RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to 2006. J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Line Features in RHESSI Spectra Kenneth J. H. Phillips Brian R. Dennis GSFC RHESSI Workshop Taos, NM 10 – 11 September 2003.
Advertisements

Thermal and nonthermal contributions to the solar flare X-ray flux B. Dennis & K. PhillipsNASA/GSFC, USA J. & B. SylwesterSRC, Poland R. Schwartz & K.
RHESSI Investigations of the Neupert Effect in Solar Flares Brian R. Dennis AAS/SPD Meeting 6 June 2002.
Masuda Flare: Remaining Problems on the Looptop Impulsive Hard X-ray Source in Solar Flares Satoshi Masuda (STEL, Nagoya Univ.)
RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Physical characteristics of selected X-ray events observed with SphinX spectrophotometer B. Sylwester, J. Sylwester, M. Siarkowski Space Research Centre,
Cristina Chifor SESI Student Intern 2005 Solar Physics, Code 612 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Mentors: Dr. Ken Phillips & Dr. Brian Dennis FE AND FE/NI.
Spatial and temporal relationships between UV continuum and hard x-ray emissions in solar flares Aaron J. Coyner and David Alexander Rice University June.
Page 1 Cristina Chifor (a) Ken Phillips (b), Brian Dennis (c) a) DAMTP, University of Cambridge, UK b) Mullard Space Science Lab, UK c) NASA/GSFC, Maryland,
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
Concealed Ejecta: The Search for a Unarmed Flare Cameron Martus Solar Physics REU 2010 Montana State University Mentors Dana Longcope & Angela Des Jardins.
Creating The RHESSI Flare List J McTiernan 3-Oct-2006.
Relations between concurrent hard X-ray sources in solar flares M. Battaglia and A. O. Benz Presented by Jeongwoo Lee NJIT/CSTR Journal Club 2007 October.
Page 1 18-OCT-2004 RHESSI Data Analysis Workshop RHESSI Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager Use or disclosure of data contained on this.
White-Light Flares: TRACE and RHESSI Observations H. Hudson (UCB), T. Metcalf & J. Wolfson (LMSAL), L. Fletcher & J. Khan (Glasgow)
+ Hard X-Ray Footpoint Motion and Progressive Hardening in Solar Flares Margot Robinson Mentor: Dr. Angela DesJardins MSU Solar Physics Summer REU, 2010.
X-Ray Observation and Analysis of a M1.7 Class Flare Courtney Peck Advisors: Jiong Qiu and Wenjuan Liu.
Characterizing Thermal and Non- Thermal Electron Populations in Solar Flares Using RHESSI Amir Caspi 1,2, Säm Krucker 2, Robert P. Lin 1,2 1 Department.
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL)
Hard X-ray footpoint statistics: spectral indices, fluxes, and positions Pascal Saint-Hilaire 1, Marina Battaglia 2, Jana Kasparova 3, Astrid Veronig 4,
White-Light Flares: TRACE and RHESSI Observations H. Hudson (UCB), J. Wolfson (LMSAL) & T. Metcalf (CORA)
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB)
Measuring the Temperature of Hot Solar Flare Plasma with RHESSI Amir Caspi 1,2, Sam Krucker 2, Robert P. Lin 1,2 1 Department of Physics, University of.
Statistical Properties of Hot Thermal Plasmas in M/X Flares Using RHESSI Fe & Fe/Ni Line * and Continuum Observations Amir Caspi †1,2, Sam Krucker 2, Robert.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We present spectral fits for RHESSI and GOES solar.
RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Test for AR Xrays with XIS 1 Black, T = 8 MK, EM = 1.0e47 cm -3 (RHESSI) Red. T=5 MK, EM = 1.0e48 (GOES) Blue, T=10 MK, EM=1.0e44 (RHESSI DEM) Flux at.
Nonlinear Force Free Field Models for AR J.McTiernan, H.Hudson (SSL/UCB) T.Metcalf (LMSAL)
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI and SXI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL) Fall 2003 AGU Meeting.
RHESSI/NESSIE, June 2003 H.S. Hudson The RHESSI 3-10 keV spectrum H. Hudson, B. Dennis, K. Phillips, R. Schwartz, D. Smith.
Relative and (maybe) Absolute RHESSI Detector Efficiency: J.McTiernan 2-dec-2009.
Center to Limb Variation of Hard X-Ray Spectra from RHESSI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We use the RHESSI flare database to measure the center to limb.
Center to Limb Variation of Hard X-Ray Spectra from RHESSI J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
RHESSI Background Spectra Vs Time. Qlook_bck Spectra have 491 energy channels, 1/3 keV resolution from 3 to 100 keV, 1 keV from 100 to 300 keV. Accumulated.
Test of STIX compression using HXT data J.McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
Magnetic Reconnection Rate and Energy Release Rate Jeongwoo Lee 2008 April 1 NJIT/CSTR Seminar Day.
Multi-Instrument DEM (RHESSI – GOES) Calculations J.McTiernan 5 th General RHESSI Workshop 8-June-2005.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemperature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB)
White-Light Flares via TRACE and RHESSI: Death to the thick target? H. Hudson, plus collaboration with J. Allred, I. Hannah, L. Fletcher, T. Metcalf, J.
AR and flare emission above 6 keV as seen by SPP/XIS J.McTiernan 12-feb-2010.
Variation of EUV solar irradiances along the cycle Vincenzo Andretta 1, Giulio Del Zanna 2, Seth Wieman 3 1 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte,
Flare Thermal Energy Brian Dennis NASA GSFC Solar Physics Laboratory 12/6/20081Solar Cycle 24, Napa, 8-12 December 2008.
Thermal, Nonthermal, and Total Flare Energies Brian R. Dennis RHESSI Workshop Locarno, Switzerland 8 – 11 June, 2005.
Evolutionary pattern of DEM variations in flare(s) B. Sylwester, J. Sylwester, A. Kępa, T. Mrozek Space Research Centre, PAS, Wrocław, Poland K.J.H. Phillips.
Multiwavelength observations of a partially occulted solar flare Laura Bone, John C.Brown, Lyndsay Fletcher.
RHESSI Microflares Steven Christe 1,2, Säm Krucker 2, Iain Hannah 3, R. P. Lin 1,2 1 Physics Department, University of California at Berkeley 2 Space Sciences.
RHESSI and Radio Imaging Observations of Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD G. Trottet, Observatoire.
Comparison of Solar EUV Irradiance Measurements from CDS and TIMED/EGS W. T. Thompson L3 Communications EER, NASA GSFC P. Brekke ESA Space Science Department.
GOES fluence in Å and Å (1 min data) GOES fluence in Å and Å (1 min data) Areas in black correspond to times with the data missing.
Final Presentation By Matthew Lewis 17 th March 2006 “To Determine the Accuracy that GOES True Numbers can Reproduce the Full X-ray Spectrum of the Sun”
RHESSI Microflare Statistics Iain Hannah, S. Christe, H. Hudson, S. Krucker, L. Fletcher & M. A. Hendry.
Studies on the 2002 July 23 Flare with RHESSI Ayumi ASAI Solar Seminar, 2003 June 2.
NoRH Observations of RHESSI Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD E.J.Schmahl, Dept. of Astronomy, University.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
Spectral Breaks in Flare HXR Spectra A Test of Thick-Target Nonuniform Ionization as an Explanation Yang Su NASA,CUA,PMO Gordon D. Holman.
Flare Differential Emission Measure from RESIK and RHESSI Spectra B. Sylwester, J. Sylwester, A. Kępa Space Research Centre, PAS, Wrocław, Poland T. Mrozek.
Characterizing Thermal and Non- Thermal Electron Populations in Solar Flares Using RHESSI Amir Caspi 1,2, Säm Krucker 2, Robert P. Lin 1,2 1 Department.
Cycle 24 Meeting, Napa December 2008 Ryan Milligan NASA/GSFC Microflare Heating From RHESSI and Hinode Observations Ryan Milligan NASA-GSFC.
RHESSI and the Solar Flare X-ray Spectrum Ken Phillips Presentation at Wroclaw Workshop “ X-ray spectroscopy and plasma diagnostics from the RESIK, RHESSI.
Coronal X-ray Emissions in Partly Occulted Flares Paula Balciunaite, Steven Christe, Sam Krucker & R.P. Lin Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley limb thermal.
Statistical Properties of Super-Hot Solar Flares Amir Caspi †1*, Säm Krucker 2,3, Robert P. Lin 2,4,5 †
CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 RAPID/IES Calibration Status J.A. Davies.
The Crab Light Curve and Spectra from GBM: An Update
Relationship between flare occurrence and the Hale Sector Boundary
Relationship between flare occurrence and the Hale Sector Boundary
The spectral evolution of impulsive solar X-ray flares
Differential Emission Measure
Presentation transcript:

RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB

ABSTRACT: Since RHESSI was launched in February 2002, it has observed thousands of solar flares. It has also observed solar emission above 3 keV when there are no flares present. The plasma temperature required for this high energy emission is greater than 5 MK, a temperature range that is not often considered for solar active regions. In this work we use RHESSI data for non-flaring times, along with GOES data, to determine the temperature and emission measure for the Sun in this high temperature range. The first step is to compare the temperatures and emission measures obtained from the two instruments using the isothermal approximation. The next step is to use the combined data from the two instruments to obtain a differential emission measure (DEM) for the 3 to 20 MK temperature range. The entire RHESSI mission, from launch until May 2006, is included. This research is supported by NASA contract NAS A

1) COUNT RATES: The top panel shows the RHESSI 3 to 6 keV count rate for one orbit. There is a jump at the day- night boundary. The black dashed lines show an interval which was chosen for a temperature measurement. For each orbit, an interval of between 1 and 5 minutes was chosen based on the following criteria: No flares or particle events, no attenuators, no data gaps, and at least 5 minutes from the SAA. The intervals chosen have the minimum (daylight) count rate for the orbit, subject to a flatness test. The dispersion of the count rate for an interval is required to be less than 1.25 times the dispersion expected from a Poisson distribution. This insures that there are no microflares in the intervals. A total of 8324 time intervals were analyzed, from 14-Feb to 31-May Of these intervals, 6578 had enough counts above the background level in the 3 to 10 keV energy range for an isothermal spectrum to be fitted, resulting in temperature and emission measure values. We also obtained temperature and emission measure for each interval from GOES data. The RHESSI spectra were fit using the SSW XRAY package which (via chianti_kev.pro) uses version 5.2 of the Chianti database (Landi et al., 2006; ApJSS, 162, 261). The GOES data were analyzed using results of White et al. (2006, Solar Physics 227, 231). Coronal abundances were assumed. The red histogram in each count rate plot is the expected background level, based on the spacecraft position.

2) BACKGROUND SUBTRACTION: This plot shows the background count rate in the 3 to 6 keV energy band for the RHESSI detectors used in the calculation. The non-solar background is mostly a function of the position of the spacecraft; here it is plotted versus the longitude of the ascending node of the orbit and the orbital phase. These data were obtained by totaling the count rates in the 5 minute periods before and after daylight for each orbit in the mission. For the low-latitude regions where most of the T measurements were taken, the uncertainty in the background is approximately 1/2 the background rate. The spectra for the fits were accumulated in 1/3 keV energy channels. To be included in the fit, the background- subtracted count rate for a channel must be greater than 3 times its uncertainty.

3) T AND EM: Here we have temperature (in MK) and emission measure (in cm -3 ) for RHESSI and GOES for (approximately) the first month of the mission. The RHESSI temperature is between 6 and 11 MK, and the GOES temperature is between 3 and 6 MK. This is generally true, except for a set of intervals in April 2006, for which GOES temperatures of 15 to 17 MK were found. The GOES EM is typically a factor of 50 to 100 times the RHESSI EM. This is consistent with a differential emission measure that decreases with increasing temperature. The GOES and RHESSI T values are not well correlated – for the full sample the correlation coefficient between the two values of T is For emission measure it is The GOES measurements do not include background subtraction. When the sun is less active, and the flux in the GOES channels reach the digitization level, the GOES temperature measurement becomes problematic.

4) FULL MISSION T AND EM: The top plot shows monthly averages of the RHESSI (black) and GOES (red) temperature. The middle plot shows the emission measure. There is not much temperature variation with the solar cycle, but the emission measure decreases. The averages do not include intervals for which there was not enough emission for temperature measurements. The bottom plot shows the relative fraction of intervals for which there were no good measurements for RHESSI. The dashed red line is the normalized average sunspot number. As activity decreases, the likelihood for good T measurements decreases.

5) THE RHESSI/GOES DEM: The top plot shows the calculated DEM for the temperature range from 3 to 25 MK for the first time interval. The DEM is calculated using a pixon method, similar to that used for RHESSI and Yohkoh HXT imaging (Metcalf et al, 1996, Apj ). The red stars show the values of the isothermal T and EM for the two instruments. The DEM surprisingly shows some emission greater than 10 MK, but with relatively large (50%) error bars. This is seen for almost all of the time intervals, but the large errors make it uncertain whether this is real emission or noise.

The middle plot is a comparison of the observed count rate spectrum with the data calculated from the DEM model. (The GOES fluxes have been normalized to look like a photon count. ) The line gives the observed data, the red diamonds are the calculated data. It turns out that if the RHESSI data between 3 and 5 keV are included, there is no good DEM solution. If a DEM fits the RHESSI data in this energy range, then the fit to the GOES data is bad. Conversely, if the GOES data is fit well, then the fit to the 3 to 5 keV RHESSI emission is bad. This is a situation that requires further study, but for now it is ignored, and the 3 to 5 keV RHESSI emission is not included in the fit. The bottom plot shows a comparison of the residuals for the fit with the observed data. The fit is excellent, with all but the last nonzero RHESSI data point being fit to within 6%. The uncertainty for the data ranges from 0.5% for the low energy GOES channel to 10% for the last nonzero RHESSI channel, and the fit data points are well within the uncertainty, except for the last one. The DEM calculation failed for approximately 1000 of the 6578 intervals for which there were good single T measurements. This is being investigated.

6) DEM vs. TIME: This plot shows the monthly average of the DEM integrated above 3, 5 and 10 MK for the RHESSI mission. There is a noticeable solar-cycle related decrease in the >3 and >5 MK range, and a smaller decrease in the >10 MK range. These averages do not include unsuccessful DEM calculations which become more prevalent with the decrease in activity, similar to the single temperature case.

7) WHAT’S THIS? This is a plot of the > 5MK DEM for each time interval versus the time since the most recent GOES flare. It might be expected that the high temperature emission is coming from post-flare loops. If this is true, then there should be some correlation between the high T emission measure and the amount of time elapsed since the last flare. Sophisticated statistical techniques will be necessary to pull any correlation out of this, but at least the highest values of emission measure tend to occur within 2 to 3 hours after a flare. The calculation only considered the previous day’s flares, so the points at 1440 minutes are lower limits.

CONCLUSIONS: High Temperature solar emission (> 5 MK) is usually present without flares, and is observed by RHESSI. The average RHESSI temperature ranges from 6 to 8 MK, with emission measures from to cm -3. Individual measurements may have higher T and EM. The average GOES temperature is 4 to 6MK, consistently less than the RHESSI temperature, but the values are not well correlated. The relative number of successful high T measurements decreases with solar activity. The DEM can be calculated from combined RHESSI/GOES data, provided that the RHESSI data from 3 to 5 keV is ignored. The high temperature emission shows some variation with the solar cycle, but the variation is less noticeable at the highest (>10MK) temperatures.