The Challenger Disaster

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mission Success Starts with Safety The Similarities and Differences of Reliability Engineering and Probabilistic Risk Assessment RAMS VII Workshop November.
Advertisements

Introduction to Engineering Ethics – 2 Engineering Ethics Agenda Review Ethics I Introduce resources for ethical decisions in engineering References Challenger.
The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster Group 3a: Matt Paschol, Chris Fuller, Brandon McCauley.
Manned Space Exploration From Apollo to present. Project Apollo Purpose: Land on the moon & return safely to the Earth Purpose: Land on the moon & return.
(Clockwise starting in left back row)  Ellison S. Onizuka, Mission Specialist  Sharon Christa Mc Auliffe, Teacher  Greg Jarvis, Payload Specialist.
Observations on the Loss of the Challenger Observations o Engineering processes (the decision- making process to arrive at the launch decision) need.
A valid measure?. Statistical graphs: The good, the bad and the ugly.
Prof Michael D. Smith School of Physical Sciences (pictures and some text reproduced from NASA sources) The Challenger Disaster.
Space Shuttle Challenger Matt Tanaka Bryent Kaneshiro.
Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster
The Normalization of Deviance at NASA. Background January 28, 1986 Shuttle engineers were worried about launching at the predicted temperature of 31 degrees.
Three Ethical Case Studies
CSC444 Lec01 1 University of Toronto Department of Computer Science Lecture 1: Why Does Software Fail? Some background What is Software Engineering? What.
Faiz Almansour Alemu Azanaw Rachel Downen Timothy Herbig Angie Schneider.
Challenger Accident or what you think you know can still hurt you CAPT RT Soule Supervisor of Shipbuilding Newport News “engineers and managers together.
An Accident Rooted in History NASA Culture History of the flawed joint Events leading up to the disaster.
Comprehend the Challenger accident Comprehend the Columbia accident The Space Shuttle Program: Challenger and Columbia Accidents.
Space Exploration Past, Present, Future. Space Exploration The Big Picture Space exploration is still very new. Although we have learned a lot, we still.
The Challenger Disaster By Diana Clarke. The Orbiter Dimensions: 122’ L x 78’ W x 57’ H Dimensions: 122’ L x 78’ W x 57’ H Crew size: Up to 8 people Crew.
Observations on the Loss of the Challenger Observations o Engineering processes (the decision- making process to arrive at the launch decision) need.
Shuttle Challenger Disaster Design Implications Homework 2 Steven Callahan Design Implications Homework 2 Steven Callahan.
Roger Boisjoly and the Challenger Disaster
Notes on Challenger DisasterChallenger Disaster Stephen Scott March 12, 2003.
Risk Management Andrew Tilstra Jameson Smieja William Schaffer Kurt Butz.
The Challenger Accident Magnus Jansson, Electrical Engineering Fredrik Mannesson, Engineering and Industrial Management Per Martinell, Civil Engineering.
SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTURE Overview and Challenger Case Study Bryan Palaszewski working with the Digital Learning Network.
Ethics in Engineering Lecture 4/4.
An Example Through When Things Go Wrong. Technical Communication Interactive and Adaptable Reader-Centered Produced In Teams Visual Influenced by Ethics,
How do we know so much about space as a society? Explain.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
The Challenger Justin Winslow Science. Early History Fell apart 73 seconds after takeoff. Killed all seven crew members. Devastated the United States.
A Major Malfunction Article Note Cards. “A Major Malfunction.” The Wichita Eagle Millenium Notebook : 1. Print. Source info for Works Cited newspaper.
COMPLEX PROBLEMS CLASS 6
FAILURES AND CAUSES NASA MISSIONS SYSM Advance Requirements Engineering Dr. Chung Muhammad Ayaz Shaikh 05/19/2012.
ENGINEERING ETHICS Prof.V.Anantha Subramanian Department Of Ocean Engineering, IIT Madras 7 th April 2015.
Unit 4 vocabulary/ page 44 L.1/ What caused the explosion? 1F. Dwaikat.
Logistic Regression Pre-Challenger Relation Between Temperature and Field-Joint O-Ring Failure Dalal, Fowlkes, and Hoadley (1989). “Risk Analysis of the.
Happy Monday 11 th Graders! Do Now: What national tragedy in your lifetime affected you the most emotionally/mentally? Why? How did government address.
ROCKET SCIENCE Ms. Wood. Rockets  Rockets move forward when a hot gas is forced out of the back of the rocket  The force of the gas out launches the.
Space Shuttle CHALLENGER. Space Shuttle Challenger Space shuttle Challenger was NASA’s greatest triumph with 9 successful missions. It also was involved.
Ethics and Engineering Presented By: Jeff Smith Greg Thurston Allen Taylor.
Lesson 14—Space Shuttle Challenger BTLEW Part Two ENTER.
Everyone needs a red book today! Log in your new assignment!  Bellringer  Who was the first person in space?  Yuri Gagarin.
By: Rachel Gambacorta.  Challenger was NASA's second space shuttle  It had 9 successful launches.
Create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Office of Communications create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Columbia Disaster Robiel Ghebrekidan SYSM 6309: Advanced.
Human Space Flight Trials and Tribulations. Human Space Flight Challenges of Human Space Flight NASATragedy Future of Human Space Flight.
Learning Goals  I will be able to recognize the three main battles of the Space Race.  I will be able to explain the pathway to putting a man on the.
Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Discovery Zumdahl, Zumdahl, DeCoste, World of Chemistry  2002, page 238 Right solid rocket booster Left solid rocket booster.
Learning Goals  I will be able to identify the names of the space shuttles in NASA’s program.  I will be able to identify two shuttle disasters.
EMGT 506 Challenger Case Study Question 2 Group B.
SOME SUPER COIN TOSSERS. CHAP 6.2 B PROBABILITY MODELS.
Ethics in Engineering Lecture 3/3.
SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER DISASTER By: Nick Clarke.
 The shuttle program started around 1977  Space crafts had a one time usage beforehand  Program was to have cargo carrying ships that can be reused.
Ronald Reagan’s Address to the Nation on the Explosion of the Space Shuttle Challenger.
UNIT- III. ENGINEERING AS SOCIAL EXPERIMENTATION.
The Challenger Explodes Article #1 use white notecards.
STANDARD LAUNCHING PROCEDURE AND A BRIEF HISTORY OF CHALLENGER SHUTTLE Valerie Griffiths Image courtesy WikiWandhttp://
Space Exploration Past, Present, Future. Space Exploration The Big Picture Space exploration is still in infancy. Although we have learned a lot, we still.
Professional Ethics Case Study CHALLENGER DISASTER
CHALLENGER DISASTER : CASE STUDY – TO BE
CHALLENGER DISASTER : CASE STUDY
Ethics in Engineering Lecture 3/3.
A CHC 2D Canadian History Presentation
Chapter 16 Section 8 What is the space shuttle?
SPACE SHUTTLES.
Time Period # US History Unit 8. Time Period # US History Unit 8.
The Challenger “Again Science Fails”
Ronald Reagan’s Challenger Speech Analysis
STS-114 Return to Flight Lessons Learned Bill Parsons
Presentation transcript:

The Challenger Disaster Risk Management Jameson Smieja Andrew Tilstra Kurt Butz William Schaffer

The art and science of identifying, analyzing, and responding to risk Risk Management The art and science of identifying, analyzing, and responding to risk

The Challenger Mission 51L 10th mission for the Challenger Shuttle TISP – Teachers In Space Program Christa McAuliffe Politically Charged Launch Christa was to appear via television link during Reagan’s State of the Union Address in 1986

Challenger Delays Liftoff: 11:38 EST January 28, 1986 Liftoff Initially Scheduled for 15:43 EST on Jan. 22, 1986 Delays in 61-C mission pushed liftoff to Jan. 23, then Jan. 24 Reset to Jan. 25 due to weather Postponed another day due to launch processing problems Rescheduled for 9:37 EST Jan. 27 due to weather Delayed again due to equipment failure for 24 hours Final 2 hour delay due to hardware interface module problems Liftoff: 11:38 EST January 28, 1986

The Challenger Disaster 73 Seconds After Liftoff

What Went Wrong?? Failure of an “O-ring” seal in the solid-fuel rocket on the Space Shuttle Challenger's right side Flames cut into main liquid fuel tank

Four Main Causes of O-Ring Failure Pre-flight Leak Tests O-Ring Erosions Joint Rotation Low Temperatures

Poor Risk Management Risks were managed using Critical Items Lists Criticality 1-Loss of Life or Ship Criticality 2-Mission Aborted CIL Flaws Unreliable In previous missions, criticality1 issues occurred but loss of life/ship did not Negotiable Identified risks could later be waived

Known Potential Problems O-rings were “Criticality 1” feature O-ring seal failure on previous missions Launch Constraint placed on subsequent launches These constraints had been imposed and regularly waived by the SRB Project Manager

Known Potential Problems Very low ambient temperatures recognized as concern by Tiokol O-ring performance at this temperature not understood NASA officials pressured Tiokol to withdraw its concerns Upper officials at NASA were unaware of these discussions and ignorantly approved launch

References “Space Shuttle Challenger 1986” (http://www.jlhs.nhusd.k12.ca.us/Classes/Social_Science/Challenger.html/Challenger.html), (1996) “Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster-A NASA Tragedy” (http://space.about.com/cs/challenger/a/challenger.htm) “Expert Panel Recommends Improvements for Space Shuttle Safety Program”, (http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/NI000494?OpenDocument), (March 3, 1988) “An Accident Rooted In History” (http://spacelink.nasa.gov/NASA.Projects/Human.Exploration.and/Development.of.Space/Human.Space.Flight/Shuttle/Shuttle.Missions/Flight.025.STS-51-L/An.Accident.Rooted.in.History), (June 6, 1986) “The Challenger Accident” (http://www.me.utexas.edu/~uer/challenger/chall2.html#mechflaw), (1997)