Planning Issues and Agriculture Lecture 4 Agriculture Land and the State Mapping Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California’s Land Resource Protection Division at Department of Conservation.
Advertisements

Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
Farms and Historic Preservation: Planning for an Agricultural Future Gerry Cohn American Farmland Trust Organic Valley.
8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia.
11/21/2002Sustainable Agriculture. 11/21/2002Sustainable Agriculture Impacts of Sprawl -NRI vs Conversions up from  1.2 Million Acres per.
Planning for Agriculture --the Land that Sustains Us American Planning Association - IL Normal, Illinois September 22, 2010 Anita Zurbrugg
SISR : STORIE INDEX Soil Ratings. Storie Index Rating System The Storie Index Rating system ranks soil characteristics according to their suitability.
WELCOME URBAN AND RURAL SERVICE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE.
Presentation for the Policy Advisory Committee California Transportation Plan 2040 April 15, 2014 Agricultural Land Stewardship Planning.
Idaho Working Lands 1 Idaho’s Private Forests, Ranches And Farms Natural Resources Interim Committee July 31, 2009.
Educating Future Rice Consumers Durham High is located in the middle of an agricultural area. Many students are unaware of the impact and benefits of the.
Kings County as part of the San Joaquin Valley Blueprint County Planning & LAFCO engaging the COG’s Blueprint efforts to map out the County’s future. Greg.
What Can Local Government Do?. Utah Agriculture Code 4-1-8(1) “the science and art of the production of plants and animals useful to man including the.
Ag-Tourism Committee Volunteers for SJ Partnership, working on strategic direction, planning & programs to enhance economic development through ag-tourism.
Farmland Preservation is essential to our Polk County lifestyle.
San Joaquin Valley Advocacy Context and Trends for Change San Joaquin Valley Funders Meeting December 5, 2013.
We can’t afford to wait until disaster strikes to protect our water supply.
Imagining the Future of Agriculture Robert Tse USDA Rural Development Yribarren Ranch Bishop, CA July 24, 2014.
THE COSTS OF SUBURBAN SPRAWL AND URBAN DECAY. What is Suburban Sprawl? Sprawl is unsustainable development that wastes tax dollars, destroys farmland.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING JUNE 24, Need for Consistency l Several landowners have been told over the years that they could have horses in R1.
1 SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE: SANTA CLARA LAFCO’s EXPERIENCE August 31, 2007 CALAFCO CONFERENCE Sacramento.
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) in Yolo County Phil Hogan, District Conservationist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 221 W. Court,
Farmland Trust in Stanislaus County Lecture 9 Planning Issues in Agriculture.
Where will our food come from? A discussion of the need to preserve farmland in the Central Valley of California. AGST 3000 Agriculture, Society and the.
The Evolution and Effects of Suburbanization By Carley Page.
Industry clusters Planning Issues in Ag Lecture 3.
Land Use Planning Committee Resolution Study Land Use Planning issues and report to Resolutions Committee no later than October Address principles.
Planning Issues in Agriculture Laws and Regulations Lecture 6 Lecture 6.
Agriculture, Water and the California Economy Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference San Diego Friday August 24, 2012 Daniel A. Sumner, University.
Working in the Urbanizing Landscape: Changing Roles for Natural Resource Professionals Oregon Department of Forestry “Stewardship in Forestry”
DOES WATER = JOBS? Dr. Jeff Michael Director, Business Forecasting Center Eberhardt School of Business.
Federal Regulations National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)- mandates an environmental assessment of all projects involving federal money or permits.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
“Real Estate Principles for the New Economy”: Norman G
Working Lands Preservation: Tools and Incentives Gerry Cohn Southeast Regional Office Graham, NC.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Chapter 13: Urbanization
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
New State Policies and Trends September 7, Planning Context California will continue to grow at what some would characterize as an alarming rate.
Land Chapter 14.
Guidelines and Applications of grant cycle Lindsay Balance Maximilian Merrill.
Citizens for Agricultural Land Reform A solution for sustainability for the Agricultural Land Reserve.
Why do inner suburbs have distinctive problems?
Central California Planning Commissioners’ Workshop May 13, 2011 Barbara Steck, AICP, Deputy Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street,
Will the Costs of Fixing the Delta Impact the Cost of Food? Mike Wade Agricultural Water Management Council.
Fredonia Mountain Properties Land value increased over 100-fold in the last five years. Development was primarily driven by non-residents (Figure 6). Wheeler.
SB 375: CREATING GREAT COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA.
Pedestrians are the lost measure of a community, they set the scale for both the center and edge of our neighborhoods. --Peter Calthorpe The Next American.
MENU OF TOOL TOPICS (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Baseline Scenario Quality Growth Strategy.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
Central Valley Agriculture: Land & Sustainability Sustainability begins with the land.
Ventura County Population of over 800,000 Voter imposed growth boundaries for the County and 8 of the 10 cities Gross agricultural production value of.
Urban Sprawl PHS Geography Department – Enhanced Canadian.
Compact Housing Sustaining Communities and the Environment.
111 Right for Yerington. Right Place. Right Time. Right People. Right Way. Proposed Acquisition of BLM-Administered Land To Transfer to the City of Yerington.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Suffolk County’s Purchase of Development Rights Program Background, Intent, Accomplishments, Trends Sarah Lansdale, AICP.
Jackson County Farmland Protection Program A County/Local/State Partnership.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : 9.02Agricultural.
Sustainable Cities Chapter 22 “Most cities are places where they cut down the trees and name the streets after them.” Evolution of Cities and Urbanization.
Karen Chapple, Professor of City & Regional Planning
Urbanization.
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
MENU OF TOOL TOPICS (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
Williamson Act Sustainability
Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan Planning Areas
An Overview of Farmland Protection Tools under The Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Enabling Act Theodore A. (Ted) Feitshans Department.
Presentation transcript:

Planning Issues and Agriculture Lecture 4 Agriculture Land and the State Mapping Project

State mapping project ► – designed to map California’s Land -- Used to determine 1 – how much Ag land is lost 2- what type of Ag land is being lost, quality of soil, access to water

Six categories of land: 1. Prime Farm land  most productive soil (highest quality) linked to higher yields and irrigation  precious commodity 2. Farmland of statewide importance  also irrigated land – ► must have been irrigated within last 4 years  Soil of slightly lesser quality, minor shortcomings ► Slope, salinity, etc. 3. Unique Farmland  irrigated or non-irrigated ► Non-irrigated orchards or vineyards  soil less productive

4. Farmland of local importance  Importance to local economy  each county can determine or have power to designate  Board of Supervisors designates 5. Grazing land  livestock grazing  non-irrigated-poorest soil quality 6. Urban  built up land  was farmland and now is used for residential/commercial Six categories of land continued:

As you recall… ► CA. Valley is losing thousands of acres of prime farmland.  Same trend in Stanislaus County  Look at all the subdivisions  Commercial development  Retail ► Patterns of growth pose a threat in the Central Valley.  Potential for urban/rural conflict ► Controlled growth?  County must approve new cities, growth boundaries and annexations

Zone of conflict is urban edge… ► For Example…N. Modesto- McHenry –  car dealer alley  ¼ community residential  ¼ transportation…roads  ¼ jurisdiction to point of sale…retail sales  ¼ Ag land now or ???

County Revenue ► Revenue – County must share with cities  enables county to recapture revenue loss when annexation occurs ► Control of land = control of $ ► Property taxes go where?

County Ag land 1. Agriculture…Limited number of people or services – cost is low,.38 for every $ tax revenue 2. But cost is high for Ranchettes, more than revenue…$ Means county govt. has limited resources to serve populace living in county 3. Ag produces sales tax revenues -- a source of limited costs, but also limited tax revenues (food is non-taxable)

Why city growth? – ► Retail trade  risk capital – will never be able to keep up with cost of service, (self funded)… so subsidized  But generates jobs, and…  Generate economic activity = growth, but  converts Ag land to development ► County/City taking of land impacts Ag and Ag industry clusters

City Growth and Agriculture ► Open space preservation –  Ag is not perceived as an industry ► At first…ambivalence –  people don’t like congestion, crime  single family detached dwelling  are interested in quality of life and open space once the issue is recognized ► Marin County for instance

Public Policy encourages urbanization and growth ► Giving incentives for this type of growth  tax credits for business  low mortgages  low cost of living in valley (comparative) ► Environment will suffer with growth ---  Air quality, water quality, open space, congestion … does reducing farmland exacerbate the problem or does it matter?

Survey of Central Valley Characteristics ► Rapid growth ► Quality of natural environment (detiorating ?)  Air, water, habitat ► Gap between rich and poor …  Income  Home ownership  Careers and upward mobility ► Job opportunities … (limited upper incomes)  Why?

American Farmland Trust ► AFT – thinks differently about growth –  we’re at a critical tipping point-(Read Article)  need a different type of urbanization and  more interest in public transportation

How do we know how much land is being lost ? Farmland Mapping ► Assessment of farmland loss is for urban or other uses  48% (half) of all state land is mapped  98% of farmland is mapped ► Have to break down – there are differences 1. Quality of soil for growing 2. Access to water (can land be irrigated?) 3. Topography (ex. Flat or sloped)

Prime Farmland ► Best land is prime farmland  50% of whole state 4.3 million acres is prime farmland –  Out of 8.5 to 9 million acres of total farmland ► In San Joaquin Valley – 49% of this prime farmland is in our 8 counties. (2.1 mil)

Farmland catagories… 1- Prime farmland- 4.3 million 2- Farmland of statewide Importance – 2 million 3- Unique – 1 million ½ of all #1,2,3 land is in our SJ Valley 8 counties! Why?...Soil, Water, Climate

Water access for irrigation ► Irrigation – best of best ( most useful ) ► ? million irrigated acres in California how much and what % of the total is in the Valley ? Look this up…

How much land is being lost statewide? ► 1992 – 1997…85,200 acres…Prime farmland ► Increase from the previous 5 year period…15% ► 500,000 acres of total farmland lost from 1988 to 1998 ► Could lose a million more by 2040 ► Conversion of prime farmland is 30% faster than non-prime farmland ► AFT classifies the Central California Valley as the most threatened farmland in the country

► Urbanization could consume or indirectly affect over 3.6 million acres of irrigated land, more than half of the 6.7 million irrigated acres in the 11 counties that comprise the Central Valley floor (AFT survey) ► Land converted to urban uses was 87,000 acres over a two year period  22% of all land converted to urbanization is prime farmland How much land is being lost statewide?...continued

Regional Picture ► Regionally – 10-11% of all prime farmland lost to urbanization in Valley ► Converted to urban use! ( ) Point is: ► Land is being developed at ever increasing rates---significant % of prime farmland is being destroyed

Interest statewide to protect prime farmland.. What are the options? ► 1. Use regulatory powers of gov. (police power) to conserve land available (Green belts, environmental sensitive areas, Ag buffer zones) ► 2. Use of special regional agencies that have control over boundaries of communities to protect farmland (Planning Commission). ► 3. Use tax incentives for landowners and local govs. to conserve local land (Williamson Act)

More options? ► 4. Use of innovative non-government tools to preserve land (transfer of developers rights/purchase of conservation easements).  Farmland Trust ► 5. Linking of ag conservation to local economic development clusters… promotes better economic value (business)

Even more options? ► 6. develop new ways of planning urban areas – smart growth into less “prime” land (General Plan) ► 7. Sustain environment, encourage greater public involvement…(initiatives on the ballot, Ag buffer zones, Green belts)  best prime farmland is on boundaries of cities.  It lands on the edge - “zone of conflict”  keeps pushing the line (who?)