International Linear Colllider Global Design Effort Barry Barish SLAC ILC Group 5-May-05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPS-HEP Aachen 2003R. Brinkmann, DESY Linear Colliders R. Brinkmann, DESY EPS-HEP Conference, Aachen, July 17, 2003.
Advertisements

Most slides from September 2006 MAC meeting ILC Cost Versus Performance (Parameter Choices) Tor Raubenheimer SLAC.
Report from the GDE director Barry Barish Snowmass 14-Aug-05.
The Art and Science of Making a Major Technical Decision Choosing the Technology for the International Linear Collider Barry Barish.
1 Personal Perspectives “Elementary Particle Physics in the 21st Century” Barry C. Barish Caltech EPP Nov-04 International Linear Collider.
Plan ahead for the GDE Barry Barish ILC Consultations URA, Washington DC 12-May-05.
News from the ILC Barry Barish Users’ Meeting Fermilab 9-June-05.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Personal Perspectives on the ITRP Recommendation and on the Next Steps Toward the International Linear Collider Barry Barish PAC Annual Meeting Knoxville,
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05.
Report from the GDE Barry Barish ACFA Workshop EXCO, Daegu, Korea 11-July-05.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish Caltech 5-Jan-06.
GDE expectations from the SRF community Barry Barish Cornell SRF Mtg 15-July-05.
The International Linear Collider The Technology Decision and the Path to the Future Barry Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
The Birth of the GDE Barry Barish TESLA Collab Mtg 31-March-05.
GDE Meeting B Barish 16-Aug-05 The GDE – who, what and how? The BCD – what is it? Internal Organization toward BCD What do we want out of Snowmass? How.
5 May 06 SLAC SPC 1 ILC Global Activities GDE, FALC Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
Status of International Linear Collider Global Design Effort Barry Barish (by telecon) HEPAP Washington DC 18-May-05.
20 April 06 P5 - SLAC Global Design Effort 1 ILC Update from the GDE Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
The Path Toward a Linear Collider Barry Barish HEP 2005 Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish EPP2010 Cornell University 2-Aug-05.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish iThemba Cape Town 21-Oct-05.
ILC Accelerator Technical Issues Nick Walker LCWS 2005 Stanford University
Review of last year: Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Consultations URA, Washington DC 12-May-05.
Technology Breakthroughs and International Linear Collider Barry Barish AAAS Annual Meeting Washington DC 19-Feb-05.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ICFA Seminar Daegu, Korea September 29, 2005.
Organizing the Linear Collider. Steps toward the ILC 1989 – 1996: Operation of the world’s only linear collider, the 90 GeV SLC at Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
The International Linear Collider Accelerator R&D Program Steve Holmes Fermilab Associate Director for Accelerators EPP2010 May 16, 2005.
W. Namkung, 3 nd ILC Workshop, April 1, ILCSC Update 3rd ILC-Korea Workshop April 1, 2005 Kunkook University Seoul, Korea Won Namkung PAL/POSTECH,
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
8 May 06 ILCSC Report Global Design Effort 1 GDE R&D Program RDR Status and Plans Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
The International Linear Collider and the Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics Barry Barish Caltech Lomonosov Conference 20-Aug-2015 ILC.
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FUTURE ACCELERATORS (ICFA) Roy Rubinstein2nd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - 4 September
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa ILCSC Chair LCWS06 at IISc Bangalore March 9, 2006.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.
On the Way to ILC Shekhar Mishra Fermilab Talk presented on behalf of ILC-GDE 2/16/06 Talk Presented at the 2006 Aspen Winter Conference: "Particle Physics.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 ILC R&D Program Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program Manager Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Global design effort DOE meeting 8/10/06 Global design effort Americas 1 FY07 DOE ILC Budget recommendations G. Dugan ILC-GDE/Cornell University GDE Americas.
ILC-GDE ILC-Americas 9/21/05ILC-Americas Regional Efforts1 G. Dugan ILC/GDE and Cornell University International Linear Collider Industrial Forums Fermilab.
1J. Brau - ILCSC Meeting - Beijing - August 19, 2004 Organizing the Global Experimental Program The ILCSC has asked the Worldwide Study, as its Physics.
Report from the GDE Barry Barish ACFA Workshop EXCO, Daegu, Korea 11-July-05.
The Path to an International Linear Collider Barry Barish TRIUMPF Seminar 15-April-05.
9/17/041 The International Linear Collider Michael Witherell Presentation to The Funding Agencies for a Linear Collider September 17, 2004.
International Linear Collider Technology: Status and Challenges Steve Holmes Fermilab Wine & Cheese Seminar September 24, 2004.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish ANL Colloquium 3-Jan-06.
23-April-13 ECFA LC2013 Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish ECFA LC2013 DESY Hamburg, Germany 27-May-13 GDE The path to a TDR.
ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish GDE 9-March-06.
Americas comments on Linear Collider organization after 2012 P. Grannis, for LCSGA – Aug. 24, 2011 ILCSC GDE.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
1 May 06 LCFOA - SLAC Global Design Effort 1 ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
Already time to think of upgrading the machine Two options presently discussed/studied Higher luminosity ~10 35 cm -2 s -1 (SLHC) –Needs changes in.
Global Design Effort1 September 20-22, 2006 MAC Review Response to 1 st MAC Mtg Barry Barish GDE.
1-2 May 2006 LCFOA Mtg Global Design Effort 1 The Baseline Configuration and the Reference Design Report Tor Raubenheimer SLAC.
The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Nan Phinney SLAC ILC Worldwide Event, Fermilab, June 12, 2013 (Many slides courtesy of Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto, Barry Barish) ILC Accelerator A 25-year.
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Report from ICFA ICFA mission and membership ICFA Panels ICFA and ILC
ILC Global Design Effort
Barry Barish GDE Caltech
The International Linear Collider
Electron Source Configuration
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
Presentation transcript:

International Linear Colllider Global Design Effort Barry Barish SLAC ILC Group 5-May-05

SLAC2 Starting Point Superconducting RF Main Linac

5-May-05SLAC3 “Target” Parameters for the ILC E cm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV Luminosity  ∫ Ldt = 500 fb -1 in 4 years Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV Energy stability and precision below 0.1% Electron polarization of at least 80% The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV

5-May-05SLAC4 TESLA Concept The main linacs based on 1.3 GHz superconducting technology operating at 2 K. The cryoplant, is of a size comparable to that of the LHC, consisting of seven subsystems strung along the machines every 5 km.

5-May-05SLAC5 TESLA Cavity RF accelerator structures consist of close to 21,000 9-cell niobium cavities operating at gradients of 23.8 MV/m (unloaded as well as beam loaded) for 500 GeV c.m. operation. The rf pulse length is 1370 µs and the repetition rate is 5 Hz. At a later stage, the machine energy may be upgraded to 800 GeV c.m. by raising the gradient to 35 MV/m.

5-May-05SLAC6 TESLA Single Tunnel Layout The TESLA cavities are supplied with rf power in groups of 36 by MW klystrons and modulators.

5-May-05SLAC7 Reference Points for the ILC Design 33km 47 km TESLA TDR 500 GeV (800 GeV) US Options Study 500 GeV (1 TeV)

5-May-05SLAC8 Experimental Test Facility - KEK Prototype Damping Ring for X-band Linear Collider Development of Beam Instrumentation and Control

5-May-05SLAC9 Evaluation: Technical Issues

5-May-05SLAC10 TESLA Test Facility Linac laser driven electron gun photon beam diagnostics undulator bunch compressor superconducting accelerator modules pre- accelerator e - beam diagnostics 240 MeV120 MeV16 MeV4 MeV

5-May-05SLAC11 ILC Design Issues First Consideration : Physics Reach ILC Parameters Energy Reach Luminosity

5-May-05SLAC12 Working Parameter Set “Point Design”

5-May-05SLAC13 GDE will do a “Parametric” Design nomlow Nlrg Ylow P N  nbnb e x,y mm, nm 9.6, 4010,3012,8010,35 b x,y cm, mm 2, , 0.21, 0.41, 0.2 s x,y nm 543, , , 8452, 3.8 DyDy d BS % szsz mm P beam MW L  Range of parameters design to achieve 210 34

5-May-05SLAC14 Maximum Luminosity nomlow Nlrg Ylow PHigh L N  nbnb  x,y  m, nm 9.6, 4010,3012,8010,3510,30  x,y cm, mm 2, , 0.21, 0.41, 0.2  x,y nm 543, , , 8452, , 3.5 DyDy  BS % zz mm P beam MW L  !

5-May-05SLAC15 Towards the ILC Baseline Design

5-May-05SLAC16 TESLA Cost Estimate 3,136 M€ (no contingency, year 2000) + ~7000 person years

5-May-05SLAC17 RF SC Linac Challenges Energy: 500 GeV, upgradeable to 1000 GeV RF Accelerating Structures –Accelerating structures must support the desired gradient in an operational setting and there must be a cost effective means of fabrication. –~17,000 accelerating cavities/500 GeV –Current performance goal is 35 MV/m, (operating at 30 MV/m ) Trade-off cost and technical risk. 1 m Risk Cost~Theoretical Max

5-May-05SLAC18 (Improve surface quality -- pioneering work done at KEK) BCPEP Several single cell cavities at g > 40 MV/m 4 nine-cell cavities at ~35 MV/m, one at 40 MV/m Theoretical Limit 50 MV/m Electro-polishing

5-May-05SLAC19 Gradient Results from KEK-DESY collaboration must reduce spread (need more statistics) single-cell measurements (in nine-cell cavities)

5-May-05SLAC20 New Cavity Shape for Higher Gradient? TESLA Cavity A new cavity shape with a small Hp/Eacc ratio around 35Oe/(MV/m) must be designed. - Hp is a surface peak magnetic field and Eacc is the electric field gradient on the beam axis. - For such a low field ratio, the volume occupied by magnetic field in the cell must be increased and the magnetic density must be reduced. - This generally means a smaller bore radius. - There are trade-offs (eg. Electropolishing, weak cell-to-cell coupling, etc) Alternate Shapes

5-May-05SLAC21 Gradient vs Length Higher gradient gives shorter linac –cheaper tunnel / civil engineering –less cavities –(but still need same # klystrons) Higher gradient needs more refrigeration –‘cryo-power’ per unit length scales as G 2 /Q 0 –cost of cryoplants goes up!

5-May-05SLAC22 Klystron Development THALUS CPI TOSHIBA 10MW 1.4ms Multibeam Klystrons ~650 for 500 GeV +650 for 1 TeV upgrade

5-May-05SLAC23 Towards the ILC Baseline Design Not cost drivers But can be L performance bottlenecks Many challenges!

5-May-05SLAC24 Parameters of Positron Sources rep rate # of bunches per pulse # of positrons per bunch # of positrons per pulse TESLA TDR5 Hz28202 · · NLC120 Hz · · SLC120 Hz15 · DESY positron source 50 Hz11.5 · 10 9

5-May-05SLAC25 Positron Source Large amount of charge to produce Three concepts: –undulator-based (TESLA TDR baseline) –‘conventional’ –laser Compton based

5-May-05SLAC26

5-May-05SLAC27

5-May-05SLAC28

5-May-05SLAC29 Strawman Final Focus

5-May-05SLAC30 International/Regional Organization ILC-Americas Regional Team Regional Director and Deputy Institutional ILC Managers for major instiutional members Cornell ILC-NSF PI TRIUMF ILC-Canada Manager NSF-funded Institutions Canadian Institutions Lead Labs Work Package Oversight ILCSC GDE - Director Regional USLCSG Funding Agencies FNAL ILC-FNAL Manager WP 1.FNAL WP 1.ANL WP 3.FNAL SLAC ILC-SLAC Manager WP 2.SLAC WP 2.BNL WP 3.SLAC communications ILC-AsiaILC-Europe International Regional

5-May-05SLAC31 Fall 2002: ICFA created the International Linear Collider Steering Committee (ILCSC) to guide the process for building a Linear Collider. Asia, Europe and North America each formed their own regional Steering Groups (Jonathan Dorfan chairs the North America steering group). Physics and Detectors Subcommittee (AKA WWS) Jim Brau, David Miller, Hitoshi Yamamoto, co-chairs (est by ICFA as free standing group) International Linear Collider Steering Committee Maury Tigner, chair Parameters Subcommittee Rolf Heuer, chair (finished) Accelerator Subcommittee Greg Loew, chair Comunications and Outreach Neil Calder et al Technology Recommendation Panel Barry Barish, chair (finished) Global Design Initiative organization Satoshi Ozaki, chair (finished) GDI central team site evaluation Ralph Eichler, chair GDI central team director search committee Paul Grannis, chair

5-May-05SLAC32 Attendees: Son (Korea); Yamauchi (Japan); Koepke (Germany); Aymar (CERN); Iarocci (CERN Council); Ogawa (Japan); Kim (Korea); Turner (NSF - US); Trischuk (Canada); Halliday (PPARC); Staffin (DoE – US); Gurtu (India) Guests: Barish (ITRP); Witherell (Fermilab Director,) “ The Funding Agencies praise the clear choice by ICFA. This recommendation will lead to focusing of the global R&D effort for the linear collider and the Funding Agencies look forward to assisting in this process. The Funding Agencies see this recommendation to use superconducting rf technology as a critical step in moving forward to the design of a linear collider.” FALC is setting up a working group to keep a close liaison with the Global Design Initiative with regard to funding resources. The cooperative engagement of the Funding Agencies on organization, technology choice, timetable is a very strong signal and encouragement. Working with Funding Agency (FALC)

5-May-05SLAC33 GDE – Near Term Plan Organize the ILC effort globally –Undertake making a “global design” over the next few years for a machine that can be jointly implemented internationally. Snowmass Aug Begin to define Configuration (1 st Step) GDE Dec Baseline Configuration document by end of 2005 Put Baseline under Configuration Control Conceptual Design of Baseline by end of 2006 –Include site dependence – 3 or more sample sites –Detector Design Concept / Scope (1 vs 2, options, etc) –Reliable Costs -- emphasis during design on cost consciousness --- value Engineering, trade studies, industrialization, etc –Coordinate worldwide R & D efforts, in order to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc. (Proposal Driven to GDE)