Happy 120 th birthday. Mimeograph Constraining Goldstinos with Constrained Superfields Nathan Seiberg IAS Confronting Challenges in Theoretical Physics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extensions of the Standard Model (part 2) Prof. Jorgen DHondt Vrije Universiteit Brussel Inter-university Institute for High Energies Content: The Higgs.
Advertisements

1. 2 SUPERSYMMETRY Most popular solution to the hierarchy problem. Symmetry between fermions, and bosons With same mass and quantum number 3.
Effective Operators in the MSSM Guillaume Drieu La Rochelle, LAPTH.
Supersymmetry Breaking, lecture 3 Ken Intriligator, UCSD Asian Pacific Winter School 2007 Based on lecture notes prepared with Nathan Seiberg.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Lecture 2. Correction Stockinger, - SUSY skript, Drees, Godbole, Roy - "Theory and.
Memorial Conference in Honor of Julius Wess. Topics in Gauge Mediation Nathan Seiberg IAS Based on: Meade, NS and Shih, arXiv: NS, Volansky and.
Rigid SUSY in Curved Superspace Nathan Seiberg IAS Festuccia and NS Thank: Jafferis, Komargodski, Rocek, Shih.
Boundaries in Rigid and Local Susy Dmitry V. Belyaev and Peter van Nieuwenhuizen.
1 MBG-60 Happy birthday, Michael!. 2 Degania, Israel (1910)
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) SM: 28 bosonic d.o.f. & 90 (96) fermionic d.o.f. SUSY: # of fermions = # of bosonsN=1 SUSY: There are no particles.
Supersymmetry in Particle Physics
Masses For Gauge Bosons. A few basics on Lagrangians Euler-Lagrange equation then give you the equations of motion:
Jan KalinowskiSupersymmetry, part 1 SUSY 1 Jan Kalinowski.
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
Monday, Apr. 2, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12, 13, 14 Monday, Apr. 2, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Local Gauge Invariance 2.U(1) Gauge.
What is mSUGRA? Physics in Progress, seminar talk, 11 th Feb 2010 Helmut Eberl.
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
Constraints on renormalization group flows Based on published and unpublished work with A.Dymarsky,Z.Komargodski,S.Theisen.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
Higher Derivative Scalars in Supergravity Jean-Luc Lehners Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics Albert Einstein Institute Based on work with.
A Composite Little Higgs ZACKARIA CHACKO UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK Puneet Batra.
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Low scale gravity mediation in warped extra dimensions and collider phenomenology on sector hidden sector LCWS 06, March 10, Bangalore Nobuchika.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
D-term Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking K. Fujiwara and, H.I. and M. Sakaguchi arXiv: hep-th/ , P. T. P. 113 arXiv: hep-th/ , N. P. B 723 H.
B EING F LAT W ITH N O S YMMETRIES arXiv: [hep-th] arXiv:15xx.xxxxx [hep-th] with Xi Dong and Daniel Z. Freedman Yue Zhao SITP, Stanford University.
Axion and anomalous U(1) gauge symmetry Axion and anomalous U(1) gauge symmetry in string theory in string theory Kiwoon Choi (KAIST) ASK 2011 Apr.11 –
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Low scale supergravity mediation in brane world scenario and hidden sector phenomenology Phys.Rev.D74:055005,2006 ( arXiv: hep-ph/ ) ACFA07 in Beijing:
Nonlinear Supersymmetric Higgs bosons Sun Kun Oh (Konkuk Univ) APCTP 2010 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea 10-12, August, 2010, Konkuk University.
For s=1 for EM-waves total energy density:  # of photons wave number vector: the Klein-Gordon equation:
Twin Higgs Theories Z. Chacko, University of Arizona H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
Family Symmetry Solution to the SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Plan of talk: I.Family Symmetry II.Solving SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Work with and Michal.
Lecture 6 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A AA.
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
9/10/2007Isaac Newton Institute1 Relations among Supersymmetric Lattice Gauge Theories So Niels Bohr Institute based on the works arXiv:
Dmitri Sorokin, INFN Padova Section based on arXiv: with I. Bandos, L. Martucci and M. Tonin VII Round Table Italy-Russia, Dubna, November.
The Search For Supersymmetry Liam Malone and Matthew French.
1 Dynamical SUSY Breaking in Meta-Stable Vacua Ken Intriligator, UCSD & IAS SUSY 2006, 6/14/2006 KI, Nathan Seiberg, and David Shih hep-th/
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
The Importance of the TeV Scale Sally Dawson Lecture 3 FNAL LHC Workshop, 2006.
BEYOND MFV IN FAMILY SYMMETRY THEORIES OF FERMION MASSES Work done with Zygmunt Lalak and Graham Ross Based on existing ideas but, hopefully, contributing.
Lecture 3. (Recap of Part 2) Dirac spinor 2 component Weyl spinors Raising and lowering of indices.
The nonperturbative analyses for lower dimensional non-linear sigma models Etsuko Itou (Osaka University) 1.Introduction 2.The WRG equation for NLσM 3.Fixed.
For s=1 for EM-waves total energy density:  # of photons wave number vector: the Klein-Gordon equation:
Lecture 7. Tuesday… Superfield content of the MSSM Gauge group is that of SM: StrongWeakhypercharge Vector superfields of the MSSM.
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 12 Chapter 15: The Standard Model of EWK Interactions A large part of today’s lecture is review of what we have already.
SUSY Breaking by Meta-stable States Chia-Hung Vincent ChangNTNU Based on a work with Kuo-Hsing Tsao now at UIC NTNU theory seminar Dec 2016.
P-Term Cosmology A.C. Davis (with C. Burrage) ,
ArXiv: (hep-th) Toshiaki Fujimori (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Minoru Eto, Sven Bjarke Gudnason, Kenichi Konishi, Muneto Nitta, Keisuke Ohashi.
Intro to SUSY II: SUSY QFT Archil Kobakhidze PRE-SUSY 2016 SCHOOL 27 JUNE -1 JULY 2016, MELBOURNE.
Metastable supersymmetry breaking vacua from conformal dynamics
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and the
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #23 Symmetries Why do we care about the symmetry?
Archil Kobakhidze PRE-SUSY 2016 SCHOOL 27 JUNE -1 JULY 2016, MELBOURNE
Lagrange Formalism & Gauge Theories
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
NGB and their parameters
Magnetic supersymmetry breaking
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #19 Wrapping up the Higgs Mechanism
Quantum Two.
Fun with the supercurrent I: FI-terms
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Effective Theory for Mesons
SUSY breaking by metastable state
Jun Nishimura (KEK, SOKENDAI) JLQCD Collaboration:
Can new Higgs boson be Dark Matter Candidate in the Economical Model
Presentation transcript:

Happy 120 th birthday

Mimeograph

Constraining Goldstinos with Constrained Superfields Nathan Seiberg IAS Confronting Challenges in Theoretical Physics June Based on: Komargodski and N.S. arXiv:09???

5 Introduction SUSY should be broken – there is a massless Goldstino which is eaten by the gravitino. If the scale of SUSY breaking is low, the gravitino is light and its couplings are dominated by the couplings to the Goldstino. By analogy to pions we can try to understand Goldstino couplings. –Current algebra –Effective Lagrangian with a nonlinearly realized symmetry

6 Questions What are the most general interactions of Goldstinos? –Derive the Akulov-Volkov Lagrangian. –What are the corrections? Goldstino couplings to other particles: –Coupling to superfields –Coupling to fermions –Coupling to gauge fields –Coupling to scalars including Goldstone bosons (e.g. R-axions)

7 The Ferrara-Zumino (FZ) multiplet The SUSY current and the energy momentum tensor reside in a real superfield which satisfies the conservation equation with a chiral superfield:

8 Supersymmetry breaking When SUSY is broken the supercharge does not exist. However, the supersymmetry current does exist. (Anti)commutators with the SUSY charge exist. Therefore, we can construct a superspace. Hence the FZ-multiplet and the chiral operator exist. Everything which follows from this is true in any theory which breaks SUSY including strongly coupled (incalculable) theories.

9 The order parameter The order parameter for chiral symmetry breaking which is also an interpolating field for the pions is. It does not have a natural normalization; it is different from. SUSY is different. Our starting points is. The order parameter for SUSY breaking is the F- component of ( is the vacuum energy, is the Goldstino decay constant, and is the Goldstino). It has a natural normalization – it is well defined both in UV and in IR.

10 The Goldstino superfield The chiral superfield includes an interpolating field for the Goldstino with a well defined normalization. We try to write a Lagrangian for the field. –It does not have dimension one. –The scalar in its first component should not create a massless scalar. Define a dimension one chiral superfield. through and impose a constraint to eliminate its lowest component.

11 The constraint We want to eliminate the first component of using a supersymmetric constraint. Analog of for pions. The first guess is. A nontrivial solution exists: with arbitrary. This expression uniquely follows from the SUSY transformations of the Goldstino.

12 Summary so far We consider a chiral superfield satisfying Other Goldstino superfields were studied by Rocek, Lindstrom, Samuel, Wess. Component nonlinear realizations were studied by many authors starting with Akulov and Volkov, including Brignole, Feruglio, Zwirner, Luty, Ponton, Clark, Love….

13 A Lagrangian for Higher order terms without derivatives vanish. Ignoring the constraint, this is the simplest model which exhibits spontaneous SUSY breaking (it is free). It has a massless fermion and a massless scalar. The constraint removes that scalar…

14 A Lagrangian for Substituting the solution in the free Lagrangian we find Integrating out the auxiliary field using its equation of motion and upon substitution we find the Akulov-Volkov Lagrangian.

15 Example It breaks SUSY and the complex scalar in has a mass. We can integrate it out. Its low momentum classical equation of motion arises from the quartic term in with the solution Substituting this in leads to our non-linear field

16 Example Substituting the solution, the quartic term vanishes. We find the quadratic Lagrangian but with a constrained field. The low energy theory below is universal. It is independent of higher energy physics and the values of. It is the Akulov-Volkov Lagrangian.

17 Corrections to the AV Lagrangian For pions the terms in the effective Lagrangian are controlled by the number of derivatives – the pion Field is dimensionless. In SUSY it is natural to assign weight to the Goldstino (like the dimension of ). Equivalently, we assign weight to our chiral superfield. The leading order terms we considered have weight zero.

Corrections to the AV Lagrangian The leading order terms lead to terms with: 2 fermions + 1 derivative, 4 fermions + 2 derivatives, 8 fermions + 4 derivatives. All have weight zero. Correction terms have higher weight; e.g. For fixed number of fermions they have more derivatives. The leading order Lagrangian has an accidental R- symmetry. It can be broken by the corrections.

19 Coupling to superfields Consider an effective Lagrangian valid above the mass of the superpartners but below (e.g. the MSSM). This Lagrangian includes explicit soft SUSY breaking terms. These can be written in terms of a spurion. The Lagrangian is made supersymmetric by replacing the spurion with.

20 Coupling to superfields The Goldstino couplings are determined by the terms in the Lagrangian (the MSSM) and depend only on its parameters and on. Higher order corrections to the MSSM and the Goldstino couplings can depend on shorter distance physics. Note the many roles of : It appears in. It leads to the Goldstino superfield. It is the spurion.

Low energy processes We are interested in low energy processes involving Goldstinos below the scale of the superpartners. We need to include explicit couplings of to the light particles and compute diagrams with intermediate superpartners. Such computations exhibit “miraculous cancelations” and have led to some controversies in the literature. We will look for a formalism which makes these computations obvious and the cancelations manifest.

Goldstino couplings to light fermions We look for an effective Lagrangian below the mass of the superpartners. Consider fermions (quarks) from chiral superfields. The scalars (squarks) can be removed by considering a constrained superfield satisfying Now we can write the most general SUSY Lagrangian with these superfields subject to their constraints.

23 Goldstino couplings to light fermions Some of the terms in this Lagrangian are universal. They depend only on. Some of the terms arise from the coupling to superfields and hence they depend only on the soft terms and on. In addition, there are higher order non-universal terms which arise from higher order corrections to the MSSM. The previously mentioned “miraculous cancelations” arise trivially as a result of the constraint (because of lack of time we will not explicitly do it here).

24 Goldstino coupling to gauge fields We can easily extend this analysis to gauge fields. Here a constraint on vector superfields which removes the gauginos is Again, the Lagrangian includes universal terms which depend only on, terms which depend only on the soft terms, as well as higher order, non-universal terms.

25 Goldstino coupling to scalars and axions It is now straightforward to extend this formalism to other kinds of matter fields. Complex massless scalars from chiral superfields are present only with fine tuning. They satisfy Real Goldstone bosons and R-axions satisfy

SUSY breaking is characterized by a natural order parameter which is in a chiral superfield. includes an interpolating field for the Goldstino. Imposing a simple constraint we easily construct the low energy Lagrangian. The corrections are easily controlled. The leading order Lagrangian is universal, depending only on, but the corrections are not. Coupling to superfields, we identify it with the spurion. The couplings below the mass of the superpartners are easily found by using constrained superfields. Conclusions

27 The constrained superfields: –Fermions from chiral fields –Vectors from vector superfields –Complex scalars from chiral fields –Real scalars from chiral fields (Goldstone bosons) Alternative formalisms exhibit “miraculous cancelations.” Conclusions

28 Some terms are universal and depend only on. Some terms depend on and the MSSM parameters. Higher order corrections to the MSSM lead to higher order corrections to the Goldstino couplings. This formalism has allowed us to re-derive, clarify, and significantly extend the existing literature about the coupling to light gravitinos. There are many potential phenomenological consequences (in progress). Conclusions

Happy 120 th birthday