GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Response of the GLAST LAT Calorimeter.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MUSIC - Past, Presence, and Future of a detector concept Walter F.J. Müller, GSI Bormio 2004.

Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.

Study of plastic scintillators for fast neutron measurements

GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,

Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.

2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.

The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.

Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.

Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)

GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 6 – 06/02/27 F. Piron & E. Nuss (LPTA) 1 Trending CAL performance and mapping crystals Gamma-ray Large Area.

1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.

A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.

Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.

GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 5 – 05/08/29 F. Piron & E. Nuss (IN2P3/LPTA – Montpellier) 1 Comprehensive review of CAL calibrations Gamma-ray.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.

GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 Analyses of Muon Calibration Data Xin Chen.

A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Recon rewriting meeting, May, 11, 2005 In what cases we need external position estimation ? Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.

Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.

Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.

Detectors of charged particles and ions 1) Gas filled detectors a) Ionization chambers b) Proportional counters c) Multiwire chambers d) Time projection.

GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop #4, 14 July 2005 David Smith CAL calib at SLAC SVAC1 Stability of the CAL Calibrations Online script “suites”

The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,

The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.

Adam Para, Fermilab, April 26, Total Absorption Dual Readout Calorimetry R&D Fermilab, Caltech, University of Iowa, Argonne National Laboratory,

1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.

Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.

FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.

A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectBeam test meeting, September 27, 2006 CsI afterglow - possible explaination of pedestal drift and excess of energy. Alexandre.

Montpellier, November 15, 2003 J. Cvach, TileHCAL and APD readout1 TileHCAL- fibre readout by APD APDs and preamplifiers Energy scan with DESY beam –Energy.

GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting August 6, 2004 David Smith w. Benoît Lott Muons in photodiodes1 MIPs in your Photodiodes David’s Instr. Ana.

1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.

January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:

A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, February, 27, 2006 CAL features and idiosyncrasies. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray Large.

Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.

Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.

Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)

Observation of light nuclei with PAMELA Roberta Sparvoli Laura Marcelli, Valeria Malvezzi, Cristian De Santis and the PAMELA Collaboration.

Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target FRS: FRagment Separator at GSI Darmstadt, Germany One single beam: 58 Ni, with energy varying between.1 and 1.7 GeV/nucleon.

GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,

Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.

Validation of EM Part of Geant4

LHC Beam Loss Monitors, B.Dehning 1/15 LHC Beam loss Monitors Loss monitor specifications Radiation tolerant Electronics Ionisation chamber development.

 production in p-A and In-In collisions Motivation Apparatus Collected data Results for     Ongoing work for    KK Alessandro De Falco – University.

(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.

00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.

Detector for the After Proton Measurement M. Aoki.

1 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target EM miniCAL GSI’s.

LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.

CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.

1 Study of Data from the GLAST Balloon Prototype Based on a Geant4 Simulator Tsunefumi Mizuno February 22, Geant4 Work Shop The GLAST Satellite.

Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.

Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.

Rita Carbone, RICAP 11, Roma 3 26/05/2011 Stand-alone low energy measurements of light nuclei from PAMELA Time-of-Flight system. Rita Carbone INFN Napoli.

1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.

Introduction of my work AYAKO HIEI (AYA) Hiroshima Univ 2008/5/30 me.

The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR

Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics

The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment

Calibrating the CAL in flight: Galactic Cosmic Ray Calibration

PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)

Giant Monopole Resonance

Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina

Prototype production and test

“minimum-ionisation” peak

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope

Project Presentations August 5th, 2004

Imaging crystals with TKR

CAL crosstalk issues and their implications

Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils

Presentation transcript:

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Response of the GLAST LAT Calorimeter to Relativistic Heavy Ions

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Energy calibration and response monitoring of the calorimeter: energy deposits of cosmic-ray heavy ions (C,N,O,Si,Fe) Introduction magnetic cutoff + “logarithmic-rise” domain: well-defined peaks in deposited energy per log Fe: peak at 7.7 GeV =25 GeV for a 300 GeV  ray

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Motivation: “quenching”

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Temporal dependence of light ouput p: fast+slow comp. ions: fast comp. only low energy

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Quenching factor: definition Quenching Factor= E meas /E dep (normalized to 1 for MIPs)

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott EM ASIC includes preamp, shaping amplifier (3.5  s), 12-bit ADC Amplitude sampled through a Track&Hold stage at fixed delay time after the trigger signal minical: 8 layers of 3 log each, with discrete electronics similar as EM, but with a 12-bit peak-sensing ADC Fragment Separator (FRS) 1.7 GeV/nucleon Ni on Be target: 4 dipole magnets: selection of particles according to magnetic rigidity (p/Q) “Cocktail” beam of A/Z=2 ions Detection system includes MWPCs for position MUSIC (ionisation chamber, Z measurement), plastic scintillation detectors ( A measurement via TOF, trigger) Three data acquisition systems, with a common trigger signal. Detector characteristics

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott MUSIC calibration

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott EM calibration - non-linearity correction - pedestal subtraction - LEX8 absolute calibration - LEX1, HEX8, HEX1: cross calibration of adjacent ranges

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott E (MeV) Counts Independent calibration performed by Frederic Piron using Gaussian+Landau fits Perfect consistency

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott minical calibration Same as for EM. Proton calibration checked against that obtained with: - 22 Na g-rays - 20 GeV muons at CERN In both cases, excellent consistency was found.

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott blue: data red: Geant4 deposited energy (MeV) 50 GeV e X 0 80 GeV e X 0 CERN data: deposited energy distributions

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Quenching determination Ion selection with MUSIC (ionization chamber) Gaussian fits of ionization peaks independently for two log ends = ( + )/2 Quenching factor = /

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Longitudinal dispersion by the spectrometer

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Calculated deposited energy

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Quenching factor for C: 1.23 “antiquenching” Quenching factors Sasha found a similar value in an independent analysis

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Quenching factors

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott  - particle measurement

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Energy resolution Another difference between MIPs and heavy ions 0.6 MeV/12 MeV = 5% extra width for MIPs much less (< 1%) for heavy ions

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Compilation of quenching factors

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Possible interpretation of the antiquenching effect, based on an extrapolation on what is known at low-energy For MIPs, part of the energy goes into a slow scintillation component, that could be absent for heavy ions. This slow component is essentially filtered out by our electronics, resulting in the measured energy being lower for MIPs than for heavy ions.

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Scintillation components measured with a standard phototube

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Hamamatsu S3590

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Scintillation components

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Ion selection with MUSIC (ionization chamber) The ionization peaks correspond to non-interacting ions. Loss to reactions

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Loss to reactions

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Charge-changing cross sections

GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Conclusion The CsI response to relativistic ions has been measured. The “antiquenching” effect was unexpected, but is compatible with the trend observed at lower energy. Data measured up to 1.7 GeV/nucleon: 90% of CR ions will have E<10 GeV/nucleon. Negligible change of quenching factors between 1 GeV and 1.7 GeV/nucleon (dE/dx changes by 7%). The assumption that they remain constant up to 10 GeV/nucleon is reasonable. Overall uncertainty ~ 3%. The scintillation components observed with a standard phototube are similar for MIPs and Carbon ions (worth repeating with a red-sensitive phototube).