualization of differentially expressed genes. Functional classification and visualization of differentially expressed.
Loyola Marymount University
Loyola Marymount University
M-H Pinard-van der Laan
Data Type 1: Microarrays
Presentation transcript:

Genome responses of trypanosome infected cattle The encounter between cattle and trypanosomes elicits changes in the activities of both genomes - that of the host and that of the parasite. These changes determine the fate of the host and parasite and the outcome of the encounter. Although the outcome in most cattle is a slow death following progressive anaemia and loss of body condition, in other cattle the outcome is more favourable; these cattle regain the initiative, suppress parasite growth, recover from the initial clinical signs, gain weight, and reproduce normally. Cattle exhibiting this latter outcome are said to be trypanotolerant. Below is a synopsis of the genome responses that set apart the trypanotolerant cattle from the susceptible cattle during experimental trypanosome infection MetaCore GeneGo was used to identify networks amongst the genes that were differentially expressed. The figure (right) shows the largest network of connected genes that were differently expressed by trypanosome infected resistant (N’Dama) and susceptible (Boran) cattle. STAT3 and c-Fos have the most connectivity. STAT3 is a transcription factor which is activated in response to the IL-6 family of cytokines and is involved in the acute phase response in the liver Interestingly, STAT3 is modulated by RAC1 which is in turn controlled by VAV1 and ARHGAP15 which are both located in the QTLs controlling trypanotolerance.  Trypanosome infection induces profound changes in the genome function manifested by changes in the steady state level of many genes.  The differences in the genome responses of resistant and susceptible cattle correspond to some of the phenotypic attributes that correlate with susceptibility. In this study, twenty N’Dama (tolerant) cattle and 20 Boran (susceptible) cattle were experimentally infected with a lethal dose of T. congolense IL1180. Liver biopsy samples were taken from each individual in specified days prior to and post infection such that at each time point there were samples from at least 5 Boran and 5 N’Dama (A). The mRNA profiles in the biopsy material were assayed using the Affymetrix system (B). The gene data were fed into an analysis workflow (C) that integrates the expression measures, gene ontology, QTL information, and gene pathways data. BC A The Affy chips contained 24K probe sets. Of these between 600 and 750 probes were differently expressed between infected and uninfected cattle. Principle component analysis of the expression data clearly shows genome-wide differences between the transcriptomes of tolerant (  ) and susceptible ( ) cattle (Top Right, PCA component 3) and some of these differences are associated with the presence and progression of trypanosome infection (Top left, PCA component 1). Agaba M 1 Hulme H 2 Rennie C 3 Mwakaya J 1 Ogugo M 1 Brass A 2 Kemp SJ 1,3 Addresses 1 International Livestock Research Institute, Box , Nairobi Kenya 2 The University of Manchester LF8 Kilburn Bldg, Oxford Rd Manchester M13 9PL UK 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK Acknowledgements: We thank all the staff at the ILRI large animal facility and all colleagues in the Welcome Trust Consortium This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. Data from an experiment showing the expression of thousands of genes on a single GeneChip® probe array. Image courtesy of Affymetrix.