Single Particle Energies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The role of the isovector monopole state in Coulomb mixing. N.Auerbach TAU and MSU.
Advertisements

A brief introduction D S Judson. Kinetic Energy Interactions between of nucleons i th and j th nucleons The wavefunction of a nucleus composed of A nucleons.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-XXXX Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA This work performed under.
Molecular Bonding Molecular Schrödinger equation
Molecular Quantum Mechanics
Introduction to Molecular Orbitals
Chapter 3 Electronic Structures
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
(taken from H-J. Wolesheima,
Spin polarization phenomena in dense nuclear matter Alexander Isayev Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology Ukraine.
Monday, Nov. 11, 2013PHYS , Fall 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #17 Monday, Nov. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Alpha Particle.
Emilian Nica Texas A&M University Advisor: Dr.Shalom Shlomo
Superfluidity of Neutron and Nuclear Matter F. Pederiva Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Trento I Povo, Trento, Italy CNR/INFM-DEMOCRITOS National.
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
Introduction to Nuclear Physics
Nucleon Optical Potential in Brueckner Theory Wasi Haider Department of Physics, AMU, Aligarh, India. E Mail:
Renormalized Interactions with EDF Single-Particle Basis States
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Nucleons & Nuclei a quick guide to the real essentials in the subject which particle and nuclear physicists won’t tell you.
M. Girod, F.Chappert, CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel Neutron Matter and Binding Energies with a New Gogny Force.
Spectroscopic factors and Asymptotic Normalization Coefficients from the Source Term Approach and from (d,p) reactions N.K. Timofeyuk University of Surrey.
Atomic Orbitals, Electron Configurations, and Atomic Spectra
MODULE 8 APPROXIMATION METHODS I Once we move past the two particle systems, the Schrödinger equation cannot be solved exactly. The electronic inter-repulsion.
Lecture 19: The deuteron 13/11/2003 Basic properties: mass: mc 2 = MeV binding energy: (measured via  -ray energy in n + p  d +  ) RMS.
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 2. The primitive model
XII Nuclear Physics Workshop Maria and Pierre Curie: Nuclear Structure Physics and Low-Energy Reactions, Sept , Kazimierz Dolny, Poland Self-Consistent.
Effects of self-consistence violations in HF based RPA calculations for giant resonances Shalom Shlomo Texas A&M University.
Alex Brown PREX Aug Neutron Radii and the Neutron Equation of State.
Alex Brown UNEDF Feb Strategies for extracting optimal effective Hamiltonians for CI and Skyrme EDF applications.
Mean-Field Description of Heavy Neutron-Rich Nuclei P. D. Stevenson University of Surrey NUSTAR Neutron-Rich Minischool Surrey, 2005.
Hypernucleus In A Two Frequency Model Yiharn Tzeng, S.Y.Tsay Tzeng, T.T.S.Kuo.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Isospin mixing and parity- violating electron scattering O. Moreno, P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra and J. M. Udías (IEM-CSIC Madrid and UCM Madrid) T.
Auxiliary Field Diffusion Monte Carlo study of symmetric nuclear matter S. Gandolfi Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Università di Trento I Povo,
 Nature of nuclear forces, cont.  Nuclear Models lecture 3&4.
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 1. Evidences [Sec. 5.1 and 5.2 Dunlap]
Nuclear Collective Excitation in a Femi-Liquid Model Bao-Xi SUN Beijing University of Technology KITPC, Beijing.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (I) Single-particle models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Hψ = E ψ Hamiltonian for the H atom. The wave function is usually represented by ψ.
Héloïse Goutte CERN Summer student program 2009 Introduction to Nuclear physics; The nucleus a complex system Héloïse Goutte CEA, DAM, DIF
Chemistry 700 Lectures. Resources Grant and Richards, Foresman and Frisch, Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods (Gaussian Inc., 1996)
NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES Shalom Shlomo Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
The nuclear mean field and its symmetries W. Udo Schröder, 2011 Mean Field 1.
Last hour: Electron Spin Triplet electrons “avoid each other”, the WF of the system goes to zero if the two electrons approach each other. Consequence:
Lecture 21: On to Finite Nuclei! 20/11/2003 Review: 1. Nuclear isotope chart: (lecture 1) 304 isotopes with t ½ > 10 9 yrs (age of the earth) 177.
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Effect of tensor on halo and subshell structure in Ne, O and Mg isotopes Chen Qiu Supervisor: Prof. Xian-rong Zhou Xiamen University April. 13, 2012.
Lecture 5. Many-Electron Atoms. Pt
Renormalized Interactions for CI constrained by EDF methods Alex Brown, Angelo Signoracci and Morten Hjorth-Jensen.
F. C HAPPERT N. P ILLET, M. G IROD AND J.-F. B ERGER CEA, DAM, DIF THE D2 GOGNY INTERACTION F. C HAPPERT ET AL., P HYS. R EV. C 91, (2015)
PKU-CUSTIPEN 2015 Dirac Brueckner Hartree Fock and beyond Herbert Müther Institute of Theoretical Physics.
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Restricted and Unrestricted Hartree-Fock method Sudarshan Dhungana Phys790 Seminar (Feb15,2007)
PROPERTIES OF HIGH-ENERGY ISOSCALAR MONOPOLE EXCITATIONS IN MEDIUM-HEAVY MASS SPHERICAL NUCLEI M. L. Gorelik 1), S. Shlomo 2), B. A. Tulupov 3), M. H.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 The Deuteron Deuterium (atom). The only bound state of two nucleons  simplest.
Variational Multiparticle-Multihole Configuration Mixing Method with the D1S Gogny force INPC2007, Tokyo, 06/06/2007 Nathalie Pillet (CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel,
Monday, Oct. 2, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #8 Monday, Oct. 2, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Nuclear Models Shell Model Collective Model.
Lecture 9. Many-Electron Atoms
Electron density: Probability of finding one electron of arbitrary spin within a volume element dr 1 (other electrons may be anywhere). Properties of electron.
Few-Body Models of Light Nuclei The 8th APCTP-BLTP JINR Joint Workshop June 29 – July 4, 2014, Jeju, Korea S. N. Ershov.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Ch.1. Elementary Quantum Chemistry
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
Shalom Shlomo Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University
The role of isospin symmetry in medium-mass N ~ Z nuclei
Structure and dynamics from the time-dependent Hartree-Fock model
Introduction to Nuclear physics; The nucleus a complex system
Kazuo MUTO Tokyo Institute of Technology
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 2. The primitive model
Presentation transcript:

Single Particle Energies in Skyrme Hartree-Fock and Woods-Saxon Potentials Brian D. Newman Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University Mentor: Dr. Shalom Shlomo

Introduction Atomic nuclei exhibit the interesting phenomenon of single-particle motion that can be described within the mean field approximation for the many-body system. We have carried out Hartree-Fock calculations for a wide range of nuclei, using the Skyrme-type interactions. We have examined the resulting mean field potentials UHF by fitting r2UHF to r2UWS, where UWS is the commonly used Woods-Saxon potential. We consider, in particular, the asymmetry (x=(N-Z)/A) dependence in UWS and the spin-orbit splitting in the spectra of 17F8 and the recently measured spectra of 23F14. Using UWS, we obtained good agreement with experimental data.

Mean-Field Approximation Many-body problem for nuclear wave-function generally cannot be solved analytically In Mean-Field Approximation each nucleon interacts independently with a potential formed by other nucleons HΨ=EΨ Mean-Field Approximation R Ui(r) Single-Particle Schrödinger Equation: A-Nucleon Wave-Function: Vo A=Anti-Symmetrization operator for fermions

Mean Field (cont.) The anti-symmetric ground state wave-function of a nucleus can be written as a Slater determinant of a matrix whose elements are single-particle wave-functions Single-particle wave-functions Φi are determined by the independent single-particle potentials Due to spherical symmetry, the solution is separable into radial component ; angular component (spherical harmonics) ; and the isospin function :

Hartree-Fock Method The Hamiltonian operator is sum of kinetic and potential energy operators: where: The ground state wave-function should give the lowest expectation value for the Hamiltonian

Hartree-Fock Method (cont.) We want to obtain minimum of E with the constraint that the sum of the single-particle wave-function integrals over all space is A, to conserve the number of nucleons: We obtain the Hartree-Fock Equations:

Hartree-Fock Method with Skyrme Interaction The Skyrme two-body NN interaction potential is given by: operates on the right side operates on the left side is the spin exchange operator to, t1, t2, t3, xo, x1, x2, x3, , and Wo are the ten Skyrme parameters

Skyrme Interaction (cont.) After all substitutions and making the coefficients of all variations equal to zero, we have the Hartree-Fock Equations: mτ*(r), Uτ(r), and Wτ(r) are given in terms of Skyrme parameters, nucleon densities, and their derivatives If we have a reasonable first guess for the single-particle wave-functions, i.e. harmonic oscillator, we can determine mτ*, Uτ (r), and Wτ (r) and keep reiterating the HF Method until the wave-functions converge

Determining the Skyrme Parameters Skyrme Parameters were determined by a fit of Hartree-Fock results to experimental data Example: kde0 interaction was obtained with the following data Properties Nuclei B 16,24O, 34Si, 40,48Ca, 48,56,68,78Ni, 88Sr, 90Zr, 100,132Sn, 208Pb rch 16O, 40,48Ca, 56Ni, 88Sr, 90Zr, 208Pb rv(υ1d5/2) 17O rv(υ1f7/2) 41Ca S-O 2p orbits in 56Ni Eo 90Zr, 116Sn, 144Sm, 208Pb ρcr Nuclear Matter Table: Selected experimental data for the binding energy B, charge rms radius rch , rms radii of valence neutron orbits rv, spin-orbit splitting S-O, breathing mode constrained energy Eo, and critical density ρcr used in the fit to determine the parameters of the Skyrme interaction.

Values of the Skyrme Parameters kde0 (2005) sgII (1985) to (MeV fm3) -2526.51 (140.63) -2645.00 t1 (MeV fm5) 430.94 (16.67) 340.00 t2 (MeV fm5) -398.38 (27.31) -41.90 t3 (MeV fm3(1+)) 14235.5 (680.73) 1559.00 xo 0.7583 (0.0655) 0.09000 x1 -0.3087 (0.0165) -0.05880 x2 -0.9495 (0.0179) 1.4250 x3 1.1445 (0.0882) 0.06044 Wo (MeV fm5) 128.96 (3.33) 105.00  0.1676 (0.0163) 0.16667  

Woods-Saxon Potential Standard Parameterization: ro a (1- αv τz ) ro=1.27 fm with

Woods-Saxon Potential (cont.) We adopt the parameterization: R = ro[(A-1)1/3+d][1-αR τz] Uo=-Vo(1- αv τz) USO=-VSO(1- αv τz) a=ao(1+ αa| |) The parameters were determined from the UHF calculated for a wide range of nuclei.

Woods-Saxon Potential (cont.) Schrödinger's Equation: Separable Solution: where: Numerical Solution: Starting from uo and u1, we find u2 and continue to get u3, u4, …

Nucleon Density from Hartree-Fock kde0 Interaction

22O kde0 r2UHF Fit to r2UWS fm MeV fm2 fm MeV fm2 Protons -Vo=58.298 a=0.520 fm MeV fm2 Neutrons -Vo=52.798 R=3.420 a=0.534

208Pb kde0 r2UHF Fit to r2UWS fm MeV fm2 fm MeV fm2 Protons -Vo=68.256 a=0.621 fm MeV fm2 Neutrons -Vo=60.875 R=7.055 a=0.636

Single Particle Energies (in MeV) for 16O Particle State Experimental kde0 sgII Woods-Saxon 1s1/2 35.74 35.09 33.84 1p3/2 21.8 20.05 20.63 20.10 1p1/2 15.7 13.88 14.98 16.56 1d5/2 4.14 5.89 7.03 6.44 2s1/2 3.27 3.20 3.99 4.68 1d3/2 -0.94 -1.02 0.11 1.13 408 31.58 31.37 30.03 18.4 16.19 17.11 16.64 12.1 10.17 11.57 13.11 0.60 2.37 3.75 2.96 0.10 0.12 0.98 1.50 -4.40 -3.65 -2.69 -2.02 neutrons protons

Single Particle Energies (in MeV) for 22O Particle State Experimental kde0 sgII Woods-Saxon 1s1/2 37.97 36.92 28.87 1p3/2 20.32 21.69 17.04 1p1/2 17.37 16.85 14.43 1d5/2 6.85 5.42 8.36 5.48 2s1/2 2.74 3.99 5.93 4.52 1d3/2 0.34 1.03 1.65 41.94 40.60 38.24 27.67 26.53 25.88 23.24 21.19 21.66 22.82 13.24 14.03 12.72 12.97 10.97 9.06 8.22 10.06 9.18 4.89 5.38 7.46 neutrons protons

Spin-Orbit Splittings for 17F and 23F Experimental values of single-particle energy levels (in MeV) for 17F and 23F, along with predicted values from Skyrme Hartree-Fock and Woods-Saxon calculations.

Conclusions We find that the single-particle energies obtained from Skyrme Hartree-Fock calculations strongly depend on the Skyrme interaction. By examining the Hartree-Fock single-particle potential UHF, calculated for a wide range of nuclei, we have determined the asymmetry dependence in the Woods-Saxon potential well. We obtained good agreement between the experimental data for the single-particle energies for the protons in 17F and 23F, with those obtained using the Woods-Saxon potential.

Grant number: DOE-FG03-93ER40773 Acknowledgments Grant numbers: PHY-0355200 PHY-463291-00001 Grant number: DOE-FG03-93ER40773