P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr. 2005 Low-Charge LCLS Operating Point Including FEL Simulations P. Emma 1, W. Fawley 2, Z. Huang 1, C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nominal and no CSR (R 56-1 = 55 mm, R 56-2 = 59 mm, R 56-3 = 0) L1 phase = 21 deg, V 3.9 = 55 MV CSR OFF BC3 OFF Elegant Tracking  z1 = mm (post.
Advertisements

 x,y = 0.4  m (slice) I pk = 3.0 kA  E /E = 0.01% (slice) (25 of 33 undulators installed) L G = 3.3 m IT WORKS!
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
UCLA 10/1/2010C. Pellegrini, Towards a 5th generation light source 1 What is a 5th Generation light source? C. Pellegrini UCLA Department of Physics and.
Approaches for the generation of femtosecond x-ray pulses Zhirong Huang (SLAC)
Hard X-ray FELs (Overview) Zhirong Huang March 6, 2012 FLS2012 Workshop, Jefferson Lab.
P. Emma LCLS FAC 12 Oct Comments from LCLS FAC Meeting (April 2004): J. Roßbach:“How do you detect weak FEL power when the.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
1 Daniel Ratner 1 Gain Length and Taper August, 2009 FEL Gain length and Taper Measurements at LCLS D. Ratner A. Brachmann, F.J.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
Wm. Fawley LCLS FAC April Sven Reiche Effects of AC Resistive-Wall Wake Upon LCLS SASE Performance: Numerical.
Juhao Wu LCLS FAC 7 Apr Dark Current, Beam Loss, and Collimation in the LCLS J. Wu, D. Dowell, P. Emma, C. Limborg, J. Schmerge,
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
P. Emma FAC Meeting 27 Oct Physics Update P. Emma FAC Meeting October 27, 2005 LCLS.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Accelerator Issues and Design Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Z. Huang LCLS FAC April Effect of AC RW Wake on SASE - Analytical Treatment Z. Huang, G. Stupakov see SLAC-PUB-10863, to.
Paul Emma LCLS Commissioning Status Nov. 11, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 LCLS Commissioning Status P. Emma for The.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Comments from LCLS FAC Meeting (April 2004): J. Rößbach:“How do you detect weak FEL power when the gain is very low (few hundred)?” K. Robinson:“Can you.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project Near term opportunities for LCLS 'upgrades' J. Hastings for the LCLS Experimental.
David H. Dowell Injector Physics/Diagnostics/Gun&L0 RF April 29-30, 2004 Injector Physics / Diagnostics / Gun & L0 Linac.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Longitudinal Space Charge in LCLS S2E Z. Huang, M. Borland, P. Emma, J.H. Wu SLAC and Argonne Berlin S2E Workshop 8/21/2003.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Simulation of Microbunching Instability in LCLS with Laser-Heater Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
J. Wu In collaboration with Y. Jiao, W.M. Fawley, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H.-D. Nuhn, C. Pellegrini, S. Reiche (PSI), Y. Cai, A.W. Chao, Y. Ding, X. Huang,
X-Ray FEL Simulation: Beam Modeling William M. Fawley Center For Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ICFA 2003 Workshop.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
LCLS-II Particle Tracking: Gun to Undulator P. Emma Jan. 12, 2011.
PAC-2001, Chicago, IL Paul Emma SLAC SLAC Issues and R&D Critical to the LCLS UCLA LLNL.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II Accel. Phys., J.
LCLS-II: Accelerator Systems LCLS SAC Meeting P. Emma et al. April 23, 2010.
Twin bunches at FACET-II Zhen Zhang, Zhirong Huang, Ago Marinelli … FACET-II accelerator physics workshop Oct. 12, 2015.
Feng Zhou SLAC Presented at HBB, Havana, Cuba, March 29, 2016 LCLS Injector Improvements & Plans.
X-band Based FEL proposal
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
A single-shot method for measuring fs bunches in linac-based FELs Z. Huang, K. Bane, Y. Ding, P. Emma.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Short pulse, low charge LCLS operation
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Design of Compression and Acceleration Systems Technical Challenges
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Physics Update P. Emma FAC Meeting October 27, 2005 LCLS.
Presentation transcript:

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Low-Charge LCLS Operating Point Including FEL Simulations P. Emma 1, W. Fawley 2, Z. Huang 1, C. Limborg 1, S. Reiche 3, J. Wu 1, M. Zolotorev 2 FAC Meeting April 7, 2005 LCLS [1]SLAC [2]LBNL [3]UCLA

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Present LCLS Design Challenges Gun emittance: 1-  m at 1 nC, 100 A Resistive wake in undulator LSC/CSR micro-bunching Transverse wakes in L2 CSR  in BC2 too much charge AC resistive wakefield

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr wakefield- induced cubic chirp in L2-linac cubic chirp produces current horns after BC2 much of charge wasted with only 3.0 kA in core Nominal 1-nC case 1-nC, 20-  m rms bunch length is 6 kA for a Gaussian bunch pre-BC2 post-BC2 in FEL

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Motivation: Less charge  less wake Same compression factor  ~same jitter Lower gun current  lower emittance Chosen Scaling: Charge: 1 nC  0.2 nC Gun Current: 100  30 A (10 ps  6.5 ps) Sliced gun emittance: 1  m  0.8  m Final current: 3 kA  2 kA (same L sat ) Low Charge Optimization

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Ming Xie 87 m final slice  = 0.85  m

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr pC optimized Parmela output at 64 MeV 200k in lcls_200k_02nc_atendl01.dat C. Limborg, Oct. 19, 2004  th /r = 1  m/mm spot radius = 0.42 mm laser pulse = 6.5 ps FWHM

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr kA pre-BC2 post-BC2 in FEL 200 pC less cubic chirp spikes reduced 80-fs FWHM X-ray pulse

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Much less CSR projected emittance growth 0.2 nC 1.0 nC  x  4  m  x  1  m  x  y BC2 BC2

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr  x,y (  m) 0.2 nC 1.0 nC Transverse Wakes & Dispersion Errors Vanish at 0.2 nC Linac Alignment Eased 300-  m struct  m quad 200-  m BPM steer 10 seeds rms errors:

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr LSC/CSR Micro-bunching Gain Reduced 1 nC,   = 1£10  4, I pk = 3.4 kA (final current) 1 nC,   = 1£10  4, I pk = 3.4 kA (final current) 200 pC,   = 1£10  4, I pk = 2 kA, 3 kA, & 5 kA, adjusted with L2 chirp and laser heater power 200 pC,   = 1£10  4, I pk = 2 kA, 3 kA, & 5 kA, adjusted with L2 chirp and laser heater power 1-nC nominal gain reduced

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr L2  RF =  1.6º  3 kA: L sat  87 m at   1.15  m,   25 m L2  RF =  1.6º  3 kA: L sat  87 m at   1.15  m,   25 m 200 pC 3 kA (RW-wake and  -bunching OK) Compress more, until back up to 12% peak-current jitter

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Cylindrical-Copper Resistive Wakes in Undulator uses K. Bane damped resonator model for AC wake 1 nC 0.2 nC

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr pC FEL Simulations: Cu cyl. pipe ( r = 2.5 mm ) Data smoothed from raw ~12-as resolution to ~1-fs resolution Curve represents output power at z = 130 m For 300-kV ext. field + Cu wake case, agreement between codes is good in overall temporal dependence, with GINGER showing ~1.5X greater power than GENESIS Compared to 1-nC case, lasing occurs over full 200-pC pulse

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Uncompensated 200-pC Cu & Al wake gives lower power ~8-10X Gain length increased ~15% but saturation point unaffected External field of +150 kV/m makes up for wake Increasing ext. field to +300 kV/m nearly doubles power over no-wake case, agreeing with Huang/Stupakov model Uncompensated 200-pC Cu & Al wake gives lower power ~8-10X Gain length increased ~15% but saturation point unaffected External field of +150 kV/m makes up for wake Increasing ext. field to +300 kV/m nearly doubles power over no-wake case, agreeing with Huang/Stupakov model ~10 12 photons GINGER Results for 200-pC Pulse Energy vs. Z

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Drive-laser energy  1/5 Laser-heater power  1/4 BC2 CSR   1/5 Linac quad/BPM align. tol.’s   2 L2 transverse wake   1/16 BC dipole field quality  1/2 Peak current jitter  ½ (or X-band  -tol.   3) Final timing jitter 95 fs (was 120 fs) X-ray pulse 85 fs (was 210 fs) No undulatorRW-wake (even for Cu, AC, cyl.) No undulator RW-wake (even for Cu, AC, cyl.) FEL power: GW & ~10 12 photons Undulator radiation damage reduced? Dump power  1/5 (to 330 W, was 1700 W) Less loading eases multi-bunch operation 1-nC operation still fully supported option Advantages for LCLS at Low Charge Disadvantages: Requires 20% smaller gun slice emittance 8-  m bunch (  z ) more difficult to measure

P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Summary LCLS The 200-pC configuration is the preferred LCLS operating point (300 pC is similar) Resistive-wall wake, transverse linac wakes, and CSR all become ~non-issues 1-nC is an alternate configuration with possibly more photons, but more challenging on all fronts Diagnostics must emphasize 200-pC range