ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Advertisements

HFT Technical Overview September 26, HFT 2013 TPC FGT 2011 STAR Detectors Fast and Full azimuthal particle identification EMC+EEMC+FMS (-1 ≤ 
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
Summary of the SVD session 19 March 2009 T. Tsuboyama (KEK)
CDF Run II Silicon John Zhou Rutgers University Z ee.
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, Round Table, 23-Jan TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction.
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, LC-TPC-LBL, 18-Oct For example: TPC: 2.0 m O.R., 0.5 m I.R., 150  m spatial.
PHENIX Vertex Tracker Atsushi Taketani for PHENIX collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Over view of Vertex detector 2.Physics.
For high fluence, good S/N ratio thanks to: Single strip leakage current I leak  95nA at T  -5C Interstrip capacitance  3pF SVX4 chip 10 modules fully.
Measuring momentum at the TIF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara June 25, 2007.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Progress towards a Long Shaping-Time Readout for Silicon Strips Bruce Schumm SCIPP & UC Santa Cruz SLAC LCWS05 July 28-31, 2004.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
SVX-II David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
SSD Operations Manual March 2014 SSD: 4 th layer of vertex detector Heavy Flavor Tracker Silicon Strip Detector – Operations Manual PXL Inserted from this.
David L. Winter for the PHENIX Collaboration PHENIX Silicon Detector Upgrades RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop 3 RHIC Future: New Physics Through.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
PHOBOS LRP: Should we fill the holes?! What happens to flow as the silicon gets blasted? J. Hamblen, S. Manly, I.C. Park.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
1 Jim Thomas - LBL HFT Issues that may Bear on the Fate of the SSD & SVT presented by Jim Thomas 07/07/2006.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
Performance and occupancies in a CCD vertex detector with endcaps Toshinori Abe and John Jaros 04/21/04.
CBM Silicon Tracking System. Microstrip Detector Module Assembly and Test V.M. Pugatch Kiev Institute for Nuclear Research GSI (CBM experiment), Darmstadt.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
Vertex ‘99, 6/21-25/1999 p. 1 CDF Run II SiliconAlan Sill, Texas Tech University CDF Run II Silicon Tracking Projects 8th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON VERTEX.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
1 FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. 2 FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size chip; ~6mm.
SVT Nov 7, 2002Luciano Ristori - Vertex2002_7Nov02.ppt1 SVT The CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger Vertex 2002 Luciano Ristori Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
STAR Pixel Detector readout prototyping status. LBNL-IPHC-06/ LG22 Talk Outline Quick review of requirements and system design Status at last meeting.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
Run2b Silicon Detector Design goals of Run2b Si system Stave design Silicon sensors Schedule K. Hara (U. Tsukuba)
Layer00 Efficiency Studies Stephen Levy, UChicago.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
9th October 2003Danny Hindson, Oxford University1 Inner Detector Silicon Alignment Simple approach -Align in stages + rely on iteration Barrel to Barrel.
Redesign of LumiCal mechanical structure W.Daniluk, E.Kielar, J.Kotula, K.Oliwa, Wojciech Wierba, L.Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow,
Dzero Collaboration Meeting, Sept. 14, M. DemarteauEric Flattum - Fermilab 1 Slide 1 Alice Bean Fermilab/University of Kansas for the D0 Run2b silicon.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
The Collider Detector at Fermilab (aka CDF) Jennifer Pursley Intermediate Seminar Oct. 28, 2003.
SPHENIX Mid-rapidity extensions: Additional Tracking system and pre-shower Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) sPHENIX workfest July 29,
I.Rashevskaya- SVT Meeting - Frascati SuperB SVT Strip Pairing: impact on the capacitance value Irina Rashevskaya, Luciano Bosisio, Livio.
Si Sensors for Additional Tracker
Alpine, very forward, EOS…
Status of the CDF II silicon tracking system
Preliminary thoughts on SVT services
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Università & INFN Padova
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Simulated vertex precision
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
FNAL Production Experience
The LHC collider in Geneva
Silicon tracker and sensor R&D for sPHENIX
SVT detector electronics
SVT detector electronics
Presentation transcript:

ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006

ISL David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara May 11, 2006 Formerly known as Intermediate Radius Silicon

I’ll review the motivation for the detector and give a tour of its design and construction

The motivation is best shown by looking at an event display from Run 1.

Tracks are obviously missed and obviously easy to find.

Actual size

Unused hits from: 1.Low p T  > 1

Using forward silicon hits in Run 1 1.Stand-alone silicon pattern recognition Fit for  0, d 0, p T (curvature) with 4 hits, <=1 dof. It worked, but was limited by lever arm (L 2 ) Too few hits Poor curvature resolution degraded impact parameter resolution 4% relative increase in b-tagging for top

Using forward silicon hits in Run 1 2.Calorimeter-seeded tracking for electrons i.e., Phoenix ee  E T event

ISL designed to extend lever arm SVX’ (Run 1) L00 SVXII ISL

Design goals Fine granularity at large radius for Low occupancy typical jet has ~10 tracks in a  <0.2 cone, covers 1000 channels Resolution and lever arm (BL 2 ) 100  m pitch = 30  m resolution sufficient for Negligible effect on d 0 resolution Pointing into COT < hit resolution at high p T < hit width at low p T 2trk COT res

Portcard scattering is a real complication

Design requirements Big (5 m 2 ) Cheap Fast

Design requirements Big (5 m 2 )  simple Cheap  simple Fast  simple Piggybacking on SVX-II infrastructure important

Sensor Design Big- used max possible sensor size per wafer. HPK only had 4” wafers Micron had 6”, and they were cheaper (in both senses of the word). Layer 6 built with HPK at Fermilab Layer 7 built with Micron at Pisa  Different geometries, mechanics, & quality

Readout Hybrid Double sided and spacious Pitch adapter Transceiver

Half ladder

Full ladder

Ganging Not in trigger, but don’t preclude, so r-phi read first. 16 chips total--max FIB can handle. Note up-down reverses hall effect and readout direction.

Joel dropped them in place

Supported by carbon fiber spaceframe Containing cable and cooling and gang card mounts

Notable differences from SVXII Because rad damage is less of a concern, and no direct silicon heating –ISL operates ~10 deg warmer than SVXII Layer 6 has the implant on the z-side IB0,1,4,5 (forward region) –L0,L2,L4 are layer seven (Micron sensors) –L1,L3 are layer six (Hamamatsu sensors) IB2,3 (central region) –Everything is layer six Within a given layer, IBxWyLz, y and z denote phi position of ganged readout pair

Forward tracking Recall Design goals

Forward tracking ? Recall Design goals