MCDA; Regime Analysis and Flag Model. Overview of the presentation zIntroduction zEvaluation zRegime Analysis and Flag Model zApplication of the methods.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modellistica e Gestione dei Sistemi Ambientali A tool for multicriteria analysis: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Chiara Mocenni University of.
Advertisements

ATFM Priorities Evaluation Study Alison Hudgell QinetiQ
Pilots & Weather Considerations Federal Aviation Administration 1.
WASH Cluster – Emergency Training S WASH STRATEGY Session 3 Strategic Planning S3 1.
German Airport Project German Airport Project DEVELOPING MEASURES OF AIRPORT PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE: APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPE ANALYSIS Presented.
Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
Hydrogen Production Decisions: Decision Making in View of Differing Stakeholder Preferences Elvin Yuzugullu Doctoral Candidate The George Washington University.
Assessing Progress For Sustainable Development
Ecological Economics Lecture 13 Ricardo da Silva Vieira Researcher/Consultant Tiago Domingos Assistant Professor Environment and Energy Section Department.
Ata Farzamnia Managing Director of: PersiaTravelMart.com & JustPersia.net S. M. R. Nasserzadeh PhD Student in Systems Management University of Tehran.
1 DEFINITE a DEcision support system for a FINITE set of alternatives Marjan van Herwijnen Institute for Environmental Studies Vrije Universiteit - Amsterdam.
Multi-Criteria Decision Aide (MCDA) at the Watershed Scale Watershed HealthLand-Use Change and Social Context Biophysical Land Use Society Community Economy.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERION 2.
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Analyzing data: Rank Ch9-p171.
School of Earth and Environment INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE Dr. Nicola Favretto Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.
Due to Congestion Presented By: Alexander Knapp.
25 Sept 07 FF8 - Discrete Choice Data Introduction Tony O’Hagan.
GaBi The contribution of Life Cycle Assessment to global sustainability reporting of organizations J. Pflieger, M. Fischer, T. Kupfer, P. Eyerer University.
MANGO May, 2007 May 2007 Specific Issues Related to Sovereign Ratings Paris Club Meeting with Private Sector Paris, May 2007 Khalid Sheikh.
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL.
Robustness in assessment of strategic transport projects The 21st International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making Jyväskylä June
Integrated Assessment and Planning
Prioritization of sub-watersheds for the application of environmental policies in the Basin of Lake Cuitzeo D. González. and M. Mendoza CIGA CENTRO DE.
© 2006 Thomson-Wadsworth. Learning Objectives List the various groups to which an organization may be accountable. Describe why accrediting agencies are.
THE IMPACT OF THE AVIATION SECTOR ON CLIMATE CHANGE – A MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS OF POSSSIBLE POLICY MEASURES Annalia Bernardini, Cathy Macharis.
EM 4103: Urban Planning II Lecture 10: Plan Evaluation Process I.
What do our students know?. What do we want our UG students to know? Student Learning Outcome Cycle #1 Assessed in: Cycle #2 Assessed in: Cycle #3 Assessed.
Thematic review of Tertiary Education 1 Czech Republic Country Note Remarks of the Council of Higher Education Institutions Jan Bednář Vice-chairman.
Dealing with Policy Change in Education Common borders. Common Solutions. Grant Contract No , MIS-ETC 2674 MANAGE.EDU: Efficient Education.
EDUCATION QUALITY Assistant Prof. Aleksandra Pejatović, PhD
EOPOWER impact assessment overview For assessment of earth observation products and services and promotion and dissemination activities in EOPOWER regions.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ASSESSMENT.
Concept Evaluation/Selection Dept. of Aerospace Engineering IIT Bombay AE 207 Introduction to Engineering Design.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP FIVE: COMPARE ALTERNATIVE PLANS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Defining and Measuring the Development Dividend Meeting of the Expert Task Force of the IISD Development Dividend Project March 27-28, 2006 Vancouver Aaron.
Hartley, Project Management: Integrating Strategy, Operations and Change, 3e Tilde Publishing Chapter 10 Risk Management Proactively managing the positive.
1 A Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set Based Fuzzy MCDM Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of the Distribution Centers Advisor:Prof. Chu, Ta-Chung.
Decision Support System for the Long-Term City Metabolism Planning Problem Work Package 54 Mark Morley, Diogo Vitorino, Kourosh Behzadian, Rita Ugarelli,
Implementation of the Water Resources Classification System and Determination of the Resource Quality Objectives for Significant Water Resources in the.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Contents and Methods of Integrated Assessment Session 3.
Methodological Framework for the Assessment of Governance Institutions P. Diaz and A. Rojas PFRA Workshop, March 17, 2006.
Access to Medicine Index Problem Statement Long-standing debate about: What is the role of the pharmaceutical industry in access to medicines? Where are.
 What is synthesis methodology?, why do we need that?  What is synthesis for grading?  Quantitative  Qualitative  How to merge all the conclusions.
Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Founded by Saaty in It is a popular and widely used method for multi-criteria.
An overview of multi-criteria analysis techniques The main role of the techniques is to deal with the difficulties that human decision-makers have been.
SANREM TOP Framework GECAFS Interpretation. SEE Conditions (Social, Economic, Environmental) Assessed Practices Changed KASAC (Knowledge, Attitudes, Skills,
Multi-criteria decision analysis in drug benefit-risk assessment
What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students: Round IV,
16469 Low Energy Building Design Conflict and Interaction in Environmental Engineering Design.
Development of a community-based participatory network for integrated solid waste management By: Y.P. Cai, G.H. Huang, Q. Tan & G.C. Li EVSE, Faculty of.
Model Calibration and Weighting Avoid areas of… High Housing Density Far from Roads In or Near Sensitive Areas High Visual Exposure …what is “high” housing.
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Analyzing data: Rank Ch9-p171.
Decision Making Matrix A Closer Look at Preliminary Ideas.
Multi-Attribute Decision Making MADM Many decisions involve consideration of multiple attributes Another term: multiple criteria Examples: –Purchasing.
New Product Development Management NPDM 6 Mohsen SADEGHI Department of Graduate School of Management and Economics Sharif University of Technology.
Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters Module 3: Action Planning for “Safe Hospitals”
Decision support on security investment Walter Peissl Idea, methodology and procedure
1 Marco Polo Accompanying Measure, Lot 4 Provision of Support Services in the Field of IWT Technical Assistance Emission Reduction of the Inland Waterway.
Culture and Group decision Making exercise
NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Completing the Package
Capital Project / Infrastructure Renewal – Making the Business Case
Right-sized Evaluation
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
Developing data maturity in local government
Introduction to Multi Criteria Analysis MCA
AP Government Exam Format
Workshop 1: PROJECT EVALUATION
Introduction to Multi Criteria Analysis MCA
Presentation transcript:

MCDA; Regime Analysis and Flag Model

Overview of the presentation zIntroduction zEvaluation zRegime Analysis and Flag Model zApplication of the methods zMaastricht Aachen Airpot: a short description zDefinition of criteria and impacts zRegime Analysis; obtaining of rank order of alternatives zFlag Model: acceptability of alternatives zConclusions

History of evaluation zThe standard evaluation framework from an economic perspective is Cost-Benefit Analysis. zUnfortunately, many intrinsic shortcomings and practical limitations are related to CBA (accuracy of information, distributional equity, compensatory payments, discount rate, lifetime of the project). zResulting in the development of alternative evaluation methods, such as multicriteria analysis. zAim. Closer orientation towards actual decision-making processes (cyclical nature of process, interactivity, conflicts between stakeholders, inclusion of unpriced effects, equity concerns, etc.)

Evaluation process 1. Problem definition 2. Definition of alternatives 3. Definition of criteria and weights 4. Impact assessment 5. Analysis of scores and alternatives 6. Conclusions

Maastricht Aachen Airport

Maastricht Aachen Airport: 4 scenarios Scenario 1: Business as Usual zA further decrease of aircargo handling at MAA. zStabilisation of passengers traffic ( p.y). Scenario 2: MAA as a Passengers Airport zConstruction of a new runway. zOutplacement of the Dutch National Aviation School. Scenario 3: MAA as an “Euregio” Airport zConstruction of a new large runway to accommodate larger aircrafts. zOpen night regime (24 hours). Scenario 4: Tradeable Permits zMAA is a buyer on the market of CO 2 permits. zNo expansion without acquisition of additional permits

Steps in the Flag Model

Impacts of the scenarios

Criteria and benchmark values

Flag Model Benchmark CTV min CTV max BACD Section A Green, No reason for specific concern Section B Yellow, Be alert Section C Red, Reverse trends Section D Black, Bad development CTV = Critical Treshold Value

Frequencies of flag counts

Evaluation 1. Problem definition 2. Definition of alternatives 3. Definition of criteria and weights 4. Impact assessment 5. Analysis of scores and alternatives 6. Conclusions

Regime analysis zRegime analysis is a discrete multicriteria method. zThe basic idea is to rank a set of alternatives by means of their pairwise comparisons in relation to a set of criteria. zRegime analysis makes use of an impact matrix and a set of weights. zThe method can cope with qualitative, quantitative and mixed data.

Regime analysis 2 zConcordance set; all criteria for which alternative A performs better than, or is equal to, alternative B. zDiscordance set; all criteria for which alternative A performs worse than, or is equal to, alternative B. zConcordance index; summation of the weights that are related to the criteria in the concordance set (C ab ). zDisconcordance index; summation of the weights that are related to the criteria in the concordance set (DC ba ). zNet concordance index = concordance index - disconcordance index zIf sign of CI is positive. Alternative A is preferred above B.

Regime analysis; ranking alternatives

1. Passenger Airport 2. MAA serving the “Euregio” 3. Business as Usual 4. Tradeable Permits

Conclusions zStructuring the evaluation process ensures the compatibility between the assessment method(s) used and the problem. zThe methods are capable of dealing with the multiple dimensions of projects (e.g. social, cultural, ecological, technological, institutional, etc.). zThe methods give due attention to interest conflicts among stakeholders involved. (Different weight schemes in Regime). zThe methods can take into account qualitative as well as quantitative effects of projects. zFlag model gives a clear visualization of the effects. zFlag model can play an important role in the interactive design of alternatives and criteria.