Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Safety. Objectives Introduce students to the TDL Career Cluster: Transportation Systems/Infrastructure Planning, Management, and Regulation.
Advertisements

Employer-Paid Parking: A Matching Grant Employers pay for parking at work if the employee is willing to pay for driving to work Commuters who don’t drive.
Industry Benchmarks How do you measure up?. Driver Qualification Standards For years insurance companies have been tightening up their driver MVR standards.
Waheed Uddin, PhD., P.E. Professor and Director, CAIT Center for Advanced Infrastructure Technology Department of Civil Engineering The University of Mississippi.
Ronald B. Achelpohl, PE Operation Green Light Mid-America Regional Council.
By: Pranav Koshiya Committee Member Huaguo Zhou, PhD 1 CE 491 dacq/idotmapdistrict.gif.
MET 12 Global Climate Change – Lecture 12
CE 4640: Transportation Design
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
CE 4640: Transportation Design
CE 4640: Transportation Design
Gresham Traffic Signal System Optimization A Comprehensive Evaluation of Corridor Performance After Deploying Adaptive Signal Control.
Public Expenditure Analysis May 4, 2007 Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment Your presenters: Annie Gorman Hazel-Ann Petersen.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E. CE 7640: Fall 2002.
CE 4640: Transportation Design Prof. Tapan Datta, Ph.D., P.E. Fall 2002.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E. CE 7640: Fall 2002.
Traffic Signal Warrants
Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer AAA Michigan Road Improvement Demonstration Program Economic Analyses Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D, P.E. CE 7640: Fall 2002.
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Alternative Transportation (AT) Includes: Public transit, Carpooling, Vanpooling, Biking/Bikepools, Walking, Ride-sharing, Hybrids, Car-share, Scooters/Motorcycles,
Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State Our roads are used by you to get to work,
May 10, 2011 Life-cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternatives for Accommodating Heavy Truck Traffic in the Las Vegas Roadway Network Dr. Alexander Paz,
Texting and Driving is the most dangerous thing to be doing, it takes away more then 5 seconds to send a text and in the 5 seconds you could crash and.
Reggie Chandra, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE Operation Green Light Manager of Traffic Operations, MARC.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Copyright © 2014, 2010, and 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 Introduction to Graphing.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
THE HISTORY OF MOBY-DICK David J Russell II. GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL FACTORS THAT IMPACT TRUCK USE OF TOLL ROADS David J Russell II.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of the SMART SunGuide Operations in Fort Lauderdale, Florida June 2006 Steve Corbin District ITS Operations Manager FDOT District.
Highway Costs Spring Highway Transportation Costs Type of CostExamples Highway investment costEngineering design, ROW, grading, drainage, pavement.
Comparative Evaluation between Elevated and Underground Metro Charkop-Bandra-Mankhurd Link By Hitesh L Bhanushali Under guidance of Prof. S.L.Dhingra.
Copyright 2001, Agrawal & BushnellVLSI Test: Lecture 31 Lecture 3 Test Economics n Economics defined n Costs n Production n Benefit - cost analysis n Economics.
1 Benefit Cost Analysis Typically used for public projects The goal is to determine if benefits exceed costs: Benefit / Cost Ratio > 1 The goal is NOT.
Korea Pedestrian Working Group The Korea Transport Institute Economic Appraisal for Technical Regulation on Pedestrian Protection (I): focused on head.
RATES LESSON 46POWER UP JPAGE 329. RATES  Miles per hour (mph)  Miles per gallon (mpg)  Dollars per hour  Per: to divide.
Warm Up #3 Convert: 25 cs = ___ ms 500daL = ___ kL kg = ___ mg? Place answer in scientific notation. Can you think of any OTHER metric units, other.
 You can use weighted averages to solve uniform motion problems when the objects you are considering are moving at constant rates or speeds.
Influencing Travel Behaviour Graham Riley Regional Programme Manager North of England Slide 1.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
Term Paper Presentation Course: CVEN 632 Presented by: Shailendra Matoria Evaluating Electronic Toll Collection System against Conventional Toll Plaza.
Presented By: Jizhou Wu.  Traffic causes inconvenience to students  Driving consumes fuel energy and money  Driving causes environment issues  Driving.
By: Christina Nahar Conservation Transport.  An effective strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must include: -Improved fuel economy -Reduce carbon.
Find the rate of change: Jodi made several deposits to her savings account over the summer as she was working. Her balance increased from $1140 on her.
Social cost benefit analysis of Delhi Metro
Reducing Idling Times of Vehicles Along a Busy Corridor – A Case Study (City of Burnaby) Michael Cetnarowski, P.Eng. DMD & Associates Ltd.
SEMESTER 1 FINAL REVIEW B I have created a pile of sheets. Take a sheet. Work on the sheet. You have been taught how to ‘do this sheet.’ At 11:00 we will.
Caldwell and Wilson (1999) 1. Determine primary rating factor for a road section based on traffic volume and user types 2. Primary rating factor is then.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment
GCAT i3 Committee Presentation
High way and Transportation 2(Lab) LCIV 3034
Metro Railway How it began
Introduction to Graphing
Project Feasibility Analysis
5-4: Dimensional Analysis
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
30 miles in 1 hour 30 mph 30 miles per hour
Section 2.1 Input and Output
example 3 Miles Per Gallon
Today’s Objective To be able to use ratios and relate quantities in the same units.
Starter Questions Convert the following to minutes :-
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Highway Engineering CE 431
Average Rates of Change
Lesson Quizzes Standard Lesson Quiz
Presentation transcript:

Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.

Example Problem A $3 million road improvement project for 10 mile stretch of a road is to be evaluated to find the Benefit-Cost ratio. The following data is available: Period Travel Speed Crash Frequency Maintenance Cost Operating Cost Average Number of stops per mile per vehicle Peak Hour Off Peak Hour PDOINJURY Before15 mph 30 mph30050$10,000/mile$8000/mile1 After20 mph 35 mph25020$5000/mile$9000/mile0.5

Assumptions 1.Service life = 10 years 2.Vest charge rate = 6% 3.Salvage value = 0 4.Peak hour traffic = 2500 vph 5.Off peak hour traffic = 1200 vph 6.Average car size is medium

Solution For Before Period: Total annual peak hour travel time = (10/15)*(2500)*(52*5*2) vehicle-hours = 866,666.7 vehicle-hours Total annual off-peak hour travel time = (10/30)*1200*[(24*365) - (52*5*2)] = 3,296,000 vehicle-hours For After Period: Total annual peak hour travel time = (10/20)*(2500)*(52*5*2) vehicle-hours = 650,000 vehicle-hours Total annual off-peak hour travel time = (10/35)*1200*[(24*365) - (52*5*2)] = 2,825,142.8 vehicle-hours

Annual Travel Time Savings Total Travel Time saved = (866, ,296,000) – (650, ,825,142.8) = 687,523.9 vehicle-hours Assume an average vehicle occupancy rate of 1.1 for medium sized cars. Total person-hours saved = 687,523.9*1.1= 756,276.3 person-hours Assuming a $7 value for each person-hour, Dollar value of travel time saved = $7*756,276.3 = $5,293,934 per year

Savings in Accident Cost PDO Savings = $6,400*(300–250) = $320,000 Injury Savings = $35,300*(50-20) = $1,059,000

Savings in Fuel Consumption Reduction in number of stops = (1-0.5)*10 per vehicle = 5 per vehicle Therefore, total annual reduction in number of stops = 5*[2500*(52*5*2)+1200*((24*365)-(52*5*2))] = 55,940,000 Assuming an average consumption of gasoline of 1/30 gallon per stop and cost of gasoline as $1.50 per gallon, savings in fuel consumption = $1.50*55,940,000*(1/30) = $2,797,000 per year

Savings in Vehicle Operation & Maintenance Cost Assuming a savings of 1 cent per mile per vehicle hour, total annual savings in vehicle operating cost = $0.01*[2500*(52*5*2)+1200*((24*365)-(52*5*2))]*10 = $1,118,800 Savings in maintenance cost = $(10,000-5,000)*10 = $50,000 Savings in road operating cost = $(8,000-9,000)*10 = -$10,000

Total Annual Benefit Total annual benefit = (5,293, , ,059, ,797, ,118, ,000 – 10,000) = $10,628,734

Total Annual Cost Total annual cost = $(3,000,000)*(CR) = $3,000,000* =$407,604 6% 10

Benefit-Cost Ratio B/C = $10,628,734 / $407,604 = 26.1:1

Sensitivity Analysis To check whether the assumptions are valid: Assuming the value of time as equal to the minimum wage rate of $5.65 per hour, dollar value of travel time saved = $5.65*756,276.3 = $4,272,961 B/C = $4,272,961 / $407,604 = 10.5:1 Therefore, the assumption was valid.