Example 4.4. No damper TMD at node 2 Tune to mode 1 modal mass =1.25 modal amplitude =1.0 Want equivalent modal damping = 0.1 Requires mbar =.065 The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuned Mass Dampers a mass that is connected to a structure
Advertisements

Beam Elements Jake Blanchard Spring 2008.
Time-frequency-domain modal identification of ambient vibration structures using Wavelet Transform Numerical example.
GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis
DISPLACEMENT TRANSMISSIBILITY IN BASE EXCITATION
Physics Based Modeling II Deformable Bodies Lecture 2 Kwang Hee Ko Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology.
TEST REQUIREMENTS AND IT EXECUTION FOR THE VELOCITY DEPENDENT ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICES Deh-Shiu Hsu, Yung-Feng Lee, Chien-Yuan Hou and Juan-The Lee Department.
MAK4041-Mechanical Vibrations
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
Unit 6: Structural vibration An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Structural vibration Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
Harmonic Analysis Appendix Ten. Training Manual General Preprocessing Procedure March 29, 2005 Inventory # A10-2 Background on Harmonic Analysis.
A spring with a mass of 6 kg has damping constant 33 and spring constant 234. Find the damping constant that would produce critical damping
Tuned Mass Dampers  Models and Implemented Devices.
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.
Basic structural dynamics II
Towers, chimneys and masts
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Static Pushover Analysis
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
Using GSA & Compos for dynamic and footfall analysis 1 Footfall induced vibration analysis using Compos Thomas Li (Software Technology Group)
RESEARCH: STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS Devices are installed in buildings to dissipate energy during a seismic event New devices dissipate energy using different.
1 Efficient Mode Superposition Methods for Non-Classically Damped System Sang-Won Cho, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ju-Won Oh, Professor, Hannam University,
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. 1 Kang-Min Choi, Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST, Korea Jung-Hyun Hong, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ji-Seong Jo,
NX nastran SEMODES 103 – Response Simlation
Along-wind dynamic response
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
1 MODAL ANALYSIS. 2 Tacoma Narrows Galloping Gertie.
Basic structural dynamics I Wind loading and structural response - Lecture 10 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST 1 Structural Vibration Control Using Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper Han-Rok Ji, Graduate Student, KAIST,
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
MODULE 08 MULTIDEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS. 2 Structure vibrating in a given mode can be considered as the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) system. Structure.
1 MIDTERM EXAM REVIEW. 2 m 081.SLDASM REVIEW Excitation force 50N normal to face k=10000N/m m=6.66kg Modal damping 5%
Modal Analysis-hw-04 The schematic diagram of a large cannon is shown below. When the gun is fired, high-pressure gases accelerate the projectile inside.
APHY201 1/30/ Simple Harmonic Motion   Periodic oscillations   Restoring Force: F = -kx   Force and acceleration are not constant  
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Dual-Functional Energy-Harvesting and Vibration Control: Electromagnetic Resonant.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Theoretical and Experimental Studies for the Application of Shape Memory Alloys.
Standing Waves Resonance Natural Frequency LT S6-8.
Standing Waves Resonance Natural Frequency LT S6-8.
Coupled Pendula.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. Analytical Solutions to H 2 and H ∞ Optimizations of Resonant Shunted Electromagnetic.
1 FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION Rayleigh-Ritz method approximate solution in the entire beam –Difficult to find good approximate solution (discontinuities.
Basics Of Seismic Vibration Control
Forces - basic physics Gravity Friction - static and kinetic Viscosity
Tunnel water conveyance
Modeling in Differential Equations Courses
Structural damping - an energy dissipation mechanism
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Equivalent Ratios.
Characterization of C Pod
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 18
Characterization of Omega Pod
ENFORCED MOTION IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
I.I- Introduction i- Loading a- Types of dynamic loading Loading
MAK4041-Mechanical Vibrations
فصل اول 1- پیشگفتار 2- کلیات خوشا پیشگفتار: از دستاورد های امروزه مهندسی زلزله و سازه ، می توان طراحی سازه ها بر مبنای عملکرد را بر شمرد که اولا.
Vibration and Oscillaton
Tuned Mass Damper Investigation for Apache Struts
هل يمكن أن نكون جيل الأرض الأخير؟
Examples of Semi-Active Structures
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
Experimentele Modale Analyse
قوانين برگزاري مناقصات و آيين نامه مالي و معاملاتي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي و خدمات بهداشتي ،درماني تهران
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
Free and Damped Oscillations
Nastran FEA Frequency Response Function for Base Input Revision B
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
Presentation transcript:

Example 4.4

No damper

TMD at node 2 Tune to mode 1 modal mass =1.25 modal amplitude =1.0 Want equivalent modal damping = 0.1 Requires mbar =.065 The appropiate damper parameters are f=.91 =.145 mdamper=1.25mbar =.081

Mode shapes -TMD tuned to mode 1

Modal periods

Periodic forcing T = 1s

TMD at node 2 - Tuned to mode 2

TMD tuned to mode 2

Periodic forcing T =.4s tuned to mode 2

TMD tuned to mode 2 periodic forcing T =.4s

TMD tuned to mode 2 periodic forcing =.4s

TMD at node 2 Tuned to mode 1 T =1s

Earthquake loading - No TMD

TMD tuned to mode 1

Earthquake loading -No TMD

TMD tuned to mode 1

Tforcing=1s TMD at node 2 Tuned to mode 2 T =.408s

Example 4.2

Mode shapes

Inter-element profiles

Damping ratios

Modal response- T=1sec

Damper properties

Nodal and damper displacements T=1sec