Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC  and 0 Mode Interaction in RF Gun John Schmerge, SLAC November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
Advertisements

Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Henrik Loos LCLS FAC Meeting 27 October RF Gun Status LCLS Facility Advisory Committee Meeting October 26, 2005 Mechanical.
C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics with mode November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics in the presence of mode 0 C.Limborg-Deprey 0 and PI.
Ch3: Lightwave Fundamentals E = E o sin( wt-kz ) E = E o sin( wt-kz ) k: propagation factor = w/v k: propagation factor = w/v wt-kz : phase wt-kz : phase.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
Juhao Wu LCLS FAC 7 Apr Dark Current, Beam Loss, and Collimation in the LCLS J. Wu, D. Dowell, P. Emma, C. Limborg, J. Schmerge,
R. Akre XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and July 26, 2004 LCLS Drive Laser Timing Stability Measurements XFEL Short Bunch Measurement.
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee October Injector Drive Laser Update 1 Facilities Advisory Committee Meeting.
DUAL FEED RF GUN DESIGN FOR LCLS Liling XIAO, Zenghai LI Advanced Computations Department Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Nov , SLAC-LCLS Injector.
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
David H. Dowell RF Gun Commissioning LCLS FAC April 16, RF Gun Commissioning Experience David H. Dowell for the LCLS Injector.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC L0-1 Electrical and Mechanical Tolerances John Schmerge, SLAC.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
David H. Dowell Injector Physics/Diagnostics/Gun&L0 RF April 29-30, 2004 Injector Physics / Diagnostics / Gun & L0 Linac.
8/24/2015Pengda Gu, Structure Meeting Study on 30GHz Pulse Compressor 1.Simulation of a multi-cavity RF pulse compressor using a coupled resonator model.
PULSE SHAPING ISSUES FOR THE PETS TESTING PROGRAM AT SLAC A.Cappelletti SLAC, Oct 2008.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL
PROPOSAL G.I.A.F. (HYBRID GUN AT HIGH FREQUENCY) INFN-LNF – UNIVERSITY OF ROME “LA SAPIENZA”- UCLA D. Alesini (T), M. Ferrario (R), A. Gallo (T),
David H. Dowell and Friends SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory David H. Dowell and Friends SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory The LCLS Gun ICFA Beam.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Frequency-domain study of acceleration & beam loading based on a circuit model by raquel fandos.
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
Measurements of the X-ray/pump laser pulse timing Valery Dolgashev, David Fritz, Yiping Feng, Gordon Bowden SLAC 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
Cecile Limborg-Deprey 0 mode in LCLS injector August 28th mode studies in LCLS injector gun C.Limborg-Deprey Frequency.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
DEVELOPMENT OF A STEADY STATE SIMULATION CODE FOR KLYSTRONS
Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.
GHz High Gradient Testing of a T18 TW StructureUsing a Fast Response Protection and Power Recirculating System GHz High Gradient Testing.
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
Feng Zhou SLAC Presented at HBB, Havana, Cuba, March 29, 2016 LCLS Injector Improvements & Plans.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
X-band Based FEL proposal
Experimental Studies of Electron Emissions and Breakdowns in RF Guns Wei Gai For ANL/THU/SLAC collaboration Symposium Accelerator Physics, August 15 XinglongShan,
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
Multi-stage pulse compressor
RF Dipole HOM Electromagnetic Design
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Beam dynamics simulation with 3D Field map for FCC RF gun
RadiaBeam Technologies, Santa Monica CA
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
X-band high-power variable RF splitter
by P. Musumeci and F.Tazzioli
SPARC RF gun status by P. Musumeci Review committee
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Parallel 3D Finite Element Particle-In-Cell Simulations with Pic3P*
Injector Performance Requirements Conventional Facilities Update
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
S-band RF gun based on new type accelerating structure
LCLS Gun Commissioning Status & Plans David H
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
RF Pulse Shaping.
5th X-Band Structure Collaboration Meeting
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002
Overview of RF Gun Specifications and Technical Issues
Minimized emittance for high charge with multi cell superconducting guns and solenoidal focusing D. Lipka, BESSY.
Presentation transcript:

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC  and 0 Mode Interaction in RF Gun John Schmerge, SLAC November 3, 2004 LCLS 1.6 Cell Gun 2 resonant frequencies Bead drop results Full and half cell field probes Measurements Time Domain Frequency Domain Calculations No pulse shaping With pulse shaping Summary

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Multiple Modes 2 modes with different resonant frequencies and different longitudinal field profiles. f  – f 0 = 3.5 MHz on GTF gun Beating observed during gun filling time (transient effect) Presence of 0 mode affects e-beam Time dependent ratio of full cell to half cell field due to the 180˚ phase shift between the two modes affects longitudinal phase space. Additional transverse fields in the cell-cell aperture affect transverse phase space. Measure each mode Measure in time or frequency at a particular longitudinal position (RF probes). Measure as a function of longitudinal position averaged over time (bead drop).

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Bead Drop Measurement

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Laser Port RF Probe Location on GTF Gun Half Cell Probe Full Cell Probe Waveguide Feed

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Time Domain Measurement Temporal Response with ≈ 6 MW incident power E cathode ≈ 90 MV/m

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Time Domain Measurement Temporal Response with ≈ 6 MW incident power E cathode ≈ 90 MV/m

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Frequency Domain Measurements Full Cell ProbeHalf Cell Probe

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Transfer Function V out /V in Full CellProbeHalf Cell Probe  mode Sum (full cell) or difference (half cell) of two second order band pass filters

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Output Response Equations  mode only  and 0 mode

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC GTF Measurements and Fits from 1998 Fit Gun Field WaveformFit Reflected Power Waveform

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Step Function Response Steady state response at applied frequency Transient response at resonant frequencies

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Transient Response Including 0 Mode f = MHz f  = MHz f 0 = MHz Q 0  = Q 0 0 =   = 1.3  0 = 0.7   = 576 ns  0 = 779 ns f = MHz f  = MHz f 0 = MHz Q 0  = Q 0 0 =   = 2.0  0 = 1.1   = 440 ns  0 = 637 ns GTF LCLS

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Transient Response With Pulse Shaping f = MHz f  = MHz f 0 = MHz Q 0  = Q 0 0 =   = 1.3  0 = 0.7   = 576 ns  0 = 779 ns f = MHz f  = MHz f 0 = MHz Q 0  = Q 0 0 =   = 2.0  0 = 1.1   = 440 ns  0 = 637 ns GTFLCLS

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Transient Response With Pulse Shaping f = MHz f  = MHz f 0 = MHz Q 0  = Q 0 0 =   = 2.0  0 = 1.1   = 440 ns  0 = 637 ns f = MHz f  = MHz f 0 = MHz Q 0  = Q 0 0 =   = 2.0  0 = 1.1   = 440 ns  0 = 638 ns LCLS Adjusted timing LCLS Increased  f

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Frequency Domain Flat klystron pulse (3  s)With pulse shaping (0.56  s)

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC Summary 0 mode produces a measurable 3.5 MHz beating on the gun field Effect more significant with short pulses used for rf pulse shaping Estimated time dependent full cell to half cell field ratio varies by less than 10% and for special cases less than 2%. Effect depends on the filling time (coupling coefficient), mode separation and exact input waveform. Timing can be adjusted to minimize beating. Mode beating can be advantageous as it allows for variable field balance depending on laser timing Shot to shot jitter on the beating will be dominated by fluctuations on the klystron input pulse. Measure beating at GTF with rf pulse shaping.