“E. coli, Enterococci and Protozoan Transport in New Mexico Watersheds” G. M. Huey 1 & Meyer, M. L 2 New Mexico Environment Department – Santa Fe, NM New.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION AND FLUX IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Brant Whiting, Jeffery S. Horsburgh and Amber S. Jones Utah Water.
Advertisements

Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.
What’s Mud Got to Do With It? Stephen J. Klaine, Ph.D. Department of Biological Sciences Clemson University
Hannouche, A.; Chebbo, G.; Joannis, C. Dynamics of pollutant discharge in combined sewer systems during rain events: chance or determinism? SPN7 – Sheffield,
RESULTS With increasing amounts of Novobiocin there was an obvious decrease in survival of colony forming units of bacteria (Fig. 8). Triclosan was more.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, CA Kings River Experimental Watersheds KREW.
A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques David K. Stevens 1, Jeffery.
Riparian zone spiders as mercury sentinels Dr. Christopher Pennuto 1,2, Marley Smith 1, and Dr. Alexander Nazarenko 3 1 Biology Department, 2 Center for.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Monitoring and Pollutant Load Estimation. Load = the mass or weight of pollutant that passes a cross-section of the river in a specific amount of time.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS IN BULL CREEK AUSTIN, TEXAS Patrick Sejkora.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
Chowan River TMDL Development Raccoon/Sappony Area 09/8/04.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
Discharge (Q) Define (cfs; m 3 /s or “cumecs”) Why is Q Important? How is it measured?
Hillsborough River Fecal Coliform BMAP Process Oct. 22, 2008.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
Why Should New Mexico Dam Owners Care about Climate Change and Extreme Events Dagmar Llewellyn, Reclamation Albuquerque Area Office Presentation to the.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
Chowan River TMDL Development Tidewater Area 08/26/04.
Ghost River & Waiparous Creek in Waiparous Village on June 21, 2007.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.
 Comparing Vegetation in a Riparian Zone to an Upland Area in a Colorado Montane Forest By: Abby Branson Vegetation Ecology, Summer 2013 Mountain Research.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Impact of Watershed Characteristics on Surface Water Transport of Terrestrial Matter into Coastal Waters and the Resulting Optical Variability:An example.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Trends in Precipitation and Stream Discharge over the Past Century for the Continental United States Andrew Simon 1 and Lauren Klimetz 1,2 1 USDA-ARS National.
Results and Discussion The above graph depicts FC colony plate averages for each sample site. Samples are ordered from upstream to downstream as indicated.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
An Overview of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Objectives Explain threats to drinking water Describe the hydrologic cycle and pathways of contamination Understand.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Nottoway River Area October 28, 2004.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Shingle Creek Chloride TMDL Abby Morrisette and Josh Kuhn 9/10/11.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in L’Anguille River Watershed and Deep Bayou Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium
Findings Is the City of Oberlin a source or a sink for pollutants? Water quality in Plum Creek as a function of urban land cover Jonathan Cummings, Tami.
Lucy McKergow and Rob Davies-Colley
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Tidewater Area October 20, 2004.
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
Sources of Bacteria and their Variability in Urban Watersheds Robert Pitt Cudworth Professor Urban Water Systems Department of Civil, Construction, and.
Chowan River TMDL Development Blackwater Area 09/07/04.
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
Chowan River TMDL Development Nottoway Area 08/31/04.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
The Importance of Groundwater in Sustaining Streamflow in the Upper Colorado River Basin Matthew Miller Susan Buto, David Susong, Christine Rumsey, John.
Land Use Influences on Water, Sediment and Nutrients in the Napa Valley Watershed: Conceptual Models and Examples Lester McKee (PhD) Watershed Program.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
CORRELATION BETWEEN HYDROLOGICAL, GEOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN GROUNDWATER-STREAM WATER MIXING ZONE Heejung Kim, Seong-Sun Lee, Yunjung.
Water Quality & micro-organisms
An Efficient Cost Effective System for Wastewater Effluent Reuse
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Conclusions & Future Work
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
Presentation transcript:

“E. coli, Enterococci and Protozoan Transport in New Mexico Watersheds” G. M. Huey 1 & Meyer, M. L 2 New Mexico Environment Department – Santa Fe, NM New Mexico Highlands University - Las Vegas, NM Research funded by the National Institutes of Health - MBRS Hypothesis:  Runoff caused by storm events from montane watershed areas that have been recently impacted by forest fires has elevated levels of suspended solids & high turbidity relative to unimpacted watersheds.  Burned watersheds pose a higher risk to human health due to increased pathogen concentrations & numeric transport loads relative to unimpacted watersheds. Methods:  Event activated monitoring stations measure & record stream flow in 15-minute intervals.  Collected automated composite samples from rising & falling hydrographs during storm runoff events in the summer and fall 2003 &  Collected biweekly grab samples during base flow conditions.  Quantified total suspended solids 1 (TSS), turbidity 1 (TRB), E. coli 2, Enterococci 2, Cryptosporidium 3 and Giardia 3 in water samples.  Data Analysis and statistical calculations with FLUX 4 for flow weighted concentrations and loading for yield determination.  Bacteria Source Tracking contracted through Source Molecular, Inc; Gainesville, Fla. 1 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition 2 Colilert and Enterolert from IDEXX 3 EPA Method FLUX, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by William Walker Spring Arroyo Maximum Minimum SE Mean Median Mean Lower Gallinas MontezumaCow Creek Stream Hydrology (CFS) TSS Concentration, Turbidity & TSS Yield Microbial Concentrations Microbial Yield Spearman Rank P-values Conclusion: 1.Urban/commercial areas produce very high concentrations of TSS, TRB and microbial contamination during storm runoff events. The LG watershed had TSS and TRB concentrations and/or yields that were two to three orders of magnitude greater than a burned forested watershed (CC) and an unburned forested watershed (MZ). Fecal contamination from human sources may be of concern in urban areas during storm runoff events. 2.The burned CC watershed had greater TSS concentrations and yields than MZ, but the forested MZ watershed produced greater microbial concentrations. This may be due to increased proximity of livestock & wildlife to the riparian zone. Microbial loading was similar for the two watersheds due to increased runoff from the CC watershed. 3.Ephemeral arroyos from rangeland drainages may contain elevated concentrations of TSS, TRB and microbial contamination during storm runoff events. However, due to the intermittent nature of these drainages, long term loading effects are not as great as these concentrations suggest. 3.Municipal water supply systems are vulnerable to higher TSS and TRB contamination from burned forests, especially during runoff events. 4.Turbidity can be used as an indicator of E. coli in surface waters, but it has not been shown as an effective indicator of Enterococci, Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Cow Creek (CC) Spring Arroyo (SA) Montezuma (MZ) Lower Gallinas (LG) Sample Size< Non-Humann/a Indeterminaten/a003 Humann/a001 E. Coli Source Tracking – DNA Analysis Introduction: The montane-forested (ponderosa pine and mixed conifer) Gallinas watershed (21,800 ha) provides 95% of the municipal water for the City of Las Vegas, NM (population 16,500). The area is listed among the New Mexico State Forestry’s twenty most vulnerable urban interface communities for wildfire outbreak. In May/June 2000 the catastrophic Viveash Fire burned the montane (ponderosa pine and mixed conifer) Cow Creek watershed (10,100 ha) that is contiguous to the Gallinas watershed. Runoff from the watershed through the summer after the fire was highly degraded with suspended solids and associated pollutants. This caused great concern for the water supply of Las Vegas. This study was initiated to predict potential risk to the city of Las Vegas’s water supply based on information from the burned Cow Creek watershed. Monitoring sites were also established on the Gallinas River below the City of Las Vegas, NM and in a prairie rangeland watershed. This poster presents the results from the burned Cow Creek (CC) watershed, the unburned Gallinas watershed with the monitoring site on the Gallinas River near Montezuma, NM (MZ), the prairie rangeland watershed in the Spring Arroyo (SA) and the urban/commercial City of Las Vegas, NM with the monitoring site downstream from city runoff on the lower Gallinas River (LG) (effective runoff area: 3,800 ha). In addition, funds were provided by the NM Water Resource Research Institute for a bacterial source tracking (BST) project for the 2005 monitoring season. Each monitoring site was sampled for E. coli source identification, based on DNA fingerprinting, to determine whether sources were human or non-human. Summary of Results and Discussion: The urban watershed (LG) generated the greatest turbidity values (NTU) and TSS concentrations, with mean values of 2,147 NTU and 3,988 mg/L, respectively. When paired with discharge, LG also produced the highest yield at 3,249 kg/ha. The prairie watershed also generated high NTU & TSS values but produced a lower yield due to low flow values from the intermittent arroyo. Values were significantly lower at the montane sites. The burned watershed (CC) produced a lower turbidity than the forested watershed (MZ), 25.8 NTU and 91.3 NTU, respectively, but generated higher TSS concentrations (80.3 mg/L vs mg/L, respectively) and subsequently higher yield 19.6 kg/ha vs. 0.8 kg/ha. This inverse relationship between TSS & NTUs found between the MZ & CC watersheds may be due to minerals eroded from the burned area in contrast to reflective organic materials of less density in the forested watershed. For each site, NTU & TSS were significantly correlated to each other with a P-value of < Bacteria concentrations were highest from the LG watershed, slightly less at the SA & MZ sites, and lowest at the CC site. Yields are also highest from the LG watershed; however, due to increased discharge from the burned watershed, loads are similar between the SA, MZ and CC sites. Cryptosporidium concentrations were highest at LG, less at SA, lower at CC and least at MZ. Yields were also highest at LG and, due to flow conditions, similar at SA, CC and MZ. There was not sufficient positive analysis for Giardia at SA & CC to perform flow adjusted concentrations ( <3). LG & MZ concentrations & yields were similar to Cryptosporidium results. Spearman Rank Correlations for E. coli and Enterococci against TSS, NTU and discharge (CFS) are variable. The CC site did not significantly correlate for any of the variables. The SA site showed the greatest amount of significant correlations, with both types of bacteria correlating with turbidity and E. coli correlating with discharge. The MZ site showed a correlation between E. coli for both TSS and turbidity, while the LG site showed a correlation between Enterococci and turbidity. Few P-values for Cryptosporidium and Giardia data with TSS, NTU and CFS from the four monitoring sites proved significant due to the low number of positive values. However, Giardia did correlate significantly with discharge at the SA site and with total suspended solids at the MZ site. Objectives: Quantify Escherichia coli, Enterococci spp., Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia lamblia concentrations and transport in runoff from four ecologically diverse watersheds in northern New Mexico Establish potential pathogen indicators and risk to human health based on watershed characteristics Forecast potential risk to the city of Las Vegas’s water supply (Gallinas River) based on information from the burned Cow Creek watershed