Linking BMPs to Pollutant Sources. After impairments are understood, pollutant causes and sources known, pollutant loads estimated, critical areas identified….

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Upper Neuse River Basin Monitoring Plan - Agriculture Subcommittee Update February 9, 2012.

Advertisements

(your state) Master Farmer Program

1 NPS MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR THE NORTH CANDADIAN RIVER (from Canton dam through Lake Overholser)

Major Sources of Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution and Best Management Practices (BMPs) By: David Wojnowski, Stream Watch/Project WET Coordinator Stream.

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.

Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans

To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)

Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.

Project collaborators: Laura Ward Good, Katie Songer, Matt Diebel, John Panuska, Jeff Maxted, Pete Nowak, John Norman, K.G. Karthikeyan, Tom Cox, Water.

Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.

Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

OC Fletcher Basin – Legacy Campus Project: Alternative MS4 Compliance Matt A. Yeager Yeager Environmental Mark Grey CICWQ Chris Crompton County of Orange.

Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.

On-Farm Conservation and Nutrient Management in Maryland: A 2010 Snapshot Erik Lichtenberg Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University.

Business Environmental Risk Management Ray Massey University of Missouri Commercial Ag Program,

Interpreting and Using Existing Data to Identify Pollution Causes and Sources.

Identifying Critical Areas for BMP Applications. Critical Areas Those areas or sources where the greatest water quality improvement can be accomplished.

Characterizing Baseline Water Body Conditions. What? Confirm impairments and identify problems Statistical summary Spatial analysis Temporal analysis.

Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.

EPA’S WATERSHED PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE SECTION 319 PROGRAM Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch October.

Agricultural Water Pollution: Some Policy Considerations Catherine Kling Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University Iowa Environmental.

North Carolina Forest Service North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services NC Forestry BMP Effectiveness Monitoring Watershed Study Virginia.

The Product: Watershed Plan Components Barry Tonning Tetra Tech.

Bill Carter Nonpoint Source Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Trade Fair and Conference, May 2015.

Northwest hydraulic consultants 2NDNATURE Geosyntec Consultants September 11, 2007 Urban Upland / Groundwater Source Category Group (UGSCG) Overview Presentation.

Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control

State Approaches to Funding Local Projects A Survey of RFPs The State/EPA NPS Partnership New Orleans, November 27, 2001.

NRCS and Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring Edward Henry and Rebecca Donegan NRCS-NY.

Stormwater Management Initiative Update. ODOT’s Goal Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff treatment program to: Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff.

Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.

Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.

Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.

L'Anguille River Riparian Modeling Biological and Agricultural Engineering 2010 Non-Point Source Project Review Meeting Cooperative Extension Service Dharmendra.

Orange Creek Basin Management Action Plan Alachua County Commission December 11, 2007 Fred Calder, FL DEP (850)

RUTHERFORD SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CLEAN WATER MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND GRANT Travis Ringo, Rutherford SWCD.

Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/

BMP CHALLENGE Experience: Cannon River Watershed Partnership Information provided by: Dave Legvold Executive Director Cannon River Watershed Partnership.

Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office

La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.

Status of the CEAP National Assessment Robert Kellogg Jerry Lemunyon Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

Best Management Practices- A Decision Making Framework Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: Naresh Pai and Mike Daniels ANRC.

Integrated Nutrients Pollution Control Project LN 4873 – RO WBTF RO MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE ROMANIA Naiana Milea - PMU Director.

Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.

Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,

Effective Post-Construction Stormwater Management Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection Ronald Feldner, P.E. Ecological Solutions, Inc.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.

Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.

A Project to Reduce Bacteria in Texas Waterways: Lone Star Healthy Streams Larry A. Redmon 1, Kevin L. Wagner 2, Robert K. Lyons 3, and Garrett Norman.

The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.

Measure M2 Environmental Cleanup Allocation Program.

Peru Creek Water Quality Improvements 319 Grant Update February 12, 2014.

Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.

Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM Workshop WELCOME!. THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED All or portions of 38 MN counties 13 major watershed management units ~90%

Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,

National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.

Streamside forests reduce nutrient pollution of aquatic ecosystems Donald E. Weller, Thomas E. Jordan, and Matthew E. Baker Smithsonian Environmental Research.

Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.

Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,

WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 4, Federal.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.

Human Impacts Part 2- Watersheds. What’s a Watershed? An area of land that drains into a common body of water.

Andrew Lyon and Daniel Storm Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering

Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee

“Working with Grape Growers in the Lake Erie Watershed”

Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources

Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources

Presentation transcript:

Linking BMPs to Pollutant Sources

After impairments are understood, pollutant causes and sources known, pollutant loads estimated, critical areas identified…. it’s time to select the treatment measures – BMPs – that will achieve your goals.

Linking BMPs to Sources Match BMP to pollutant(s) Match BMP to source(s) Consider pollutant transport/delivery Evaluate load reduction capability Cost Acceptability/practicality

Match BMP to pollutant(s)

USDA-NRCS Conservation Practice Physical Effects (CPPE) adapted from:

Match BMP to source(s)

Consider pollutant transport/delivery BMP interventions in NPS pathways: Availability/pollutant prevention (e.g., NMP) Detachment (e.g., conservation tillage) Transport (e.g., WASCOB) Delivery (e.g., filter strip, riparian buffer)

Evaluate load reduction capability Stormwater/Urban (BMP Effectiveness database; Menu of BMPs) Agriculture (Ag Management Measure document) Forestry (Forestry Management Measures document) Mining (Development document for proposed Effluent Guideline for Mining)

Sample BMP effectiveness table

Cost Look at experience in other watershed programs in the region NRCS cost tables, other programs

Cost

Acceptability/practicality Look at what’s worked and what hasn’t Consider costs/benefits Property ownership/site access Look for added benefits Use a combination of techniques

Rank alternatives