“AC” Dispersion Measurement David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

ILCDR/CesrTA meeting Low Emittance Tuning 報告 K.Kubo.
Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
Driving Term Experments at CERN References List of Possibilities General Overview Theory New Developments List of Limits Linear Coupling Compensation Sextupole.
E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
CesrTA Low Emittance and Electron Cloud R&D David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
Beam Based Survey and Alignment of Ring Magnets David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
PRISM experiment on EMMA Test Non-Scaling optics for PRISM ¼ of the synchrotron oscillation takes ~3 turns in EMMA and ~6 turns in PRISM. Experimental.
Low Emittance Program David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education CesrTA.
Experimental Plan for Achieving Low Emittance in CesrTA David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Low Emittance Program David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education CesrTA.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
AC dipole for LHC Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
Development of Simulation Environment UAL for Spin Studies in EDM Fanglei Lin December
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
Studies on Lattice Calibration With Frequency Analysis of Betatron Motion R. Bartolini DIAMOND Light Source Ltd FMA workshop, Orsay, LURE, 1 st and 2 nd.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CesrTA Low-Emittance Tuning Update September 29, 2011 Jim Shanks, for the CesrTA Collaboration CLASSE, Cornell University.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Stephan I. Tzenov STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
CESR Test Accelerator Optics Correction and Tuning Tools David Sagan Cornell University.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Low-Emittance Tuning at CesrTA Jim Shanks Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Weiming Guo Accelerator Physics Group / ASD Advanced Photon Source
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Low Emittance Tuning in CESR TA
Low Emittance Tuning David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
CesrTA Low Emittance Program David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for
Optics Measurements in the PSB
100th FCC-ee Optics Design Meeting
Presentation transcript:

“AC” Dispersion Measurement David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 2 “AC” dispersion measurement Traditional dispersion measurement - Measure orbit - Change ring energy (  E/E = (  f rf /f rf )/  p ) - Measure again.  x =  x/(  E/E) “AC” dispersion - Drive an energy oscillation by modulating the RF phase at the synchrotron tune - Measure the phase and amplitude of the vertical and horizontal signal at each BPM that is oscillating at the synchrotron tune - Use the phase and amplitude information to reconstruct vertical and horizontal dispersion Advantages: 1. Nondestructive Use a signal bunch to measure dispersion without disturbing all of the other bunches in the ring 2. Fast - Changing the ring energy via the RF frequency is slow, especially with high Q cavities 3. Better signal to noise (Filter all but signal at synch tune)

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 3 “AC” dispersion measurement “AC” dispersion Note that dispersion is z-x and z-y coupling Use transverse coupling formalism to analyze dispersion Review of transverse coupling formalism and measurement T=VUV -1 (T is 4X4 full turn transport, U is block diagonal ) propagates the phase space vector (x,x,y,y) In the absence of coupling, C=0, V=I 4X4, U=T

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 4 AC dispersion measurement To measure x-y coupling Drive beam at horizontal [a-mode] (or vertical [b-mode]) frequency. The beam responds resonantly Measure x and y amplitude and phase of the a-mode (b-mode) at each BPM Finite y amp indicates coupling The relative phase tells us something about its source We find that: If we drive the b-mode we can extract  C 11 Note:  C 12 is insensitive to BPM tilts If there is no coupling, but a BPM is tilted, then y amp ≠ 0, but  y =  x   C 12 = 0

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 5 AC dispersion measurement To measure x(y) - z coupling Construct the matrix that propagates x-z motion. Again T=VUV -1 (T is 4X4 full turn transport, U is block diagonal ) But here T propagates the phase space vector (x,x,l,  ) [or (y,y,l,  )] As before we can write: Here, the a-mode corresponds to horizontal[vertical] motion and the b-mode is synchrotron motion Now C=0  no coupling of longitudinal and horizontal motion, That is, zero dispersion

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 6 “AC” dispersion measurement It turns out that n the limit Q s  0 C 12 (z-x) =  x, C 22 (z-x) =  x C 12 (z-y) =  y, C 22 (z-y) =  y Drive beam at synchrotron tune (z-mode) Measure x, y (and z?) amplitude and phase at each BPM Is related to the horizontal dispersion according to to the vertical dispersion (  y ) Then as with transverse coupling ~  /(  a  b ) 1/2

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 7 Dispersion Simulation of “AC” dispersion measurement “measured c 12 ” - 30k turn simulation “model c 12 ” - Model y-z and x-z coupling “model eta” - Model dispersion Introduce a vertical kick into CesrTA optics to generate vertical dispersion -Drive synchrotron oscillation by modulating RF at synch tune ( In the simulation: apply an energy kick modulated at synch tune) and track for >30k turns -“Measure” vertical & horizontal amplitudes and phases of synch tune signal at BPMs - Construct C 12

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 8 “AC” dispersion measurement We measure x amp and  x, y amp and  y But we are unable (so far) to measure z amp and  z with sufficient resolution Longitudinal parameters come from the design lattice (Perhaps with new BPM system we will be able to extract  z from 2f s ) z amp =  (a z  z ), 13m <  z < 14.6m (CesrTA optics)  z amp is very nearly constant - there is an overall unknown scale (a z ) 0 <  z < 36 . We compute  z from the design optics at each BPM - there is an overall unknown phase offset (  0 ) - Determine a z,  0 by fitting x - data to model horizontal C 12 - Then use fitted parameters to determine vertical C 12

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 9 “AC” dispersion measurement Change vertical steering 31e +200cu and measure orbit and “ac”dispersion (data). Restore vert 31e to zero and remeasure orbit and dispersion (ref) Same data - different scales

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 10 “AC” and “DC” measurements “ac” dispersion “dc” dispersion (same as last slide) Same steering change with“DC” dispersion measurement

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 11 Dispersion modeled and measured “Data”: measurement with v31e=200cu “Ref”: measurement with v31e=0 “Model”: modeled orbit and dispersion with v31e=200cu “ac” measurement “dc” measurement (Data-ref)-model

July 8, 2008 ILCDR08 12 AC Dispersion Conclusions Dispersion is coupling of longitudinal and transverse motion Measurement -Drive synchrotron oscillation by modulating RF at synch tune -Measure vertical & horizontal amplitudes and phases of signal at synch tune at BPMs Then {  v /  v }= (y amp /z amp ) sin(  y -  z ) {  h /  h }= (x amp /z amp ) sin(  h -  z ) Advantages?: 1. Faster (30k turns) (RF frequency does not change) 2. Better signal to noise - (remains to be seen) filter all but signal at synch tune 3. Nondestructive (RF frequency does not change) Witness bunch?