Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First look at mass constraint [How simple can it be?] Two decays: i) pi 0 -> g g ii) K 0 -> pi+ pi- - Mother particle momenta: P = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 GeV -
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Efforts to Improve the Reconstruction of Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Lori Stevens UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting May 15, 2007 Includes contributions.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Progress in the cone analysis: Optimization and systematic checks n Introduction n Performance n Systematic checks n Conclusions n Introduction n Performance.
A Package For Tracking Validation Chris Meyer UC Santa Cruz July 6, 2007.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
Efficiency and Purity Studies Outside the VXD: Applying AxialBarrelTrackfinderZ and GarfieldTrackFinder By: Tyler Rice, Chris Meyer August 21, 2007.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
March 6th, 2006CALICE meeting, UCL1 Position and angular resolution studies with ECAL TB prototype Introduction Linear fit method Results with 1, 2, 3,
Preliminary analysis of ZHH events (2) Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway, University of London UK CALICE UK-SOFTWARE.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution Analysis Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting March 13, 2007.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Adventures In Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Chris Meyer, Tyler Rice UC Santa Cruz October 16, 2007.
Characterization MC Particles Missed by Axial-Barrel Reconstruction & Obtaining Perfect Efficiency Using Zpolebbar Event File By: Tyler Rice.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
Tracking Simulation Studies at UC Santa Cruz Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP LCWS07 DESY May 30-Jun Tracking Validation Studies Non-prompt tracks with SiD.
Parametrized Jet Energy Resolution Studies Darius Gallagher, Graham W. Wilson Univ. of Kansas Cornell Workshop, July 15 th 2003.
SIMULATION STUDIES AT SANTA CRUZ Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Vancouver July 19-22, 2006 Special Recognition: Eric.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Jetset vs Herwig … Once more III Jetset vs Herwig on same selected events.
Event-Specific Hadronic Event Reconstruction 1 Graham W. Wilson, University of Kansas.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Resolution and radiative corrections A first order estimate for pbar p  e + e - T. H. IPN Orsay 05/10/2011 GDR PH-QCD meeting on « The nucleon structure.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
ATLAS Jet/ETmiss workshop, 24/06/ Scale and resolution Measurement errors Mapping of material in front of EM calorimeters (|  | < 2.5) Inter-calibration:
VXDBasedReco TRACK RECONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE STUDIES Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Snowmass Colorado August 14-28,
Feasibility study of Higgs pair creation in gamma-gamma collider Hiroshima University Nozomi Maeda 19.April 2009.
Andreas Imhof, DESY1 Status of a measurement of the Higgs-Bosons parity at the ILC A. Imhof 1, K. Desch 2, T.Kuhl 1, T. Pierzcha ł a 3, Z. W ąs 4, M. Worek.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
December, Calibration of electromagnetic calorimeter of Hall A DVCS experiment Eric FUCHEY Ph.D Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
DESY1 Particle Flow Calorimetry At ILC Experiment DESY May 29 th -June 4 rd, 2007 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Contents.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Observation of a “cusp” in the decay K±  p±pp
Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.
A reconstruction algorithm for photons converted in tracker
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Measurement of
M. Ohlerich, A. Raspiareza, W. Lohmann DESY and MPI Munich
Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007

Motivation No one has yet studied how tracking limitations effect Jet Reconstruction. Limit in P T reach Limit in cos θ reach Non prompt tracks (K S ) Photon conversion in tracker material

Approach Use e + e -  q qbar at E cm = 500 GeV (turn off ISR so that events are evenly distributed) Find “perfect jets” from MC truth particles that: –Originate within 1cm and terminate outside 1cm from the origin –Are FINALSTATE or INTERMEDIATE –Are not backscatter –Confirmed  E i = 500 ± a few GeV for this selection Using a y cut of 0.07 select events with only 2 jets Calculate Jet/Jet invariant mass

Approach cont. Apply tracking limitation (e.g. P T > 0.5 GeV cut) Find jets with cut applied. If no y cut gives two jets, toss event (<1%) Compare Jet/Jet mass with “perfect” reconstruction. Accumulate RMS ( δm) of Jet/Jet mass degradation.

Goal For Maximum Degradation: 1% Need to distinguish W’s from Z’s using the Jet/Jet invariant mass from high energy Jets. Our sample has high energy Jets but a Jet/Jet mass of 500 GeV (rather than 100 GeV). Taking two jets of the same energy we find the invariant mass and associated error go as: m 2 = 2 (1 – cos θ ) p 2 δm 2 = 2 (1 – cos θ ) δp 2 Error on momentum is constant wrt mass, to eliminate the mass dependence from cos θ form fractional error on mass, so that δm 2 / m 2 = const. wrt mass, so that δm / m = const. wrt mass also To distinguish between a Z and W 10% resolution is required, and to be outside 3 standard deviations brings it down to 3%. Finally to disregard error on tracking we require the error to be 1%. Using 500 GeV uds events, m = 500, which means δm ≤ 5 To keep from degrading W and Z seperation we need an error on invariant mass of less then 5 GeV.

Cuts on charged track P T P T cut of 0.75 GeV δm = 5.62 GeV P T cut of 0.5 GeV δm = 3.49 GeV

K Shorts Finding NO K Shorts δm = GeV Finding 90% of K Shorts δm = GeV But RMS is still dominated by tails…

K Shorts Finding 90% K Shorts (cutting top 3%) δm = 2.86 GeV

Gamma’s Finding NO Photons < 1 GeV δm = 3.45 GeV Finding 90% of Photons < 1 GeV δm = 0.65 GeV Low energy photons that convert will miss the calorimeter. How many low energy ( < 1 GeV ) photons do we need to find then?

Gamma’s Finding NO Photons δm = GeV Finding 90% of Photons δm = GeV How many photons (no energy cut) do we need to find?

Conclusions Looking at simple cuts on Jets we have found: The P T range of any proposed ILC tracker looks fine. We have to find a good percentage (90%) of the K shorts. Low energy photons don’t play an enormous role, but when you include higher energy photons you need to find them. Next we plan on running over cos θ cuts and put more stringent cuts on material parameters. This should be accomplished within the next week.