ROMAN: Real-Time Observation Monitor and Analysis Network John Horel, Mike Splitt, Judy Pechmann, Brian Olsen NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional Prediction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1st National Weather and Climate Enterprise Partnership Summit John Horel NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional Prediction Department of Meteorology.
Advertisements

Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Development of Bias-Corrected Precipitation Database and Climatology for the Arctic Regions Daqing Yang, Principal Investigator Douglas L. Kane, Co-Investigator.
Observing, Analyzing, and Simulating the Boundary Layer in Northern Utah and Beyond John Horel, Erik Crosman, Xia Dong, Matt Lammers, Neil Lareau, Dan.
Unit 8.
Acknowledgments Jennifer Fowler, University of Montana, Flight Director UM-BOREALIS Roger DesJardins, Canadian East Fire Region, Incident Meteorologist.
2012: Hurricane Sandy 125 dead, 60+ billion dollars damage.
0 Future NWS Activities in Support of Renewable Energy* Dr. David Green NOAA, NWS Office of Climate, Water & Weather Services AMS Summer Community Meeting.
Science and Technology Infusion Plan for Fire Weather Services Paula Davidson Science and Technology Infusion Plan for Fire Weather Services Paula Davidson.
MesoWest - Monitoring Weather Conditions around the West and the Nation
SMOS SAG, Villafranca November 2-3, 2006 Development of a Global In-Situ Soil Moisture Network: A SMOS Project Contribution P.J. van Oevelen.
Daniel P. Tyndall and John D. Horel Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah.
ROMAN: Real-Time Observation Monitor and Analysis Network John Horel, Mike Splitt, Judy Pechmann, Brian Olsen NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional Prediction.
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Analysis of Record Issues: Research Perspective John Horel NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional Prediction Department of Meteorology University of Utah.
Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 22 March 2011.
W ildland F ire D ecision S upport S ystem Overview April, 2008.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 An Operational Configuration of the ARPS Data Analysis System to Initialize WRF in the NWS Environmental Modeling System 31.
Geospatial Decision Support Tools: A Geographic Area Coordination Center (GACC) Perspective Kim Kelly Northwest Wildland Fire Coordination Center & BIA.
Descriptive Analysis Database Archive monitoring network locations, climate, emissions, wildfires, census, political, physical, and image databases Databases.
Descriptive Analysis Database Archive monitoring network locations, climate, emissions, wildfires, census, political, physical, and image databases Databases.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Stakeholder Forum NOAA’s National Weather Service Welcome to the Colorado Basin RFC Logistics & Introductions Office.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
Part III: ROMAN and MesoWest: resources for observing surface weather  MesoWest and ROMAN are software that require ongoing maintenance and development.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS USING ADAS John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional.
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
Integration of Surface Weather Observations with MODIS Imagery for Fire Weather Applications Mike Splitt, Brian Olsen, John Horel, Judy Pechmann NOAA Cooperative.
Synthesizing Weather Information for Wildland Fire Decision Making in the Great Lakes Region John Horel Judy Pechmann Chris Galli Xia Dong University of.
National Weather Service Goes Digital With Internet Mapping Ken Waters National Weather Service, Honolulu HI Jack Settelmaier National Weather Service,
Part II  Access to Surface Weather Conditions:  MesoWest & ROMAN  Surface Data Assimilation:  ADAS.
P1.7 The Real-Time Mesoscale Analysis (RTMA) An operational objective surface analysis for the continental United States at 5-km resolution developed by.
Flash Flood A rapid and extreme flow of high water into a normally dry area, or a rapid water level rise in a stream or creek above a predetermined flood.
2006(-07)TAMDAR aircraft impact experiments for RUC humidity, temperature and wind forecasts Stan Benjamin, Bill Moninger, Tracy Lorraine Smith, Brian.
July 31, 2012 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Tim Bardsley Western Water Assessment 1 Future Colorado Basin Observing System.
DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW LETTUCE ICE FORECAST SYSTEM FOR YUMA COUNTY Paul Brown Mike Leuthold University of Arizona.
USDA Forest Service Joint Action Group for National Wildland Fire Weather Needs Assessment - Agency Needs USDA Forest Service Research and Development.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS USING ADAS John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional.
CBRFC Stakeholder Forum February 24, 2014 Ashley Nielson Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 CBRFC Forecast Verification.
1 National HIC/RH/HQ Meeting ● January 27, 2006 version: FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS.
NFUSE Conference Call 4/11/07 How Good Does a Forecast Really Need To Be? David Myrick Western Region Headquarters Scientific Services Division.
RFC Climate Requirements 2 nd NOAA Climate NWS Dialogue Meeting January 4, 2006 Kevin Werner.
The Iowa Environmental Mesonet - KCCI SchoolNet - National Weather Service Partnership Working together to save lives and increase data distribution Contacts:
1 NOHRSC Challenges of using Snow Data Carrie Olheiser Office of Hydrologic Development National Weather Service, NOAA U.S. Department of Commerce National.
1 Vision for Marine and Coastal Services Digital Products Jamie Vavra Marine and Coastal Weather Services Branch Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services.
Task B7. Monitoring and Forecasting for Water Management and Drought/Flood Hazards Goals National scale characterization of snow water resources (Afghanistan’s.
2/18/2016 Data Management Issues Related to Drought Monitoring at Environment Canada Robert Morris Data Analysis and Archive Division Meteorological Service.
ROMAN: Real-Time Observation Monitor and Analysis Network John Horel, Mike Splitt, Judy Pechmann, Brian Olsen NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional Prediction.
Patterns and Trends CE/ENVE 424/524. Classroom Situation Option 1: Stay in Lopata House 22 pros: spacious room desks with chairs built in projector cons:
Performance Comparison of an Energy- Budget and the Temperature Index-Based (Snow-17) Snow Models at SNOTEL Stations Fan Lei, Victor Koren 2, Fekadu Moreda.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey October 22, 2015 EROS Fire Science Understanding a Changing Earth.
USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center, FSWeb: WWW: National Geospatial Fire.
The National Weather Service Goes Geospatial – Serving Weather Data on the Web Ken Waters Regional Scientist National Weather Service Pacific Region HQ.
1 CWSU Near-term Improvement Program. 2 Objective Low-cost improvements at CWSUs which will noticeably improve quality of support provided to FAA ARTCCs.
Fire, Smoke & Air Quality: Tools for Data Exploration & Analysis : Data Sharing/Processing Infrastructure This project integrates.
Fire Weather 2016 NWS Los Angeles/Oxnard DAVID GOMBERG Fire Weather Program Manager ERIC BOLDT Warning Coordination Meteorologist Springs Fire – May 2013.
A new way of looking at things, doing things…and some new things.
Web Services for Fire Weather Applications
Drought Analysis of Utah County
Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Hongli Jiang Paul Schultz and ZoltanToth
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
Be The Weather Guy Presented to UCALL on October 14, 2009
Objective Analyses & Data Representativeness
Alexander A. Jacques, John D
Introduction and Overview of Course
Challenge: High resolution models need high resolution observations
Mareile Wolff1 with input from Cristian Lussana2 and Thomas Nipen3
Presentation transcript:

ROMAN: Real-Time Observation Monitor and Analysis Network John Horel, Mike Splitt, Judy Pechmann, Brian Olsen NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional Prediction University of Utah Ed Delgado Eastern Great Basin Coordination Center San Diego Tribune. 28 Oct. 2003

Outline  Data quality: limitations of observations  Overview of ROMAN  Goals and Applications  ROMAN displays  Surface data assimilation: ADAS  Summary

Limitations of Observations- All That Is Labeled Data Is NOT Gold (Lockhart 2003)  References:  Challenges of Measurements. T. Lockhart (2003). Handbook of Weather, Climate and Water. Wiley & Sons  Review of the RAWS Network. Zachariassen et al. (2003). USDA Tech. Report RMRS-GTR-119. GNI

Are All Observations Equally Bad?  All measurements have errors (random and systematic)  Errors arise from many factors:  Siting (obstacles, surface characteristics)  Exposure to environmental conditions (e.g., temperature sensor heating/cooling by radiation, conduction or reflection)  Sampling strategies  Maintenance standards  Metadata errors (incorrect location, elevation) SNZ

Are All Observations Equally Good?  Why was the sensor installed?  Observing needs and sampling strategies vary (air quality, fire weather, road weather)  Station siting results from pragmatic tradeoffs: power, communication, obstacles, access  Use common sense  Wind sensor in the base of a mountain pass will likely blow from only two directions  Errors depend upon conditions (e.g., temperature spikes common with calm winds)  Use available metadata  Topography  Land use, soil, and vegetation type  Photos  Monitor quality control information  Basic consistency checks  Comparison to other stations UT9

Documentation  ROMAN:  Horel et al. (2004) Submitted to International Journal of Wildland Fire. Jan  Text:  Figures:  Horel et al. (2004) IIPS Conference  MesoWest: Horel et al. (2002) Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. February 2002  ADAS:  Myrick and Horel (2004). Submitted to Wea. Forecasting.  Lazarus et al. (2003) Wea. Forecasting  On-line help:

Goal  Provide real-time weather data around the nation to meteorologists and land managers  Display data in fast-loading formats tailored to the wildland fire community and accessible to:  Top-level managers using high speed networks  Fire-behavior analysts and IMETs in the field over slow dial- up connections San Diego Tribune. 28 Oct. 2003

2003 Fire Locations (Red); ROMAN stations (Grey) Fire locations provided by Remote Sensing Applications Center from MODIS imagery

ROMAN Development  Software developed at University of Utah to assist entire fire weather community to obtain access to current surface weather information  Support for development of ROMAN from BLM and NWS  Tools designed for fire weather applications can be used for many other purposes  Tested during 2002 and 2003 summer fire seasons  Operational for 2004 summer fire season Geographic Area Coordination Centers

Applications of ROMAN  Fire behavior analysts, fire management officers, GACC meteorologists:  Monitor weather conditions for strategic and tactical decision making  Determine impacts of weather on fire behavior and fire fighting resources  NWS meteorologists at WFOs  Monitor conditions within County Warning Areas, issue spot fire and general forecasts, verifying forecasts  NWS Incident Meteorologists  Monitor weather conditions in vicinity of major wildland fires

Current ROMAN Web Portal:

States Top-Level Organization GACCs CWAs FWZsMODIS regions

ROMAN  Structured by  GACC Predictive Service Areas  NWS CWA Forecast Zones  NWS Fire Weather Zones  Counties within States  Intuitive, easily navigable interface  Clickable maps  Station Weather  Weather Summary  Trend Monitor  Weather Monitor  5 Day Temp/RH Summary  Precip Summary/Monitor  Weather Near Fires  Search by zip code, geographic location Triangles: RAWS Major data providers: NWS/FAA; SNOTEL; RAWS

What Weather Information is Available? Search by: maps (state, CWAs, GACCs, etc.)

Surface Weather Plots

Surface Data Plot

What Weather Information is Available? Search by: zip code, geographic location, latitude/longitude

What Has Been Happening Recently? 5-Day Max/Min Temperature, RH, Wind Speed

What Are the Current Conditions? Weather Summary

What Has Changed Since Yesterday? Trend Monitor

What Extreme Conditions Are Underway? Weather Monitor

How Much Precipitation Has Fallen? Monitor Summary

Weather Near Fires

Current Weather Near Fires

Archived Fires

Weather Near Fires: 31 October 2003

MODIS Base Maps October 29 October 31

Current Configuration at CIRP Database Preprocessing Web Server Data Streams Users

Proposed Configuration: 2004 Fire Season WR Web UU Data Streams Users Boise Web Boise RAWS Other WR/WFO Apps

ADAS: ARPS Data Assimilation System  ADAS is run in near-real time to create analyses of temperature, relative humidity, and wind over the western U. S. (Lazarus et al WAF)  Analyses on NWS grid at 2.5, 5, and 10 km spacing  The 20km Rapid Update Cycle (RUC; Benjamin et al. 2002) is used for the background field  Background and terrain fields help to build spatial & temporal consistency in the surface fields  ADAS helps provide additional quality control of MesoWest/ROMAN observations as well as applications to nowcasting and forecast verification

Current State of the Art  While surface data may have negligible or detrimental impacts to operational NWP, assimilation of surface data is critical for generating and verifying human-edited gridded forecasts  Current ADAS analyses are a compromise solution  Suffer from many fundamental problems due to nature of successive corrections/optimum interpolation approach  Flow does not adjust dynamically to terrain  Appropriate and practical constraints beyond mass balance are not clear for use in variational techniques  See Kalnay(2003) for further comparison of assimilation methods

Arctic Outbreak: November 2003 NDFD 48 h forecastADAS Analysis

Summary  ROMAN under development for use by weather professionals and the public  ROMAN will be operated at the Boise WFO/ NIFC facility with 24/7 support this summer  Existing web resources can be used for many applications with access to both real-time and archival information  will continue as a testbed and ROMAN backup  Operational ROMAN will be located at  Feedback: