Deborah Simmons, Hank Fien and Nicole Sherman Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Students Struggle: Perception vs. Reality
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Kindergarten Reading at PS 11
What is Word Study? PD Presentation: Union 61 Revised ELA guide Supplement (and beyond)
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2nd Edition
Research-Based Instruction in Reading Dr. Bonnie B. Armbruster University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Archived Information.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
Making Instructional Adaptations for Struggling Readers MiBLSi State Conference 2008 Presented by: Betty Arnold.
Effective Intervention Using Data from the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI-5) Developed by the authors of the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI) -5,
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 4: Instruction: Time, Scheduling & Grouping / Reading.
Supplemental and Intervention Programs
Institute on Beginning Reading II
Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D Coordinator, Oregon Reading First Center
Scott Baker, Ph.D. Michael Rebar, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential Component Reading Comprehension Edward J. Kame’enui, Ph. D.
Overview Training Cohort B June 23, 2005 Open Court Rhonda Wolter Bethel School District Reading Coordinator.
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
Overview Training Cohort B June 23, 2005
Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading (IBR) Leadership Session for Mentor Coaches August 25, 2004.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning.
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Overview of Advanced DIBELS Applications Institute on Beginning Reading II.
Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading II Planning Core/Benchmark, Strategic, & Intensive Interventions.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
Beth Harn & Rachell Katz Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential Component.
Implementation Plan Jamie Stief. Problem Statement Several upper elementary students receiving pull out special education services are continuing to struggle.
Report of the National Reading Panel TEACHING CHILDREN TO READ: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its.
1 Differentiated Instruction Massachusetts Reading First Plan and John Silber Early Literacy Initiative Advanced Seminar Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph. D.
Early Literacy Interventions focused on Phonemic Awareness, Phonics and Vocabulary By Alicia Smith.
1 Investigating the Standards: K-12 English Language Arts Bruce Bufe, Ann Craig, Kathy Learn, Leigh McEwen, Nicole Peterson, Pat Upchurch, Martha Yerington.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research Georgia March, 2004.
Reading First Supplemental Review June 1-4, 2004 Dr. Robin G. Jarvis, Director Division of School Standards, Accountability, and Assistance.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Grade 1: Phonemic Awareness
Welcome to our 3 rd Grade Back to School Night Thanks for coming!
English Language Arts Program Update Lisa M. White, ELA Coordinator School Committee Meeting March 5, 2012.
TECHNOLOGY AND TEXTBOOKS: Cutting- Edge Early Literacy Technology By Kari Miller.
CHAPTER SEVEN ASSESSING AND TEACHING READING: PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS, PHONICS, AND WORD RECOGNITION.
Marie Murray Spring  Learning to read is a complex, multi-faceted process.  Children must understand comprehension is the main goal.  Children.
CHAPTER 5: Reading: Word Recognition
For Each Student Instruction GoalsAssessment For All Students OR Reading First: Review of Comprehensive Programs.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.
Day 1. Literacy development Why are we here? Historical trends in beginning reading. Language and reading development.
Collaborative Inquiry “Teachers possess tremendous knowledge, skill, and experience. Collaborative inquiry creates a structure for them to share that expertise.
1 Wilson Reading System “What is Intervention”. 2 The Gift of Learning to Read When we teach a child to read we change her life’s trajectory.
Orton- Gillingham RTI Intervention By: Breanna Wisnor.
CMP3 – Services Tiered Packages* PD Essentials PackagePD Fidelity PackagePD Growth Package Product Implementation Essentials Plus Product Implementation.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
All About Phonics Instruction By: Mary Kaish. Phonological Awareness and its Role in Phonics The reading process can be described as a developmental continuum.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Marcia L. Kosanovich, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Florida State University July 17-20, 2006 National Reading First Conference.
1 Adapted from Deborah C. Simmons (2002) BIG IDEAS.
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
1 Tour Guides D. Barton, S. Kravet, W. Oliver and C. Smart Chapter 9 Journey Through A First Grade Differentiation Plan “Mr. Hartline’s Difficult Assignment”
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Schoolwide Reading: Day Instructional Priorities
IMPLEMENTING RTI Critical Features: Practices & System Components.
Parent University # 2 Grades K-5 Reading and Language Arts
Utilizing the Student Teacher for Positive Student Outcomes
Supporting All Readers in Small Group Instruction Providing Equity in Literacy Instruction Beth Estill.
What does this mean for my child?
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Teacher Training Program
OCS: Putting the Assessment Pieces Together
Presentation transcript:

Deborah Simmons, Hank Fien and Nicole Sherman Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential Component Phonics

Acknowledgments  Oregon Department of Education  Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement, College of Education, University of Oregon  U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs  Oregon Reading First Supplemental and Intervention Curriculum Review Panel

Content Development Content developed by: Deborah Simmons, Ph. D. Professor, College of Education University of Oregon Hank Fien Oregon Reading First Regional Consultant University of Oregon Nicole Sherman-Brewer Oregon Reading First Regional Consultant University of Oregon Additional support: Patrick Kennedy-Paine Katie Tate University of Oregon

Copyright  All materials are copy written and should not be reproduced or used without expressed permission of Dr. Edward J. Kame’enui or Dr. Deborah C. Simmons. Selected slides were reproduced from other sources and original references cited.

Schoolwide: Each & All Prevention Oriented Scientifically Based Results Focused IBR Foundational Features: Translating Research into Practice

Today’s Focus IBR Guiding Questions 1.Goals: What outcomes do we want for our students in our state, district, and schools? 2.Knowledge: What do we know and what guidance can we gain from scientifically based reading research? 3.Progress Monitoring Assessment: How are we doing? What is our current level of performance as a school? As a grade? As a class? As an individual student? 4.Outcome Assessment: How far do we need to go to reach our goals and outcomes? 5.Core Instruction: What are the critical components that need to be in place to reach our goals? 6.Differentiated Instruction: What more do we need to do and what instructional adjustments need to be made?

The objectives of today’s session are to: Review items on the Supplemental/ Intervention (S/I) Consumer's Guide for phonics. Review data on all S/I phonics programs. Discuss overall strengths and weaknesses found in all S/I phonics programs. Provide an overview of selected S/I phonics programs. Objectives: What You Will Learn and Do

Consumer’s Guide: Phonics: Decoding

Consumer’s Guide: Phonics: Decoding (cont.)

Consumer’s Guide: Phonics: Irregular Words

Summary of Results

Evidence for the following instructional criteria were documented in many of the programs reviewed: Evidence of Sufficient Instructional Quality for Phonics Programs NumberCriterion 4. Models instruction at each of the fundamental stages. 8. Provides teacher guided practice in controlled word lists and connected text. 13. Uses structural analysis judiciously to support word recognition strategies. 1.(IW) Selects words that have high utility and are used frequently in grade-appropriate literature and informational text.

Evidence of Insufficient Instructional Quality for Phonics Programs NumberCriterion 9. Begins instruction in word families, word patterns, and larger orthographic units after students have learned the letter-sound correspondence in the unit. 10. Teaches students to process larger, highly represented patterns to increase fluency in word recognition. 11. Teaches advanced phonic-analysis skills explicitly, first in isolation, then in words and connected text. 4.(IW) Points out irregularities and provides a strategy for reading irregular words using letters or parts of the words. Evidence for the following instructional criteria were documented in many of the programs reviewed:

Phonics Program Overview  Touchphonics  Early Reading Intervention  Headsprout

Phonics Program Overview Early Reading InterventionTouchphonicsHeadsprout PUBLISHERScott ForesmanEducators Publishing ServiceYriondo GRADEK-1K-3K-2 GROUP SIZEsmall group (2-5 students) Individual or small group (1-3) Classroom Version (Magtiles) Individual LESSONS126 lessons* Program divided into 4 parts: Part 1: Learning Letters and Sounds Part 2: Segmenting, Blending, and Integrating Part 3: Reading Words Part 4: Reading Sentences and Storybooks * Each lesson is divided into two parts: PA/Alphabetic Understanding and Spelling/Writing 77 Prepared Lesson Plans Pattern-Based rather than rule based Program divided into 9 parts: Build the word 2. Touch and sound the units 3. Blend the sounds into a word 4. Cover and spell the word 5. Cover and write the word 6. Change the word/ Shake and Make 7. Read the word in isolation 8. Read the word in print 9. Write the word in print 80 online, interactive lessons 70 “ ready to read ” stories More details to come. IRREGULAR WORD INSTRUCTION Yes- Begin Lesson 94 Each lesson introduces 1 new word and reviews 2 previously introduced irregular words. Yes- Lessons 2-39 Each lesson introduces 1-2 new words and reviews 2-3 previously introduced words. Yes TIME30 minutes 5x a week ~ 8 months for K 1st graders - depends on entry point 20 minutes-Building, spelling and writing words 5 minutes- Reading text matched with word patterns in the lesson 5 minutes- Writing and spelling original work Online Lessons are minutes COST$ $