Co-evolution in Constructing Regional Advantage: Exploring the Multiple Roles of Lund University in Strengthening the Scania Regional Innovation System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 © NOKIA Stocholm/ /EO. 2 © NOKIA Stocholm/ /EO Issues Evolution of Innovation Policies Systemic approach Business perspective Future.
Advertisements

Constructing Regional Advantage: Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy for Small and Medium Enterprises Professor Bjørn Asheim, Deputy Director, CIRCLE.
The Role of Cities & City Regions in EU Regional Programmes: Experiences from NE England Kevin Richardson
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
The project is funded by the European Union Institutional capacity development of the three innovation centres and research sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Industry-School Partnerships: Boundary crossing to enable school-to-work transitions across three targeted industries.
The ECPG’s final report Structured in two parts: Three core principles for the next stage of cluster programmes Eight action proposals directed at both.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
ESIF Priority Areas and Detailed Design Workshop Tuesday 2 December 2014 Sheffield Hallam University The Sheffield City Region and Innovation Yasmin Knight,
Industrial clusters and competence building in the globalizing learning economy Presentation at Technical University of Lisboa October 2003 Bengt-Åke Lundvall.
Analysing university-firm interaction in the SADC countries: An initial overview Glenda Kruss SARUA workshop October 2008.
Knowledge Transfer from Public Research Organisations: Study for STOA Paula Knee Erik Arnold Technopolis 29 February 2012.
1 Foreign Direct Investment and IP in Knowledge-based Development Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Minsk, 9-10 June 2010.
2013 EDITION Mr. Pierre Vigier Head of Unit Economic Analysis and Indicators.
LOCAL SYSTEM OF INNOVATION CENTERED ON AUDIOVISUAL PRODUCTION Marcelo Matos Fluminense Federal University and RedeSist - IE/UFRJ.
Constructing Regional Advantage Presentation at the First Joint IKINET-EURODITE Conference, Warsaw, May 24th, Professor Bjørn T. Asheim, Circle (Centre.
Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation Systems Community Participation and Emerging Forms of Governance in Economic Development Strategy David.
GATEWAY TO FINNISH EXPERTISE 1 Commercialization guidelines – NanoCom and ProNano results Dr. Eeva Viinikka, Business Director Programme Director of National.
Competitiveness and the knowledge economy - where do we stand? Prof David Charles University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Regional Facts and Figures (4) 3.5 mill. inhabitants 14 universities 29 hospitals 5 science parks 5 airports 4 defined clusters 2 – 3 emerging clusters.
Chapter 9 New Business Development
The Higher Education Innovation Fund Vinnova and British Embassy seminar 21 March 2006.
KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: THE NEW ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES Two experts group have prepared reports on the future of university/research relations They have proposed.
Innovation Systems Research Network MCRI Theme III: Social Inclusion and Civic Engagement David A. Wolfe, Ph.D. Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation.
NEW INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES, case Finland Mervi Käki, CEO, Partner
Changing the Business Model -- Adding Value Constantine Katsigiannis President HELLENIC-CANADIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Constantine Katsigiannis President.
1 Behavioural Additionality in Strategic Basic Research ‘New Frontiers in Evaluation’ Vienna, 24 April 2006 Jan Larosse, EC-DG RTD Paul Schreurs, IWT Flanders.
III ASTANA ECONOMIC FORUM INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIVE CONGRESS Innovative potential development in SME`s in region Dr. Karl-Heinz Klinger Technostart GmbH,
Fraunhofer ISI Institute Systems and Innovation Research Trentino plus 10 Foresight Workshop July 2003 (Trento) Introductory notes on the Fraunhofer.
Do regional collaborations matter in biomedicine? The case of Western Sweden Jens Laage-Hellman IMIT and RIDE at Chalmers University of Technology Annika.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly Kick Off Event Inova+ Overview Diana Magalhães.
Linking business to knowledge: new challenges Dr Kastytis Gečas, Lithuanian Innovation Centre.
Fraunhofer ISI Institute Systems and Innovation Research Trentino plus 10 Foresight Workshop July 2003 (Trento) Trentino plus 10: Innovation system.
Tourism and Leisure Services R&D programme Funding for Innovative Tourism and Leisure Service Concepts.
1 Innovation and innovation policies in developing countries in the framework of PaceNet+ Ludovico Alcorta Director. Research, Statistics and Industrial.
The Evolution of Innovation Policy: Theory and Practice By Jan Fagerberg, Aalborg University, University of Oslo and University of Lund
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
Knowledge for development in sub- Saharan Africa: University-firm interaction in Nigeria, Uganda and South Africa Glenda Kruss, John Adeoti and Dani Nabudere.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
The Role of Government in Building Absorptive Capacity Ken Warwick DTI Knowledge Economy Forum VI 17 April 2007.
Internationalisation of Finnish Public Research Organisations Dr. Antti Pelkonen Senior Scientist, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Latin American Graduate School in Industrial Development and SME Policies Guatemala, 17th - 22th July Universidad Rafael Landivar David Bailey Birmingham.
1 Regional Innovation Strategies RIS. 2 About Regional Innovation Strategies The RIS projects aimed to support regions to develop regional innovation.
Making Universities More Entrepreneurial Dr. David Woollard Special projects Manager.
Policy Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Enhancing and focusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Stratinc Meeting –Thessaloniki Oct. 7/ A contribute to a rationale (a preliminary view) DRAFT Maximiano Martins / Scientific Board.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
1 Trends in Science, Technology and Industry: An OECD Perspective Jerry Sheehan OECD Science & Technology Policy Division Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest,
Anders Malmberg Regional Economies in a Globalising World Enhancing Intellectual Capacity and Innovation Cardiff, 21 November 2008 Localised Clusters in.
Regions for Economic Change : fostering competitiveness through innovative technologies, products and healthy communities PAULO GOMES Brussels, 7-8 March.
Meeting 4: Innovation strategy
Policy analysis – ESF/ECRP project ’Constructing Regional Advantage: Towards State-of-the-art Regional Innovation System Policy in Europé’ Professor Bjørn.
Cluster theory evidence: What remains of the concept – some reflections Session IX – Innovation Systems Research Network Seventh Annual Meeting Toronto,
Version VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Evaluating the societal impacts of Public research organisations: A (belated) paradigm shift in the making Kaisa.
Answering the Economic and Social Environment Expectations Role of the Higher Education Institutions for the Development of the Continuing Education. Answering.
MTT Agrifood Research Finland - strategy Target for 2015 and operating model set for achieving it.
MODELS OF STRATEGIC RESTRUCTURING OF COMPANIES AFTER GLOBALIZATION.
Growth in East Asia: Innovative Firms in Dynamic Cities Shahid Yusuf World Bank DECRG February 18, 2004.
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, Austria, web: ISO 9001 zert.
17 March 2016 How do we conceptualise the role of universities and PRIs in a national system of innovation where the goal is inclusive and sustainable.
Balancing Objectives and Needs of Industry and Academia: the Role of Government Presentation by Mary Cryan Meeting of National Councils for S&T Policy.
Benchmarking RTDI Organisations in Central and Southeast European Countries Regional Innovation Strategies International workshop 19 November 2004 Zoya.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Strengthening multi-sectoral collaboration: a framework for building interactive capabilities Glenda Kruss HESA Conference 3-4 April 2012.
International Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Co-evolution in Constructing Regional Advantage: Exploring the Multiple Roles of Lund University in Strengthening the Scania Regional Innovation System Björn Asheim, Paul Benneworth, Lars Coenen, Jerker Moodysson CIRCLE: Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy, Lund University Sweden Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University, Sweden CURDS: Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle, UK

From comparative to constructed advantage Comparative advantage: criticized for dismissing the role of technological change and innovation Competitive advantage: too narrowly institutional oriented by focusing on the creation of endogenous capacity of regions to learn and innovate by an interaction of markets and networks Constructed advantage: acknowledges more the important interplay between industrial dynamics (knowledge bases) and organisational dynamics as well as private-public complementarities in policy making by a stronger focus on actors, agencies and governance forms in a multi-level perspective.

Platform Policy The dilemma of regional innovation: from imitation to innovative adaptation Industrial renewal takes place in-between and beyond existing sectors – need for transcending traditional sector policies Innovation through combining existing knowledge, technologies and competencies with new generic technologies (IT, biotech) How to shape conditions for cross-fertilization?

Platform Policy II Related variety – creating spillover effects - Related variety: related sectors in terms of shared or complementary knowledge bases and competences - specialisation of localisation economies + diversity of urbanisation economies Differentiated knowledge bases - analytial <> synthetic <> symbolic Distributed knowledge networks - from internal knowledge within firms to distributed knowledge networks of firms across a range of technologies, industries and sectors in global value chains

Sector characteristics and universities institutional learning: differentiated knowledge bases (Asheim and Gertler, 2005) SyntheticAnalytical Innovation by application or novel combination of existing knowledge Innovation by creation of new knowledge Importance of applied, problem related knowledge (engineering) often through inductive processes Importance of scientific knowledge often based on deductive processes and formal models Interactive learning with clients and suppliersResearch collaboration between firms (R&D department) and research organisations Dominance of tacit knowledge due to more concrete know-how, craft and practical skill Dominance of codified knowledge due to documentation in patents and publications Communities of practiceEpistemic communities

Platform policies – Japan’s new cluster policy: Ex: Strengthening policies for advanced component/materials industries

Regional Innovation Systems (RIS)? In Constructing Regional Advantage RIS is still important: A RIS is constituted by two sub-systems and the systemic interaction between them (and with non-local actors and agencies): The knowledge generation and diffusing sub-system (universities, technical colleges, R&D institutes, technology transfer agencies, business associations and finance institutions) The knowledge exploitation sub-system (firms in regional clusters as well as their support industries (customers and suppliers))

Regional Innovation Systems Knowledge Generation Subsystem (universities, research institutes, technology transfer offices, etc) Knowledge Exploitation Subsystem (business, possibly cluster) Intra-RIS Knowledge exchange / Interactive Learning Extra-RIS Knowledge exchange / Interactive Learning (e.g. scientific communities, (inter)national research collaboration Extra-RIS Knowledge exchange / Interactive Learning (e.g. global value chains, transnational corporation) Governance PolicyInstitutions RIS

Regional Innovation Policy Support: Financial and technical Behavioural change: Learning to innovate Firm-focusedFinancial support Brokers Mobility schemes System-focusedTechnology centresRegional innovation systems

Emerging trends Universities are increasingly seen as important actors for regional development in the knowledge economy Constructing regional advantage –Actively upgrading and building regional innovation systems has become important objectives in regional development University’s third mission –As active contributors to regional innovative capacity by being actors in the knowledge generation subsystem of RIS

The role of universities in RIS Third mission (after teaching and research): direct interaction between universities and society –Creating high-tech firms –Consulting for local industry –Delivering advice for politicians –Informing general public debates Knowledge economy discourse prevails Generative role: discrete outputs in response to specific demands Developmental outputs: development of regional institutional capacities (Gunesekara, 2006)

Objective and reserach question To analyze and compare three mechanisms through which Lund University has contributed to Scanias RIS –IDEON Science Park –Life Science Cluster Medicon Valley –VINNVÄXT support for the food sector ’Innovation i Gränsland’ (Food Innovation at Interfaces) How do different organizations and institutions in the RIS co-evolve over time when the university is faced with competing sectoral demands for regional engagement?

Scania

LU involvement in the region’s industries SectorKnowledge baseGovernance Structure Technology Status ICTSynthetic/ analytical, creating spin-offs and upgrading existing firms Well developed with wide range of supportive/ dedicated BSOs Mature high technology Life scienceAnalytical: creating new growth businesses in novel market areas Aspirational, attempting to learn from existing structures Disruptive technology FoodSynthetic: upgrading an old industry, shifting its value composition ’Old boys network’, very traditional, potentially locked in Mature technology

ICT-From Ideon to a Regional Innovation System Ericsson (now Sony Ericsson) funded 20 staff in the early 1980s. IDEON, the first Science Park in Scandinavia, established LU was at this time foremost a supplier of human capital. Main challenge: avoid lock in to the former industrial configuration, promote a dynamic ICT cluster. IDEON proved to be an important point of stability around which new ICT activities could emerge. LU deepened its engagement in regional policy. IDEON was an arena for concrete activity in which various regional partners where co-operating → an institutional opening up process → a more flexible RIS

Life Science – From Local Integration to Global Visibility Long history of pharma and medtech in the region (Astra, Pharmacia, Gambro etc). Strong growth of biotech firms (DBFs) since early 1990s (today ~ 35 DBFs). Successful academic life science research. High quality health care. Medicon Valley Academy established in the mid 1990s as an initiative by Lund and Copenhagen Universities to promote knowledge transfer between companies, universities and health care organisatoins in the region. Early enthusiasm has decreased. Global collaboration proved indispensable. MVA strategy was revised. Less focus on local integration, more on global visibility (e.g. attract VC and research funds, link up with other CoE etc). Other LU initiatives with similar rationale: BMC, Stem Cell Centre, Swegene, SCIBLU

Food – From Process Streamlining to Innovation at Interfaces Scania represents 45% of Sweden’s total food production but increasingly outsourced VINNVÄXT funding to stimulate a transition from price competition and economies of scale to quality competition and economies of scope Increase the added value and upgrade the innovative capacity by targeting new market opportunities A central role for Scania Food Innovation Network, a public-private cooperation in which LU is a leading member

Food – From Process Streamlining to Innovation at Interfaces Food Innovation at Interfaces seeks to realise the potential of a latent innovation network between university and food industry Broad and interdisciplinary approach Food and Health – Functional Food Convenience foods and logistics Marketing of Advanced food products IDEON Agro food: technology transfer directly related to the food industry

Conclusions Deepened contribution: from provider of human capital to an orchestrator of regional innovation support Widening involvement: through its national and international networks the university has extended the innovation network of regional actors Integrating various sectors: innovativeness and competitiveness generated by related variety in the regional economy with the university as a core Increased activity-level and overlap between different innovation activities > merging organizational units within the university (CoE)

Multiple impacts of university engagement on restructuring and strengthening the RIS ‘Global’ ‘Regional’ University Local knowledge exploiters Resource flows 3. Unifying 2. Widening 1. Deepening Scania RIS