Www.alcoholandhealth.org1 Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2014.
Advertisements

Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2013.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2014.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2013.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July-August 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2008.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2009.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2009.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2004.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2009.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence April 2008.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2011.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July-August 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2008.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2009.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2011.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2011.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September-October 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January-February 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2011.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2004.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2004.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January-February 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2009.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence September-October 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2015.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Chapter 4: Prognosis Presented by: Laurie Huston and Kurt Spindler Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2007.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2008.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2008.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2009.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2012.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2014.
 Is there a comparison? ◦ Are the groups really comparable?  Are the differences being reported real? ◦ Are they worth reporting? ◦ How much confidence.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2012.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2012.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2012.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2012.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Prognosis study EBM questions. Prognostic factors Characteristics of patient that may predict eventual outcome Several types: demographic (eg age) disease-specific.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2015.
Field Assessment of BAC Data to Study College Drinking.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December, 2015.
CAT 4: How to Read a Prognosis Article Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :黃美琴 Date : 2005/10/27.
Case control & cohort studies
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2013.
Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario Alcohol. Proportion of cancer cases attributable to alcohol consumption, by sex and cancer type, Ontario, Cancer.
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2017
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2017
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2018
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2019
Presentation transcript:

Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2005

Featured Article High-Risk Alcohol Consumption and Late-Life Alcohol Use Problems Moos RH, et al. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(11):

Study Objective To examine… –the prevalence of at-risk drinking, as defined by various guidelines, and –the association between alcohol consumption and related problems …among older adults

Study Design Mail and telephone surveys at baseline and 10 years later 1291 non-abstinent, community- dwelling older adults

Assessing Validity of an Article about Prognosis Are the results valid? What are the results? How can I apply the results to patient care?

Are the Results Valid? Was the sample representative? Were the subjects sufficiently homogeneous with respect to prognostic risk? Was follow-up sufficiently complete? Were objective and unbiased outcome criteria used?

Was the sample representative? The sampling procedure is not reported in the article. If sampled appropriately, subjects would represent people who… –were aged 55–65 years at recruitment, –were from Northern California, –had telephones, and –had contact with the outpatient healthcare system.

Were the subjects sufficiently homogeneous with respect to prognostic risk? Few data are provided regarding the risk of alcohol problems. Those who had never consumed alcohol were excluded. –92% of subjects had consumed alcohol in the past 2 years.

Was follow-up sufficiently complete? Follow-up was 93% at 10 years. Although this proportion seems “high,” results could be biased if loss to follow-up was biased. –Example: Loss of the lightest drinkers (if they had MORE problems than the light drinkers who were not lost) might imply that the observed findings overestimate problems associated with drinking.

Were objective and unbiased outcome criteria used? Although self-report is a valid measure to determine consumption, it is not clear whether the specific measure used in this study was validated. Alcohol problems were assessed with a validated survey tool.

What are the Results? How likely are the outcomes over time? How precise are the estimates of likelihood?

How likely are the outcomes over time? Prevalence of risky drinking differed depending on the thresholds defined by various guidelines. –23% to 50% among women –29% to 45% among men Those who exceeded limits were more likely to have alcohol-related problems (e.g., difficulties with relationships and functioning) both at study entry and follow-up. –These problems were more prevalent in men.

How likely are the outcomes over time? (cont.) Both men and women reduced consumption after 10 years. The limit of no more than 7 drinks per week/3 drinks per day offered the best combination of sensitivity and specificity in predicting alcohol-related problems in both men and women. –At this cut-off, 16% of women and 34% of men had alcohol use problems at follow- up.

How precise are the estimates of likelihood? Odds ratios and confidence intervals are not provided. The P value for the increased risk of later problems associated with exceeding limits at baseline (versus not exceeding limits) is <0.01.

How Can I Apply the Results to Patient Care? Were the study patients and their management similar to those in my practice? Was the follow-up sufficiently long? Can I use the results in the management of patients in my practice?

Were the study patients similar to those in my practice? Based on the information provided in the paper, this question is difficult to answer. However, the results may be applicable to community-dwelling adults of the age studied.

Was the follow-up sufficiently long? 10 years is appropriate to detect differences in alcohol-related problems based on consumption.

Can I use the results in the management of patients in my practice? Despite the limitations noted, these data do support the use of currently recommended national guidelines for risky and less risky drinking that do not differ by sex. Physicians should counsel patients to avoid exceeding these limits and can provide data from this study as one reason to do so (to avoid the risk of subsequent alcohol-related problems).