W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics Preliminary Design & Path Forward Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flow-down of Strategic Priorities to Annual and 5-year WMKO Plan Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September 18, 2009 Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September.
Advertisements

1 Keck LGS AO Planning Workshop: Overview, Requirements & Schedule December 5, 2004.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting February 20, 2008.
NGAO Instrumentation Overview September 2008 Updated Sean Adkins.
NIR LOWFS for Keck and TMT Roger Smith & David Hale.
Build to Cost Meeting: Goals, Agenda & New Directions Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO 1-tier Draft Optical Relay Design P. Wizinowich 12/7/07.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
LGS WFS Design Status & Issues Dekany, Delacroix, & Velur Caltech Optical Observatories.
NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea P. Wizinowich for the NGAO Team.
What should we propose to ATI? Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
1 Keck NGAO Proposal: Management Overview Presenter: P. Wizinowich SSC Meeting June 21, 2006.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 3, 2007.
LO WFS Summit 6/19/2015Richard Dekany A Joint Meeting of the NGAO, IRIS, and K1 LO WFS Teams 12/15/2009.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
Build to Cost Directions & Guidelines Peter Wizinowich SSC Meeting November 3, 2008.
The Path to NGAO Core Science Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
Keck Interferometer Support Trade Study Christopher Neyman Junichi Meguro W. M. Keck Observatory Viswa Velur Caltech Keck NGAO Team Meeting #5 March 7,
NGAO Meeting #3 Introduction NGAO Meeting #3 Peter Wizinowich December 13, 2006.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
Demonstration of Science Observing Modes AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 D. Le Mignant, A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Management Update Peter Wizinowich NGAO Meeting #11 November 5, 2007.
Palomar Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Antonin Bouchez & Mitchell Troy John Angione, Rick Burruss, John Cromer, Richard Dekany, Steve Guiwits, John Henning,
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
The Future of AO at Keck Sept 2004 Mike Brown, for the AOWG and Keck AO team.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
NGAO: Cost Comparison with First Light TMT AO Peter Wizinowich, Richard Dekany, Don Gavel with input & review by Brent Ellerbroek SSC Meeting November.
Design Team Report: Laser Facility Chris Neyman Jim Bell, Erik Johansson, Jason Chin W. M. Keck Observatory Viswa Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Keck.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich March 19, 2009.
NGAO Build to Cost Summary Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max & the NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 14, 2009.
Major Management & Systems Engineering Ideas for Reducing Costs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
Keck Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: 1 st & 2 nd Milestones AOWG Telecon Oct. 17, 2003 A. Bouchez, J. Chin, A. Contos, S. Hartman, E. Johansson,
NGAO Meeting #5 Introduction NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) Facility Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team:
NGAO Instrumentation Preliminary Design Phase Planning September 2008 Sean Adkins.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: AO System Design Impact of Cost Savings Ideas Don Gavel December 19, 2008.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting November 6, 2007.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Wavefront Error Performance Budgets R. Dekany 13 May 2010.
NGAO Controls Team Kickoff Meeting August 5, 2008 Erik Johansson.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
Keck Observatory and The System: Astro2010 Activities Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Taft Armandroff Keck Strategic Planning Discussions September 18, 2009.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
Advancing GSMT SWG Recommendations: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom AURA New Initiatives Office Presented to the GSMT SWG 12 February, 2004.
TMT.PMO.PRE REL011 Thirty Meter Telescope Background and Status.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
AURA New Initiatives Office. GSMT SWG Meeting L. Stepp, July 30, 2002 NSF Science Working Group Support Available from AURA NIO Available Personnel Current.
Keck Observatory Overview Peter Wizinowich W. M. Keck Observatory AOSC May 31, 2004.
Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Science Priorities and Implications of Potential Cost Savings Ideas
NGAO System Design Project Plans and Schedule
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Presentation transcript:

W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics Preliminary Design & Path Forward Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team: R. Bartos, J. Chin, A. Conrad, A. Delacroix, R. Kupke, C. Lockwood, J. Lyke, E. McGrath, D. Medeiros, D. Morrison, C. Neyman, S. Panteleev, M. Pollard, M. Reinig, T. Stalcup, S. Thomas, M. Troy, K. Tsubota, V. Velur, K. Wallace, E. Wetherell SSC, Waimea July 7, 2010

2 Flowed-Down Key Architectural Features

3 NGAO System Architecture Key Features: 1.Fixed narrow field laser tomography 2.AO corrected NIR TT sensors 3.Cooled AO enclosure 4.Cascaded relay 5.Combined imager/IFU instrument

44 NGAO on Nasmyth Platform

55

6 DAVINCI – Imager & IFS Entrance window Coronagrap h mask wheel Imager detector head Imager/IFS selector mirror Pupil imager wheel Filter and pupil mask wheels IFS detector head Grating selector wheel On axis imager 28.7" x 28.7" FOV –7 mas pixel scale On axis selectable IFS –50 mas spatial scale FOV 5.6" x 3" –35 mas, FOV 3.92" x 2.1" –10 mas, FOV 1.12" x 0.6"

7 AO Enclosure Model DAVINCI Instrument Overhead HEPAs LGSWFS Gowning Room Area AO Bench Secondary Instrument Interferometer DSM Thermal Management DM Electronics

LGS Facility TOPTICA/MPBC RC Optical

9 Science Case Performance Summary Galaxy assembly: 30º zenith angle, 60º galactic latitude, 30 min integ.

AO correction of IR tip-tilt stars has big benefit for sky coverage Galaxy assembly science case Current Keck TT Current Keck EE NGAO TT NGAO EE

11 NGAO is robust against conditions and design assumptions

12 NGAO changes the Keck AO observing experience Monte Carlo performance estimate simulating 44 nights observing (Galaxy Assembly science case), drawing random values for r 0, wind speed, sodium abundance, and zenith angle Includes comparison with M. Liu’s measured K2 LGS data ( = 17%), the model prediction for K2 LGS ( = 20%), and NGAO predict ( = 70%)

Path to Early Science Benefits from NGAO is Already Under Way - 1 NGAO laser launch telescope –NSF-MRI (Aug/09) funding to procure & implement a K2 center launch telescope NGAO laser –Preliminary designs completed (Dec/09) from 2 vendors. Collaboration with ESO, AURA, GMT & TMT. TOPTICA/MPBC selected to begin final design. –MRI proposal submitted to procure & implement 1 st NGAO laser on K2. Collaboration with TMT & ESO. 13

Path to Early Science Benefits from NGAO is Already Under Way - 2 PSF reconstruction –Collaboration with Gemini & U. Groningen to demonstrate on-axis NGS AO PSF reconstruction on Gemini & Keck –Plan to implement off-axis LGS AO PSF reconstruction with Keck –MASS/DIMM implemented (Sept/09) as a Mauna Kea facility Focal anisoplanatism reduction –Risk reduction to demonstrate 20% reduction using Cn2 data Tip-tilt vibration reduction –Risk reduction plan to prototype parametric oscillator on K2 AO NIR tip-tilt sensing (no object selection or AO correction) –ATI (Jun/10) funding to implement a near-IR tip-tilt sensor 14

15 Major Keck AO Science Capability Milestones Future

16 Cost Estimate by FY (then-year $k) Assumes 3.5% annual inflation $1.5M (3.8%) of $60M cap reserved for schedule contingency $58.5M (then-year) $53.9M (FY10)

17 Cost Estimate versus Funding Need a path to $49.3M (then-year $) or $44.5M (FY10 $) Includes ~$11M (then-year) for detailed design with contingency

Path Forward

19 Funding Options (Project Perspective) 1.Proceed with full NGAO plan (as outlined at PDR & endorsed by Review Committee) or 2.Proceed with staged implementation on the path to the full NGAO system, with clear near-term science return We will discuss each of these in turn

20 1.Proceed with Full NGAO Plan Potential path to significant funding (dependent on Astro2010 report) : –Submit an unsolicited proposal to MPS’s existing “Mid- Scale Instrumentation Program” to fund detailed design This program has funded multiple AST programs (Atacama Cosmology Telescope, Murchison Wide-Field Array, LSST design, GSMT development, etc.) –Develop a proposal to NSF for full funding –Continue private fundraising efforts This is the path recommended by the NGAO team –We would continue to seek early science / staged opportunities

NGAO has demonstrated that it can successfully compete & collaborate 21 Demonstrated fund raising & leveraging successes: One (extreme) interpretation: 36 nights  $9.0M or $249k/night

2. Staged Implementation Path to NGAO Significant “development chunks” that are on the path to the full NGAO system, with clear near-term science return Criteria for selection: each development stage should accomplish the following goals, with equal weight: –It should provide early science return to the WMKO community –It should be on the path to the full NGAO project In addition a proposal should accomplish the following: –It should help keep the NGAO team working together on NGAO goals –It should reduce NGAO risk –It should allow us to leverage the work of others, especially TMT Potential funding sources: NSF ATI, MRI, TSIP & private fundraising past the January 2011 deadline 22

Preliminary list of possible early “stages” 1.New laser (if not funded by MRI) 2.Develop PSF reconstruction techniques –Will be useful to all Keck AO users –Key to precision photometry and astrometry with NGAO 3.Increase sky coverage of existing AO system by building an AO feed to the new infrared tip-tilt sensor –Would serve as prototype for NGAO’s tip-tilt arms 4.Implement laser tomography on existing AO system –Increase Strehl & enclosed energy by reducing “cone effect” –Risk/cost reduction collaboration opportunities on RTC & WFS camera In support of decision making NGAO team & NSAT will evaluate science return, feasibility & cost of “stages” 23

In Closing Keck AO has been very successful scientifically NGAO preliminary design received a very strong endorsement NGAO can successfully compete for & leverage Federal funding NGAO Team ready to compete for funding & to deliver this key element which is “critical to WMKO’s future as a facility producing forefront science” (NGAO Review Panel) Keck AO NGAO