DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 1 Results from parametric studies of thin liquid wall IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. Fusion Technology Institute University.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.

Advertisements

October 2, 2002/ARR 1 1. Liquid Wall Ablation 2. FLiBe Properties A. R. Raffray and M. Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES-IFE Meeting.

Initial Results from ARIES-IFE Study and Plans for the Coming Year Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team Heavy-ion IFE Meeting July 23-24, 2001 Lawrence.

May 27, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., IFE Chamber Walls: Requirements, Design Options, and Synergy with MFE Plasma Facing Components 1 IFE Chamber Walls:

Assessment of Chamber Concepts for IFE Power Plants: The ARIES-IFE study Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team IFSA2001 September 9-14, 2001 Kyoto, Japan.

Relevant one dimensional simulations of prompt physics in thick liquid design Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.

April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,

RRP:3/9/01Aries IFE 1 Parametric Results for Gas-Filled Chamber Dynamics Analysis Aries Workshop March 8-9, 2001 Livermore, CA Robert R. Peterson and Donald.

March 3-4, 2005 HAPL meeting, NRL 1 Target Survival During Injection…The Advantages of Getting Rid of the Buffer Gas Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors:

IFSA, Kyoto, Japan, September Dry Chamber Wall Thermo-Mechanical Behavior and Lifetime under IFE Cyclic Energy Deposition A. R. Raffray 1, D. Haynes.

DAH, RRP, UW - FTI ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 1 Thin liquid Pb wall protection for IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. and R. R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute.

Vapor Conditions Including Ionization State in Thick Liquid Wall IFE Reactors Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition at Radius of 0.5 m A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University of.

Design Considerations for Beam Port Insulator Rings

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley C.S. Debonnel 1,2, S.S. Yu 2, P.F. Peterson 1 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department.

A. R. Raffray, B. R. Christensen and M. S. Tillack Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber? Japan-US Workshop on IFE Target Fabrication,

June 18, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities, IAEA Meeting, San Diego 1 ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities A. R.

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 ARIES-IFE ARIES Project Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia September 3-4, 2003 Summary of Issues, Results,

Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.

Design Windows and Trade-Offs for Inertial Fusion Energy Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi ISFNT 6 April 8-12, 2002 Hotel Hyatt Islandia, San Diego Electronic.

EFFECTS OF CHAMBER GEOMETRY AND GAS PROPERTIES ON HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,

HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS WITH DIFFERENT PROTECTIVE GASES AND PRE-IGNITION CONDITIONS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of.

November 20, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation 1 Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation A.

Design Windows for IFE Chambers and Target Injection Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team US/Japan Workshop on Target Fabrication December 3-4, 2001 General.

April 10, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE 1 Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE A. R. Raffray 1, G.

June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.

July 1, 2002/ARR 1 Scoping Study of FLiBe Evaporation and Condensation A. R. Raffray and M. Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES-IFE Meeting.

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.

April 22, 2002/ARR 1 1. Concluding Sacrificial Liquid Film Activities 2. Starting Thick Liquid Wall Activities A. R. Raffray, J. Pulsifer, M. Zaghloul.

Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:

May 5-6, 2003/ARR 1 Town Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics ARIES Town Meeting Hilton Garden Inn, Livermore, CA May 5-6, 2003 Background and Goals.

Findings and Recommendations from Wetted-Wall IFE Designs Jeff Latkowski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory March 9, 2001 Work performed under the.

October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.

ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.

Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.

Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.

Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison NRL IFE Concepts Project 9/19/ Output Calculations for Laser Fusion Targets ARIES Meeting.

ARIES-IFE: An Integrated Assessment of Chamber Concepts for IFE Power Plants Mark Tillack for the ARIES Team 19th IEEE/NPSS SOFE January 22-25, 2002 Atlantic.

January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.

Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.

Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.

Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:

January 1, 2002/ARR 1 1. “Overlap” Design Regions for IFE Dry Wall 2. Scoping Analysis of Condensation for Wetted Wall A. R. Raffray, D. Blair, J. Pulsifer,

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Update on IFE Aerosol Analysis J.P. Sharpe INEEL Fusion Safety Program.

ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.

Design Considerations for Thin Liquid Film Wall Protection Systems S.I. Abdel-Khalik and M.Yoda Georgia Institute of Technology ARIES Project Meeting,

Status of Operational Windows for HIF Chamber Transport Modes D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, C. L. Olson, S. Neff, and S. S. Yu ARIES Project Meeting January.

RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.

HAPL WORKSHOP Chamber Gas Density Requirements for Ion Stopping Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.

ARR/April 8, Magnetic Intervention Dump Concepts A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: A. E. Robson, D. Rose and J. Sethian HAPL Meeting.

1 4/22/2002 ARIES1 Fusion Technology Institute 4/22/2002 Dynamics of Liquid Wall Chambers R.R. Peterson, I.E. Golovkin, and D.A. Haynes University of Wisconsin.

Fracture of Tungsten in a HAPL Chamber Jake Blanchard HAPL MWG Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin September 2003.

ARIES Workshop Dry Wall Response to the HIB (close-coupled) IFE target Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.

Status of HAPL Tasks 1 & 3 for University of Wisconsin Gregory Moses Milad Fatenejad Fusion Technology Institute High Average Power Laser Meeting September.

-Plasma can be produced when a laser ionizes gas molecules in a medium -Normally, ordinary gases are transparent to electromagnetic radiation. Why then.

Temperature Response and Ion Deposition in the 1 mm Tungsten Armor Layer for the 10.5 m HAPL Target Chamber T.A. Heltemes, D.R. Boris and M. Fatenejad,

Target threat spectra Gregory Moses and John Santarius with Thad Heltemes, Milad Fatenejad, Matt Terry and Jiankui Yuan Fusion Technology Institute University.

Target threat spectra Gregory Moses and John Santarius Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison HAPL Review Meeting March 3-4, 2005.

Fusion Technology Institute 4/5/2002HAPL1 Ion Driven Fireballs: Calculations and Experiments R.R. Peterson, G.A. Moses, and J.F. Santarius University of.

Radiological Issues for Thin Liquid Wall Options L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, and D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison.

Modeling of Z-Ablation I. E. Golovkin, R. R. Peterson, D. A. Haynes University of Wisconsin-Madison G. Rochau Sandia National Laboratories Presented at.

350 MJ Target Thermal Response and Ion Implantation in 1 mm thick silicon carbide armor for 10.5 m HAPL Chamber T.A. Heltemes and G.A. Moses Fusion Technology.

Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, GA, July 1-2, 2002 (DRAFT)

BUCKY Simulations of Z and RHEPP Experiments

IFE Wetted-Wall Chamber Engineering “Preliminary Considerations”

University of California, San Diego

Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers

First Wall Response to the 400MJ NRL Target

Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, UW, April 22-23, 2002 (DRAFT)

Presentation transcript:

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 1 Results from parametric studies of thin liquid wall IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 2 Summary/Outline We present results from a set of BUCKY simulations of the response of a thin liquid wall chamber to the threat spectrum of the C/C HIB target. Parameters considered were wall material (Pb or FLiBE), vapor composition (Xe or vapor from the liquid) and vapor pressure. All variations considered lead to acceptable chambers from the point of view of ion deposition, vaporization thickness and condensation rates, though these simulations do not include the effects of splashing or aerosolization. Wall material (Pb or FLiBe) Vapor pressure (10mTorr or 1000mTorr) Vapor composition (Xe or wall material) Conclusions and future work Old business: dry wall strawman results

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 3 Wetted-Wall Chamber Physics Critical Issues Involve Target Output, and First Wall Response Target Output Simulations (BUCKY, etc) Target Disassembly Energy Partition Target Output Simulations (BUCKY, etc) Target Disassembly Energy Partition Liquid Dynamics Simulations (BUCKY) X-ray Deposition Vaporization Self-Shielding Shocks in Liquid Liquid Dynamics Simulations (BUCKY) X-ray Deposition Vaporization Self-Shielding Shocks in Liquid Chamber Recovery Simulations (1-D: BUCKY, 2, 3-D TSUNAMI, ?) Re-condensation, Substrate Survival Chamber Recovery Simulations (1-D: BUCKY, 2, 3-D TSUNAMI, ?) Re-condensation, Substrate Survival X-rays, Ion Debris, Neutrons Vapor Mass Impulse Rep-Rate Target Design Wall Design Low T, Hi  Opacity Liquid Properties Beam Transport Criteria Vapor Opacity

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 4 This talk concentrates on the effects of the threat from the closely coupled HIB target. The threat is predominantly from the soft x-rays produced by the interaction of capsule output and the massive hohlraum Though this target is not currently being emphasized by the HIB target community, its threat spectrum should be grossly similar to the more likely contenders. As this target is the only one for which we have detailed threat spectra, we use it a representative.

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 5 We have generated relevant FLiBE opacity and equation of state Calculations performed using DTAOPA, a detailed transition accounting, NLTE version of EOSOPA

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 6 FLiBe is considerably more transparent to the target x-rays than is Pb. This leads to more volumetric heating of the liquid, and less shielding by the chamber vapor and the superheated vapor. As of 0.1ms after implosion: X-ray energy absorbed in vapor: FLiBe: 36MJ Pb:114MJ Energy re-radiated to the wall: FLiBe:16MJ Pb:60MJ

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 7 A hybrid design using both a chamber gas chosen for beam transport and a thin liquid wall chosen to protect the first wall is conceivable: 1000mTorr Xe As of 0.1ms after implosion: X-ray energy absorbed in vapor: FLiBe wall: 78MJ Pb wall:111MJ (Blow-off is treated as vapor for this purpose. Note that the Pb created early in the pulse better shields the wall from the end of the pulse.) Energy re-radiated to the wall: FLiBe wall:25MJ Pb wall:31MJ

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 8 Different driver transport beam transport methods require different pressure of chamber gas. Last meeting we looked at 1mTorr. Here, we look at 10mTorr and 1000mTorr. The lower Pb chamber pressure actually results in less vaporized mass at the end of 0.1ms. This is due to the effect of soft, re-radiated energy due to ions and x-rays absorbed in the chamber gas. Re-radiated energy: 10mTorr:36MJ 1000mTorr60MJ

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 9 BUCKY does not include the effects of aerosol formation nor splashing. We have handed off early time, post flash chamber conditions to Phil Sharpe, who will report on his analysis of aerosol issues later this meeting. Plan of attack from last meeting: “Homogenize” chamber, converting bulk kinetic energy into thermal energy. Start condensation run from these conditions. Geometry dependent uncertainty: how long does it take to homogenize, and will there be any x-ray pulse produced by stagnation on axis?

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 10 Re-establishment of conditions suitable for target injection: do drops of aerosol remain? t ~ ms Vapor density and temperature are suitable for beam transport and target injection? Protecting liquid is re-established? We need to decide on the parameters space in which we want to identify operating windows, and what constitutes an acceptable design: Target Output Driver/Transport Method Radius Liquid Wall temperature

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 11 Summary/Conclusions We present results from a set of BUCKY simulations of the response of a thin liquid wall chamber to the threat spectrum of the C/C HIB target. Parameters considered were wall material (Pb or FLiBe), vapor composition (Xe or vapor from the liquid) and vapor pressure. All variations considered lead to acceptable chambers from the point of view of ion deposition, vaporization thickness and condensation rates, though these simulations do not include the effects of splashing or aerosolization. For the 4.5m radius chamber assaulted by the C/C HIB target: All of the combinations of chamber gas, pressure, and wall considered lead to 10s of kilograms of mass vaporized at the end of 0.1ms. Based on results presented last time, and absent splashing and aerosolization, recondensation should proceed quickly enough to maintain a 5Hz rep. rate. More vapor does not necessarily provide more protection to the first wall, due to soft re-radiation with no time of flight spreading.

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 12 Dry Wall Strawman Results BUCKY simulations for the LY DD, HY DD, and ID Target 1 have been performed. Protective gas requirement, armor temperature and evaporation rates are reported.

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 13 Dry Wall Strawman Results ID1: 500mTorr DDLY:10mTorr DDHY:28mTorr N.B.: The effect of ion implantation is an important outstanding issue. Is brief melting acceptable? Desireable? No mass loss due to vaporization from thermal response.