Phenomenology of M-theory compactifications on G2 manifolds Bobby Acharya, KB, Gordon Kane, Piyush Kumar and Jing Shao, hep-th/0701034, B. Acharya, KB,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kiwoon Choi PQ-invariant multi-singlet NMSSM
Advertisements

Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Memorial Conference in Honor of Julius Wess. Topics in Gauge Mediation Nathan Seiberg IAS Based on: Meade, NS and Shih, arXiv: NS, Volansky and.
May 25, 2004Kakizaki, Mitsuru1 Flavor structure in supersymmetric models Kakizaki, Mitsuru (ICRR, University of Tokyo) May 25, 2004 We proposed a new alignment.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
Title of talk1 A Fertile Patch in the Heterotic Landscape Stuart Raby Rutgers University March 24, 2009.
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) SM: 28 bosonic d.o.f. & 90 (96) fermionic d.o.f. SUSY: # of fermions = # of bosonsN=1 SUSY: There are no particles.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
1 the LHC Jet & MET Searches Adam Avakian PY898 - Special Topics in LHC Physics 3/23/2009.
June 8, 2007DSU 2007, Minnesota Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Phys.
Large Volume String Compactifications hep-th/ , , , , hep-ph/ and to appear F. Quevedo, Cambridge. UKBSM Liverpool 2007.
REHEATING TEMPERATURE IN GAUGE MEDIATION MODELS AND COMPRESSED PARTICLE SPECTRUM Olechowski, SP, Turzynski, Wells (ABOUT RECONCILING SUPERSYMMETRIC DARK.
As a test case for quark flavor violation in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
What is mSUGRA? Physics in Progress, seminar talk, 11 th Feb 2010 Helmut Eberl.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
Axion and anomalous U(1) gauge symmetry Axion and anomalous U(1) gauge symmetry in string theory in string theory Kiwoon Choi (KAIST) ASK 2011 Apr.11 –
Supersymmetric Models with 125 GeV Higgs Masahiro Yamaguchi (Tohoku University) 17 th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow State.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Outline of talk  Phenomenological motivations for heavy scalars  Making string theory predictions for data -- assumptions – discrete, not directly related.
Mirage Mediation of SUSY Breaking K. S. Jeong KIAS 25 May, 2007 Based on hep-ph/ , hep-ph/
Family Symmetry Solution to the SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Plan of talk: I.Family Symmetry II.Solving SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Work with and Michal.
Low-scale Gaugino Mediation in Warped Spacetime Toshifumi Yamada Sokendai, KEK in collaboration with Nobuchika Okada (Univ. of Alabama ) arXiv: May 11,
Title of talk1 A Fertile Patch in the Heterotic Landscape Stuart Raby String Phenomenology CERN August 11, 2008.
Flavor induced EDMs with tanbeta enhanced corrections Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Aug. 4, 2007 Summer Institute 2007 In collaborated with: J.Hisano.
SUSY in the sky: supersymmetric dark matter David G. Cerdeño Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Based on works with S.Baek, K.Y.Choi, C.Hugonie,
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
Moduli stabilization, SUSY breaking and the Higgs sector Tatsuo Kobayashi 1. Introduction 2. KKLT scenario 3 . Generalized KKLT scenario 4. TeV scale mirage.
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
1 Enhancement of in supersymmetric unified models Yukihiro Mimura (National Taiwan University) Talk at SUSY2015, Lake Tahoe.
Yukawa and scalar interactions induced by scalar relevant for neutrino masss generation are: Since is assumed to be an exact symmetry of the model has.
3. Supersymmetry.
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
The Search For Supersymmetry Liam Malone and Matthew French.
“Planck 2009” conference Padova May 2009 Facing Dark Energy in SUGRA Collaboration with C. van de Bruck, A. Davis and J. Martin.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Z’production at LHC in an extended.
BEYOND MFV IN FAMILY SYMMETRY THEORIES OF FERMION MASSES Work done with Zygmunt Lalak and Graham Ross Based on existing ideas but, hopefully, contributing.
SUSY GUT Predictions for Neutrino Oscillation Mu-Chun Chen Brookhaven National Laboratory DUSEL Workshop, January 4-7, 2005 University of Colorado at Boulder.
Family Gauge Bosons with an Inverted Mass Hierarchy Yoshio Koide (Osaka University) in collaboration with Toshifumi Yamashita (Maskawa Insititute, KSU)
Impact of quark flavour violation on the decay in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
Moduli stabilization, SUSY breaking and the Higgs sector Tatsuo Kobayashi 1. Introduction 2. KKLT scenario 3 . Generalized KKLT scenario 4. TeV scale mirage.
Mar. 29, 2008 LHC 研究会 Axionic Mirage Mediation Tohoku Univ. Shuntaro Nakamura Collaborated with K. Okumura and M. Yamaguchi This talk is based on arXiv:
Jun. 19, 2008SUSY 08 Axionic Mirage Mediation Tohoku Univ. Shuntaro Nakamura Collaborated with K. Okumura and M. Yamaguchi This talk is based on arXiv:
Lecture 7. Tuesday… Superfield content of the MSSM Gauge group is that of SM: StrongWeakhypercharge Vector superfields of the MSSM.
Dirac Gauginos, Negative Supertraces and Gauge Mediation hep-th Linda Carpenter CERN 2011.
M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai (arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D77:015006, 2008 D. Demir, M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai, I.Turan ( arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D78:035013,
DIS2003 A.Tilquin Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at LEP What is the Standard Model Why to go beyond and how Supersymmetry Higgs sector.
Durmu ş Ali Demir İ zmir Institute of Technology Reasons for … Results from … Extra U(1) in SUSY.
Hunting for Hierarchies in PSL 2 (7) MICHAEL JAY PEREZ PHENOMENOLOGY 2015 MAY 5, 2015 ARXIV : /
Perturbative vs Non- Perturbative Effects for Moduli Stabilisation and Cosmology J. Conlon, FQ [hep-ph] M. Cicoli, J. Conlon, FQ, [hep-th]
Phys. Lett. B646 (2007) 34, (hep-ph/ ) Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter Masato Senami (University of Tokyo, ICRR)
1-2 Mass Degeneration in the Leptonic Sector Hiroyuki ISHIDA (Tohoku University) Collaboration with : Takeshi ARAKI (MISC) Ref ; T. Araki and H.I. arXiv.
Title of talk1 The Heterotic Road to the MSSM Stuart Raby Seoul National University June 10, 2008.
Origin of large At in the MSSM with extra vector-like matters
-- compactify on manifolds with G2 holonomy
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
Dark Matter Phenomenology of the GUT-less CMSSM
Grand Unified Theories and Higgs Physics
MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS
The Constrained E6SSM TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Phenomenology of SUSY Models with Non-universal Sfermions
非最小超对称唯象研究: 工作汇报 杨 金 民 中科院 理论物理所 南开大学.
Electric Dipole Moments in PseudoDirac Gauginos
Presentation transcript:

Phenomenology of M-theory compactifications on G2 manifolds Bobby Acharya, KB, Gordon Kane, Piyush Kumar and Jing Shao, hep-th/ , B. Acharya, KB, G. Kane, P. Kumar and Diana Vaman hep-th/ , Phys. Rev. Lett and B. Acharya, KB, P. Grajek, G. Kane, P. Kumar, and Jing Shao - in progress Konstantin Bobkov MCTP, May 3, 2007

Overview and summary of previous results Computation of soft SUSY breaking terms Electroweak symmetry breaking Precision gauge coupling unification LHC phenomenology Conclusions and future work Outline

M-theory compactifications without flux All moduli are stabilized by the potential generated by the strong gauge dynamics Supersymmetry is broken spontaneously in a unique dS vacuum is the only dimensionful input parameter. Generically ~30% of solutions give Hence – true solution to the hierarchy problem When the tree-level CC is set to zero for generic compactifications with >100 moduli !

The full non-perturbative superpotential is where the gauge kinetic function Introduce an effective meson field For and hidden sector gauge groups:,,, where Overview of the model dual Coxeter number SU(N): c k =N SO(2N): c k =2N-2 E 8 : c k =30

An N-parameter family of Kahler potentials consistent with holonomy and known to describe accurately some explicit moduli dynamics is given by: where the 7-dim volume and the positive rational parameters satisfy Beasley-Witten: hep-th/ , Acharya, Denef, Valandro. hep-th/ after we add charged matter

The N=1 supergravity scalar potential is given by

When there exists a dS minimum if the following condition is satisfied, i.e. with moduli vevs with meson vev Moduli Stabilization (dS)

Moduli vevs and the SUGRA regime Since a i ~1/N we need to have large enough in order to remain in the SUGRA regime from threshold corrections Friedmann-Witten: hep-th/ For SU(5):,where integers can be made large O(10-100) dual Coxeter numbers

When there exists a dS minimum with a tiny CC if the following condition is satisfied, i.e. moduli vevs meson vev

Recall that the gravitino mass is given by where Take the minimal possible value and tune..Then Scale of gaugino condensation is completely fixed!

Computation of soft SUSY breaking terms Since we stabilized all the moduli explicitly, we can compute all terms in the soft-breaking lagrangian Nilles: Phys. Rept. 110 (1984) 1, Brignole et.al.: hep-th/ Tree-level gaugino masses. Assume SU(5) SUSY GUT broken to MSSM. where the SM gauge kinetic function

Tree-level gaugino masses for dS vacua The tree-level gaugino mass is always suppressed for the entire class of dS vacua obtained in our model The suppression factor becomes completely fixed! - very robust

Anomaly mediated gaugino masses Lift the Type IIA result to M-theory. Yields flavor universal scalar masses Bertolini et. al.: hep-th/ constants - rational where Gaillard et. al.: hep-th/ , Bagger et. al.: hep-th/

Anomaly mediated gaugino masses. If we require zero CC at tree-level and : Assume SU(5) SUSY GUT broken to MSSM Tree-level and anomaly contributions are almost the same size but opposite sign. Hence, we get large cancellations, especially when - surprise!

Gaugino masses at the unification scale

Recall that the distribution peaked at O(100) TeV Hence, the gauginos are in the range O(0.1-1) TeV Gluinos are always relatively light – general prediction of these compactifications! Wino LSP

Trilinear couplings. If we require zero CC at tree- level and : Hence, typically

Scalar masses. Universal because the lifted Type IIA matter Kahler metric we used is diagonal. If we require zero CC at tree-level and : Universal heavy scalars

- problem Witten argued for his embeddings that - parameter can vanish if there is a discrete symmetry If the Higgs bilinear coefficient then typically expect Phase of - interesting, we can study it physical in superpotential from Kahler potential. (Guidice-Masiero)

In most models REWSB is accommodated but not predicted, i.e. one picks and then finds, which give the experimental value of We can do better with almost no experimental constraints: since, Generate REWSB robustly for “natural” values of, from theory Electroweak Symmetry Breaking

Prediction of alone depends on precise values of and Generic value Fine tuning – Little Hierarchy Problem Since, the Higgs cannot be too heavy M 3/2 =35TeV 1 < Z eff < 1.65

● Threshold corrections to gauge couplings from KK modes (these are constants) and heavy Higgs triplets are computable. ● Can compute M unif at which couplings unify, in terms of M compact and thresholds, which in turn depend on microscopic parameters. ● Phenomenologically allowed values – put constraints on microscopic parameters. ● The SU(5) Model – checked that it is consistent with precision gauge unification. PRECISION GAUGE UNIFICATION

– Here, big cancellation between the tree-level and anomaly contributions to gaugino masses, so get large sensitivity on – Gaugino masses depend on, BUT in turn depends on corrections to gauge couplings from low scale superpartner thresholds, so feedback. – Squarks and sleptons in complete multiplets so do not affect unification, but higgs, higgsinos, and gauginos do – μ, large so unification depends mostly on M 3 /M 2 (not like split susy) – For SU(5) if higgs triplets lighter than M unif their threshold contributions make unification harder, so assume triplets as heavy as unification scale. – Scan parameter space of and threshold corrections, find good region for in full two-loop analysis, for reasonable range of threshold corrections. Details:

t = log 10 (Q/1GeV) Two loop precision gauge unification for the SU(5) model α 2 -1 α 1 -1 α 3 -1

After RG evolution, can plot M 1, M 2, M 3 at low scale as a function of for ( here ) M3M2M1M3M2M1

Can also plot M 1, M 2, M 3 at low scale as a function of In both plots as M3M2M1M3M2M1

Moduli masses: one is heavy N-1 are light Meson is mixed with the heavy modulus Since, probably no moduli or gravitino problem Scalars are heavy, hence FCNC are suppressed

LHC phenomenology Relatively light gluino and very heavy squarks and sleptons Significant gluino pair production– easily see them at LHC. Gluino decays are charge symmetric, hence we predict a very small charge asymmetry in the number of events with one or two leptons and # of jets In well understood mechanisms of moduli stabilization in Type IIB such as KKLT and “Large Volume” the squarks are lighter and the up-type squark pair production and the squark-gluino production are dominant. Hence the large charge asymmetry is preserved all the way down

For, get Compute physical masses: Dominant production modes: (s-channel gluon exchange) (s-channel exchange) almost degenerate! Example

Decay modes: very soft! ~37% ; ~20.7% ; ~19% ; ~8.3% ; ~12% ; ~3% ; ~ 50% ; is quasi-stable!

Signatures Lots of tops and bottoms. Estimated fraction of events (inclusive): 4 tops 14% same sign tops 23% same sign bottoms 29% Observable # of events with the same sign dileptons and trileptons. Simulated with 5fb -1 using Pythia/PGS with L2 trigger (tried 100,198 events; 8,448 passed the trigger; L2 trigger is used to reduce the SM background) Same sign dileptons 172 Trileptons 112

L2 cut Before L2 cuts After L2 cuts Before L2 cuts After L2 cuts

Dark Matter LSP is Wino-like when the CC is tuned LSPs annihilate very efficiently so can’t generate enough thermal relic density Moduli and gravitino are heavy enough not to spoil the BBN. They can potentially be used to generate enough non-thermal relic density. Moduli and gravitinos primarily decay into gauginos and gauge bosons Have computed the couplings and decay widths For naïve estimates the relic density is too large

In the superpotential: Minimizing with respect to the axions t i and fixes Gaugino masses as well as normalized trilinears have the same phase given by Another possible phase comes from the Higgs bilinear, generating the - term Each Yukawa has a phase Phases

Conclusions All moduli are stabilized by the potential generated by the strong gauge dynamics Supersymmetry is broken spontaneously in a unique dS vacuum Derive from CC=0 Gauge coupling unification and REWSB are generic Obtain => the Higgs cannot be heavy Distinct spectrum: light gauginos and heavy scalars Wino LSP for CC=0, DM is non-thermal Relatively light gluino – easily seen at the LHC Quasi-stable lightest chargino – hard track, probably won’t reach the muon detector

Our Future Work Understand better the Kahler potential and the assumptions we made about its form Compute the threshold corrections explicitly and demonstrate that the CC can be discretely tuned Our axions are massless, must be fixed by the instanton corrections. Axions in this class of vacua may be candidates for quintessence Weak and strong CP violation Dark matter, Baryogenesis, Inflation Flavor, Yukawa couplings and neutrino masses