SRI International Patricia Schank Anders Rosenquist Vera Michalchik Tina Stanford Reina Fujii Patty Kreikemeier Robert Kozma Tools for Investigating, Visualizing,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
When Students Can’t Read…
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Fostering Learners’ Collaborative Problem Solving with RiverWeb Roger Azevedo University of Maryland Mary Ellen Verona Maryland Virtual High School Jennifer.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 This multimedia product and its content are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: Any public.
MMAP Middle School Math Through Applications Project Dahwun Deepak Gazi Scott Sun-Young.
Computer-Based Performance Assessments from NAEP and ETS and their relationship to the NGSS Aaron Rogat Educational Testing Service.
Suggestions from the Field Catherine Milne and Jan Plass with Bruce Homer, Trace Jordan, Ruth Schwartz, Elizabeth Hayward, Yoo Kyung Chang, Yan Wang, Florrie.
1 Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE 2004/1/12 吳秋儀 Bell, P. & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
CONSTRUCTIVISM.
Guidelines for Best Practices in Educational Use of Virtual Instrumentation Presentation created by Adina Glava Babeş – Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca,
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Turn Down the Heat: Exploring Thermal Insulation.
The Impact of Project Based Learning on High School Biology SOL Scores Rhiannon Brownell April 1, 2008 ECI 637 ECI 637 Instructor: Martha Maurno, M.S.
The 5 E Instructional Model
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
Framework for K-12 Science Education
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
TECHNOLOGY WITH MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE BY: BRITTANY OWENS & NATHAN JACKSON.
Integrating Technology into the 5 E Learning Model Stephanie Nowak Science Regional Network Leader February 12, 2015.
IDDEAS: Introducing Desirable Difficulties for Educational Applications in Science Classroom studies of desirable difficulties implemented in astronomy.
Contributions of Contextual Teaching to Improved Student Learning Richard L. Lynch, PI University of Georgia (706)
Inquiry-based Learning and Digital Libraries in Undergraduate Science Education Xornam Apedoe Learning & Instruction University of San Francisco November.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Project-Based Learning: Engaging Middle School Students Regina Grant-New Hanover County Schools.
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
Common Core National State Standards Math Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and other subject areas. Two foci: Reading and Writing.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Technology Integration Lesson Planning. A Virtual Field Trip By: Paula Smith, Patty Deering, Vicki Matchett & Renata Sorel.
Measuring What Matters: Technology & the Assessment of all Students Jim Pellegrino.
The Learning Sciences and Constructivism. Learning Sciences: interdisciplinary science based in psychology, education, computer science, philosophy, sociology,
The ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS  S) and Performance Indicators for Students.
Technology in Math and Science Maria Rojas Angela Cyrus Jennifer Sepulvado.
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Scientific Inquiry by:. Icebreaker “Scientific Inquiry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations.
 For years, corporations have used computer-based simulations with employee-training programs, augmenting traditional on-the-job training with virtual.
Learning from Model-Produced Graphs in a Climate Change Science Class Catherine Gautier Geography Department UC Santa Barbara.
Constructivist Learning. The Constructivist Learning Theory The construction (not reproduction) of knowledge. Reflection on previous knowledge. Multiple.
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
ITEAMS is designed to provide teachers with the tools to develop inquiry-based lessons, and the opportunity to develop a deep understanding of implementation.
Building Bridges. After school programs can provide: an environment in which children can practice ways of learning and behaving that will help them succeed.
Google Earth INTEGRATING GLOBAL THINKING. Why Use Virtual Tours? Flexible Tool: History, Science, Math, English, etc. An Interactive Way to Explore Supports.
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Chapter 8 Putting It All Together DEVELOPING A TEACHING PHILOSOPHY © 2015 Etta R. Hollins.
Teaching with CHRONOS Data and Tools A Framework for Design Cathy Manduca Science Education Resource Center Carleton College June 13, 2006.
Getting the Most Out of Learning Opportunities
Five Tools & Processes for NGSS Tool 3: Using the 5E instructional model to develop a conceptual flow.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Community Event: Technology Makes a Difference District Educator: Stephanie Allen EDU 620: Meeting Individual Student Needs with Technology Instructor:
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Curricular Design and Academic Expectations
IQWST Investigating & Questioning our World
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn via Visualization
Setting Writing Goals in Science The Living Environment
Educational Technology Lab, National Kapodistrian
Presentation transcript:

SRI International Patricia Schank Anders Rosenquist Vera Michalchik Tina Stanford Reina Fujii Patty Kreikemeier Robert Kozma Tools for Investigating, Visualizing, and Discussing chemistry in the Classroom Center for Technology in Learning SRI International

Tools for Investigating, Visualizing, and Discussing chemistry in the Classroom Judy Larson – San Leandro High School, San Leandro, CA Britt Hammon – Antioch High School, Antioch CA Irene Hahn – Miramonte High School, Orinda, CA Nikki LeBoy - Miramonte High School, Orinda, CA Richard Kassissieh – University High School, San Francisco, CA Alexi Velis – University High School, San Francisco, CA

SRI International Students leave high school chemistry courses with profound misunderstandings about the nature of matter, chemical processes, and chemical systems. ????? process of inquiry ????? ????? concepts and principles can be used to explain real world phenomena ????? ????? systems of interacting molecular entities ????? Problem

SRI International Students leave high school chemistry courses with profound misunderstandings about the nature of matter, chemical processes, and chemical systems. ????? process of inquiry ????? ????? concepts and principles can be used to explain real world phenomena ????? ????? systems of interacting molecular entities ????? These difficulties influence attitudes toward future science courses future success in science everyday decision-making in our scientifically complex world. Problem

SRI International Our Theoretical Framework Visualizations in science help students Access features of aperceptual phenomena (Kozma) Reason about causality (Gobert & Clement) Coordinate multiple representations (Kozma) Engage in "disciplinary seeing" (Stevens & Roth, Goodwin)

SRI International Our Theoretical Framework Social Constructivism Building on shared knowledge gives learners an opportunity to identify problems, analyze alternatives, and reflect on their thinking (Bereiter, Herrenkohl)

SRI International Our Theoretical Framework Situative theory Visual representations are symbolic tools within environment; part of the constraints and affordances of the setting (Greeno)

SRI International Our Approach Drawing on this work, we have developed a computer-based collaborative learning environment and associated activities to increase students’ chemical understanding and representational competence.

SRI International The ChemSense KBE a virtual representation workspace tools to share, view, and edit text imported images graphs student generated drawings, and student generated animations use w/ data loggers / probeware for real-time data collection

SRI International The ChemSense KBE "Build on" dialog Search dialog

SRI International The ChemSense KBE (continued) lab-based curriculum units that focus on themes of chemical change (connectivity, state, geometry, aggregation, concentration) students express & discuss ideas in chemistry project-based investigation peer review

SRI International Prior Findings - ChemSense I concomitant tool development and classroom try-outs 1 teacher, low s.e.s, “low-performing” (CA rankings) ~ 50 students 2 week “drop-in” unit (solubility issues – gas in liquid, ionic solid in liquid, covalent solid in liquid, temperature changes, pressure changes etc.) pre- and post-tests student ChemSense-generated artifacts videotaped student pairs

SRI International Prior Findings - ChemSense I concomitant tool development and classroom try-outs 1 teacher, low s.e.s, “low-performing” (CA rankings) ~ 50 students 2 week “drop-in” unit (solubility issues – gas in liquid, ionic solid in liquid, covalent solid in liquid, temperature changes, pressure changes etc.) pre- and post-tests student ChemSense-generated artifacts videotaped student pairs

SRI International Prior Findings - ChemSense I concomitant tool development and classroom try-outs 1 teacher, low s.e.s, “low-performing” (CA rankings) ~ 50 students 2 week “drop-in” unit (solubility issues – gas in liquid, ionic solid in liquid, covalent solid in liquid, temperature changes, pressure changes etc.) pre- and post-tests student ChemSense-generated artifacts videotaped student pairs

SRI International Prior Quantitative Findings - ChemSense I Significant improvement in representational competence and understanding of connectivity and geometry (p<.05). Gains in chemical understanding did not favor any particular group: low, medium, and high-performing students all showed similar test score gains. Gains in representational competence favored students who started out with the most limited representational competence. Students who created more drawings showed greater representational competence and chemical understanding.

SRI International Prior Qualitative Findings - ChemSense I (analysis of student conversations during 2 week interaction with the ChemSense KBE) students collaboratively construct and refine nanoscopic level representations of their developing conceptualizations of chemical phenomena

SRI International work with high school and college teachers to develop new curricular activities that implement ChemSense in a sustained setting (currently have 30 units developed!) activities and assessments designed around key chemistry concepts - changes in: molecular geometry, connectivity, aggregation, state, and concentration Current Research Activities - ChemSense II

SRI International HYPOTHESIS: the extended use of representations (student and probeware-generated) results in conversations that help students better connect physical phenomena with underlying chemical entities and processes teacher guidance / scaffolding of student conversation plays a critical role Current Research Activities - ChemSense II

SRI International During sustained use of the ChemSense KBE over the course of one academic term, how does student construction, participation, and contribution to small- group, whole-class, and on-line discussions of chemical phenomena change? During sustained use of the ChemSense KBE over the course of one academic term, how does the quality student chemical understanding and representational competence change in their discussions, presentations, and assessments? ChemSense II Research Questions

SRI International During sustained use of the ChemSense KBE over the course of one academic term, how do chemistry teachers integrate the tool into their curriculum and classroom? During sustained use of the ChemSense KBE over the course of one academic term, how do teachers model and assess representational and collaborative practice of students? How does this practice develop over time? Which particular features of the ChemSense KBE promote conceptual elaboration in student discussions? How do these concepts transfer to other aspects of student work? ChemSense II Research Questions (continued)