Pretty Big Trends, “Pretty Good” Practice, and New Tools Tim Jewell UW Libraries Collection Management Services UCLA Libraries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is HathiTrust and How Can it Make a Difference? Sourcing and Scaling brought to the collective collection.
Advertisements

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Electronic Journals but Were Afraid to Ask! NASIG Pre-Conference June 2002 Stefanie Wittenbach Head of Acquisitions,
The ERMS Value Proposition Norm Medeiros Associate Librarian of the College Haverford College NISO E-Resource Management Forum: The What, Why, and How.
Global Resources Forum October 21, 2010 The Western Waters Digital Library: Building a Resource Through Multi- State Collaboration and Technology
1. The Digital Library Challenge The Hybrid Library Today’s information resources collections are “hybrid” Combinations of - paper and digital format.
Integration of Library Resources and Services in Sakai 3 Susan Hollar, Curriculum Integration Coordinator University of Michigan Library Jon Dunn, Associate.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
Managing & Providing Access to eResources Catherine Davidson Associate University Librarian, Collections York University CAPITALizing on Change, May 8,
Christopher Lewis - EBSCO Information Services Robert Jacobs - Swets How will subscription agents help you manage your e-resources in a constantly changing.
John Ben DeVette Asia General Manager Vice President 19 October, 2005 EBSCO Information Services Web Initiatives: The New Online Interface for Libraries,
BC Integration of Systems and Resources MetaLib at Boston College Theresa Lyman Digital Resources Reference Librarian Boston College Libraries.
E-Resource SOS! Where Do I Go for Help? Brought to you by CILU: Committee on Instruction in Library Use May 2005.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
Building Publishing Services in the Academic Library Brian Rosenblum University of Kansas Colorado Academic Library Summit Denver, Colorado June 1, 2007.
Web-scale discovery services: searching the library in the era of Google Katie Dunn Technology & Metadata Librarian Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Slides:
E-journals: opportunities and challenges Bharati Banerjee.
Session 7 Selection of Online Resources and Options for Providing Access.
The National Digital Newspaper Program (NDNP) An NEH/LC Collaborative Program Enhancing access to historical newspapers Release: September 2006.
Jee Davis University of Texas Libraries ALCTS Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group 2014 ALA Annual Conference in Las.
Metadata Guidelines for Disclosing Shared Print Commitments Lizanne Payne Shared Print Consultant ALA Midwinter 2013.
Evaluating and Purchasing Electronic Resources- The University of Pittsburgh Experience Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University of Pittsburgh.
Describing Collections So Visitors Can Find Them: A sampling of ways to get materials on-line Amanda Focke, Rice University
Web Capture team Office of strategic initiatives February 27, 2006 Selecting Content from the Web: Challenges and Experiences of the Library of Congress.
Impact of E-Resources 2004 North Carolina Serials Conference Aisha Harvey Collection Development & Reference Perkins Library, Duke University 4/16/2004.
Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners, March 14, 2014 The National Digital Stewardship Alliance Agenda Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners Meeting Abigail.
WHY LIBRARIES WILL CARE HOW LINKING WORKS... November, 2000.
Interoperability with ILS Acquisition Systems Why is it important to make sure your ILS and ERM are interoperable? Angela Riggio, UCLA NISO E-Resource.
Managing E-resources Across the Consortium: DLF Project and Data Standards Developments ICOLC New Orleans, LA March 16, 2004.
Group 1 Case Study Presentation Proposal for Open Access (OA) Library Leadership Institute 2014.
Making the Connections An E-Matrix for Managing Resources in the Dis-integrated Library System David Goldsmith and Greg Raschke, NCSU Libraries ACRL, April.
The role of knowledge bases in improving discoverability now and in the future- why national and international collaboration is key The role of knowledge.
Looking to the East: Challenges in Connecting Asian Libraries in the World of Information Karen T. Wei University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Hong.
Re-Implementing ERM MENA-IUG 5 th Annual Conference 1-2 November 2010.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
1 Keeping stuff safe: how can libraries maintain their e-journal collections in the long-term? Richard Gartner King's College London International conference.
The Library of Congress Martha Anderson Program Officer, NDIIPP Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress April 2005 LC Perspective : Preservation.
Sandy Hurd Director of Strategic Markets March 30, 2007 Got Chopsticks? Get SUSHI! 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference, 2007.
13th North Carolina Serials Conference, April 15-16, Working with Vendors: Collaborating to Drive Product Development Yvette Diven Director, Product.
November 2004 NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries Beth Dulabahn Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress November 7,
Sakaibrary Project Update: Subject Research Guides and Next Steps Jon Dunn Indiana University July 2, 2008.
Made by: Mudassar Iqbal 1 INTEGRATION OF IT PLAN IN SCHOOL SYSTEM.
Christine Stohn SFX Product Manager Ex Libris January 8th, 2011 ALA Midwinter, San Diego.
E-Resources Management: So Many Silos to Synchronize…Still! A Presentation to the Electronic Resources & Libraries Conference Atlanta, GA March 2008 Luiz.
E-Resource Management Systems and Standards: An Invitation to Work in Progress NISO/DLF Workshop on Standards for Electronic Resource Management May 10,
CBSOR,Indian Statistical Institute 30th March 07, ISI,Kokata 1 Digital Repository support for Consortium Dr. Devika P. Madalli Documentation Research &
Electronic Resource Management: a Vended Approach Tony Harvell Head of Acquisitions UCSD Libraries
A Management Tool David Goldsmith E-Matrix Oct 27 th, EPA Meeting NCSU Libraries.
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Resource Issues.
Current ERM Activities at the University of California Bev French, Director, Shared Content, CDL Wendy Parfrey, Shared Content Analyst, CDL ICOLC Meeting,
1 Engineering Faculty Council Library Service Trends Mark Haslett University Librarian University of Waterloo “Day 20”
Warwick Cathro Assistant Director-General Resource Sharing and Innovation National Library of Australia Trove – a service built on collaboration OCLC Asia.
April 14, 2005MIT Libraries Visiting Committee Libraries Strategic Plan Theme III Work to shape the future MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology.
Building a Framework to Support Scholarly Journal Publishing at the University of Pittsburgh Vanessa Gabler Electronic Publications Associate, Office of.
The Catalog of the Future: Integrating Electronic Resources By Dana M. Caudle Cataloging Librarian Auburn University Libraries
Portico’s “d-collections” preservation service Stephanie Orphan Positive trends in sustainability? Emerging approaches to archiving commercial databases.
EDLproject WP3 “Developing the European Digital Library” LIBER – EBLIDA workshop Digitisation of Library Material in Europe Copenhagen, October.
NCSU Libraries Collections Budget Presentation University Library Committee October 28, 2013 Greg Raschke Associate Director for Collections and Scholarly.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium Sustainability and.
NASIG 2012 Andrea Imre, Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Digital Library Development: Springboard to State-Wide Access Barbara I. Dewey Dean of Libraries University of Tennessee.
Consortia in the USA Past, Present, Future A Presentation by: Antoinette Paris Greider Association Dean, Research and Education University of Kentucky.
Adriana Popescu Douglas McGee Princeton University University of Pennsylvania 2014 IFLA WLIC 21 August, 2014 Assessing the Shared Usage of Collaboratively.
Grant Writing 2012 Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium.
Making Sense of the Alphabet Soup of Standards
Reinventing Cataloging: Models for the Future of Library Operations
Standards For Collection Management ALCTS Webinar – October 7, 2014
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III
Presentation transcript:

Pretty Big Trends, “Pretty Good” Practice, and New Tools Tim Jewell UW Libraries Collection Management Services UCLA Libraries Tech Talk Feb. 7, 2002

Related 2001 DLF Reports (available on DLF Web Site)DLF Web Site  Goal: “ARL SPEC Kit Plus”: identify and propagate best practices  Strategies for Building Digitized Collections (Abby Smith)  Building Sustainable Collections of Free Third-Party Web Resources (Lou Pitschmann)  Selection and Presentation of Commercially Available Electronic Resources (Tim Jewell)

Talk Overview I. Broad Context II. Idealized Practice Model  Digression 1 III. Collaborating on Standards  Digression 2 IV. Next Steps

I. Broad E-resource Context  Demand for “24x7” access high  “Google-ization”  E-resource budget shares continue to grow (mostly digital environment in 5 years?)  Most larger libraries rely on multiple providers and consortia  E-resources are complex to fund and acquire  Complexity makes management hard  Current integrated online systems mainly built for print collections?

II. Idealized Model of Effective Selection and Presentation Practices

A. Selection Policies and Strategic Plans  Well-developed selection guidelines and policies  Articulated goals and strategic approach to selecting or developing e- resources

B. Institutional Finance and Organization  Broad-based oversight and coordination committee structures  E-resource coordinators  Distributed “resource stewardship”

C. Internal Procedures for Initial Evaluation and Purchase  Systematic, understandable workflows; forms to expedite handling  Easy to determine order status  Information about library readily available to vendors.  Clear system for conducting trials

D. Licensing Issues and Practices  Process for smooth handling of licenses  Staff and users informed of licensing terms

E. Web Presentation Strategies  Aggregator database periodical holdings available, integrated into catalog and resource lists  A & I database citations linked to e-journal and aggregator holdings  User-oriented presentation of resources and “personalization” services

Digression 1: Web presentation examples  UW Libraries Gateway UW Libraries Gateway  Yale Libraries Online Journal List Yale Libraries Online Journal List  UW Healthlinks UW Healthlinks  Penn Gateway Penn Gateway  UW Engineering page prototype UW Engineering page prototype  UWILL UWILL  SFX SFX

F. User Support  General support information readily available to users  Comprehensible problem escalation/ triage paths for staff  Integration of instructional information  (New) Digital/interactive reference

G. Ongoing Evaluation and Usage Information  Planned/cyclic reviews prior to renewal  Systematic reporting of usage to staff  (New) Usability testingUsability testing

H. Preservation and Archiving  Efforts to establish preservation techniques and standards  Realistic assessment of E-resource preservation/archiving risks

I. Toward Integrated Systems for Managing Electronic Resources  Develop plans for e-resource support system  (New) Participate in developing standards for new e-resource support systems

III. Collaborating to Develop Standards for E-resource Management Systems

E-resource Management Systems and Initiatives 1: Available Now  Penn State (ERLIC)  MIT (VERA)  Michigan  Notre Dame  Texas (License Tracker)  Virginia  Yale

E-resource Management Systems and Initiatives 2: Under Development  California Digital Library  Cornell (?)  Johns Hopkins (HERMES)  Stanford  UCLA

“Communication History”  ALCTS Big Heads (Midwinter and Annual 2001)  “Web Hub”  Listserve  DLF Spring Forum, 2001  Metadata Group Meeting, Midwinter 2002

Digression 2: E-resource Management Demos  Yale (again) Yale  MIT (VERA) MIT  Penn State (ERLIC) Penn State  Texas (License Tracker) Texas  Johns Hopkins (HERMES) Johns Hopkins

“Compare and Contrast” Spreadsheet Analysis  Similarities  Platforms  Functions  Elements  Differences  Platforms  Functions  Elements

Advantages of Standards  Jump start local development (prevent “reinventing the wheel”)  Data sharing  “OCLC cataloging model”  Serials vendors  Publishers  Future portability  Focus vendor attention

Possible Drawbacks of Standards  Too early? (needs may change)  Inhibit innovation?  IOLS vendors might sacrifice competitive advantages  May accelerate negative licensing practices  Fair Use-hostile license models  UCITA

Interested Parties and Potential Partners  Developers of local systems  Digital Library Federation  ALA/ALCTS groups (“Big Heads”; Networked Resources Metadata Committee, etc.)  IOLS vendors (III, ExLibris, etc.)  “Open Source” community  NASIG, Serials vendors and publishers  Standards groups (NISO, TeSLA)

General Strategy  Goal: develop, register XML schema  Steps  Develop “functional specs.” statement over next month  Divide data elements into two “phases”  Identify and define phase 1 data elements over next 2-3 months  Publish, discuss, refine  Move on to phase 2 data elements

Phase 1 Elements (relatively) easy stuff  Set up 3 groups of volunteers to identify and define data elements and descriptions for:  Identification/description  “parent and child” structure and relationships  Licensing details  “what can you do” with this stuff?  Access and Support  “who you gonna call?”

Phase 2 Elements tougher/more institution- specific stuff  Process Status  “who’s got the ball?”  Financial Management  “who pays what?”  Usage Information  “what do we know about use?”

Pragmatic Problems and Issues  IOLS vendors may provide usable “modules” in time, but libraries feel urgent need to develop short-term fixes  Previous/ongoing investments in systems  Probably don’t want to make major changes to longstanding record-keeping practices  Multiple data streams need to be brought together

Relevant Dublin Core Elements?  Subject  Description  Publisher  Date(s)  Type  Format  Relation  Coverage  Rights

IV. Next Steps  Form “Functional Spec.” group  Call for more volunteers for phase 1  Communicate with potential partners  Plan for conference events  DLF  ALA Annual  NASIG  Etc.