The Vote Formula Imperial College’s Resource Allocation Methodology Carole Hobden Planning April 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING TRANSPARENCY TO SUPPORT THE PRICING (AND COST RECOVERY) STRATEGY Jim Port J M Consulting Ltd.
Advertisements

Practical issues of fEC John Newton National Co-ordinator for Costing and Pricing, JCPSG.
Planning Office and Academic Registry Planning Office Overview.
Research Contracts 11 October 2007 University of Strathclyde Kathleen Boyle.
Transparency as a means to achieve institutional objectives Jim Port J M Consulting Ltd The big picture Transparency and public funding TRAC as an aid.
The Mysteries of Indirect Costs Revealed Lee Williams Vice-President for Research Faculty Brown-Bag Seminar November 14, 2006.
Financing higher education and research Lennnart Ståhle.
FINANCE Academic Workload Planning The Derby Experience Presented by John Hurd TRAC Manager.
The University of Edinburgh Resource Allocation Model.
Distribution of Performance- based Funding to CASS 2008 ANU COLLEGE OF ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery Report April 22, 2009 Carol Hollingsworth, Director, Grants & Contracts Financial Services & Janet Parker,
Scottish Funding Council Funding of colleges in Scotland May 2011.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
Florida Atlantic University Overview of Operating Budget Process Presentation to the Florida Atlantic University Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors February.
The New RASCAL Model Resource Allocation System and Cost Apportionment at Loughborough (RASCAL) 25 April 2012.
Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education Presentation by Arthur M. Hauptman Financing Reforms for Tertiary Education in the Knowledge Economy Seoul,
The Vote Formula Imperial College’s Resource Allocation Methodology Carole Hobden Planning April 2010.
Fiscal Year University of Nevada School of Medicine Self-Supporting Budgets.
Communicating the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise A presentation to press officers in universities and colleges. Philip Walker, HEFCE.
Budget Office Division of Business and Finance DEVELOPING A UNIVERSITY-WIDE BUDGET An Overview of the External Budget Development Process.
The Vote Formula: Resource Allocation Methodology Planning Division October 2010.
1 Budget Model Update #2 Resources Implementation Team.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009.
How the main HEFCE teaching grant is calculated Thom Brain Funding Round Project Manager.
Financial Outlook 2013/14 Tom Wale - PRAS Helen Knight - Finance.
London Metropolitan University Financial Benchmarking Project 2009/10 23rd March 2011.
SHOPS is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. Abt Associates leads the project in collaboration with Banyan Global Jhpiego Marie Stopes.
Manoa Budget Committee Update Kathy CutshawFebruary 18, 2015.
REPORT STATUTE Statute of Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, stipulated in Article 58, Paragraph 5, Subparagraph 3 of the Law on Scientific.
School Funding Formula (Agenda item 7). Overview Provide an overview of the formula headlines Final schools funding formula 2015/16 Base Formula.
RCUK fEC Update. Full Economic Costing From 1 September 2005, research grants awarded by the UK Research Councils.
Full Economic Costing and Pricing – Latest developments John Newton - National Co-ordinator for Costing and Pricing JCPSG.
Northumbria University Where does the money come from & how is it spent? David Chesser DVC & FD 1.
A review of innovative allocation mechanisms Jamil Salmi and Art Hauptman international forum on tertiary education financing Barcelona, 30 Nov-2 Dec 2005.
Budget Briefing 2011/12 Catherine Whalley - PRAS Stephen Purbrick - Finance.
Farm Bill/Dairy Policy February 26, 2014 Dairy Gross Margin, LLC Dr. Scott Brown Agricultural Markets and Policy Division of Applied.
School of Social Sciences Research Costing / Recovery of Overheads Mary White – Senior Management Accountant 23 February 2010.
Office of Science and Technology. The Sustainability of University Research: Consultation on Dual Support Reform Presentation to Professors and Heads.
1. 2 Implementation of Grants on a Full Economic Cost Basis John Wand.
Research Assessment Exercise RAE Dr Gary Beauchamp Director of Research School of Education.
Benchmarking Academic Enterprise Robert Belsole M.D. Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs.
Campus Forum: Resource Allocation at UKZN in 2008 Glen Barnes Director, Management Information (for the Budget Working Group)
April, 2005 Texas Public University Cost Study. April, 2005 Charge To develop a defensible and acceptable “Instruction and Operations Formula” Matrix.
DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL VOTE 16: HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING Presentation to Standing Committee on Appropriations 26 February 2010.
Professor David Eastwood Review of the year and the future direction of higher education Chief Executive Higher Education Funding Council for England.
Consistent distribution of revenues and costs Distribute revenues to units Units pay for all the costs associated with their programs Eliminate the “General.
IBHE Presentation 1 Illinois Higher Education Performance Funding Model IBHE Board Meeting February 7, 2012 Dr. Alan Phillips.
Understanding State Share of Instruction and Resource Analysis Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614)
Information Services The JCPSG case study BUFDG Full Economic Costing Seminars December 2004 / January 2005.
WACTC 2014 Allocation and Accountability Recommendations - Briefing SBCTC October 2014.
September Presentations to Staff1 Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC) : an update.
HEFCE review of TRAC (Transparent Approach to Costing) Steve Egan Deputy Chief Executive, HEFCE Issues and proposals in the consultation.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Hands on Budgeting Wendy Watson April 18, Agenda Why and when to budget? Types of budgets Revenues Expenses Cost allocation Types of budget Reports.
Florida International University G-51 April 9, 2010.
INCENTIVE FUNDING UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Created on 2/17/2016.
TRAC – the Transparent Approach to Costing Finance Services.
Collective Bargaining Contracts with Performance Metrics A “Success Pool” and ”Faculty Excellence Awards” Kent State University NCSCBHEP 39 th Annual National.
Student Financial Support for 2009 Higher Education entrants.
Lancashire Schools Forum School Budget 2015/16, including Recommendations from Chairman’s group on 12 January 15 January 2015.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Evaluation of the Space Projection Models
at the University of Virginia
Budget Overview Kelly Ratliff
UW Program Fees Proposal
Support for Heads of Department and Departmental Managers
Funding the full economic costs of research
Budget February 5, 2019.
EFTSU, Funding and the RMIT University Budget
Presentation transcript:

The Vote Formula Imperial College’s Resource Allocation Methodology Carole Hobden Planning April 2010

Resource allocation We will be covering: – The resource allocation process – Provide an overview of the College’s resource allocation model called the Vote Formula

The resource allocation process Resource allocation takes place from January to March and is overseen by the Resource Allocation Committee (RAC) The RAC is responsible for the methodology (Vote Formula) used in allocating general recurrent funding to the faculties and Business School The RAC reports to the Management Board, its membership is: –Chairman, Deputy Rector –Principals (Faculty and Business School) –COO, Director of Planning, Director of Finance, Deputy Rector (Research), College Secretary

The resource allocation process The RAC meet three to four times each year A few days before the RAC meetings members of the Planning Division meet with the FFOs and FOOs The final Vote Formula allocations, as proposed by RAC, are presented to the Management Board in March for approval

What is the Vote Formula? The College’s main mechanism for distributing general funds to the faculties (and the Business School) Most (but not all) income from HEFCE and from fees that the College receives is distributed to faculties through the Gross Vote Formula Some of that resource is retrieved through the Infrastructure Charge mechanism to fund the College’s non-academic departments

Resource Allocation: General Objectives EQUITY in the distribution of HEFCE grant and tuition fees INCENTIVES to change behaviour to further the strategic objectives of the College Financial STABILITY

Why a formula? Principally: Based on performance, not influence Also: Is relatively transparent Provides gearing with HEFCE’s formula, but takes College circumstances into account “Formula reflects but does not mimic HEFCE’s formula” Allows organic change in academic profile Can be used as a planning tool

Disadvantages of a formula Data are historic; a time lag is inbuilt so faculties that are expanding are restrained and those that are contracting are buffered Difficult to take special factors into account Danger of lack of transparency if becomes too complicated over time Strategic direction of College must be mediated through formula; strategic initiatives and new academic activities have to be provided for in other ways

Overview of the Vote Formula The Management Board (in February each year) determines the total amounts to be distributed to faculties and non-academic departments These two together form the Gross Vote Pot

Overview of the Vote Formula Firstly, four items are allocated directly to faculties from the Gross Vote Pot: – HEFCE funding for charity funded research (c stream) –HEFCE funding for strategically important and vulnerable subjects (s stream) –100% premium element (premium fee less the standard fee) (p) –25% standard overseas fees (o)

Overview of the Vote Formula The remaining Gross Vote Pot is then divided into two portions, one for Teaching (T) and one for Research (R) This division is done using the R:T ratio which is calculated on the basis of College income from HEFCE and fees, less the directly allocated items

Overview of the Vote Formula Gross Vote Pot (funds Faculties and non-academic departments)

Overview of the Vote Formula RT Items directly allocated to faculties The remainder is split into a Research (R) pot and a Teaching (T) pot:

Overview of the Vote Formula RT Items directly allocated to faculties Infrastructure charge

Overview of the Vote Formula Net Vote to faculties (includes directly allocated items) Faculties Infrastructure charge Non-academic departments Infrastructure charge Non-academic departments

Formulae are used to distribute each of the six streams of the Gross Vote Pot between the Faculties (and the Business School). The Vote Formula: the Gross Vote R T All the resource that is available is allocated to the Faculties in the Gross Vote allocations. Then some of it is retrieved through the Infrastructure Charge mechanism. Four directly allocated items (s, c, p, o)

The Vote Formula: the Gross Vote In both the R and T formulas: -Volume measures are used to determine the activity occurring in departments/faculties - Weightings are applied to each stream of volumes to affect the relative importance of the various streams

The T Vote: Volume measures The T formula uses STUDENT LOAD data for its volume measures. Student load is used rather than student registrations to reflect the fact that various departments/faculties may contribute to a student’s teaching. Student load information is collected annually through the Student Load Exercise.

The T Vote: weightings Weightings are applied to the volumes in relation to: Type of student (Undergraduate or Postgraduate Taught) Type of teaching (own, service or exported) Subject matter (clinical medicine, lab-based, maths, other)

The R Vote: Volume Measures R volume is measured through the following streams: FTE of 2008 RAE-active staff (Category A) Postgraduate Research (PGR) Student Load FTE Staff expenditure on all research grants and contracts

The R Vote: weightings Weightings are applied to the volumes in relation to: Performance in the 2008 RAE Subject matter of teaching for Research students (clinical medicine or lab-based, maths, other)

The Vote Formula: the C and S streams C stream As UK Charity sponsors do not usually pay full economic costs, HEFCE receives funds from the UK government to pass on to HEIs to support charity research. These funds are mapped from UoAs to the most appropriate faculties. Resource is passed directly to the faculties in what is referred to as the c stream. S stream HEFCE provides extra funding in relation to certain science subjects. We pass this on to the relevant faculties.

The Vote Formula: Overseas Fees Faculties receive 25% of the appropriate full standard overseas fee for each overseas student, a year in arrears. Overseas students are also funded through the gross T or R vote, at the same rates as Home/EU students.

The Vote Formula: Premium Fees Some faculties charge fees that are higher than the standard College fee for a particular type of course. These are referred to as premium fees. The premium fee element is the margin between the actual (premium) fee level and the College standard fee for a course. Faculties receive 100% of the premium fee element, one year in arrears.

The Vote Formula: Premium Fees & Overseas Fees Example: UG Y1 Overseas student on Mechanical Engineering course £20,400 £1,100 (Premium fee) GROSS POT Faculty of Engineering O/S fees element £4,825 (25% of £19,300) Remainder £14,475 (75% of £19,300)

So now, each of the six streams in the Gross Vote has been divided up across the Faculties (and the Business School). The Vote Formula: the Gross Vote Next, the Infrastructure Charge is applied to retrieve resource to fund the non- academic departments. R T Four directly allocated items (s, c, p, o)

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge Recovers cost of non-academic departments Total amount is decided annually by the Management Board Divided into streams related to four main types of activity: - Student load FTEs stream - Staff FTEs stream - Space sqm stream - Research £k staff expenditure stream Resource Allocation Committee (RAC) decides how much of the total Infrastructure Charge amount should be distributed against each volume stream

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge Infrastructure Charge

6% Student Load 34% Staff 16% Space 38% RG&C Exp. 12% The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge

Student Load 34% Staff 16% Space 38% RG&C Exp. 12% ENGINEERINGMEDICINE NATURAL SCIENCES BUSINESS SCHOOL 37% 32% 24% 26% 48% 3% 37% 31% 2% 32% 20% 24% 58% 1% 24% 8% 31% 25% 29% 21%

The Vote Formula: Infrastructure Charge ENGINEERINGMEDICINE NATURAL SCIENCES BUSINESS SCHOOL 33% 35% 28% 4%

The Vote Formula: Conclusion Each Faculty (and the Business School) receives a Net Vote allocation This consists of its share of the Gross Vote Gross Vote = T + R + c + s + o + p less its share of the Infrastructure Charge (InfCh) Net Vote = Gross Vote – Infrastructure Charge

Outside the Vote Formula In addition to formulaic allocations, the Resource Allocation Committee may also distribute additional resource alongside the Net Vote allocations. Other sources of income to the Faculties include: Research Income including Overheads and fEC income resource from HEFCE earmarked for specific purposes allocations from SIF

The Vote Formula Questions and discussion