Hank Fien, Carrie Thomas Beck, Nicole Sherman-Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Leadership Session: Fidelity of Implementation Observation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Providing Effective Feedback
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Grade 3 Portfolio Implementation Guide Training for School Test Coordinators and Instructional Coaches NHCS Implementation Support Discussion Group Edmodo.
Coaching Continuum/Cycle
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading (IBR) Leadership Session for District Team Members, Principals, and Mentor Coaches August 25, 2004.
Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D Coordinator, Oregon Reading First Center
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading (IBR) Leadership Session for New District Team Members Principals and Mentor Coaches August 24, 2004.
Early Reading First Project Professional Development Model Mary Abbott Juniper Gardens Children’s Project-University of Kansas Amy Herring Project.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B-ELL Statewide Coaches’ Training Session February 28, 2007.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Establishing Training Capacity for Classroom Management Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Kim Herrmann, S.S.P. University of South Florida Marla Dewhirst Illinois.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
ILP Intervention Plans Tutorial. Intervention Plans in the ILP The Intervention Plan module was added to the ILP in May 2009 to meet requirements of SB.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Promoting Reflective Teaching in Adult ESL/LINC through Peer Mentoring A UNIQUE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY.
Technology Integration Planning Model (TIP) Effective Classroom Uses of Technology.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
CPD- Continuous Professional Development & GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONTRACTUAL STAFF.
Monitoring Practice Quality First Teaching High Quality Interventions.
An Introduction to Formative Assessment as a useful support for teaching and learning.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 VISIT DAY Wednesday 7th October WEEK BLOCK SCHOOL EXPERIENCE 1 (SE1) Monday.
Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership Friday 25 th January pm – 4.00pm Barbara Hosier & Alison Silby.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Activity 1 Stickies on the board Any unanswered questions so far Issues or challenges What do I want to know before the end of this session?
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
GOING DEEPER WITH INDEPENDENT READING AND FURTHER THAN INDEPENDENT READING.
Chapter 8:Evaluation Anwar F. Al Arfaj Supervised by Dr. Antar Abdellah Submitted by.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Empowering Teachers: Evidence- based practices to tackle Problem Behavior and Manage the Learning Environment BY MARY BUCCI AND CINDY ELAYOUBI.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Ready for Anything SUPPORTING NEW TEACHERS for SUCCESS by Lynn Howard.
Which critical component (or guiding principle) of MTSS does the following statement belong with? A district-wide commitment and focus on student achievement.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Polices, procedures & protocols
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Our Partnership: Who’s Who!
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
مكتب معايير المناهج Role of Coordinator 20-Sep-18.
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Impossible Induction.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer
Presentation transcript:

Hank Fien, Carrie Thomas Beck, Nicole Sherman-Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Leadership Session: Fidelity of Implementation Observation System Fidelity of Implementation Observation System

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Objectives 1.Rationale for Observation System 2.Features of Program Fidelity Checklist, General Features of Instruction and Observation Feedback Forms 3.Procedures for Conducting an Observation 4.Next Steps and Expectations

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Rationale for Observation  Oregon’s Reading First Application states:  “The mentor coaches primary responsibility will be to support and guide classroom teachers in their effective implementation of high-quality instruction in beginning reading.”  Therefore...“ the school mentor coach will observe each teacher on a regular basis, providing support and feedback, and model instruction as needed or requested by the teacher.”

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Focus of Observations  Mentor Coaches will focus on two instructional areas during observations:  Program Fidelity  Implementation quality of more general features of instruction  Observation Feedback Form

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Program Fidelity Checklist  USDOE states:  The State Educational Agency must report Implementation Evidence to the U.S. Department Of Education “ demonstrating that it has met all program requirements related to the implementation and administration of the Reading First Program..”

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Program Fidelity Checklist  Features:  Instructional Heading  Activity  Instructional Target (PA, PH, FL, V, C, Other)  Grouping (whole group, small group, Independent)  Time (actual time of activity, e.g. 8:15-8:25)  Level of Implementation (None, Partial, Partial+, Full)  Comments

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © General Features of Instruction Form Oregon Reading First Grant states:  “Another aspect of the observation will be to determine how well aspects of the curriculum are implemented, as well as the implementation quality of more general features of instruction. Identifying which curriculum components are implemented as well as the quality of instructional delivery provides a more comprehensive assessment of classroom implementation than either aspect on it’s own.”

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © General Features of Instruction Form  Components  Grouping structure (whole group, small group)  9 items focusing on effective teaching practices ( 5 point scale)  Comments  Response Format: Teacher Led/ Student Led  Daily Oral Reading Check

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Observation Feedback Form  Areas Implemented Well  Indentified Need(s) for Support  Support Plans  Evaluation Plan

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Procedures for Conducting Observations 1.Set a date with the teacher to conduct observation. 2.Determine the instructional lesson being taught that day and make a copy of the lesson. 3.Fill out Heading and Activity section of the Program Fidelity Checklist prior to observation. 4.Conduct Observation  Program Fidelity Checklist: Assess Level of Implementation for each Instructional Activity  General Features of Instruction Form: Complete a form for each group observed 5.Set up time and date to debrief information with the teacher using Observation Feedback Form. 6.Arrange for follow-up

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Next Steps and Expectations  Mentor coaches will begin scheduling Observations.  As soon as possible, Mentor Coaches will pair up with their respective Regional Coordinator to conduct an observation.  The expectation will be to observe each k- 3 teacher in the school one time by IBR 4 (May 26-27).

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Appropriate Use of Observation Forms  To inform instruction  To target areas of assistance for individual teachers  To establish trends that may inform professional development  To link fidelity and general features of instruction with student achievement data: internal/external evaluation

Thomas-Beck, Sherman-Brewer, & Fien © Inappropriate Use of Observation Forms  Teacher evaluations  Including observation forms in teacher file(s)  Public sharing of information