Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 1 Planning to Maximize Longevity of Digital Information Howard Besser UCLA School of Education & Information
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 2 Planning to Maximize Longevity of Digital Info- Access and Preservation Why are you Managing this Information? Key Considerations for Imaging Projects Important Planning Considerations Models for Digital Collections Importance of Metadata Standards Digital Longevity Issues More Planning Issues
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 3 Access and Preservation _ Digitizing can serve both Access and Preservation –E.g. Access to digital surrogates saves wear & tear on originals _ But Digitization for Access can be quite different than Digitization for Preservation –Level of detail, scanning quality, extensiveness of resources –And long-term retention of digital works is still an open issue
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 4 Why are you Managing this Information? Organizational mission & type Users Uses
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 5 Key Considerations for Imaging Projects- Users' Needs Image Quality Intellectual Property Standards Topology Tools & Processes
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 6 Key Considerations for Imaging Projects (1 of 3) Users' Needs – Quality of Digital Surrogate – Interoperable desktop applications Image Quality – Archival – Current online delivery
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 7 Key Considerations for Imaging Projects (2 of 3) Intellectual Property Standards – Modular and Layered Architecture – Terminology – Technical imaging information Topology
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 8 Key Considerations for Imaging Projects (3 of 3) Tools & Processes – Scanners – Compression techniques – Linking files – Workflow – Interoperable desktop applications
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 9 Some nuts-and-bolts Planning Considerations Think about users (and potential users), uses, and type of material/collection Scan at the highest quality that does not exceed the likely potential users/uses/material Do not let today’s delivery limitations influence your scanning file sizes; understand the difference between digital masters and derivative files used for delivery Many documents which appear to be bitonal actually are better represented with greyscale scans Include color bar and ruler in the scan Use objective measurements to determine scanner settings (do NOT attempt to make the image good on your particular monitor or use image processing to color correct) Don’t use lossy compression Store in a common (standardized) file format Capture as much metadata as is reasonably possiple (including metadata about the scanning process itself)
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 10 Why Scale is important
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 11 Important Planning Considerations File Formats Choosing Interoperable Systems Adhere to standards Vendors with large installed base Refreshing and/or Migration
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 12 Key problems we’re facing Discovery Longevity- Interoperability-
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 13 Serious Longevity Problems What we know from prior widespread digital file formats Images separating from their metadata Inaccessibility of software needed to view an image Inability to even decode the file format of an image …return to Longevity problem later-
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 14 Traditional Digital Library Model DL user search & presentation
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 15 Ideal Digital Library Model DL user search & presentation
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 16 For Interoperability Digital Libraries Need Standards Descriptive Metadata for consistent description Discovery Metadata for finding Administrative Metadata for viewing and maintaining Structural Metadata for navigation ... Terms & Conditions Metadata for controlling access...
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 17 Why are Standards and Metadata consensus important? Managing digital files over time Longevity Interoperability Veracity Recording in a consistent manner Will give vendors incentive to create applications that support this
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 18 Why Standards? Why do we need standards? – To make information universally available to users – facilitate sharing and interchange of information – To preserve information (make it safe from changes in hardware and software) Standards only work if communities widely accept them, but they’re necessary for communities to work together
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 19 Questions to Ask What communities is this standard designed for? What type of information is this standard designed to handle? What functions is this standard designed to serve? What previous standards is it built upon? Does the standard prescribe how to create new records (or parts of records), or how to map from existing records? How far does the standard go? Semantics: Does it define element sets? Rules? Syntax?-
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 20 Semantics/Syntax/Structure _ Semantics – meaning, as defined by a community to meet their particular needs (DC) _ Syntax – a systematic arrangement of data elements for machine processing – facilitates the exchange and use of metadata among various applications (HTML, XML, RDF) _ Structure – a formal arrangement of the syntax with the goal of consistent representation of the semantics (rules defining field contents like 1/11/99)
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 21 The Short Life of Digital Info: Digital Longevity Problems- Disappearing Information The Viewing Problem The Scrambling Problem The Inter-relation Problem The Custodial Problem The Translation Problem
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 22 The Viewing Problem Digital Info requires a whole infrastructure to view it Each piece of that infrastructure is changing at an incredibly rapid rate How can we ever hope to deal with all the permutations and combinations
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 23 The Scrambling Problem Dangers from: Compression to ease storage & delivery Container Architecture to enhance digital commerce
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 24 The Inter-relation Problem -Info is increasingly inter-related to other info -How do we make our own Info persist when it points to and integrates with Info owned by others? -What is the boundary of a set of information (or even of a digital object)?
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 25 The Custodial Problem How do we decide what to save? Who should save it? How should they save it? – -methods for later access: emulation, migration, etc. – -issues of authenticity and evidence
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 26 The Translation Problem Content translated into new delivery devices changes meaning – -A photo vs. a painting – -If Info is produced originally in digital form in one encoded format, will it be the same when translated into another format? – Behaviors
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 27 Pieces of the Solution (1/2) -We need to insist upon clearly readable standardized ways for digital objects to self- identify their formats -We should discourage scrambling -We need to better understand information inter-relates to other Info, and what constitutes “boundaries” of Info objects
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 28 Pieces of the Solution (2/2) -People and organizations wishing to make information persist need guidelines of how to go about doing it -We need to better understand how translating from one storage or display format to another affects the meaning of a work -We need to save the “behaviors” of a digital object, not just it’s “contents”
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 29 Conceptual Approaches to Digital Preservation _ Refreshing always necessary due to volatility of physical strata –Impact on evidential value _ Migration -- advantages & disadvantages _ Emulation -- advantages & disadvantages
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 30 Metadata can be the first line of defense Can tell you – where the file is (if you can’t find the file) – where more info about the file is (if you have the file but most other metadata has become separated) – what the file format is – what the compression scheme is – what application program and version is needed for the file
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 31 Groups Working on the Big Problem CPA Task Force Getty “Time & Bits” Conference & Follow-ups- Emulation experiments in US and Europe NEDLIB, CURL, Michigan Mellon-funded E-Journal Archive experiments Internet Archive Long Now
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 32 Time & Bits
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 33 Time & Bits Participants Steward Brand Howard Besser Brian Eno Danny Hillis Peter Lyman Brewster Kahle Kevin Kelly Jaron Lanier Doug Carlston John Heilemann Ben Davis Margaret MacLean Bruce Sterling Paul Saffo
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 34 Groups Working on Pieces of the Big Problem Internet Archive Long Now Emulation experiments in US and Europe NEDLIB, CURL, Michigan
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 35 Journal Archiving _ License, don’t own; may not be even able to obtain right to make archival copy _ Increasingly no paper back-up at all _ Usually we don’t have the important redundancy factor _ Stanford’s LOCKSS Project (Lots of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe) and its problems (
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 36 Migration/Refreshing Impact on evidential value
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 37 More Planning Issues _ Image Families _ Behaviors _ Persistent Identification
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 38 Identification/Provenance (Images)- The number of variant forms of a work can be enormous Image Families A digital image frequently has many layers of parentage Information about the parentage that can indicate the quality and veracity of the image (Dublin Core "Source" and "Relation") how to deal with different versions derived from the same scan or different encoding schemes Vocabulary Standards to express this
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 39 The number of variant forms of a work can be enormous different views of the same object different scans of the same photo different resolutions different compression schemes different compression ratios different file storage formats different details of the same image ...
Image Families
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 41 Identification/Provenance how to deal with different versions (browse, hi-res, medium res) derived from the same scan or different encoding schemes (TIFF, PICT, JFIF) Vocabulary Standards to express this – VRA Surrogate Categories – CIMI's "Image Elements”
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 42 MOA II Behaviors Navigation Display/Print
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 43 MOA II Best practices Use/Users/Collection: Benchmarking Masters vs. Derivatives Scanning- Administrative Metadata- Structural Metadata-
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 44 To deal with Immediately _ Persistent IDs _ Metadata
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 45 Persistent IDs--the Problem _ Need to separate work ID from work location _ URNs probably won’t be ready until 2003 _ Becomes a business process issue when one organization maintains the resource and another organization references it (ie. licensed from vendors or managed by separate administrative structures)
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 46 More Persistent IDs --the Approach for today _ PURLs _ Handles _ HTTP redirects _ And worry about costs now and conversion costs when URNs become feasible
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 47 Data Set Management More issues with referencing IDs _ References for mirror sites _ References for back-up sites when main site is down or bottle-necked _ References for off-site copies and archival copies
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 48 One Final Question: Who will collect the digital works of today that should become the Special Collections of tomorrow? _ web sites _ zines _ electronic journals _ listserve and discussions _ drafts of works that later become famous
Besser--Planning (Brazil) 31/5/01 49 Howard Besser UCLA School of Education & Information Planning to Maximize Longevity of Digital Information