Computer Science Lecture 14, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Consistency and Replication Today: –Introduction –Consistency models Data-centric consistency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMP 655: Distributed/Operating Systems Summer 2011 Dr. Chunbo Chu Week 7: Consistency 4/13/20151Distributed Systems - COMP 655.
Advertisements

Linearizability Linearizability is a correctness criterion for concurrent object (Herlihy & Wing ACM TOPLAS 1990). It provides the illusion that each operation.
Replication. Topics r Why Replication? r System Model r Consistency Models r One approach to consistency management and dealing with failures.
CSE 486/586, Spring 2014 CSE 486/586 Distributed Systems Consistency Steve Ko Computer Sciences and Engineering University at Buffalo.
Consistency and Replication Chapter Introduction: replication and scalability 6.2 Data-Centric Consistency Models 6.3 Client-Centric Consistency.
Consistency and Replication Chapter Topics Reasons for Replication Models of Consistency –Data-centric consistency models: strict, linearizable,
1 CS6320 – Performance L. Grewe 2 The Servlet Interface Java provides the interface Servlet Java provides the interface Servlet Specific Servlets implement.
Consistency and Replication
Synchronization Chapter clock synchronization * 5.2 logical clocks * 5.3 global state * 5.4 election algorithm * 5.5 mutual exclusion * 5.6 distributed.
Consistency and Replication Chapter 6. Object Replication (1) Organization of a distributed remote object shared by two different clients.
Replication and Consistency Chapter 6. Data-Centric Consistency Models The general organization of a logical data store, physically distributed and replicated.
Consistency Models Based on Tanenbaum/van Steen’s “Distributed Systems”, Ch. 6, section 6.2.
Consistency and Replication. Replication of data Why? To enhance reliability To improve performance in a large scale system Replicas must be consistent.
Computer Science Lecture 14, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Consistency and Replication Today: –Introduction –Consistency models Data-centric consistency.
Distributed Systems1 Chapter 8: Replication and Consistency  Replication: A key to providing good performance, high availability and fault tolerance in.
Consistency And Replication
Consistency and Replication
Distributed Systems Spring 2009
Tanenbaum & Van Steen, Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms, 2e, (c) 2007 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS.
Computer Science Lecture 16, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Last Class: Web Caching Use web caching as an illustrative example Distribution protocols –Invalidate.
Consistency and Replication Chapter 6. Reasons for Replication Data replication is a common technique in distributed systems. There are two reasons for.
Distributed Systems Fall 2009 Replication Fall 20095DV0203 Outline Group communication Fault-tolerant services –Passive and active replication Highly.
Replication and Consistency CS-4513 D-term Replication and Consistency CS-4513 Distributed Computing Systems (Slides include materials from Operating.
Computer Science Lecture 14, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Consistency and Replication Introduction Consistency models –Data-centric consistency models.
Tanenbaum & Van Steen, Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms, 2e, (c) 2007 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 7 Consistency.
Computer Science Lecture 16, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Last Class:Consistency Semantics Consistency models –Data-centric consistency models –Client-centric.
Computer Science Lecture 12, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Last Class Vector timestamps Global state –Distributed Snapshot Election algorithms.
Consistency & Replication Chapter No. 6
Consistency and Replication Chapter Concepts Reasons for Replication Reliability Earthquake, flood Misoperation Performance Place copies of data.
Consistency and Replication CSCI 4780/6780. Chapter Outline Why replication? –Relations to reliability and scalability How to maintain consistency of.
Consistency and Replication
Consistency And Replication
Computer Science Lecture 12, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Last Class Vector timestamps Global state –Distributed Snapshot Election algorithms –Bully algorithm.
Consistency and Replication Chapter 6. Release Consistency (1) A valid event sequence for release consistency. Use acquire/release operations to denote.
Consistency and Replication. Replication of data Why? To enhance reliability To improve performance in a large scale system Replicas must be consistent.
Tanenbaum & Van Steen, Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms, 2e, (c) 2007 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS.
Consistency and Replication Distributed Software Systems.
第5讲 一致性与复制 §5.1 副本管理 Replica Management §5.2 一致性模型 Consistency Models
Computer Science Lecture 13, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Last Class: Canonical Problems Distributed synchronization and mutual exclusion Distributed Transactions.
Distributed Shared Memory Presentation by Deepthi Reddy.
Consistency and Replication Chapter 6 Presenter: Yang Jie RTMM Lab Kyung Hee University.
Replication (1). Topics r Why Replication? r System Model r Consistency Models – How do we reason about the consistency of the “global state”? m Data-centric.
Tanenbaum & Van Steen, Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms, 2e, (c) 2007 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS.
Distributed Systems Replication. Why Replication Replication is Maintenance of copies at multiple sites Enhancing Services by replicating data Performance.
DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING
Consistency and Replication Chapter 6. Topics Reasons for Replication Models of Consistency –Data-centric consistency models –Client-centric consistency.
Replication (1). Topics r Why Replication? r System Model r Consistency Models r One approach to consistency management and dealing with failures.
Consistency and Replication. Outline Introduction (what’s it all about) Data-centric consistency Client-centric consistency Replica management Consistency.
Linearizability Linearizability is a correctness criterion for concurrent object (Herlihy & Wing ACM TOPLAS 1990). It provides the illusion that each operation.
Distributed Systems CS Consistency and Replication – Part IV Lecture 13, Oct 23, 2013 Mohammad Hammoud.
Hwajung Lee.  Improves reliability  Improves availability ( What good is a reliable system if it is not available?)  Replication must be transparent.
Linearizability Linearizability is a correctness criterion for concurrent object (Herlihy & Wing ACM TOPLAS 1990). It provides the illusion that each operation.
Consistency and Replication Chapter 6 Presenter: Yang Jie RTMM Lab Kyung Hee University.
Consistency and Replication CSCI 6900/4900. FIFO Consistency Relaxes the constraints of the causal consistency “Writes done by a single process are seen.
OS2 –Sem 1, Rasool Jalili Consistency and Replication Chapter 6.
Consistency and Replication (1). Topics Why Replication? Consistency Models – How do we reason about the consistency of the “global state”? u Data-centric.
CS6320 – Performance L. Grewe.
Distributed Shared Memory
Consistency and Replication
Consistency and Replication
Consistency Models.
Linearizability Linearizability is a correctness criterion for concurrent object (Herlihy & Wing ACM TOPLAS 1990). It provides the illusion that each operation.
7.1. CONSISTENCY AND REPLICATION INTRODUCTION
Consistency and Replication
Consistency and Replication
DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS Principles and Paradigms Second Edition ANDREW S
Distributed Systems CS
Replication Chapter 7.
Consistency and Replication
CSE 486/586 Distributed Systems Consistency --- 2
Presentation transcript:

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 1 CS677: Distributed OS Consistency and Replication Today: –Introduction –Consistency models Data-centric consistency models Client-centric consistency models –Thoughts for the mid-term

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 2 CS677: Distributed OS Why replicate? Data replication: common technique in distributed systems Reliability –If one replica is unavailable or crashes, use another –Protect against corrupted data Performance –Scale with size of the distributed system (replicated web servers) –Scale in geographically distributed systems (web proxies) Key issue: need to maintain consistency of replicated data –If one copy is modified, others become inconsistent

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 3 CS677: Distributed OS Object Replication Approach 1: application is responsible for replication –Application needs to handle consistency issues Approach 2: system (middleware) handles replication –Consistency issues are handled by the middleware –Simplifies application development but makes object-specific solutions harder

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 4 CS677: Distributed OS Replication and Scaling Replication and caching used for system scalability Multiple copies: –Improves performance by reducing access latency –But higher network overheads of maintaining consistency –Example: object is replicated N times Read frequency R, write frequency W If R<<W, high consistency overhead and wasted messages Consistency maintenance is itself an issue –What semantics to provide? –Tight consistency requires globally synchronized clocks! Solution: loosen consistency requirements –Variety of consistency semantics possible

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 5 CS677: Distributed OS Data-Centric Consistency Models Consistency model (aka consistency semantics) –Contract between processes and the data store If processes obey certain rules, data store will work correctly –All models attempt to return the results of the last write for a read operation Differ in how “last” write is determined/defined

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 6 CS677: Distributed OS Strict Consistency Any read always returns the result of the most recent write –Implicitly assumes the presence of a global clock –A write is immediately visible to all processes Difficult to achieve in real systems (network delays can be variable)

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 7 CS677: Distributed OS Sequential Consistency Sequential consistency: weaker than strict consistency –Assumes all operations are executed in some sequential order and each process issues operations in program order Any valid interleaving is allowed All agree on the same interleaving Each process preserves its program order Nothing is said about “most recent write”

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 8 CS677: Distributed OS Linearizability Assumes sequential consistency and –If TS(x) < TS(y) then OP(x) should precede OP(y) in the sequence –Stronger than sequential consistency –Difference between linearizability and serializbility? Granularity: reads/writes versus transactions Example: Process P1Process P2Process P3 x = 1; print ( y, z); y = 1; print (x, z); z = 1; print (x, y);

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 9 CS677: Distributed OS Linearizability Example Four valid execution sequences for the processes of the previous slide. The vertical axis is time. x = 1; print ((y, z); y = 1; print (x, z); z = 1; print (x, y); Prints: Signature: (a) x = 1; y = 1; print (x,z); print(y, z); z = 1; print (x, y); Prints: Signature: (b) y = 1; z = 1; print (x, y); print (x, z); x = 1; print (y, z); Prints: Signature: (c) y = 1; x = 1; z = 1; print (x, z); print (y, z); print (x, y); Prints: Signature: (d)

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 10 CS677: Distributed OS Causal consistency Causally related writes must be seen by all processes in the same order. –Concurrent writes may be seen in different orders on different machines Not permittedPermitted

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 11 CS677: Distributed OS Other models FIFO consistency: writes from a process are seen by others in the same order. Writes from different processes may be seen in different order (even if causally related) –Relaxes causal consistency –Simple implementation: tag each write by (Proc ID, seq #) Even FIFO consistency may be too strong! –Requires all writes from a process be seen in order Assume use of critical sections for updates –Send final result of critical section everywhere –Do not worry about propagating intermediate results Assume presence of synchronization primitives to define semantics

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 12 CS677: Distributed OS Other Models Weak consistency –Accesses to synchronization variables associated with a data store are sequentially consistent –No operation on a synchronization variable is allowed to be performed until all previous writes have been completed everywhere –No read or write operation on data items are allowed to be performed until all previous operations to synchronization variables have been performed. Entry and release consistency –Assume shared data are made consistent at entry or exit points of critical sections

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 13 CS677: Distributed OS Summary of Data-centric Consistency Models ConsistencyDescription StrictAbsolute time ordering of all shared accesses matters. Linearizability All processes must see all shared accesses in the same order. Accesses are furthermore ordered according to a (nonunique) global timestamp SequentialAll processes see all shared accesses in the same order. Accesses are not ordered in time CausalAll processes see causally-related shared accesses in the same order. FIFO All processes see writes from each other in the order they were used. Writes from different processes may not always be seen in that order (a) ConsistencyDescription WeakShared data can be counted on to be consistent only after a synchronization is done ReleaseShared data are made consistent when a critical region is exited EntryShared data pertaining to a critical region are made consistent when a critical region is entered. (b)

Computer Science Lecture 14, page 14 CS677: Distributed OS Mid-term Exam Comments Closed book, closed notes, 90 min Lectures 1-13 included on the test –Focus on things taught in class (lectures, in-class discussions) –Start with lecture notes, read corresponding sections from text –Supplementary readings are not included on the test. Exam structure: few short answer questions, mix of subjective and “design” questions Good luck!