Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
National Survey of Student Engagement—Technology and Diversity Indicators for Student Success Indiana State University College of Education.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
The University of Texas-Pan American
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Faculty In-Service Week
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE

The family of NSSE surveys  FSSE – emerged from the field as a tool to promote faculty reflection on student engagement  BCSSE – obvious pre-test to NSSE; can we measure what the institution contributes to student engagement, or “value-added”?  LSSSE – Law School Survey

Rejected “essies”  Student Affairs Survey of Student Engagement (sassy!)  Administrator Survey of Student Engagement  Medical School Survey of Student Engagement (messy!)  Graduate School Survey of Student Engagement …..We are focused on UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION. Surveys grounded in body of research on undergraduate student learning and development.

Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced “fessie”) FSSE measures faculty expectations and activities related to student engagement in effective educational practices

FSSE and NSSE Point to “Disorienting Dilemmas” Situations in which usual perspectives or ways of responding do not work or don’t fit are more likely to motivate us to learn and change (Mezirow, 1990)

Faculty Priorities and Student Engagement

Faculty Priorities and Selected Student Outcomes

What to make of this? 1.When faculty members emphasize certain educational practices, students engage in them to a greater extent than their peers elsewhere. 2.Good things go together

Deep Learning Sub-Scale Integrative Learning  Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources  Included diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class discussions or writing assignments  Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions  Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class  Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

Disciplinary Comparisons Integrative Learning

BCSSE How much do student’s background characteristics affect NSSE scores? Are institution’s benchmark scores the result of good practices or good recruitment? Pilot 04, 05,06

BCSSE  BCSSE measures: HS experiences; Importance of college activities Baseline self-assessment of knowledge and skills Demographics  Use to examine gap between expectations and engagement  Study effect of students’ background on NSSE scores

Focus on First-year students: Expectations for Engagement High importance: Asking questions Come to class with readings/assignments completed Discuss grades/assignm’t with faculty Talk about career plans Feedback on performance Work hard Learn something that changes way you understand issue Low or mixed importance: Make class presentation Work with peers in AND out of class Tutor peers Service learning Work with faculty on activities other than coursework Discuss ideas with others, and also faculty outside of class Important NSSEville emphasis : Spend significant amount of time studying Provides support to succeed academically Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, racial-ethnic backgrounds Less important NSSEville emphasis: Helping students cope with non-academic responsibilities Provide support to thrive socially Using computers in academic work

Mind the Gap: FY expectations and engagement Match value to engagement Ask questions in class* Prepare 2 drafts Work on integrated paper* Include diverse perspectives Work with peers out of class Put together different ideas Tutor peers – Service learning – Used * Discuss ideas with faculty Receive feedback Discuss ideas with others Serious conversation race- ethnicity – Serious conversation beliefs Better understand diff POV Learn something change view on issue* * High value- High engagement - Low value – Low engagement  Students who do not value activity are less motivated to participate in it in college.  How to re-shape student values concerning activity?

Mind the Gap: FY expectations and engagement Mixed value – Low engagement Class presentation Work with peers in class Work with faculty on activities High value – Mixed engagement Discussed grades Talk about career plans Work hard Examine strength of views  Activity is valued, but students don’t do it much; Is “sometimes” an acceptable response?  College providing students with fewer experiences than they anticipated

Mind the Gap: FY expectations and engagement Time Gaps:  45% entering students expect to spend 20+ hrs per week studying, but only 30% actually spent this much time studying  FY spent less time in co-curriculars (avg. 5 hrs per week) than they expected (avg. 11 hrs per week)  Estimates for working were slightly higher; relaxing & socializing about what they expected

Patterns in FY NSSE Results Diversity Experiences: Slightly more FY report conversations with students of different race-ethnicity More FY & SR perceive an institutional emphasis on encouraging contact among students from different economic, social and racial-ethnic backgrounds More FY report gains in understanding people of other racial-ethnic backgrounds Student Faculty Interaction: FY have less interaction with faculty outside class Enriching Experiences Some flux over the years. –Plan to do an internship –Study abroad (71% plan to do in 2005; 63% in 2006) More emphasis on attending campus events FY students plans match what Seniors report in terms of Enriching Experiences –51% FY plan to do research with faculty; 52% seniors do