1 Approaching the Problem of Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow CM23 HIT, Harbin January 14th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of multivariate transformations. Transformation of the response in regression The normalized power transformation is: is the geometric mean of.
Advertisements

Introducing LEP3 zero M. Koratzinos TLEP3 day, 9 January2013.
1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.
Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.
1 Angular Momentum from diffuser Beam picks up kinetic angular momentum (L kin ) when it sits in a field –Canonical angular momentum (L can ) is conserved.
Cox Model With Intermitten and Error-Prone Covariate Observation Yury Gubman PhD thesis in Statistics Supervisors: Prof. David Zucker, Prof. Orly Manor.
Particle by Particle Emittance Measurement to High Precision Chris Rogers Imperial College/RAL 17th March 2005.
1 Emittance Calculation Progress and Plans Chris Rogers MICE CM 24 September 2005.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.
Emittance–momentum matrix1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, MICE Video Conference, 21 January Initial 4D.
CF-3 Bank Hapoalim Jun-2001 Zvi Wiener Computational Finance.
1 September 09Mark Rayner – Emittance measurement by The TOFs1 Emittance measurement by the TOFs Via trace space reconstruction of individual muons. Complementary.
Updates: Misalignment, Statistics David Forrest (Happy new year)
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
1 Configuration Database David Forrest University of Glasgow MICO Meeting 13/10/2008
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
1 Statistics Toy Monte Carlo David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Statistics.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Tracker Misalignment Study David Forrest CM23 HIT, Harbin January 14 th.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Beam Parameter Study - preliminary findings Tim Carlisle.
1 st Study of Tracker Misalignments with G4MICE David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Bill Atwood - July 2002 GLAS T 1 A Kalman Filter for GLAST What is a Kalman Filter and how does it work. Overview of Implementation in GLAST Validation.
1 Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
18 August 09Mark Rayner – Momentum measurement by The TOFs1 Momentum measurement by the TOFs A correction to an O(4 MeV/c) bias on the current muon momentum.
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.
M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Stats update Was asked to provide comparison between toy mc and g4mice at two points along z (middle of first and third absorbers) 10,000 events, step.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
Lecture 7: Simulations.
Software Summary 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 16th January 2009  Four very good presentations that produced a lot of useful discussion: u Online Reconstruction.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
MathematicalMarketing Slide 2.1 Descriptive Statistics Chapter 2: Descriptive Statistics We will be comparing the univariate and matrix formulae for common.
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation Introduction Find several parameters Parameter follow the specific probability distribution Generate parameter.
Tracker Misalignment Study David Forrest University of Glasgow.
MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
1 Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow May 5 th 2009.
Integrated Tracker (progress, status, plans) Y. Fisyak.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
3 June 2009J. H. Cobb 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY CM24 Agenda for Analysis parallel session at CM Sunday 31 May 14:00.
PID Detector Requirements for Emittance Measurement Chris Rogers, MICE PID Review, Thursday Oct 12.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
Status of MICE on the GRID  MICE VO u CEs  G4MICE Installation  Example test job  Station QA Analysis  Analysis jobs  File Storage  Documentation.
Analysis meeting: Beam momentum measurements using TOFs Tuesday, 22 January 2008 Slide 1 of 10 Beam momentum measurement using.
Software Overview 1M. Ellis - CM21 - 7th June 2008  Simulation Status  Reconstruction Status  Unpacking Library  Tracker Data Format  Real Data (DATE)
1 Statistics Update David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November Beam characterization by the TOFs Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
Preliminery results from a 1 st study of misalignment and a fresh look at statistics David Forrest, University of Glasgow.
Mark Rayner 26/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Measuring emittance with the TOFs Data: –G4MICE has been used to obtain transfer.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
15 June 2010PC Analysis PC Schedule Tuesdays fortnightly Provisional dates 1 June 15 June 28 June (JC away) CM27 7 – 10 RAL Let me & Yagmur.
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
Field-on measurement of multiple scattering
Misalignment Study David Forrest University of Glasgow
Instrument Analysis Workshop II
EMPIRICAL FORMULA The empirical formula represents the smallest ratio of atoms present in a compound. The molecular formula gives the total number of atoms.
آشنايی با اصول و پايه های يک آزمايش
Unfolding Problem: A Machine Learning Approach
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation
Unfolding with system identification
Presentation transcript:

1 Approaching the Problem of Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow CM23 HIT, Harbin January 14th

2 The Problem - We don't know the statistical error on the measurement we want to make in the MICE - But our aim is to show 10% emittance drop with an error of 1% We need to know the statistical error on the fractional change of emittance

3 Trackers We calculate 4D emittance from the fourth root of a determinant of a matrix of covariances...The problem is compounded because our data is highly correlated between two trackers.

4 How We Mean To Proceed W e assume that we will discover a formula that takes the form Sigma=K*(1/sqrt(N)) where K is some constant or parameter to be determined. How do we determine K? 1) First Principles: do full error propagation of cov matrices → difficult calculation 2) Run a large number of G4MICE simulations, using the Grid, to find the standard deviation for every element in the covariance matrix → Toy Monte Carlo (ready to start this month) 3) Empirical approach: large number of simulations to plot   versus 1/sqrt(N), identifying K (started)

5 Empirical approach For N= 1000 then:   = (with  = ) For N= 10,000 then   = (with  = ) 500 1k event runs 50 10k event runs

6 10pi K= K=0.31

7 Stats conclusions -Preliminary results suggest that for a 10pi beam the statistical error goes as:   =0.31/sqrt(N) The implication of this is that to achieve 0.1% error measurement we need to run ~10 5 events This needs to be redone for all emittances