The Halo CMEs’ Speeds and Energy of Their Related Active Regions Yang Liu¹, and CDAW Source Identification Team² ¹Stanford University ² Including: E. Cliver,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
Advertisements

The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott,
The Relation between Filament Skew Angle and Magnetic Helicity of Active Regions Masaoki HAGINO, Y.J. MOON (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
X-Ray Observation and Analysis of a M1.7 Class Flare Courtney Peck Advisors: Jiong Qiu and Wenjuan Liu.
Can We Determine Electric Fields and Poynting Fluxes from Vector Magnetograms and Doppler Shifts? by George Fisher, Brian Welsch, and Bill Abbett Space.
A Diachronic Topological Analysis of the 13th May 2005 Solar Flare William M.R. Simpson, Angela Des Jardins U NIVERSITY OF S T. A NDREWS, M ONTANA S TATE.
Free Magnetic Energy and Flare Productivity of Active Regions Jing et al. ApJ, 2010, April 20 v713 issue, in press.
September 2006 CISM All Hand Meeting Properties of Solar Active Regions and Solar Eruptive Events Yang Liu -- Stanford University
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
August 2006 IAU Assembly Halo CMEs and Configuration of Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University
The Hunt for a Link : Quantitative Connections Between Magnetic Fields and EIT Coronal Wave/CME Properties Prepared by James R. Robertson J.R. In conjunction.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Solar Polar Field Observed by SOHO/MDI and Hinode Yang Liu Stanford University 10/01/ Hinode Workshop.
“Refinements to flare energy estimates…” Emslie et al., et Hugh too, JGR 110, 2005 Particles Flows Waves Corona B 2 /8  EM radiation Mechanical energy.
RHESSI OBSERVATIONS OF FLARE FOOTPOINTS AND RIBBONS H. Hudson and M. Fivian (SSL/UCB)
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
September 2007LWS 2007 Halo CMEs and Configuration of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
1Yang Liu1997 May 12 Event The 1997 May 12 Event Yang Liu – Stanford University
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Observations of December 2006 events Yang Liu – Stanford University
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
V.I. Abramenko, V.B. Yurchyshyn, H. Wang, T.R. Spirock, P.R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Magnetic Field and Heating of the Corona Valentyna Abramenko and Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory.
Elmau III, March 16, 2004 Coronal mass ejections A critical view of interpretations H.S. Hudson (UC Berkeley)
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
MAGNETIC TWIST OF EUV CORONAL LOOPS OBSERVED BY TRACE RyunYoung Kwon, Jongchul Chae Astronomy Program, School of Earth and Environmental Science Seoul.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
Comparison on Calculated Helicity Parameters at Different Observing Sites Haiqing Xu (NAOC) Collaborators: Hongqi, Zhang, NAOC Kirill Kuzanyan, IZMIRAN,
The Relation between Soft X-ray Ejections and Hard X-ray Emission on November 24 Flare H. Takasaki, T. Morimoto, A. Asai, J. Kiyohara, and K. Shibata Kwasan.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
A study of flare-associated X-ray plasma ejections. I. Association with coronal mass ejections Yeon-Han Kim, Y.-J. Moon, K.-S. Cho, Kap- Sung Kim, and.
Practical Calculation of Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budgets in Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis Research Center for Astronomy.
Coronal Sources of Impulsive Fe-Rich Solar Energetic Particle Events S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, NM, USA D. V. Reames IPST,
1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.
SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.
Connecting Near-Sun CME flux Ropes to the 1-AU Flux Ropes using the Flare-CME Relationship N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama NASA/GSFC.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
Energy Budgets of Flare/CME Events John Raymond, J.-Y. Li, A. Ciaravella, G. Holman, J. Lin Jiong Qiu will discuss the Magnetic Field Fundamental, but.
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.
Global Forces in Eruptive Solar Flares: The Role of the Lorentz Force George H. Fisher, Benjamin J. Lynch, David J. Bercik, Brian T. Welsch, & Hugh S.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
Relationships Between Flares and CME’s Monday, 23 June 2008 Monday, 23 June, 1:30pm, Grindelwald, we have 3 Invited speakers, plenty of extra time for.
October-November CMEs Yang Liu – Stanford University
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
The CME-Flare Relationship in Homologous Eruptive Events
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
Flux Rope from Eruption Data (FRED) and its Interplanetary Counterpart
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
2. An ion accelerated through a potential difference of 115 V experiences an increase in kinetic energy of 7.37 × 10–17 J. Calculate the charge on the.
Presentation transcript:

The Halo CMEs’ Speeds and Energy of Their Related Active Regions Yang Liu¹, and CDAW Source Identification Team² ¹Stanford University ² Including: E. Cliver, N. Gopalswamy, J. Kasper, N. Nitta, I. Richardson, B. Thompson, D. Webb, C. Wu, S. Yashiro, J. Zhang, A. Zhukov, etc.

Motivations CMEs and active regions (large-scale and local fields): CMEs and active regions (large-scale and local fields): Observation has shown some CMEs are associated with solar flares in active regions; Observation has shown some CMEs are associated with solar flares in active regions; Studies further demonstrate correlation between the soft X-ray flux of flares and the speeds of the CMEs (Moon et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2004); and also show relationship of the inferred magnetic reconnection rate and the acceleration of the CMEs (Qiu et al. 2004); Studies further demonstrate correlation between the soft X-ray flux of flares and the speeds of the CMEs (Moon et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2004); and also show relationship of the inferred magnetic reconnection rate and the acceleration of the CMEs (Qiu et al. 2004); It is generally believed that the energy released during the events is primarily the free energy stored in the magnetic field in the corona. It is generally believed that the energy released during the events is primarily the free energy stored in the magnetic field in the corona. Thus, it is reasonable to search for relationship between the magnetic energy of active regions and the related CMEs’ energy. Thus, it is reasonable to search for relationship between the magnetic energy of active regions and the related CMEs’ energy.

Purpose of this work We are seeking for indexes from magnetograms that can describe the energy of solar active regions, and also seeking for possible correlation between the indexes and the related CMEs’ speeds; We are seeking for indexes from magnetograms that can describe the energy of solar active regions, and also seeking for possible correlation between the indexes and the related CMEs’ speeds; We are seeking for advancing our understanding on underlying link between the local field of active regions and global phenomenon of CMEs. We are seeking for advancing our understanding on underlying link between the local field of active regions and global phenomenon of CMEs.

Energy indexes of active regions Potential field energy of active regions. Potential field energy of active regions. Free energy of active regions Free energy of active regions (assuming single flux tube). Index of free energy (single flux tube). Index of free energy (single flux tube). Where L is self-inductance and I is electric current that can be computed assuming the field is force free. But we need to estimate force-free alpha. Two parameters to be calculated: tilt angle, and force free alpha (alpha).alpha From Fisher et al (2000)

Samples We choose events from CDAW (Coordinate Data Analysis Workshop held in 2005) event list based on two criteria: We choose events from CDAW (Coordinate Data Analysis Workshop held in 2005) event list based on two criteria: Halo-CMEs; Halo-CMEs; Solar source is associated with active regions. Solar source is associated with active regions.

List of the events IDDstCMEFlare Active region PeaktimeTimeVelAceMagposAREtiltalphafluxnetFlen Yy/mm/dd UT Km/sm/s/se32deg/pixel1e21-1e21e21 e7 m 03 97/05/ /05/ c1.3n23w /11/ /11/ X /05/ /05/ X1.1s15w ? /11/ /11/ M8.4n22w /07/ /07/ X5.7n22w ? /08/ /08/ C2.3n11w /10/ /10/ C6.7n01w ? /03/ /03/ X1.7n20w /09/ /09/ X2.6s16e /10/ /09/ M1.8n13e /10/ /10/ X1.3s18w ? /11/ /11/ X1.0n06w /11/ /11/ M9.9s14w /04/ /04/ M1.2s15w /04/ /04/ M2.6s14w /05/ /05/ C4.2s12w /08/ /07/ M4.7s17w /10/ /10/ X17s16e /10/ /10/ x10s15w /11/ /11/ M3.9n00e /07/ /07/ M1.1n04w

Potential field energy versus CMEs’ speeds No correlation is found. No correlation is found.

Properties of active regions versus CMEs’ speeds No correlation was found between sizes of active regions and CMEs’ speeds; No correlation was found between sizes of active regions and CMEs’ speeds; No correlation was found between net flux of active regions and CMEs’ speeds. No correlation was found between net flux of active regions and CMEs’ speeds.

Free energy in active regions versus CMEs’ speeds Weak correlation was found between E_free/length and CMEs’ speed. Weak correlation was found between E_free/length and CMEs’ speed.

Energy index of active regions versus CMEs’ speeds Weak correlation was found between the parameter ε×E_potential and CMEs’ speed. Weak correlation was found between the parameter ε×E_potential and CMEs’ speed.

Summary Potential field energy of active regions versus CMEs’ speed: NO CORRELATION. Potential field energy of active regions versus CMEs’ speed: NO CORRELATION. Free energy of active regions versus CMEs’ speed: WEAK CORRELATION. Free energy of active regions versus CMEs’ speed: WEAK CORRELATION. Index of free energy of active regions versus CMEs’ speed: WEAK CORRELATION. Index of free energy of active regions versus CMEs’ speed: WEAK CORRELATION.

Conclusions We have examined here two measures of free energy of solar active regions; we found weak correlations between such measures and related halo CMEs’ speed; We have examined here two measures of free energy of solar active regions; we found weak correlations between such measures and related halo CMEs’ speed; These correlations imply that, although magnetic field of active regions is localized and a CME is a global phenomenon, active regions make a significant contribution in energizing the active region-associated CMEs. It suggests again, from energy perspective of active regions and CMEs, that local and global fields are coupled each other. These correlations imply that, although magnetic field of active regions is localized and a CME is a global phenomenon, active regions make a significant contribution in energizing the active region-associated CMEs. It suggests again, from energy perspective of active regions and CMEs, that local and global fields are coupled each other.

Free energy of active regions versus CMEs’ kinetic energy No correlation was found between total free energy of active regions and CMEs’ kinetic energy; No correlation was found between total free energy of active regions and CMEs’ kinetic energy; No correlation was found between proxy of total energy (ε×E_potential) of active regions and CMEs’ kinetic energy. No correlation was found between proxy of total energy (ε×E_potential) of active regions and CMEs’ kinetic energy.