6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK 15.-17.5.2006 Using TMI derived soil moisture to initialize numerical weather prediction models: Impact studies with ECMWF’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Advertisements

OSE meeting GODAE, Toulouse 4-5 June 2009 Interest of assimilating future Sea Surface Salinity measurements.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office EWGLAM / COST-717.
Remote Sensing of Hydrological Variables over the Red Arkansas Eric Wood Matthew McCabe Rafal Wojcik Hongbo Su Huilin Gao Justin Sheffield Princeton University.
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
SMOS – The Science Perspective Matthias Drusch Hamburg, Germany 30/10/2009.
Xin Kong, Lizzie Noyes, Gary Corlett, John Remedios, Simon Good and David Llewellyn-Jones Earth Observation Science, Space Research Centre, University.
Stéphane Bélair Numerical Enrivonmental Prediction, on the Way Towards More Integrated Forecasting of the Earth System WWOSC, Montreal, August 19 th, 2014.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Single Column Experiments with a Microwave Radiative Transfer Model Henning Wilker, Meteorological Institute of the University of Bonn (MIUB) Gisela Seuffert,
ECMWF – 1© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Developments in the use of AMSU-A, ATMS and HIRS data at ECMWF Heather Lawrence, first-year.
Assimilation of MODIS and AMSR-E Land Products into the NOAH LSM Xiwu Zhan 1, Paul Houser 2, Sujay Kumar 1 Kristi Arsenault 1, Brian Cosgrove 3 1 UMBC-GEST/NASA-GSFC;
Experiments with the microwave emissivity model concerning the brightness temperature observation error & SSM/I evaluation Henning Wilker, MIUB Matthias.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
ASSIMILATION OF GOES-DERIVED CLOUD PRODUCTS IN MM5.
CAUSES (Clouds Above the United States and Errors at the Surface) "A new project with an observationally-based focus, which evaluates the role of clouds,
2nd GRAS SAF User Workshop, June 2003, Helsingør, Denmark. 1Introduction to data assimilation An introduction to data assimilation Xiang-Yu Huang.
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom 陳登舜 ATM NCU Group Meeting REFERENCE : Liu., H., J. Anderson, and Y.-H. Kuo, 2012: Improved analyses.
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
Princeton University Development of Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties Eric. F. Wood, Princeton University Dennis. P. Lettenmaier,
DA Surface Analysis (II) M. Drusch Room TT 063, Phone 2759.
EGU General Assembly C. Cassardo 1, M. Galli 1, N. Vela 1 and S. K. Park 2,3 1 Department of General Physics, University of Torino, Italy 2 Department.
A Comparison of the Northern American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) to an Ensemble of Analyses Including CFSR Wesley Ebisuzaki 1, Fedor Mesinger 2, Li Zhang.
Data assimilation and observing systems strategies Pierre Gauthier Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Division Meteorological Service of Canada.
Coupling of the Common Land Model (CLM) to RegCM in a Simulation over East Asia Allison Steiner, Bill Chameides, Bob Dickinson Georgia Institute of Technology.
Regional Climate Simulations of summer precipitation over the United States and Mexico Kingtse Mo, Jae Schemm, Wayne Higgins, and H. K. Kim.
The revised Diagnostics of 2m Values - Motivation, Method and Impact - M. Raschendorfer, FE14 Matthias Raschendorfer DWD COSMO Cracow 2008.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Land Surface Analysis SAF: Contributions to NWP Isabel F. Trigo.
Modification of GFS Land Surface Model Parameters to Mitigate the Near- Surface Cold and Wet Bias in the Midwest CONUS: Analysis of Parallel Test Results.
The 2nd International Workshop on GPM Ground Validation TAIPEI, Taiwan, September 2005 GV for ECMWF's Data Assimilation Research Peter
Soil moisture generation at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Interim Data Co-ordination.
Promoting Satellite Applications in the TPE Water and Energy Cycle Studies: Chance and Challenge Kun Yang Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research Chinese.
1 Hyperspectral Infrared Water Vapor Radiance Assimilation James Jung Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
Improved road weather forecasting by using high resolution satellite data Claus Petersen and Bent H. Sass Danish Meteorological Institute.
Land Surface Modeling Studies in Support of AQUA AMSR-E Validation PI: Eric F. Wood, Princeton University Project Goal: To provide modeling support to.
GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS AIRS Profile Assimilation - Case Study results Shih-Hung Chou, Brad Zavodsky Gary Jedlovec,
T. Bergot - Météo-France CNRM/GMME 1) Methodology 2) Results for Paris-CdG airport Improved site-specific numerical model of fog and low clouds -dedicated.
Hou/JTST NASA GEOS-3/TRMM Re-Analysis: Capturing Observed Rainfall Variability in Global Analysis Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 2.
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
This study compares the Climate System Forecast Reanalysis (CFSR) tropospheric analyses to two ensembles of analyses. The first ensemble consists of 12.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Challenges and Strategies for Combined Active/Passive Precipitation Retrievals S. Joseph Munchak 1, W. S. Olson 1,2, M. Grecu 1,3 1: NASA Goddard Space.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
EUCLIPSE Toulouse meeting April 2012 Roel Neggers Process-level evaluation at selected grid-points: Constraining a system of interacting parameterizations.
Hydrologic Data Assimilation with a Representer-Based Variational Algorithm Dennis McLaughlin, Parsons Lab., Civil & Environmental Engineering, MIT Dara.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
Developing Synergistic Data Assimilation Approaches for Passive Microwave and Thermal Infrared Soil Moisture Retrievals Christopher R. Hain SPoRT Data.
Of what use is a statistician in climate modeling? Peter Guttorp University of Washington Norwegian Computing Center
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 DEVELOPMENT OF 1- 4KM RESOLUTION DATA ASSIMILATION FOR NOWCASTING AT THE MET OFFICE Sue Ballard, September 2005 Z. Li, M.
1 INM’s contribution to ELDAS project E. Rodríguez and B. Navascués INM.
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
Evaluation of cloudy convective boundary layer forecast by ARPEGE and IFS Comparisons with observations from Cabauw, Chilbolton, and Palaiseau  Comparisons.
Development of an Ensemble Gridded Hydrometeorological Forcing Dataset over the Contiguous United States Andrew J. Newman 1, Martyn P. Clark 1, Jason Craig.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Methodology 2) The assimilation procedures at local scale 3) Results for the winter season Improved Site-Specific.
1 Xiaoyan Jiang, Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin 03/20/2007 Feedback between the atmosphere,
Status of soil moisture production at DWD Interim ELDAS Data coordination meeting Martin Lange, Bodo Ritter, Reinhold Schrodin.
The SCM Experiments at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Progress Meeting 12./
Land-Surface evolution forced by predicted precipitation corrected by high-frequency radar/satellite assimilation – the RUC Coupled Data Assimilation System.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Experiments at MeteoSwiss : TERRA / aerosols Flake Jean-Marie.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.
The Sea Surface Temperature in operational NWP model ALADIN
Alexander Loew1, Mike Schwank2
The Sea Surface Temperature in operational NWP model ALADIN
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties
Presentation transcript:

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Using TMI derived soil moisture to initialize numerical weather prediction models: Impact studies with ECMWF’s Integrated Forecast System Matthias Drusch ECMWF Acknowledgements: E.F. Wood and H. Gao (Princeton University)

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Outline 1.Motivation and introduction 2.Operational OI analysis vs Open Loop experiments - Forecast impact - Soil moisture validation against OK Mesonet 3.Operational OI analysis vs TMI nudging experiment - Bias correction - Soil moisture validation - Forecast impact 4.Summary and Outlook

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK ECMWF long-term forecasts (from ENSEMBLES project) volumetric soil moisture [%] 2 m temperatures [º Celsius] (monthly averages for North America) [W m -2 ] turbulent surface fluxesfractional cloud coverage [%] Soil moisture has an impact on the atmosphere and the weather forecast. Systematic errors in the land surface scheme result in a (dramatic) dry down with summer values close to the permanent wilting point. The corresponding 2 m temperature forecasts show a strong warm bias exceeding 10 K during summer and 5 K during winter. The model has to be re-initialized with analysed soil moisture to prevent from drifting into an unrealistic state.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK General introduction A well posed analysis is a better estimate of the true state than either the modelled background information or the observation data sets available. - initial state for a numerical weather forecast - reference against which to quality check other observations - pseudo observation for e.g. satellite retrieval algorithm development sequential, intermittent assimilation analysis observations shortrange forecast medium-range forecasts

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Data Assimilation Experiments 1. CTRL OI (Optimum Interpolation) based on screen level analyses for the top three model soil layers. 2. OL (Open Loop) without any soil moisture analysis. 3. NUDGE (Nudging) experiment using the TMI Pathfinder soil moisture product. Common features: - Full atmospheric 4DVar analysis using ~ 10 6 observations / 6h (reflecting the operational configuration). - Model version CY29R1. - T511 spectral resolution, 60 vertical levels. - ‘Early delivery’ set up with 10-day forecasts from 00 and 12 UTC. - Study period from 1 June to 31 July 2002.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Soil moisture increments (CTRL OI) [mm] Accumulated root zone soil moisture increments for June 2 to July 30, Analysis increments are a sizeable part of the terrestrial water budget.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Forecast skills Temperature at 1000 hPa grey: OI black: OL solid: North America dotted: Europe dashed: East Asia Root-mean-square error E areaHeight [hPa] 24 h72 h120 h168 h216 h Northern Hemisphere Europe East Asia North America Significance levels The proxy ‘observations’ are efficient in improving the turbulent surface fluxes and consequently the weather forecast on large geographical domains.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Validation against OK Mesonet observations

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Validation of forcing data area averages for Oklahoma (72 stations) daily precipitation model forecast (OI) observations total amount of rainfall: June87.3 mm modelon19 days 87.8 mm observationson 9 days July 110. mm modelon26 days 79. mm observationson20 days daily downward shortwave radiation model forecast (OI) observations Correlation: 0.85 Bias: Wm -2

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Validation of soil moisture area averages for Oklahoma (72 stations) surface soil moisture model forecast (OI) observations model forecast (OL) Too quick dry downs (model problem). Too much precip in July (model problem). Too little water added in wet conditions (analysis problem). NO water removed in dry conditions (analysis problem). root zone soil moisture model forecast (OI) observations model forecast (OL) Precipitation errors propagate to the root zone. Analysis constantly adds water. The monthly trend is underestimated. The current analysis fails to produce more accurate soil moisture estimates.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK TMI Pathfinder Data Set (%) July 2 nd, 1999 (Gao et al. 2006) Data set produced by: Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, NJ Basis: brightness temperatures at GHz horizontal polarization Method: physical retrieval based on land surface microwave emission model and auxiliary data sets from the North American Land Data Assimilation Study project Output: surface soil moisture [cm 3 cm -3 ],

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Corrected TMI soil moisture volumetric surface soil moisture [%] for 06/06/2004 the modelled first guess original TMI Pathfinder data corrected TMI data set (bias correction through CDF matching)

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Nudging set up Delayed cut-off atmospheric 4D-Var (12 h) AN FC AN FC TMI sampling period (daily) soil moisture analysis 1/4 2/41/42/4 10-day forecasts

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Validation of soil moisture area averages for Oklahoma surface soil moisture Nudging / satellite data remove water effectively and produce a realistic dry down. Nudging the satellite results in the most accurate surface soil moisture estimate. root zone soil moisture The information introduced at the surface propagates to the root zone. The monthly trend is well reproduced using the nudging scheme. Satellite derived soil moisture improves the soil moisture analysis and results in the most accurate estimate.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Forecast skill correlation (observation / fc)bias Nudging OL OI rH T T The impact of the satellite data on the forecast quality (of screen level variables) is neutral (correlation). The biases obtained from the nudging experiment are slightly higher when compared against the OI and lower when compared against the OL.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Forecast – observation differences CTRLOpen LoopNUDGE RH 2m [%] T 2m [%] The nudging experiment performs best in the south-western and central parts of the study area, which are characterized by ‘low vegetation’ (short grass) and ~ 15 % of bare soil.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Impact on weather parameters CTRLNUDGEOpen Loop surface soil moisture [%] at 18 June, 12 UTC latent heat flux [Wm -2 ] mean over 18 June 12 UTC to 00 UTC sensible heat flux [Wm -2 ] mean over 18 June 12 UTC to 00 UTC planetary boundary layer height [m] at 19 June 00 UTC total cloud coverage [0-1] at 19 June 00 UTC

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Soil moisture increments [mm] accumulated increments over June and July 2002 Optimal Interpolation (2 m T and RH) Nudging (TMI soil moisture)

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Summary The OI analysis using 2 m temperature and precipitation is efficient in Improving the turbulent fluxes and consequently the weather forecast on large geographical domains. The quality of the resulting soil moisture profile is not improved. The OI analysis is not able to correct for the underestimation of the seasonal cycle in root zone soil moisture and for the effects of erroneous precipitation forecasts. However, it prevents the system from drifting into a too dry state. Surface soil moisture is a strong constraint for the NWP model. The surface scheme is able to propagate the information introduced in the top layer to the root zone. Soil moisture analysed from the satellite data is most accurate. There is a clear impact of soil moisture on weather parameters. The forecast skill is neutral (rms) to slightly negative (rH bias).

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Summary (continued) The best soil moisture product does not necessarily result in the best NWP forecast. New (satellite) observations help to identify model errors and to improve physical models. In the end, the forecast will benefit from a better soil moisture product. In-situ observation are of fundamental importance for the development of model / data assimilation systems. It is important to observe soil moisture AND fluxes, screen level variables and meteorological forcings.

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK Oklahoma data sets 2002

6 th SMOS Workshop, Lyngby, DK TMI soil moisture transformation / bias correction r 2 = 0.66 r 2 = 0.69 r 2 = 0.01 r 2 = 0.18 CDF matching reduces systematic errors: The bias has been removed and the dynamic range has been adjusted. The random error may increase. transfer funcion 03/ /2002 x‘-x x Bias: % Bias: %