1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002 The Fiber Tracker Option for MICE Spectrometers The D0 Central Fiber Tracker – Experience and Implications for MICE.
Advertisements

TPC status Marian Ivanov. Outlook TPC performance ExB correction Alignment Nonlinearities and edge effects Drift velocity calibration.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
1 Scintillating Fibre Tracker Simulation Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
First Results from Tracker 1  Cryostat Commissioning  AFE/VLSB Firmware and Readout  Cosmic Ray Setup  Tracker Readout  Software  Trigger Timing.
1 Sci Fi Simulation and Reconstruction Status M.Ellis/C.Rogers Wednesday 31 st March 2004.
Tracker Software 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 15th January 2009  Four key areas that currently need some work: u Digitisation u Decoding files u Unpacking.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
1 Status of Cosmic Analysis Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Wednesday 10 th March 2004.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
1 VLPC system and Cosmic Ray test results M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Julia Sedgbeer Mice Collaboration Meeting, June SciFi Tracker – SW Status & Plans General SW status Simulation & Reconstruction Performance Studies.
Prototype Performance in D0 test stand M.Yoshida (Osaka Univ.)
KEK Analysis Report Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2006/06/10 MICE CM15.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
February 8 th, 2001 Status Report: SciFi for MICE Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
MICE Video MTG 9/25/2002 MICE Fiber Tracker Design Update Requirements and Proposed Detector Implementations A. Bross Fermilab.
9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.
M. Ellis - 11th February 2004 Sci Fi Cosmic Light Yield 2 views 3 views.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
1 KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 15 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 10 st June,2006.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Cosmic Ray Analysis 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 15th January 2009  Not enough time to go into detail, so just a quick summary of the status since CM22:
Prototype Performance in D0 test stand & fiber intrinsic performance with KEK test beam M.Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) Osaka.
Tracking Detectors Working Group MICE Collaboration Meeting March 30, 2004 A. Bross.
1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.
1 Status of the MICE SciFi Tracker Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido.
J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
1M. Ellis - MICE Video Conference - 15th March 2007 Software Report  New G4MICE Users  TOF Simulation and Digitisation  SciFi Reconstruction  Tracker.
1 MICE Tracker Update M. Ellis UKNFIC Meeting 25 th August 2005.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
1 SciFi Results and Comparison Malcolm Ellis, for the MICE Scintillating Fibre Group Abingdon, 31 st October 2003.
1 MICE Tracking Detectors Malcolm Ellis NFMCC Meeting 12 th March 2006.
1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  For details of software see my previous talk here: u
ECFA Sep 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P.
Sci-Fi Tracker: Progress Report Malcolm Ellis, MICE Video Conference Wednesday 6 th October 2004.
Montpellier, November 15, 2003 J. Cvach, TileHCAL and APD readout1 TileHCAL- fibre readout by APD APDs and preamplifiers Energy scan with DESY beam –Energy.
Status of cosmic-ray test of the SciFi prototype and SciFi software in G4MICE M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.)
All DØ Meeting, 12/01/00 Central Fiber Tracker Light Guide Performance Thomas Nunnemann Fermilab 90 days before RunII … (a.k.a. 12/01/00)
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Tracker.
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
1M. Ellis - 17th May 2007 SciFi Decoding (Everything you never wanted to know but couldn’t avoid going over and over)  VLSB Data (unpacking to AFE, MCM,
1 KEK test-beam software progress Malcolm Ellis MICE Video Conference 4 th May 2005.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Analysis for QA (temporary) Hideyuki Sakamoto 1 st October 2007 MICE Tracker Phone Meeting.
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
Summary of final results from MICE note: “ MICE Scintillating Fibre Tracker Prototype - First progress report - ” M.Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) for the SciFi.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
Tracker Readout Progress Terry Hart, MICE Tracker Meeting, July 29, 2008 Cosmic Ray Readout with 1 st Tracker at RAL 2 nd Tracker Preparation at FNAL Firmware.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
T585 analysis status 2005/12/02 HIDEYUKI SAKAMOTO This analysis was done by RUN# (+1.0 GeV/c normal beam run) For the problem of small light yield.
Irradiated 3D sensor testbeam results Alex Krzywda On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration Purdue University March 15, 2012.
Station Acceptance Test. 22/02/2007 M. Takahashi 2 Lab Layout at IC.
1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 1st October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  Looking at the same data as Hideyuki, but using G4MICE.  Have not yet had.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
20 April 2007MICE Tracker Phone Meeting1 Analysis of cosmic/self-triggerd data of station 5 Hideyuki Sakamoto MICE Tracker Phone Meeting 20 th April 2007.
1M. Ellis - Tracker PC - 7th March 2007 VLPC Cassette Characterisation  Third application (as described in past tracker meeting and CM17) is now working.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
Slice Test: Preliminary Data Analysis The Ohio State University
Cosmic ray test of RPC for the ATLAS experiment
Imperial laser system and analysis
Presentation transcript:

1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004

2 Fibre Tracker Measurements Status at Abingdon Meeting VLPC decoding Trigger Timing Reconstruction: –Pedestal and CMN –Clusters –Space Points –Tracking Dead Channels Track Residuals Light Yield

3 Status at Abingdon 3 Station tracker had been assembled (in only a few months) and data-taken at D0 test stand in Fermilab First analysis of the data saw signals from the tracker, however there were question marks over the decoding of the data and less light seen than anticipated. Initial estimates of efficiency and dead channel rates were consistent with expectations, however had large uncertainties...

4 VLPC Decoding The tracker is read-out by one 1024 channel VLPC cassette, through eight 128 fibre D0 connectors. Each of these is read out by a pair of multi chip modules (MCMs). The ordering of the data in the output stream from the MCMs was originally incorrect. This has been corrected, and two parallel approaches to describing the full decoding from electronics channel to station, plane and fibre numbers now agree completely.

5 Trigger Timing There is a particular window during which the VLPCs are most sensitive to arriving photons. A delay between the trigger and VLPC read-out needs to be adjusted in order to time the read-out with respect to the trigger such that the light arrives during this window. Studies of light yield versus timing have shown that in 2003 this situation was not optimised. The data taken in March 2004 has included a timing scan to optimise the read-out.

6 Gain Settings and Calibration DAQ run with ramp trim set at two values: –0x150 (most data) gives gain of ~5 ADC/PE –0x350 (small amount) gives gain of ~14 ADC/PE Calibration of gains for each channel determined from runs taken with LED. Not had enough time to sort out channels with poor fits from 2003 data, so will only use 2004 data. Mean gain is 5.3 ADC/PE with a spread of about 12%.

7 Pedestal and CMN Pedestals are typically around 30 ADC counts. Common noise per MCM (64 channels) creates a global shift of all 64 channels from event to event. This CMN is subtracted event by event. Resulting distribution shows pedestal at 0 (width 2.9 ADC) with signal above. 3 times sigma of pedestal width is 1.95 PE.

8 Reconstruction - Clusters Most tracks go through one group of seven fibres, and so a single electronic channel sees all the light. A fraction go through the edges of two neighbouring groups, and so the light is shared between neighbouring channels A cluster is built from one or two channels, each channel must have at least 1 PE and the sum must have at least 2 PE.

9 Space Points Triplets (a hit in all 3 projections) are built in station B first. Clusters used in a triplet (or triplets) are not used in the next stage. Duplets (pairs of clusters in two projections of a station) are built from all remaining combinations in all 3 stations. Due to DAQ restriction (only 1 cassette means 1008 out of 1512 channels read-out), active area in 3 stations is not the full 30cm circle.

10 Tracking All combinations of points are tested, and that with the best  2 is kept (assuming that the  2 is small enough) data has 1670 tracks data taken so far has 8484 (0x150) and 1679 (0x350) tracks. Space points in tracks are used to determine point resolution. Light Yield determined by looking at distribution of light in clusters that are included in a track.

11 Our First Track:

12 Dead Channels For each channel, determine the rate of hits above 4 PE on that channel. Plot rate versus channel number and look for channels that are 0, or very low. No channels with exactly 0 hits, however 1 with a very low rate, and another that is a little lower than its neighbours. Worst case: 2 / 1008 = 0.2% G4MICE assumption is 0.25%

13 Point Resolution Take two points in a track, use these to determine expected position in third station. Point resolution is residual width after extrapolation error is subtracted in quadrature. Two options: –Interpolation (Stations A and C) –Extrapolation (Stations A and B or B and C)

14

15 Point Resolution Subtracting extrapolation error from residual widths (RMS or sigma) gives point resolution (assuming all three X planes have the same resolution). Resolution = 442 ± 4 (stat) ± 27 (syst)  m. Depending on definition of the width of one channel (clusters complicate the issue slightly), expected resolution is between 424 and 465  m. Resolution measured in tracker agrees with expectations.

16 Light Yield 7 planes contain different amounts of 3HF: –2500 ppm (1 plane) –3500 ppm (1 plane) –5000 ppm (4 planes) –One plane has a mixed composition and is not used for this study. Proposal assumed a light yield of 8 PE. Due to non-linearity in gain at high signal, gaussian fit to most-probable peak.

ppm 3HF

ppm 3HF

ppm 3HF

20 Single Plane Efficiency Efficiency calculated in Station B, one plane each of 2500, 3500 and 5000 ppm 3HF. Track built from 6 other planes and extrapolated to plane under test. Road-width varied from 2 to 50mm. Systematic errors determined from variation with road-width and runs on different sets of data. Algorithm will not over-estimate efficiency, but as a result may slightly under-estimate it.

21 Efficiency Efficiency expected due to Poisson: – 8 PE: % – 9 PE: % –10 PE: % Efficiency measured (0x150 data): –5000 ppm 3HF: ± 0.20 (stat.) ± 0.51 (syst.) –3500 ppm 3HF: ± 0.14 (stat.) ± 1.11 (syst.) –2500 ppm 3HF: ± 0.11 (stat.) ± 0.88 (syst.) Efficiency measured (0x350 data): –5000 ppm 3HF: ± 0.39 (stat.) –3500 ppm 3HF: ± 0.25 (stat.) –2500 ppm 3HF: ± 0.16 (stat.)

22 Conclusions Tracker performs at least as well as expected based on expectations from D0 and design: –Light Yield better than 8 PE –Single Plane efficiency consistent with light yield –Dead channel rate lower than G4MICE assumption –Point Resolution as expected from design Performance currently being fed into G4MICE (see talk on Wednesday) Only thing left is to build a couple of full trackers for MICE…